Table of Contents



Copyright page

Forward

1. Social security for the informal sector: Designing pilot projects; Wouter van Ginneken

The context and aims of pilot activities

Intended beneficiaries and their social security needs

The three options

The project strategy

Conclusions

2. Sécurité sociale pour le secteur informel au Bénin: Etude de faisabilité du projet national; Bernardin Gauthé

Introduction

Les programmes existants

Les projets pilotes

3. Social Security for the informal sector in India: Feasibility study on area-based pilot projects in Anand (Gujarat) and Nizamabad (Andhra Pradesh); Shashi Jain

Introduction

Project areas in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh

The area-based pilot project

4. Seguridad social para el sector informal en El Salvador: Análisis de viabilidad para los municipios de Ataco, Caluco, Santa Elena y Perquín; Sandra de Barraza and Carlos Umaña

Descripción y análisis de las localidades seleccionadas

Descripción y análisis de las instituciones

Viabilidad del proyecto por componente

Conclusiones: Perspectiva de replicabilidad a nivel nacional

5. Health insurance for informal sector workers: Feasibility study on Arusha and Mbeya, Tanzania; A.D. Kiwara and Frans Heynis

Introduction

Investigating conditions in Arusha and Mbeya

Assessing the feasibility of the pilot projects


Remark: Not all the tables referred to in the text have been included in this Web document. In order to obtain a copy of the complete document, kindly contact the Social Security Department.





3. Social security for the informal sector in India: Feasibility study on area-based pilot projects in Anand (Gujarat) and Nizamabad (Andhra Pradesh)

Shashi Jain, Consultant, New Delhi



1. Introduction

Security and support are required by all persons in order to face difficulties and to mitigate hardships when struck by losses involving health, income and inability to work and life itself. It is only a planned and comprehensive social security system that can ensure protection to all members of the society. Although the need is universal, its availability is very much limited, especially in the economically less developed countries like India. The extension of social security in India is mainly through the mechanisms of statutory entitlements; through the universally available services such as health and public distribution of essential commodities; by means of targeted social assistance programmes; and, through social insurance schemes.



1.1 Coverage by statutory schemes

There exists extensive legislation which provides for mandatory social security benefits either solely at the cost of employer or on the basis of joint contribution of the employers and the employee. While protective entitlements accrue to the employees, the responsibility for compliance largely rests with the employers. The major enactments are:

    * The Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, requiring payment of compensation to the workman or his family in cases of employment related injuries resulting in death or disability;

    * The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, covering factories and establishments with ten or more employees provides for comprehensive medical care to the employees and their families as also cash benefits during sickness and maternity, and monthly payments in the events of death and disablement;

    * The Employees Provident Fund (&MP) Act, 1952, being applicable to all scheduled factories and establishments employing 20 or more employees, ensures terminal benefits of PF, superannuation pension, and family pension in case of death during service. Separate laws exist for similar benefits for the workers in the coal mines and tea plantations;

    * The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, providing for 12 weeks wages during maternity as also paid leave in certain other related contingencies;

    * The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, providing 15 days wages for each year of service to employees who have worked for five years or more in establishments having a minimum of 10 workers.



In order to understand the availability of statutory entitlements to the Indian people, the extent of coverage, vis-a-vis the workforce needs to be seen. Of the total 315 million workers, the EPF(&MP) Act, the law with the widest coverage, reaches around 18 million subscribers - which, together with other PFs for coal mine and tea plantation workers comes to about 7% of the workforce. To this if we add another 3% or so employees of the Central and State Governments, it is clear that the above-mentioned statutory protections are largely confined to 10% of the working population. These mainly belong to the organised sector even though the laws do not themselves have any restrictive classification or conditions in respect of the unorganised or informal sectors. In fact, in case they were to be enforced more strictly, a large number of workers in the latter category would be covered, since the laws recognise fundamentally the responsibility of the principal employers for casual and contract workers including those working in their homes. Judicial pronouncements have upheld the applicability of the EPF and the ESI Acts to the home-based workers involved in beedi rolling, carpet manufacturing and in various cottage industries. And yet, these workers are not able to access the benefits because of difficulties in establishing the indirect or tenuous employer-employee linkages coupled with the employers' predilections for evasion. As such, the coverage of unorganised workers is merely 2 million, constituting less than 10% of the EPF and ESI subscribers and only 1% of the workers in this sector.

Apart from the numerous informal sector workers, the statutes leave out groups of employees such as:

    - those working outside the scheduled industries and establishments;

    - the ones in smaller enterprises;

    - those drawing salaries beyond the wage ceilings; and,

    - the very substantial category of the self-employed (comprising 54% of the workforce) who are not even targeted for being brought within their protective ambit.



It is indeed possible to extend coverage through filling up of the gaps in the legislative provisions as also by setting up and developing appropriate implementation instruments.

A few of the uncovered or excluded categories are sought to be given some protection through the mechanism of welfare funds targeting specific employment areas. At the Central level, there are five such Funds established out of the cess monies levied on the employers and cover beedi rollers besides cine workers and those working in certain mines. In all, they cover around 4.5 million workers. Through another recent central law, the State Governments are expected to set up welfare funds for workers in the building and construction industry. However, in view of the welfare orientation and the non-contributory nature of these Funds, the level of benefits is rather low. Besides, although statutory, the legal entitlement base for social protection rights for the individual workers is extremely weak. Some of the States have also set up welfare funds for the agriculturists (who constitute 65% of the workforce on an all-India basis), artisans, construction workers, etc. The most notable of these efforts have been made by the State of Kerala which has set up over 30 such separate funds on a contributory basis. The multiplicity of funds has led to high administrative costs and the State Government is considering their integration which is a difficult and complex venture. This points to the need and the possibility of a higher level of benefits being made available through a single contributory scheme organised for a defined area.

Certain essential aspects of social security, notably health care including maternity benefit, have been sought to be universally provided through a public service network meant to be largely free of cost. The overall health status of the people of India in terms of the basic health indices is rather poor - the life expectancy being around 60 years and the birth, death and infant mortality rates are high. As such, the achievement of the goals set under Health for All by 2001 is a veritable challenge. The public and even the private health infrastructures are themselves very much inadequate and are also not universally accessible for ensuring a fair level of medical care. Nor are the health services free of cost. Indeed, of the Rs.320 per capita health expenditure per year, the largest share (75%) comes from the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by households (World Bank 1995). The cost and burden of treatment for hospitalisation is very high especially for poor families in whose case a single episode may be the equivalent of an entire month's consumption expenditure. Although there are wide variations between the costs in different States, generally the treatments are costlier in rural areas and when offered by the private providers (Krishnan 1994). Group health insurance could play a vital role as envisaged in the National Health Policy formulated by the Government of India in 1983. Para 16 of the Policy states "Besides mobilising the community resources, through its active participation in the implementation and management of national health and related programmes, it would be necessary to devise well considered health insurance schemes, on a State-wise basis, for mobilising additional resources for health promotion and ensuring that the community shares the cost of the services, in keeping with its paying capacity." This resource is yet to be tapped on an extensive scale since besides the Government sector significant health insurance exists only under the ESI Scheme. However, the few initiatives taken are a pointer to its possible use for the unorganised workers. Better benefits could thus be extended through a properly designed health insurance scheme for a lower premium than the level of expenditure which such households are required to make in any case at present.

With unemployment at over 23 million and a sizeable population (almost 30%) having incomes below the poverty line, the need for support programmes to carry people through spells of unemployment, disability and deprivation, of old age and destitution becomes necessary. Although the impact of overall economic growth on poverty reduction is well established, the trickle down effect' is not felt by many population groups and regions who are in a way by-passed by the developmental process. To correct the imbalances, a number of promotional and protective measures for disadvantaged groups have been undertaken in India as part of an anti-poverty policy. These have focussed mainly on the areas of employment, food subsidies and old age pensions. A large number of programmes have been taken up under the two clearly identifiable streams - the self-employment and income generation stream, and, secondly, the wage employment and infrastructure development stream. These include credit linked self-employment schemes for individuals and groups (Integrated Rural Development Programme, Development of Women and Children in Rural Areas); training for skill upgrading (Training Rural Youth for Self-Employment, Self-Employment Programme for Urban Poor, Support to Training and Employment Programme for Women), programmes of wage employment (Jawahar Rojgar Yojna, Prime Minister's Rojgar Yojna and Employment Assurance Scheme); and housing (Indira Awas Yojna).

Apart from the above, a degree of security for the contingencies of death, disability and loss of economic assets procured against credit has been extended through the Group Insurance Schemes, the premia for which are mainly subsidised from the Social Security Fund with the Life Insurance Corporation. The balance of premium being paid by the Government and in some cases shared by the beneficiaries.

Although evaluation of the individual programmes have identified several strengths and weaknesses, it has been generally observed that a more committed local Government, vigilant local groups and non-governmental organisations have had a crucial role in ensuring a more effective reach. There clearly exists a possibility for enhancing the utility of such programmes through better organisation and initiative.

1.2 Extending social security protection

With a view to universalise the access to social protection, it is evident from the foregoing that there exists a need and a possibility for extension of a reasonable level of social security to a large number of workers in the self-employed and in the unorganised and informal sectors through an appropriately designed scheme, the modalities of which could be tried out especially through the medium of a pilot project. It would be necessary for such a scheme to take into account the inherent characteristics of the unorganised labour force which have been clearly identified. Besides the absence of a clear and continuing employer-employee relationship, they include seasonal work and under-employment, marginal and peripheral jobs at times involving migration, dispersed workplaces which are mostly home-based, low levels of earnings and hardly any unionisation. It is also evident that any meaningful system must have the secure foundation of a contributory base to be financially viable. Since the facility of collection of contributions through the deduction from wage payments made by the employers is either not available (as in the case of self-employment), or not easy (as in the indirect and informal employments), a pragmatic and workable arrangement has necessarily to be found and set up. A similar arrangement would be essential for organising a worthwhile delivery of benefits. It is clear that the informal sector schemes built around the individual employment areas and being rooted in the employer-employee relationship are not suitable. Even when admitted through sectoral welfare funds, besides leaving out many undefined informal sector jobs, their multiplicity induces compromise on cost effectiveness. A reasonable alternative thus seems to be to work out schemes on an area basis. Moving away from the vertically organised employment spheres to a person- centred approach, the aim would be to cover all workers in a compact geographical area. Some of the normative requirements that an area based security scheme for the unorganised should be expected to fulfill may be mentioned as follows:

    - its scope and applicability must extend to all categories of workers including the home-based, the self-employed and women workers, irrespective of the duration of any specific work;

    - the scheme must be economically viable and self financing, being worked out on the basis of adequate identified sources of funds, including compulsory contributions from the workers and agencies carrying on economic activities

    - the benefits of insurance and security cover that are extended should be self-evident, and be seen to be advantageous by the persons for whom they are meant

    - an extent of flexibility must be built-in, beyond prescribed minimum levels, in order to cater to the local needs and priorities;

    - its basic features should be easy to administer and enforce, involving a system of decentralisation going down to the local areas, the administrative costs being kept to a minimum;

    - the delivery of benefits ad services must be worked out with reference to the convenience of the covered members.



Since this would be a difficult venture, pilot projects in carefully selected areas would be required to be set up for trying out and evolving a scheme, permitting modifications in the package of benefits and the procedures to be introduced and experimented with. Apart from the special scheme, it would possible for the project to aim towards better social protection in two other spheres - one, through the extension of formal sector schemes, and, two, through ensuring better access to the social assistance programmes of the Government. This should be feasible on account of the special base created at local levels for implementation of the project.


up

2. Project areas in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh

Pilot projects are intended to be set up in selected areas of two States in India, namely, Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh. With a population of 41 million and 66.5 million, respectively, together they hold 13% of the country's people. Each of these States represent a different level of development. While Gujarat is a more progressive state with a greater degree of industrialisation and urbanisation, Andhra Pradesh is more agrarian and rural based. In terms of per capita income, Gujarat is amongst the first five highest Indian States. Andhra Pradesh, on the other hand, is one of the more backward and poorer States with almost 32% of its population below the poverty line as against Gujarat which has around 18% and the national average of 29% population below the poverty line. Gujarat has achieved a much higher level of urbanisation (34.5%) being second in the country while Andhra Pradesh with less than 27% urban population lags behind ranking 15th amongst Indian States.

While both the States have a higher than the all-India work participation rate, agricultural employment in Gujarat is only 56% as compared to 80% in Andhra Pradesh (national average being 65%). Women's share of employment is, however, more in Andhra Pradesh (35%) than in Gujarat (31%). Both the states are representative of the country's general trend towards increasing rates of women's employment. In terms of literacy, Gujarat also has shown a much better performance (61%) while Andhra Pradesh with 44% of literates is much below the all India level (52%).

The social security projects taken up in these two States would thus be relevant and useful for other States of the country which, being at different stages of development, may be closer to either of the project states..

Keeping in view the requirements for a successful experiment in a difficult and complex sphere, suitable areas in the two States have been identified with reference to certain broad parameters for taking up appropriate pilot projects. Within an identified district, a project area has been selected in consultation with State Government officers for setting up a special scheme for providing social protection to the informal sector and self-employed workers in order to move towards universal coverage. These parameters pertain to -

    - the existence of a substantial population which is not covered by the existing schemes especially the informal sector ones, which would establish the need;

    - the area being representative in having both urban and rural population and also being able to specifically target women workers;

    - a paying capacity and a willingness to contribute - elements that are essential to make the scheme financially viable; and,

    - the availability of a proper organisational network that would make the operation of the scheme feasible.



Keeping in view the above parameters, Anand taluka (a revenue division) of Kheda district in Gujarat and Nizamabad revenue division of the Nizamabad district in Andhra Pradesh have been selected for pilot projects in consultation with the state and district authorities. A description of certain salient features of the project areas in the above context would bring out the positive factors favouring the selection and would also indicate the broad directions which the new scheme would take under the pilot project.

2.1 Anand in Gujarat

Anand in Kheda has been a pioneer in the cooperative dairy movement in the country and is comparatively a more prosperous area. The Kheda district is largely agrarian and has a sizeable working population (around 65%) depending on agriculture and related activities as against the State average of 56%. The increase is mainly on account of a higher proportion of agricultural labourers who are generally poorer and more deprived as against cultivators. Facility for irrigation appears to be available to over 60% of the cultivated area. In Anand, where women constitute about a fourth of the workforce, it needs to be appreciated that most of them are engaged in disadvantageous jobs. Women form one third of total field labour and almost the total (96%) of marginal workers. Combined, these two categories form 76% of the women workers.

The level of urbanisation while much less in Kheda district (only around 23%) has attained the average level for the State in the Anand taluka (35% of its population being urban). Anand has two municipalities and four boroughs. The overall density of population for Kheda district is high (478 per 1000), being next only to the capital district of Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad. The higher percentage is mainly due to the rural areas being about two and a half times more densely populated than the State average. In terms of special groups, while Kheda has a little less of the Scheduled Caste persons than in the State as such, there are very few Scheduled Tribes. The proportion of people under the poverty line in the district is only marginally higher than the State level of 18.23%.

In terms of literacy, although Kheda with around 66% literates fares better than the overall level in Gujarat State, it is worth noting that the female literacy in rural areas is only at 44%. Moreover, despite the comparative edge that the district has from some of the developmental aspects, it has alarmingly high rates of child mortality, in fact the highest in the State. Also, the public health infrastructure is much less extensive in Kheda district when compared to the overall level in the State. There are fewer Community Health Centres, Primary Health Centres and Sub-Centres per one lakh of population. However, the district has a good number of hospitals in all, including Government, Government aided and in non-Government sectors. It also has a medical college, two homoeopathic colleges (all three located in Anand taluka) and an Ayurvedic college.

The major strength of the Kheda district is the prevalence of cooperatives. There are as many as 3301 registered cooperative societies. The most numerous of these being the milk cooperative societies (950) which are organised all over the State in three tiers, the village level society, the District Union and the State Federation. The milk products of Anand Milk Union Limited (AMUL) have become a household name all over India. There exist now around 80,000 milk cooperative societies with more then 8 million member farmers in the country. Apart from dairy, the prominent areas in which large number of cooperative societies are functioning are agricultural credit and non-credit, irrigation, employees' credit, marketing, banking, housing, labour, etc. Although all cooperatives are not successful, Gujarat with its traditions and cooperative culture has many of them functioning well, even the milk cooperatives which have been extremely successful. And yet, there is a feeling and an assessment that the poorest have been left outside the cooperative movement which has benefitted many. Insofar as the trade unions are concerned, although there are some unions affiliated to the Textile Labour Association, the Indian National Trade Union Congress, All India Trade Union Congress, the general impression is that they are not very active.

Anand also has the presence of the Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Limited (a prominent State level body); the National Dairy Development Board which has been instrumental in the movement for dairy development in the country (and generally referred to as the white revolution'); and the Institute of Rural Management, Anand, which conducts short and long term courses for specialisation in rural development and management.

Gujarat, like some other Indian States, also has a strong base of voluntary organisations working in many social and development areas. Their presence and credibility, apart from their own activities, is considered to enhance people's access to public services and also to facilitate the taking up of new programmes. Mention may be made, by way of illustration, of two of the NGOs that are active in Kheda and in Anand.

Emphasising the overall and integrated development approach, the Self-Employed Women's Association (SEWA) has been trying to give both economic and organisational strength to women workers especially in the informal sectors. With over 40,000 members of the SEWA union in Kheda, it is operating in about 400 villages of the district and has been able to mobilise savings groups in half of them. For making women self-reliant, its strategy involves the forming of cooperatives, the development of women's leadership and providing supportive services in health and child care, banking and legal aid. It is making efforts to link up with the Government's poverty alleviation programmes (notably Integrated Child Development Services and DWCRA) which came to the district rather late on account of its perceived comparative prosperity. The organisation is proud of being instrumental in bringing about a 25% increase in the wages of tobacco workers in farms and factories (half of the 40,000 such workers being women) even though the wages are said to be still below the minimum levels notified by Government. SEWA, Ahmedabad, has also taken initiative in operating a health insurance scheme (joined by 15,000 of its members) as part of an integrated social security package. Another voluntary organisation, Tribhuvan Das Fonadation, is concentrating on preventive aspects of health care along with curative services for common ailments, supplemental nutrition and development of handicrafts in the rural areas. Safe deliveries have also been a point of focus for the organisation which have found that 70% of the total are home deliveries. The Foundation has been able to raise small regular contributions from its members besides being financially supported by the milk union. Improvement in health care services is felt to be the urgent need of the area.

So far as formal social protection is concerned, in the State as a whole, only 7% of the workforce is covered under the Employees Provident Fund (&MP) Act (around 1.2 million subscribers out of a total of 17 million workers). The percentage of those covered in Kheda district and in Anand taluka is not likely to be any higher. The ESI scheme is yet to come to Anand, although it might become available for about 10,000 workers in the near future since the State has already recommended the same to the ESI Corporation. But, this would mean a benefit for merely 5% of the organised sector workers (most of whom are in the overlapping purview of EPF) out of the total workforce of over 210,000 of Anand taluka. The benefits of gratuity and maternity under the relevant laws are largely available to the same organised sector, where also the actual receipt of the benefits on an all-India basis has not been found to be very satisfactory.

The main benefits for the majority of workers are thus only available through the social assistance schemes of the Central and State Governments, the extent of some of which may be briefly noted here. The poverty alleviation programmes mentioned earlier are mostly applicable in the district. The self-employment schemes targeted to those below the poverty line (18% in Gujarat) especially the IRDP, have been stated to have assisted the women workers very significantly (up to 70% of the total beneficiaries). The extent to which the programme helped them in crossing the poverty line was, however, not readily known. The wage employment programmes which have the virtue of self-targeting were in some evaluations found to have certain positive features along with a number of negative factors. Where implemented very intensively, the programmes were found to have brought about wage increases and to have reduced the debts as also the extent of out-migration. Although the idea of a social audit' by the poor was not yet achieved, the village Panchayats were observed to be learning to use the funds more effectively for public works, albeit a great scope for improvement was noted. (Reference 16, Basic Social Protection for All in Gujarat)

The State has been giving a small monthly pension to the destitute above the age of 60 years under the Old Age Pension Scheme. In Kheda district, such assistance is being given to around 900 persons, 70% of whom are women. The pensions for those above the age of 65 years are reimbursable to the State by the Central Government under the National Social Assistance Programme. The second benefit under this Programme pertains to a life insurance cover for the primary bread winner of the family to the extent of Rs.5,000/- in the case of natural death and Rs. 10,000/- in case of death due to accident. Assistance during maternity to the extent of Rs. 300/- is the third benefit under the NSAP which is likely to be available in the Kheda district shortly. The national scheme replaces the states scheme of maternity benefit for landless women agricultural labour under which a higher benefit of 6 weeks and 4 weeks notified minimum wages (amounting to Rs 630 & Rs 420) for the first and second pregnancies, respectively. The scopes of the two schemes though overlapping are not identical; the national scheme being extendable to families of all workers below the poverty line while the state scheme, although restricted only to women landless agriculture workers, covered such workers above the poverty line as well. It may be mentioned that all these social assistance programmes are limited to those below the poverty line and are thus not available to more than 80% of the workers.

The coverage by central welfare funds in the district is insignificant. A small assistance of Rs.500/- for the cost of medicines is available under a State scheme for agricultural and rural labour in cases of serious diseases but the extent of utilisation is rather limited (around 2,000 persons in a year all over the State).

Various group insurance schemes are also being implemented in the district. The landless agricultural workers are insured for a sum of Rs. 1,000 and Rs.2,000, respectively, in cases of natural and accidental deaths. The sum assured is meagre, and small cultivators (not being landless) and other informal sector workers in non-agricultural sectors would not be covered under the scheme. However, the most extensive cover that is now offered to all classes of agricultural and other rural workers, numbering around 7 million, is through a new scheme effective as from January 26, 1996 and manage by the Life Insurance Corporation to whom the premium is paid by the State government. The sum assured is also substantial being Rs. 20,000 in cases of accidents resulting in death or permanent disability and Rs.10,000 where partial disablement occurs. However, the scope is limited since natural death is not covered. An initiative has also been taken by the milk union to provide an insurance to its over half a million members, the premium being shared by the member, the village society and the district union. Again, it covers only accidental death and disability while leaving out natural deaths. It is significant to note that out of every 1,000 deaths there are only 6 or 7 accidental deaths. Thus, most families losing the earning member would not really be helped even though their loss would be as great. Natural death cover is provided mainly under Landless Agricultural Labour Group Insurance Scheme mentioned at the beginning of this para.

2.2 Nizamabad in Andhra Pradesh

Revenue division of Nizamabad comprises 14 out of the 36 mandals (blocks) of the Nizamabad district, having both rural and urban areas and holds almost half of the district's total population of over 2 million. The district falls in the most backward Telengana region of Andhra Pradesh (the coastal region being the most prosperous and the Rayalseema having an intermediate level of development). Within this backward area, the Nizamabad district is comparatively more advanced mainly on account of better irrigation facilities. The major and medium irrigation projects (Nizamsagar, Sreeramsagar, Pocharam and Ramadugu) together with other minor sources means that irrigation serves 59% of the cultivated area of the district as against the state average of 39%. This has helped the agriculturists comprising 65% of the one million workers in the district - half of them directly (the land owning cultivators) and the balance agricultural labourers through provision of work opportunities in the more extensive double cropped areas. For most of the rural workers, it means a situation of almost no unemployment.

The work force participation rate (WFPR) of 48% in Nizamabad is much higher than the state and national averages of 43% and 38%, respectively. Besides agriculture, the largest employment sector is beedi manufacturing which employs more than 200,000 workers in around 2400 establishments. The district also has a much higher proportion of workers in the household industry sector (16%) as compared to 5% in the State as a whole. While the district has a favourable sex ratio, it also has an overall female WFPR of 45.3% which is substantially higher in the rural areas (52%) - an evidence of greater economic compulsions rather than of any advanced status of civilization. The proportion of child labour in the workforce (7.75%) in Andhra Pradesh, which is the highest in the country, is a clear indicator of its low status in human development terms. Most of the women workers are agriculturists but a majority of them work as hired wage labour on other farmers' fields. The household industry sector employs most of the women working outside agriculture (28%). In the urban areas, over 45% of the women workers are engaged in this sector. Since both agricultural labour and household industry are employment areas which lack security of work and wages, women workers are in a particularly disadvantageous position.

The level of urbanisation in Nizamabad district (20%) is less than the overall State level (27%) making the district even more rural (80%) and agrarian in character. The main urban centres are the headquarters of its three revenue divisions, namely Nizamabad, Kamareddy and Bodhan which have municipalities and only three other town areas (Armoor, Sriramsagar Colony and Banswada). The project area with 30% urban population has 3 towns and 321 villages (over a third of the districts 923 villages) and 252 gram panchayats.

The district has a low level of literacy (34%) which is even lower than the percentage for Telengana region (35%). This presents an anomalous situation especially in view of the districts comparative prosperity within the backward region. Andhra Pradesh itself has a lower literacy level (45%) than the all India average (52%) and Nizamabad is deficient by a further 11%. Female literacy in rural areas is abysmally low at 15% and very high drop out rates, which for the scheduled tribes at 80% are amongst the highest in the State.

The health infrastructure in the district is inadequate with only 12 hospitals, 37 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 6 Community Health Centres (CHCs). According to the norms adopted at the national level, a substantial strengthening is required; PHCs need to be twice and the CHCs thrice the existing numbers. For hospitalised care, the bed strength available is only 815 which amounts to one bed for every 2500 persons as against the norm of one bed per thousand. In terms of locational accessibility, only one fourth of the villages in the district have any medical facility, the majority having access within 3 kilometres, while for 10 per cent of the villages such facility is more than 3 kilometres away. Since the public health care is generally cheaper than from the private sources, the lack of public facilities both for domiciliary and hospitalised treatments hits the poor and the low income groups the hardest. It is also noteworthy that in rural areas of Andhra Pradesh out-patient treatment is 4 times costlier than in the urban areas. It is for these reasons that various groups of workers as well as women seem to consider health services as the most important priority requiring attention. For this benefit, a willingness has also been expressed for making regular monetary contributions. Insurance against death and disability and credit facility are other areas where need for security appears to be keenly felt by the workers.

It is surprising that even with almost 60% of irrigation facilities, Nizamabad continues to have 41% of its population below the poverty line which is only marginally lower than the State average of 43.7%. For the people belonging to the Scheduled Tribes, this proportion is much higher (57.7%) . The situation is indicative of the prevalence of significant inequalities in income distribution. The national and state programmes for poverty alleviation mentioned earlier are, however, being implemented in the district. The availability of cheaper rice for the poor, subsidised to the extent of 75% under the special state scheme 'Rs.2 a Kg rice', has been much appreciated. Other welfare measures include a grant of a monthly old age pension to various categories of destitute, widows and landless agricultural labourers under different state schemes. The amounts of pensions available to more than 30,000 persons in the district are quite meagre ranging between Rs.30 to Rs.50 per month, and for old age pensioners above the age of 65 years this amount has now been enhanced to Rs.75 per month under the central government's National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP). A more liberal maternity assistance of Rs.900 (as against Rs.300 under the NSAP) limited to two pregnancies is being given to more than 2000 women every year in Nizamabad. Insurance benefits are also available under various group insurance schemes, the sum assured varying between Rs.1000 to Rs.10,000. The benefits are limited since most of the natural deaths either remain uninsured or the coverage is for very low amounts; the benefits are comparatively more substantial in the case of accidental deaths.

Under the formal social security, the district has comparatively better coverage under the Employees' Provident Fund (and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1952, there being almost 350,000 subscribers in Nizamabad and the neighbouring areas falling under the Nizamabad Sub Regional Office of the EPF. Andhra Pradesh and Nizamabad District within the State have indeed set an example for coverage of beedi workers under the EPF despite their being largely home-based. This has been possible through the mechanism of issue of identity cards under the Beedi Workers' Welfare Fund, a statutory fund established at an all India level with the cess moneys collected from the beedi manufacturers. More than 2/3rds of the beedi workers in the State have already been issued the identity cards which has facilitated the informal sector of beedi workers getting the benefit of the formal sector schemes for Provident Fund and now also for a comprehensive pension. The beedi workers under the Welfare Fund have also, especially in Nizamabad, got other benefits such as educational scholarships for the children and housing, an area where notable achievement has been possible through a good team work and coordination amongst the officers of the central and state govts. and the district authorities. The Employees State Insurance scheme (ESIS) , however, has a low coverage in the district, only 5500 employs, and two dispensaries have been set up (although a 50 bedded hospital is, now coming up in Nizamabad) . But it may be mentioned here that the ESIS does not yet extend to the beedi and workers with the result that its significant comprehensive health care benefit is not available to them. As for the health care facilities extended under the Beedi Workers' Welfare Fund there is merely one static-cum-mobile dispensary for more than 200,000 beedi workers in the district as against the norm of one dispensary for every 5000 workers.

 

up


3. The area-based pilot project

From the foregoing it is evident that viable schemes for comprehensive social insurance are feasible in Anand and Nizamabad on contributory basis under pilot projects. The present availability of such protection is insubstantial leaving out many groups of the workforce and is also unsatisfactory in qualitative terms. The workers have shown their capacity as well as willingness to contribute for life insurance and health services. The social protection areas and the level of benefits in order to be meaningful will have to be worked out under the project in consultation with the beneficiaries, their representative organisations such as the cooperatives, the voluntary agencies, as also the insurance companies and local and State administration. Informal consultations with various agencies (workers associations, voluntary agencies, women's groups, Government officials in various Departments) indicate that the priority areas requiring support and protection are health care and insurance against death and disability. Provision of an old-age pension and availability of credit for productive enterprises as well as education of children are also seen as significant requirements for the purpose. To be realistic, at the outset it may be better to begin with benefits that are seen as the most crucial and the very minimum, these being a system of health insurance and life security. Other benefits can be considered for addition after the scheme establishes itself and its various mechanisms are worked out.

While the working out of a health insurance scheme in detail would be an exercise to be taken up as a project activity, some of its broad aspects may be mentioned here. So far as the scope of health care is concerned although the insurance companies prefer to limit it to major illnesses and hospitalised treatments, the beneficiaries themselves favour a more comprehensive package that would include primary health care as well. Since the day to day requirements are seen as more immediate and real it would be desirable to work out a system that can take care of primary and even preventive health needs. This would further necessitate a decentralised delivery system which can ensure locational access to the insured workers and their families. Apart from assigning of doctors for identified geographical areas the health insurance scheme would require tie-up arrangements with hospitals (public and private). A certain degree of managerial control by the local groups would also be necessary for an effective and satisfactory service. The organisation of medical assistance in terms professional service and financial arrangements could take different forms with reference to the primary, secondary and referral services. The premium collected would require to be pooled for the entire project area in order to have a broader base for setting off the higher expenditure levels in complicated and chronic cases. Yet, there could be provision for allocation or retention of a portion of the collections at intermediate levels to defray certain types of expenses. The public and private infrastructure could both be considered for utilisation as providers but the extent and manner of use would need to be worked out.

Since most of the group insurance schemes introduced are unable to give adequate security in cases of natural death which are indeed the most numerous, it would be desirable to extend cover for an equal sum assured irrespective of the cause of death or disability. With the group being large, this may not be difficult. Also an appropriately graded level of benefits would take care of the different economic strata as well as of the rural and urban priorities. For large groups insurance schemes offer significant discounts (extending to over 66% for groups of more than 50,000 in some cases) which can be availed of. Past experience has shown that simplicity and convenience of procedures will be essential as also a degree of flexibility. The role and association of the nodal agencies will be crucial at all stages, from the working out of the scheme to the delivery of services and its supervision. It would thus be possible to formulate viable schemes keeping in view the normative requirements mentioned in para 10 earlier. Financial contributions from the State Governments which have shown a great deal of commitment as also others could be identified. The conditions existing in the project areas indicate that taking up of such a project could be a promising exercise. Activities proposed under the project are described in annexes 1 and 2.

In the case of informal sector workers collection of contributions and disbursement of benefits linked to them being a challenge, the process of designing and evolving a scheme would require a number of activities including studies, extensive and intensive consultations, workshops, training, finalisation and implementation of the scheme, its monitoring evaluation and efforts for its replication. An initial study with base data collection would be required in respect of the current social security status in the project area covering formal social insurance systems, the social assistance programmes and the self-financing initiatives. The study would be expected to lead to identification of gaps and difficulties, their analyses and remedial possibilities.

In each area the project is proposed to be administered at the district level under the guidance and supervision of the state government, the national project coordinator having the overall responsibility. Collector of the district would head the governing body of the public trust or the registered society, a legal entity for the social insurance scheme and fund, other members being drawn from representatives of the democratically elected panchayats and municipalities, the concerned government departments, groups and societies of the beneficiaries, NGOs, providers of the benefits and services, and the professional agencies. There would be a project team, (fitting within the district administrative set up itself), consisting of a project officer and two other staff (including one with proficiency in finance and accounts). This team would work on various activities under the project including identification of target groups and their organisation, holding detailed consultations with them regarding aspects that are crucial to their social insurance (contributions, benefits, administrative mechanisms and detailed procedures) which would be important inputs in the evolving of the scheme. Ascertaining the possible role of the local government bodies (both rural and urban), the tie-ups with various government and professional agencies, private providers especially for health insurance are likely to substantially engage the project team in the initial phase besides giving necessary assistance in conducting the studies and base line surveys. Once the scheme is finalised the team's major responsibilities would be in terms of its implementation, direct supervision and constant review with all the participating groups and organisations, maintaining of necessary records and documentation for monitoring and evaluation.

The replaceability of the pilot project once it succeeds in Anand and Nizamabad would appear to be greatly possible. The setting of the project within the district framework while advantageous for the continuance and sustain ability of the scheme would also facilitate its replaceability. Expansion of the scheme within the district to areas outside the project is in fact built into the structure of the project itself and can be achieved without requiring any further mechanisms. As for other districts in the project state as also other states in the country since the administrative framework is broadly similar at the district level throughout the country once the feasibility of the scheme is established in the project areas its introduction elsewhere with necessary local adaptations would be easier. The need all over the country is self-evident. Central as well as other State Governments have been showing increasing concern and commitment towards programmes for social protection. As the framework for a large scale coverage especially of the self-employed and informal sector workers emerges many local variations would be facilitated. A beginning made from a point of strength gives confidence and hope for a promising expansion.

Annex 1 Project activities

Remark: Not all the tables referred to in the text have been included in this Web document. In order to obtain a copy of the complete document, kindly contact the Social Security Department.

 

up

Updated by JD. Approved by ER. Last update 7 December 2001