Judgment No. 1280
Decision
1. THE IMPUGNED DECISION OF 22 JANUARY 1992 IS SET ASIDE. 2. THE CASE IS SENT BACK TO THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL FOR A NEW DECISION ON THE SALARY SCALE TO BE TAKEN IN THE LIGHT OF THE PRESENT JUDGMENT. 3. THE INTERVENERS SHALL HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS THE COMPLAINANTS INSOFAR AS THEY ARE IN LIKE CASE IN FACT AND IN LAW. 4. THE ORGANIZATION SHALL PAY THE COMPLAINANTS A TOTAL SUM OF 50,000 FRENCH FRANCS IN COSTS.
Dissenting opinion
Extract:
A dissenting opinion by Justice Mella Carroll is attached to the judgment.
Keywords
dissenting opinion
Considerations 14-15
Extract:
Vide Judgment 1279, considerations 14 and 15.
Reference(s)
Jugement(s) TAOIT: 1279
Keywords
complaint; receivability of the complaint; internal appeal; time limit; good faith; organisation's duties; staff regulations and rules; date
Consideration 29
Extract:
Vide Judgment 1279, consideration 29.
Reference(s)
Jugement(s) TAOIT: 1279
Keywords
flemming principle; general service category; reckoning; salary; local status; scale; adjustment; discretion; executive head
|