EPO - European Patent Organisation
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | next >
| Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
| 3512 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges a warning letter from his reporting officer, warning him that he was at risk of receiving markings of less than "good" in his forthcoming staff report. |
| 3511 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests the third version of his staff report for 2002-2003. |
| 3510 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant objects to the excessive length of the process of obtaining a visa for his wife’s adopted daughter. |
| 3509 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the EPO’s refusal to send his mail to an address, which is not the declared residence address in his last retirement questionnaire. |
| 3508 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the EPO’s alleged failure to take an express decision on his claim for the reimbursement of the travel expenses that he incurred in respect of his children upon leaving the service of the EPO. |
| 3480 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant applies for review of Judgment 3427, alleging that the Tribunal has failed to take into account an important fact. |
| 3479 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant applies for review of Judgment 3273, in which the Tribunal dismissed his complaint challenging the reclassification of his post. |
| 3478 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant applies for review of Judgment 3429, in which the Tribunal dismissed his complaint against the EPO’s decision not to reimburse the remainder of his removal costs. |
| 3477 |
120th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant applies for review of Judgment 3300, in which the Tribunal dismissed his seventh complaint. |
| 3466 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaint, which challenges a rule of general application, is clearly irreceivable and is summarily dismissed. |
| 3465 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal summarily dismissed the complaint for failure to exhaust internal means of redress. |
| 3464 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal summarily dismissed the complaint as the complainant cannot validly impugn a decision which was not a final decision. |
| 3463 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaints are summarily dismissed because, by the time they were filed, there had been a decision on the complainants' claim, which precludes the challenging of an implied rejection of their requests for review. |
| 3462 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaint, clearly irreceivable, is summarily dismissed. |
| 3461 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaints are irreceivable and they are summarily dismissed. |
| 3460 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal found that the Organisation properly exercised its discretion and it summarily dismissed the complaint. |
| 3459 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal found that it was not competent to hear the complaint and summarily dismissed it. |
| 3458 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaints, clearly irreceivable, are summarily dismissed. |
| 3457 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal considered that the complaint was premature and summarily dismissed it. |
| 3456 |
119th Session, 2015
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaints, essentially identical and clearly irreceivable, were summarily dismissed. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | next >
|
