Organisation's reputation (500,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Organisation's reputation
Total judgments found: 30

< previous | 1, 2

• Judgment 513

  
  49th Session, 1982
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations

  Extract:

  To satisfy the rule on dismissal for misconduct, "it is not necessary for the organization to prove that the conduct of the staff member has actually brought the organization into public discredit. The section in which the rule appears is headed 'standards of conduct for staff members' and is concerned with the standards with which the staff member must comply irrespective of whether his non-compliance with them is or is not publicly known."

  Keywords:

  conduct; enforcement; organisation's reputation; provision; serious misconduct; termination of employment;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 367

  
  41st Session, 1978
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 16

  Extract:

  "Just as it is implicit in every contract of service that the staff member shall be loyal, shall treat his superiors with due respect and shall guard the reputation of the organization, so it is implicit that the administration in its treatment of staff members shall have a care for their dignity and reputation and shall not cause them unnecessarily personal distress."

  Keywords:

  general principle; organisation's duties; organisation's reputation; professional injury; respect for dignity; staff member's duties; supervisor;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 361

  
  41st Session, 1978
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 9

  Extract:

  Vide Judgment 367, consideration 16.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 367
  

  Keywords:

  organisation's duties; organisation's reputation; professional injury; respect for dignity; staff member's duties; supervisor;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 150

  
  23rd Session, 1970
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 2

  Extract:

  "In cases where the Director-General suspects an official of having committed acts of undiscipline in the performance of or in connection with his duties, he has to take action in the most adroit fashion to safeguard, if possible, the reputation of both the organization and of the official. For that reason, before initiating the disciplinary procedure, the Director-General is always free [...] to summon the official and ask him for explanations."

  Keywords:

  complainant; disciplinary procedure; executive head; inquiry; investigation; misconduct; organisation's duties; organisation's reputation; respect for dignity;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 111

  
  17th Session, 1967
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations 4-5

  Extract:

  The complainant made use of statements in the proceedings before the Tribunal "as tracts designed to discredit [the organisation] and the Administrative Tribunal." His actions could not have been directed to defending his freedom and rights. They were undoubtedly related to "activities exercised by [him] as an official of the organisation; as such they constituted serious misconduct and were consequently such as to justify the legal application of a disciplinary sanction [...] the free choice of the sanction to be imposed was within the Director-General's discretion."

  Keywords:

  disciplinary measure; discretion; duty of discretion; organisation's reputation; serious misconduct; vexatious complaint;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 96

  
  16th Session, 1966
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 6

  Extract:

  "The complainant's behaviour, in which he persisted over a period of several years in spite of warnings from the organisation and from the Tribunal, showed repeated infringements by him [...] of the Staff Regulations and was of a nature to throw public discredit on the organisation; it thus constituted serious misconduct under which [the applicable provision] was such as legally to justify his summary dismissal without notice."

  Keywords:

  conduct; organisation's reputation; serious misconduct; staff member's duties; summary dismissal; termination of employment; vexatious complaint; warning;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 79

  
  13th Session, 1964
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations

  Extract:

  The acts criticised show that "the complainant was guilty of serious misconduct; moreover, even if they had concerned only his private life - which is not the case - these acts were of a nature to compromise the organization's reputation and thus legally to warrant summary dismissal [...] under the terms laid down" in the relevant provision. The fact that the complainant "was ill at the time and that special sick leave for officials is normally provided for [...] constitutes no obstacle to the enforcement of the said provision by the Director-General."

  Keywords:

  conduct; disciplinary measure; illness; organisation's reputation; outside activity; serious misconduct; summary dismissal; termination of employment;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 65

  
  11th Session, 1962
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 4

  Extract:

  The complainant, a public information officer, received an invitation mistakenly bearing his name to a diplomatic dinner party. In disclosing to press correspondents the details of a conversation on this subject with his chief, the complainant violated his obligations, "having regard both to the fact that the information related to a matter of official business which should have remained privy to the organization and to the fact that the information so disclosed was such as might harm the prestige of the United Nations."

  Keywords:

  duty of discretion; organisation's reputation; staff member's duties;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 63

  
  11th Session, 1962
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 2

  Extract:

  The "many breaches of duty imply serious misconduct. Not only did [the complainant] cause so much dissension among the teaching staff and students [...] that the [national] authorities intervened, but he compromised the reputation of [the organization] itself. From an objective point of view, he has incurred a heavy responsibility which is equally heavy if viewed from a subjective point of view. As an intellectual he was bound to be aware of the consequences of his actions and, as an expert on an important mission, he should have been scrupulously careful to show himself worthy of the confidence that had been placed in him."

  Keywords:

  conduct; duty of discretion; organisation's reputation; serious misconduct; staff member's duties;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 53

  
  9th Session, 1961
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 7

  Extract:

  "As defaulting on financial obligations and incurring debts beyond the debtor's capacity to repay [...] are incompatible with the standards of conduct required of an international civil servant and are likely to bring the organization and its officials into public disrepute [...]. The Director General's decision to terminate the complainant's probationary appointment [...] was in the circumstances of this case fully justified."

  Keywords:

  conduct; debt; organisation's reputation; probationary period; staff member's duties; termination of employment;
  

< previous | 1, 2