Fixed-term (317, 318,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Fixed-term
Total judgments found: 292
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 | next >
Judgment 1221
74th Session, 1993
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
"The complainant's appointment expired on 31 March 1992 and there was no reason why the organization should renew it. In the light of all the material circumstances, including her behaviour, the Tribunal disallows her claim to reinstatement."
Keywords:
complainant; conduct; contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; refusal; reinstatement; request by a party; tribunal;
Judgment 1159
72nd Session, 1992
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 15
Extract:
WHO Staff Rule 1050.2.3 "distinguishes between holders of a career-service appointment and temporary staff. Whereas the former 'shall be given priorities', the Director-General enjoys discretion to 'establish priority' among the latter. He was therefore under no obligation to give any particular priority to the holder of a temporary appointment like the complainant."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: WHO STAFF RULE 1050.2.3
Keywords:
career; contract; discretion; fixed-term; organisation's duties; priority;
Consideration 6
Extract:
"As to the lack of proper notice, the Director-General's decision [...] to grant him another two years' appointment affords ample compensation".
Keywords:
compensation; contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; notice;
Judgment 1154
72nd Session, 1992
World Intellectual Property Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
"It is a general principle of international civil service that there must be a valid reason for any decision not to renew a fixed-term appointment and that the reason must be given to the staff member. That principle was set out, for example, in Judgment 675 [...] in 10 and 11."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 675
Keywords:
case law; contract; duty to substantiate decision; fixed-term; international civil service principles; non-renewal of contract;
Judgment 1151
72nd Session, 1992
European Organization for Nuclear Research
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 5
Extract:
After many years in CERN's employ under fixed-term appointments, the complainants applied for indefinite appointments. Their cases having been reviewed according to a new procedure for the grant of such appointments. CERN told them it would neither grant them indefinite appointments or renew their fixed-term ones on expiry. "But there is no obvious logical connection between the refusal to grant an indefinite appointment and the refusal to renew a fixed-term one."
Keywords:
contract; duration of appointment; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; permanent appointment;
Judgment 1145
72nd Session, 1992
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
"Notwithstanding the terms of 4.6(d) the practice in the ILO is to give at least two months' notice of non-renewal of a fixed-term appointment. The Organisation admits that the practice was not followed in the complainant's case but points out that he got compensation for its mistake in the form of another two months' pay. The Tribunal holds such compensation to be adequate".
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 4.6(D) OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
Keywords:
compensatory allowance; contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; notice; practice;
Judgment 1138
72nd Session, 1992
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The unsatisfactory nature of [the complainant's] services is well-documented, was the conclusion of objective assessment and amply justified the decision not to renew his contract."
Keywords:
contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; unsatisfactory service;
Judgment 1131
71st Session, 1991
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
The Tribunal observes that UNESCO's decision to separate the complainant from service after it abolished his post was flawed by the Organization's failure to abide by the rules in Circular No. 1583. The report of the Joint Co-Operation Committee, which was to make a recommendation on the case, gives no evidence of any discussion of the administration's proposals concerning the complainant. What is more, the proposal to freeze his post did not come from the competent authority. A redeployment proposal was rejected without having been discussed or put to the Director-General as required by the circular. As the complainant is not seeking reinstatement, the Tribunal grants him redress for material injury in the amount of one year's full pay.
Keywords:
abolition of post; administrative instruction; advisory body; advisory opinion; competence; consultation; decision-maker; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; organisation's duties; procedural flaw; reassignment; separation from service;
Judgment 1128
71st Session, 1991
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
As stated in Judgment 675, "an international organisation is under an obligation to consider whether or not it is in its interests to renew a contract and to make a decision accordingly: though such a decision is discretionary, it may not 'be arbitrary or irrational'; there 'must be a good reason for it and the reason must be given'."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 675
Keywords:
contract; discretion; duty to substantiate decision; fixed-term; grounds; limits; non-renewal of contract; organisation's duties; organisation's interest;
Consideration 6
Extract:
Two police reports show that the complainant was held in disfavour by the local authorities at two duty stations. As a result his appointment was not renewed. "On the evidence the Tribunal is satisfied not only that the Organization's doubts about the complainant were legitimate but also that it was free to conclude that he was unsuitable for future assignments and, more particularly, to fear that, if granted any further assignment, he might not, as was his duty under [Regulation] 301.014, behave 'in a manner befitting [his] status' as an international civil servant and with proper 'reserve and tact'."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: FAO STAFF REGULATION 301.014
Keywords:
conduct; contract; duty of discretion; fitness for international civil service; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; staff member's duties;
Judgment 1116
71st Session, 1991
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
The complainant submits that the decision not to renew his appointment was tainted with breach of his right of defence since he failed to get a copy of a report concerning him by the Joint Disciplinary Committee. The Tribunal observes that such reports are confidential under Rule 110.2(e). "Besides, the report is immaterial, even in the present context, because the Committee recommended no disciplinary action and the stated reasons for termination were financial stringency and abolition of post."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: UNESCO STAFF RULE 110.2(E)
Keywords:
abolition of post; advisory body; budgetary reasons; confidential evidence; contract; disclosure of evidence; fixed-term; lack of injury; non-renewal of contract; report; right to reply;
Consideration 5
Extract:
The complainant, whose post was abolished, alleges that the organization committed a mistake of law by keeping him in its employ under a long string of short-term appointments. He relies on what he says was UNESCO's established practice of extending fixed-term appointments for never less than one year. The Tribunal observes that there is no rule binding the organization to a minimum or maximum period of extension and that the complainant does not offer a shred of evidence of the practice he says it followed.
Keywords:
burden of proof; contract; duration of appointment; evidence; extension of contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; organisation's duties; practice; short-term; successive contracts;
Consideration 2
Extract:
"According to consistent precedent the Director-General has discretion to extend a fixed-term appointment or convert it into an indeterminate one and his decision will be set aside only if taken without authority [etc]".
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; contract; discretion; duration of appointment; fixed-term; judicial review; non-renewal of contract; permanent appointment;
Judgment 1115
71st Session, 1991
World Intellectual Property Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 6-7
Extract:
The complainant wants the Tribunal to set aside two reports which describe his work as unsatisfactory as well as decisions to suspend his salary step increase and not to extend his appointment. He alleges bad faith and abuse of authority on the part of the administration. There is conflicting evidence. "A complainant must discharge the burden of proof and satisfy an internal appeal body or the Tribunal that the balance of probability is that his allegations of fact are true. [...] The Tribunal has [...] considered all the evidence, including a transcript of a recording the complainant secretly made of a conversation with his supervisor. It finds that he has not discharged the burden of proving his allegations".
Keywords:
abuse of power; appraisal of evidence; burden of proof; complainant; conduct; contract; evidence; fixed-term; good faith; increment withheld; lack of evidence; misuse of authority; non-renewal of contract; performance report; recording; unsatisfactory service;
Consideration 11
Extract:
"The Director General decided [...] not to allow his request for a permanent appointment on the grounds that he failed to meet the condition of seven years' satisfactory service. The complainant therefore has no right to any further extension".
Keywords:
condition; contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; permanent appointment; refusal; unsatisfactory service;
Judgment 1114
71st Session, 1991
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
The complainant, an official of the World Bank, was hired by UNESCO to work for a limited period in a "co- operative programme". His appointment was not extended. He "had no entitlement to any extension since according to Staff Rule 104.6 a fixed-term appointment ends automatically on expiry, without notice or indemnity, and carries no expectation of renewal: his mere expectation of renewal did not confer any right on him in law."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: UNESCO STAFF RULE 104.6
Keywords:
contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract;
Consideration 8
Extract:
The complainant, whose appointment had not been extended, "accuses the organization of acting arbitrarily because it made no effort to find a position for him, though it did seek to place other members of [his division]. But the explanation is that he had the possibility of reinstatement in the World Bank - and indeed he himself arranged [...] to go back to the Bank - whereas the other members [of the division] presumably had no such alternative to fall back on. In the circumstances there was no abuse of authority or arbitrariness in the organization's stand."
Keywords:
abuse of power; contract; fixed-term; misuse of authority; non-renewal of contract; reassignment;
Judgment 1052
69th Session, 1990
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
"Where the reason given for the non-renewal is unsatisfactory performance, the Tribunal will not replace with its own the organisation's view of the complainant's fitness for his duties."
Keywords:
contract; discretion; fixed-term; judicial review; non-renewal of contract; unsatisfactory service; work appraisal;
Consideration 4
Extract:
"The case law is that a decision not to renew a fixed-term appointment, being discretionary, may be set aside only if it was taken without authority, or in breach of a rule of form or of procedure, [etc]. Although such criteria hold good for the review of all discretionary decisions, the Tribunal will exercise especial caution in reviewing a decision not to confirm the appointment of someone who is still on probation; else probation would fail to serve its purpose as a period of trial. In the case of a probationer the administration must indeed be allowed the widest measure of discretion, and its decision will stand unless the flaw was particularly serious or glaring."
Keywords:
contract; discretion; fixed-term; judicial review; non-renewal of contract; probationary period; termination of employment;
Consideration 5
Extract:
The complainant objects to the non-renewal of his appointment after probation. He alleges breach of his right to a hearing. "The plea is unsound because there was no element of disciplinary sanction in the decision. What the administration did was to make an assessment of the complainant's performance and it was under no duty to enter into any dialogue with him on the subject."
Keywords:
contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; organisation's duties; probationary period; right to reply; termination of employment;
Judgment 1047
69th Session, 1990
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 9
Extract:
"A decision by the Director-General not to renew an appointment is a discretionary one, but his discretion is not unfettered. Since one of the reasons he gave for the decision impugned in this case is unfounded and the other reason is tied in with it, the decision must be set aside."
Keywords:
contract; discretion; fixed-term; grounds; judicial review; non-renewal of contract;
Judgment 1046
69th Session, 1990
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
The organization alleges that the reason it put an end to the complainant's appointment was the expiry of his contract. The Tribunal is satisfied that it failed to extend his appointment because his performance was considered unsatisfactory. "The Director-General's decision confirming the complainant's termination must be set aside because he was not separated for the reason it gave."
Keywords:
contract; fixed-term; grounds; judicial review; non-renewal of contract; unsatisfactory service;
Summary
Extract:
The complainant was transferred on 1 February 1988. On 5 February he got notice that his contract would not be renewed because of an unsatisfactory report concerning his new assignment. The Tribunal holds that "it was incumbent on the [organization] to give him a fair trial in the job, and [...] to ask after the lapse of only four days for an immediate replacement was to act with undue haste."
Keywords:
contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; organisation's duties; reasonable time; time limit; unsatisfactory service; work appraisal;
Judgment 1045
69th Session, 1990
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"Rule 1050.2 provides: 'When a post of indefinite duration, which is filled, is abolished, a reduction in force shall take place, in accordance with procedures established by the Director'. The procedures are set out in detail in the Manual of the WHO, and it is clear that the rules preclude the termination of an appointment until the reduction-in-force procedure has been completed. The notice [given to her] was therefore invalid, and in keeping with the reasoning in Judgment 469 the complainant's contract is renewed by implication and remains in force. She is entitled to payment of the salary and allowances due under her contract less any indemnity of earnings she may have received in the meantime."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: PAHO STAFF RULE 1050.2
ILOAT Judgment(s): 469
Keywords:
abolition of post; amount; consequence; contract; enforcement; extension of contract; fixed-term; material damages; permanent appointment; post; procedure before the tribunal; staff reduction; termination of employment;
Judgment 1044
69th Session, 1990
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"Whether to renew a fixed-term appointment is a discretionary decision, and the Tribunal may not set it aside unless it was taken without authority, or in breach of a rule of form or of procedure, or unless it was based on a mistake of fact or of law, etc." The organization's financial difficulties constituted a proper basis on which to base the decision not to extend her appointment.
Keywords:
budgetary reasons; contract; discretion; fixed-term; judicial review; non-renewal of contract;
Summary
Extract:
The complainant objects to the non-renewal of her appointment. She alleges that upon recruitment she was given assurances that her fixed-term appointment would be converted into a continuing one on the date of expiry. But there is no evidence to suggest that she was given any such assurance.
Keywords:
contract; evidence; fixed-term; lack of evidence; non-renewal of contract; permanent appointment; promise;
Judgment 1038
69th Session, 1990
European Southern Observatory
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 5
Extract:
The complainant, who is challenging the non-renewal of his contract, is concerned that the Director-General's decision may have been prompted by unsubstantiated charges. He alleges breach of his right to a hearing. "The plea is unsound because there was no element of disciplinary sanction in that decision [...] The Director-General made a value judgement which did not require entering into a dialogue with him. There is no reason to hold that the Director-General was not genuine in his evaluation of the complainant's suitability for the post of administrator or that his decision was based on any mistake of fact."
Keywords:
contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; organisation's duties; right to reply;
Consideration 4
Extract:
"The Director-General took his decision [not to renew the complainant's contract] in the exercise of his discretionary authority. Even though colleagues of the complainant's thought him suitable and recommended extending his appointment, the decision was not theirs to make."
Keywords:
competence; contract; discretion; executive head; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; qualifications; work appraisal;
Judgment 1037
69th Session, 1990
European Southern Observatory
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
After his appointment was extended several times and he received favourable staff reports, the complainant was denied the renewal of his appointment. That decision was based on a lack of leadership qualities, even though these were not mentioned in the requirements set out in his job description. As the decision mistakenly took account of facts unrelated to the duties assigned to him, it is tainted by a fatal flaw and the Tribunal will set it aside.
Keywords:
contract; fixed-term; mistaken conclusion; non-renewal of contract; post description; qualifications; work appraisal;
Judgment 1035
69th Session, 1990
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
The complainant's permanent post was abolished and he was appointed to a temporary one for a period of two years. Any post, whatever its duration or source of funding, may be abolished because of a change of programme. Besides, the organisation had assured him that his post description, status and conditions of service would be the same as before. Under the circumstances the Tribunal finds that the decision has neither infringed his contractual rights nor otherwise affected him adversely.
Keywords:
abolition of post; budgetary reasons; contract; fixed-term; lack of injury; permanent appointment; post; terms of appointment; transfer;
Judgment 974
66th Session, 1989
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
"In the absence of a specific provision in the Rules, the Tribunal holds that, for the reasons it stated in Judgments 470 [...] and 891 [...], the right to the application of the reduction-in-force procedure arises on the abolition of a post of indefinite duration even though the official may have only a fixed-term appointment."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 1050.2 OF THE PAHO STAFF RULES
ILOAT Judgment(s): 470, 891
Keywords:
abolition of post; contract; duration of appointment; fixed-term; no provision; non-renewal of contract; permanent appointment; post; procedure before the tribunal; right; staff reduction;
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 | next >
|
