Promotion (269, 270, 271, 945, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 666,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Promotion
Total judgments found: 166
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | next >
Judgment 4019
126th Session, 2018
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision not to grant her a promotion in the 2013 promotion exercise.
Consideration 2
Extract:
The Tribunal has consistently held that staff promotions by an international organisation are decisions which lie within the discretion of its executive head. Such a decision is therefore subject to only limited review by the Tribunal, which will interfere only if the decision was taken without authority, if a rule of form or procedure was breached, if it was based on a mistake of fact or of law, if an essential fact was overlooked, if a clearly mistaken conclusion was drawn from the facts, or if there was abuse of authority (see, for example, Judgments 2834, under 7, 3006, under 7, or 3742, under 3).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2834, 3006, 3742
Keywords:
discretion; judicial review; promotion;
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; decision quashed; promotion;
Consideration 11
Extract:
The setting aside of this decision does not, in itself, imply that the complainant would actually have been promoted if the proper procedure had been followed. Nevertheless, as her immediate supervisor had submitted a very complimentary promotion proposal, which would normally have been supported by her second-level supervisor, the procedural flaw identified above unduly deprived her of a promotion opportunity. This lost opportunity constitutes material injury which, as the complainant rightly submits, entitles her to compensation (see, for example, Judgments 2869, under 10, or 3084, under 21).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2869, 3084
Keywords:
loss of opportunity; material injury; promotion;
Judgment 4017
126th Session, 2018
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainants challenge the decisions not to promote them during the 2014 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Consideration 4
Extract:
The Tribunal considers that, although the Organisation may not lawfully preclude any possibility of promotion year after year for officials who have reached the top of their grade bracket, since as stated in the above-mentioned judgments the Staff Regulations make provision for such promotions in exceptional cases, it was open to it to decide once more that they could not be granted by the Director General in the 2014 promotion exercise.
Keywords:
promotion;
Judgment 3877
124th Session, 2017
World Intellectual Property Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the date on which her retroactive promotion took effect.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3870
124th Session, 2017
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant alleges that he was promised promotion to grade D-2.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
case sent back to organisation; complaint allowed; decision quashed; promise; promotion;
Judgment 3776
123rd Session, 2017
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant contests the decision preventing her from receiving a merit-based increment.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3773
123rd Session, 2017
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant disputes the calculation of the number of years of service taken into consideration to determine the date on which she became eligible for personal promotion.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; promotion;
Judgment 3771
123rd Session, 2017
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant contends that the ILO misled her concerning the personal promotion system.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3767
123rd Session, 2017
ITER International Fusion Energy Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to delay the grant of a periodic step advancement based on his 2012 performance appraisal report.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; promotion;
Judgment 3730
123rd Session, 2017
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant contends that Eurocontrol withdrew his title and duties as Head of Section.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; promotion;
Judgment 3667
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that he was not promoted during the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3666
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant contests the decision not to promote him in 2012.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3664
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that she was not promoted during the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3659
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that she was not promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3657
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that he was not promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3655
122nd Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that she was not promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3572
121st Session, 2016
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges his non-inclusion in the list of staff members eligible for promotion in 2013.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Judgment 3535
120th Session, 2015
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: In his two complaints, the complainant challenges the effective date of his promotion.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint allowed; decision quashed; joinder; promotion;
Judgment 3524
120th Session, 2015
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the non-application to her of a rule concerning automatic promotion.
Consideration 3
Extract:
The Tribunal’s case law, as recalled in Judgment 2682, under 6, establishes that “an acquired right is breached only when [...] an amendment adversely affects the balance of contractual obligations by altering fundamental terms of employment in consideration of which the official accepted an appointment, or which subsequently induced him or her to stay on. In order to determine whether there has been a breach of acquired rights, it is therefore necessary to ascertain whether the altered terms of employment are fundamental and essential within the meaning of Judgment 832”. This case law was confirmed in Judgment 3074 (under 15 and 16).
It is well settled that the particular arrangements for the grant of promotion confer no acquired rights, because on recruitment staff cannot foretell how they will fare in their career. An organisation may always change the rules on promotion for the sake of efficiency and so as to cope with changing circumstances. (See Judgment 1025, under 4.)
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1025, 2682, 3074
Keywords:
acquired right; promotion;
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
acquired right; complaint dismissed; equal treatment; promotion;
Judgment 3495
120th Session, 2015
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that she was not promoted in the 2012 promotion exercise.
Consideration 11
Extract:
"As the Tribunal has already held in a similar case involving Eurocontrol and another official, while every official should have some prospect of advancement within an organisation and may therefore legitimately hope to move up to a higher position one day, there is no automatic right to promotion. This right is limited, on the one hand, by the official’s seniority, qualifications, skills and performance and, on the other, by the Organisation’s administrative structure and budgetary resources (see Judgment 3404, under 8, and the case law cited therein)."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3404
Keywords:
discretion; judicial review; promotion; right to career advancement;
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; intervention; promotion;
Judgment 3404
119th Session, 2015
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The Tribunal found that the complainant had not proved that his lack of promotion in 2012 undermined his prospect of advancement within Eurocontrol.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
complaint dismissed; promotion;
Consideration 8
Extract:
The Tribunal holds that, while every official should have some prospect of advancement within an organisation and may therefore legitimately hope to move up to a higher position one day, there is no automatic right to promotion. This right is limited, on the one hand, by the official’s seniority, qualifications, skills and performance and, on the other, by the Organisation’s administrative structure and budgetary resources (see Judgments 526, under 4, 3279, under 11, and 3280, under 7, and the case law cited therein).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 526, 3279, 3280
Keywords:
discretion; judicial review; promotion;
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | next >
|
