|
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |
Order of suspension (139,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Order of suspension
Total judgments found: 4
Judgment 3141
113th Session, 2012
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 14
Extract:
[T]he complainant has asked that a suspensory effect be conferred upon his complaint as protection against possible expulsion by the Swiss authorities. However, the wording of Article VII, paragraph 4, of the Statute of the Tribunal specifies that “[t]he filing of a complaint shall not involve suspension of the execution of the decision impugned” and no other provision of the Statute authorises the Tribunal to order such suspension. This claim is therefore irreceivable (see Judgment 1584, under 6).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1584
Keywords:
order of suspension;
Judgment 1390
78th Session, 1995
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 16
Extract:
"As for the application for a stay of proceedings, Article 10(3) of the Rules says that 'the Tribunal [...] shall rule on an application by either party for a stay of proceedings'". The Tribunal holds that no stay of proceedings is warranted in this case. Whatever changes may be made in the procedure for filling vacant posts, the complaint must be reviewed in the light of the rules in force at the material time. Once the proceedings have begun, the Tribunal is bound to reach a decision as promptly as possible and will not stay the proceedings pending possible changes in the rules."
Reference(s)
ILOAT reference: ARTICLE 10(3) OF THE RULES
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; applicable law; closure of written proceedings; competition cancelled; iloat statute; order of suspension; procedure before the tribunal; refusal; staff regulations and rules; submissions;
Judgment 1029
69th Session, 1990
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Order
Extract:
"Since the parties are agreed on the suspension of the proceedings the organisation's application is granted."
Keywords:
order; order of suspension; organisation; request by a party;
Judgment 809
61st Session, 1987
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Order
Extract:
"The President may direct proceedings and even if not expressly so empowered may order suspension. Since a complainant may withdraw a complaint he may also apply for suspension. Such application will succeed unless the advantage to the complainant of suspending the proceedings is outweighed by the advantage to the defendant of pursuing them."
Keywords:
competence; implied powers; no provision; order; order of suspension; organisation's interest; president of the tribunal; procedure before the tribunal; request by a party; staff member's interest; withdrawal of suit;
Order
Extract:
"Continuation of the suspension might [...] needlessly hold up the proceedings and cause detriment to the defendant without serving the interests of the complainant. The application accordingly fails".
Keywords:
extension of contract; order; order of suspension; president of the tribunal; refusal; request by a party;
|
|
|
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |
![](/webcommon/s-images/empty.gif) |