Judgment No. 4646
Decision
The complaint is summarily dismissed.
Summary
The complainant, who was employed under a series of Special Service Agreements, submits that she was requested without a valid reason to stop working immediately and that WHO did not grant her request for conciliation and amicable settlement.
Judgment keywords
Keywords
competence; summary procedure; special service agreement; ratione personae; complaint dismissed
Consideration 3
Extract:
The complainant states in the complaint form that she filed the complaint in her capacity as a former official. However, according to the express terms of the SSA under which she was employed, the complainant did not have the status of a WHO official. As the complainant cannot be considered as an official or former official of WHO and is not covered by WHO’s Staff Rules and Regulations, she has no access to this Tribunal (see Judgments 3705, consideration 4, 3551, consideration 3, and 3049, consideration 4).
Reference(s)
Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3049, 3551, 3705
Keywords
competence; former official; special service agreement; ratione personae
Consideration 5
Extract:
The Tribunal notes, as it did in Judgment 3551, that clause 15 of the SSA provides for arbitration if necessary, and that there is no time limit provided for in relation to the submission of the dispute to arbitration.
Reference(s)
Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3551
Keywords
arbitration; special service agreement
| 
