Judgment No. 934
Decision
THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.
Consideration 8
Extract:
"The Tribunal [...] deplores the complainant's manner of pleading. [...] His rejoinder contains accusations and remarks that are offensive to everyone concerned, including members of the Tribunal when they do not agree with him."
Keywords
recusal; tribunal; composition of the internal appeals body
Summary
Extract:
The complainant is mistaken in alleging breach of the principle of double jeopardy, since the grounds for the two reprimands were different.
Keywords
grounds; double jeopardy; disciplinary measure; censure; difference
Consideration 3
Extract:
The complainant invites the Tribunal to declare the two reprimands imposed on him void ab initio. The claim to have the first declared void is res judicata, the Tribunal having already dismissed it in its Judgment no. 801 because the decision had been previously withdrawn. As the second reprimand has also been withdrawn, the Tribunal dismisses the claim to have it declared void as well.
Reference(s)
Jugement(s) TAOIT: 801
Keywords
cause of action; no cause of action; res judicata; settlement out of court; censure; application for quashing
|