ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By session > 127th Session

Judgment No. 4115


1. The impugned decision and the decision of 8 April 2016 are set aside.
2. The EPO shall restore the complainant with retroactive effect to the grade and step he would have held but for the imposition of the disciplinary sanction, with all legal consequences, in accordance with consideration 15 of the judgment.
3. The EPO shall pay interest on the resulting remuneration arrears at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from due dates until the date of payment.
4. The EPO shall pay the complainant 7,000 euros for costs.
5. All other claims are dismissed.


The complainant challenges the decision to downgrade him for serious misconduct.

Judgment keywords


complaint allowed; decision quashed; downgrading; serious misconduct

Consideration 7


Contemporaneous documents are often more reliable than subsequent oral testimony.


evidence; testimony

Consideration 13


The disciplinary proceedings were initiated before the appraisal period concluded. In Judgment 3224 the Tribunal said at consideration 7 that an organisation cannot base an adverse decision on a staff memberís unsatisfactory performance if it has not complied with the rules governing the evaluation of that performance. The decision to commence disciplinary proceedings can, for the purposes of the application of this principle, be characterised as an adverse decision. Even if the EPO believed that nothing was going to change, in terms of the complainantís conduct, between the time the disciplinary proceedings were commenced and the conclusion of the appraisal period a little over a month later, it was nonetheless obliged to complete the assessment of the complainantís performance in accordance with Circular No. 366 before initiating the disciplinary proceedings.


due process; organisation's duties; patere legem; work appraisal; unsatisfactory service; disciplinary procedure; performance evaluation

Consideration 14


It is unnecessary to hold an oral hearing as requested by the complainant. The written material provided by the parties has been sufficient to enable the Tribunal to resolve this complaint without such a hearing.


oral proceedings

Consideration 15


The complainant sought moral damages by way of relief but advanced no evidence, or even argument, to support this claim.


moral injury; evidence

Last updated: 22.06.2020 ^ top