Study highlights forced labour amongst migrant domestic workers in Southeast Asia
Survey by International Labour Organization (ILO) of migrant domestic workers in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand points to poor working conditions, yet also highlights the skilled nature of domestic work.
BANGKOK, Thailand (ILO News) - Denial of labour and social protection rights to migrant domestic workers is leading to exploitation and forced labour in key Southeast Asian employment markets according to a new report issued by the International Labour Organization (ILO). Findings also highlight the skills required for work carried out by domestic workers and calls for this to be recognized in pay and regulated hours, like any other job.
The study is based on interviews with 1,201 domestic workers between July and September 2022 in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Findings indicate that 29 per cent of surveyed migrant domestic workers in Malaysia were in conditions meeting the ILO’s statistical definition of forced labour; as were 7 per cent of surveyed workers in Singapore and 4 per cent in Thailand. Indicators of involuntariness include not being able to quit your job, having to stay in the job longer than agreed, and being made to work without overtime pay, among others.
“Domestic work is one of the most important tasks in our society, and yet provided with the least protection. This can no longer be accepted,” said Anna Engblom, Chief Technical Adviser of ILO’s TRIANGLE in ASEAN programme which produced the study.
The study challenges the narrative that domestic work is unskilled or low skilled. Domestic workers were found to be regularly doing medium-skilled tasks, especially when providing care work. These were classified as International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) Skills Level 2 which require more technical skills and good transversal skills including communication and the ability to speak the local language. However, these skill levels are neither recognized in domestic workers’ pay nor other working conditions.
“Domestic workers need to be recognized as the skilled employees that they are in terms of pay and employment conditions. The skilled nature of their work should also be reflected in migration pathways. All too often migrant domestic workers are locked into restrictive employment patterns. By allowing them the opportunities to change employers or negotiate better working conditions, as other skilled migrants can, they would be far less likely to suffer exploitation,” Ms Engblom added.
Recommendations made by the study include the ratification and implementation of ILO’s Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 (No. 189), Forced Labour Convention, 1929 (No. 29), and the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 to ensure that domestic workers enjoy rights at least equal to those of other workers, in law and in practice. Instances of forced labour should result in criminal charges and policies changed to prevent its occurrence. Skills recognition opportunities for domestic workers should also be explored and migration pathways should be appropriately flexible, accessible and rights-based.
