1. Representation alleging non-observance by France of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.342/INS/9/1, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.

(GB.342/INS/9/1, paragraph 5)

2. Representation alleging non-observance by Peru of the Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100), the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111), the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102), and the Maternity Protection Convention, 2000 (No. 183)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.342/INS/9/2, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.

(GB.342/INS/9/2, paragraph 5)

3. Representation alleging non-observance by Sudan of the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.342/INS/9/3, and taking into consideration the recommendations of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and that it would be examined by the tripartite committee set up to examine it.

(GB.342/INS/9/3, paragraph 5)

4. Representation alleging non-observance by Colombia of the Maternity Protection Convention, 1919 (No. 3), the Workmen's Compensation (Agriculture) Convention, 1921 (No. 12), the Workmen's Compensation (Accidents) Convention, 1925 (No. 17), the Workmen's Compensation (Occupational Diseases) Convention, 1925 (No. 18), the Sickness Insurance (Industry) Convention, 1927 (No. 24), the Sickness Insurance (Agriculture) Convention, 1927 (No. 25), and the Tripartite Consultation (International Labour Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 144)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.342/INS/9/4, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.

(GB.342/INS/9/4, paragraph 5)

5. Representation alleging non-observance by France of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.342/INS/9/5, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and, as it relates to a Convention dealing with trade union rights, to refer it to the Committee on Freedom of Association for examination in accordance with articles 24 and 25 of the Constitution of the ILO.

(GB.342/INS/9/5, paragraph 5)

6. Two representations alleging non-observance by Argentina of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98), the Labour Relations (Public Service) Convention, 1978 (No. 151), and the Collective Bargaining Convention, 1981 (No. 154)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.342/INS/9/6, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representations were receivable and, as they relate to Conventions dealing with trade union rights, to transmit the representations to the Committee on Freedom of Association for examination as per the procedures set out in the Standing Orders on articles 24 and 25 of the Constitution of the ILO.

(GB.342/INS/9/6, paragraph 7)