Purport (625,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Purport
Total judgments found: 23

< previous | 1, 2

• Judgment 1223

  
  74th Session, 1993
  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations 33 to 36

  Extract:

  The complainant, a Eurocontrol official, is challenging the rejection of his application to a post of head of division and the appointment of an external candidate to that post on the grounds that the decision was not substantiated. "Mutual trust between organisation and staff requires that in such circumstances the applicants should be properly informed of the decision and of the reasons for it. of course the content of the obligation [...] will depend on the sort of decision that has been taken. [...] The principle holds good: the organisation has a duty to state the reasons for the decision, that being an essential condition for proper defence of the official's rights. The staff member is therefore entitled to be given any information necessary for that purpose."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 1016
  

  Keywords:

  competition; decision; duty to inform; duty to substantiate decision; organisation's duties; promotion; purport; purpose; refusal; right to reply;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 635

  
  54th Session, 1984
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 6

  Extract:

  According to the material provisions of the Staff Regulations, staff members must exercise the utmost discretion in all matters of official business. The dispute between the complainant and the organization did not concern official matters. "The staff member believed, rightly or wrongly, that she had suffered injustice and she was not bound to absolute secrecy. In any case fellow staff and her family and friends outside the FAO must have known she had been suspended from duty."

  Keywords:

  disciplinary measure; duty of discretion; purport;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 570

  
  51st Session, 1983
  European Southern Observatory
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 8(1)

  Extract:

  "A review is normally confined to the facts in the dossier of the case whose judgment is being submitted for review. It is useless for the applicant to refer to facts outside the dossier unless he introduces them specially as new facts and justifies their introduction accordingly."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 507, 508
  

  Keywords:

  application for review; purport;
  

< previous | 1, 2