|
|
 |
|
|
Rating (288,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Rating
Total judgments found: 54
< previous | 1, 2, 3
Judgment 1144
72nd Session, 1992
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 4-6
Extract:
The complainant, who has objections to his performance report, contends that the EPO's reporting system does not treat all officials on the same basis inasmuch as one group of officials may complete a shortened report and because the system is in breach of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which says that everyone shall be entitled to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal. But the Tribunal considers that "the complainant has not shown that he himself has been adversely affected because staff who belong to another category have [the aforementioned] option." Moreover, "the Convention puts obligations on signatory States, and it is not apparent that it is applicable [...]. At all events, even supposing that the Convention as such was applicable, the Tribunal's answer to the plea would be that the principles underlying Article 6 are fully recognised in the Service Regulations".
Keywords:
enforcement; equal treatment; international instrument; lack of injury; performance report; rating; right to reply;
Judgment 920
65th Session, 1988
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 5
Extract:
"It is clear form the evidence before the Tribunal that the complainant's objections to the report are unfounded. He knew already, because [his supervisor] had often told him, that his performance was considered poor. The period covered by the report was not too short because the minimum period a report may cover is three months."
Keywords:
performance report; period; rating; rebuttal; unsatisfactory service;
Judgment 880
64th Session, 1988
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
The complainant objected to being given a general rating couched in the form "3, albeit inclining to 2". The Tribunal considers that: "reporting officers may not, to suit themselves, make up vague in-between ratings of their own but must put against each head of assessment one of the marks on the scale. If they do want to qualify it the proper way is to add comments."
Keywords:
rating; work appraisal;
Judgment 723
58th Session, 1986
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
"The Director-General's implied endorsement of the performance report, his postponement of the increment and the transfer are all discretionary decisions and, moreover, ones that fall within an area in which the Tribunal will not ordinarily interfere."
Keywords:
discretion; increment withheld; judicial review; performance report; rating; transfer; unsatisfactory service;
Judgment 438
45th Session, 1980
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 2 and 10
Extract:
The determination of an assessment falls within the discretionary authority of the Director of the organisation. The Tribunal may not substitute its own assessment for the decision taken by the Director in the exercise of his discretion.
Keywords:
competence of tribunal; discretion; judicial review; rating; work appraisal;
Judgment 352
41st Session, 1978
International Patent Institute
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 5
Extract:
"In exercising his authority the Director-General is not bound by the recommendations of the advisory bodies. He is indeed quite free to determine the general assessment in the light of the whole file and even to alter the assessments agreed on by the official's own supervisors. The bodies which advise the Director-General therefore enjoy just as much freedom as he to assess the official's performance. [...] It is therefore open to them, if they wish, to dissent from an opinion shared by [the supervisors]."
Keywords:
advisory body; advisory opinion; binding character; discretion; executive head; performance report; rating; supervisor; work appraisal;
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The impugned decision, which relates to the assessment of an official's performance, is of a discretionary nature. Hence the Tribunal may quash it only if [...]."
Keywords:
discretion; judicial review; rating; work appraisal;
Judgment 300
38th Session, 1977
International Patent Institute
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
"It is true that marking may partly depend on subjective factors which have little or nothing to do with actual performance, but the complainants have not shown that they suffered on that account."
Keywords:
bias; burden of proof; discretion; judicial review; lack of evidence; rating; work appraisal;
Judgment 283
37th Session, 1976
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
"[T]he Tribunal must determine whether the performance report given to the complainant was in all respects properly established, but it may not substitute its own opinion for that of the administration on the quality of the staff member's performance nor exercise any power of review over the administration's assessment."
Keywords:
discretion; judicial review; rating; work appraisal;
Judgment 282
37th Session, 1976
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
"A clear distinction must be drawn between the quality of a staff member's work, as reflected in such things as performance reports and promotion, and specific facts or a general attitude at variance with his duties as a staff member and warranting disciplinary action."
Keywords:
conduct; elements; fitness for international civil service; promotion; rating; staff member's duties; work appraisal;
Judgment 232
32nd Session, 1974
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
As with any appraisal by the Director-General of an official's performance, the tribunal may "interfere with the impugned decision only if it was taken without authority, is irregular in form or tainted by procedural irregularities or by illegality, or is based on incorrect facts, or if essential facts have not been taken into consideration, or, again, if conclusions which are clearly false have been drawn from the documents in the dossier, or finally, if authority has been exercised for purposes foreign to the organization's interests."
Keywords:
discretion; judicial review; performance report; rating; rebuttal; work appraisal;
Judgment 197
29th Session, 1972
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
Reports on each staff member must be made in the first place by his immediate supervisor, who is the best qualified to make an appraisal. This principle cannot be applied "in some units which, because of their nature, activities or the very form of their organization, a small number of officials are associated in a specific common task. It may be conducive to the efficiency of such units for the chief to report directly on all the staff members with whom he is in close and continuous collaboration in the exercise of their duties."
Keywords:
competence; probation report; probationary period; rating; supervisor; work appraisal;
Judgment 188
28th Session, 1972
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
The complainant maintains that she "suffered from the prejudice of one of her supervisors [...] The Appeals Board dismissed the charge of prejudice, however, and the Advisory Board recommended upholding the performance reports complained of. In these circumstances there are no grounds for holding that the Director-General's decision taken in the light of the reports in question was based on incorrect facts."
Keywords:
bias; performance report; rating; supervisor; unsatisfactory service; work appraisal;
Consideration 2
Extract:
"The Director-General's decision to maintain the complainant's performance reports and temporarily to withhold her salary increment lies within his discretion."
Keywords:
discretion; increment withheld; judicial review; rating; unsatisfactory service; work appraisal;
Judgment 155
24th Session, 1970
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
"[I]t does not fall to the Administrative Tribunal to order any alteration of a report made on an official of the organization by the competent authorities or the withdrawal from the dossier of any part of such report."
Keywords:
application for quashing; competence of tribunal; judicial review; performance report; personal file; rating; work appraisal;
Judgment 33
7th Session, 1958
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
"While it has not been proved that performance reports should have been drawn up in connection with the complainant's participation in a competition, such performance reports should have been drawn up in any case once in each calendar year [...]. The absence of performance reports for the [material] year is a breach of [the Staff Rules] and may have been prejudicial to the complainant."
Keywords:
breach; injury; omission; performance report; provision; rating; staff regulations and rules;
< previous | 1, 2, 3
|
|
|
|
|
