|
|
 |
|
|
Step (266, 267,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Step
Total judgments found: 29
< previous | 1, 2
Judgment 755
59th Session, 1986
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The distinction between the reckoning for starting step and the reckoning for promotion is plain from the actual wording of the rules. The distinction warrants different treatment, and there is no breach of the principle of equality where the treatment is a fair, reasonable and logical outcome of circumstantial differences."
Keywords:
appointment; difference; equal treatment; professional experience; promotion; reckoning; seniority; step;
Judgment 739
58th Session, 1986
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
In 1984, after the President of the Office adopted new rules to take account of the Tribunal's case law, the complainant was awarded a further step in his grade and additional seniority. He is asking that the impugned decision take effect not as from 1 January 1984 as called for by the new rules but as from 1 June 1982, the date when he took up his appointment. The plea fails. The Tribunal observes that, far from discriminating, the impugned decision corrects an existing element of inequality and if there remains inequality it is due to the terms of the complainant's appointment, which were not challenged within the prescribed time limits.
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; appointment; date; effective date; enforcement; equal treatment; grade; professional experience; provision; reckoning; seniority; step;
Judgment 657
55th Session, 1985
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
The wording of the relevant guidelines "is such that they cannot be treated as a mere statement of policy: they set objective criteria for dealing with individual cases."
Keywords:
administrative instruction; appointment; binding character; criteria; general decision; grade; promotion; step;
Judgment 572
51st Session, 1983
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 1
Extract:
"While [the system] gives the President a discretionary power [with respect to the calculation of seniority], it is not disputed that the rules themselves and the decisions made thereunder must conform with the principle of equality of treatment."
Keywords:
discretion; equal treatment; limits; professional experience; reckoning; seniority; step;
Judgment 294
38th Session, 1977
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 1
Extract:
"[A]n officer whose increment was withheld otherwise than on the grounds of unsatisfactory service would be recognised as having cause for complaint. [...] In fact, the increment is simply a way of rewarding seniority and the accumulated experience that goes with it, and the number of an officer's step is simply a convenient way of describing the salary level to which he has attained.
Keywords:
grounds; increment withheld; purpose; salary; step;
Consideration 1
Extract:
"While grades are distinguishable from one another by a difference in the nature of the duties performed and in the degree of responsibility undertaken, steps within grades are not similarly distinguishable. In fact, the increment is simply a way of rewarding seniority and [...] experience [...]."
Keywords:
difference; grade; purpose; step;
Judgment 284
37th Session, 1976
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
"In such circumstances the principle which the Tribunal applies is that it will not interfere, except upon particular and limited grounds such as prejudice or incorrect appreciation of facts or formal or procedural irregularity, with decisions of the Director-General."
Keywords:
discretion; increment withheld; judicial review; salary; step;
Judgment 233
32nd Session, 1974
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
The purpose of the applicable provision is to ensure that on promotion to a higher grade the staff member receives an increase in salary of a certain amount. "The minimum is fixed as the amount he or she would have received if the promotion, instead of being to a higher grade, had been to the next highest step in the old grade. The language of the rule assumes that there will be a step in the new grade which will carry with it a salary high enough for this purpose."
Keywords:
consequence; grade; increase; promotion; right; salary; step;
Judgment 183
27th Session, 1971
World Meteorological Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations
Extract:
"It is not established that the assessments in the performance report of the complainant's attitude to her work were influenced by the fact that she had prolonged absences on sick leave. It was on the basis of these assessments, and not because of the sick leave, which he expressly disregarded, that the Secretary-General took his decision. There are no grounds on which the Tribunal can interfere with it."
Keywords:
bias; increment withheld; salary; sick leave; step; work appraisal;
Judgment 149
23rd Session, 1970
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
The appeals body which heard the persons closely concerned with the appeal, found that the increase had been withheld out of personal prejudice. Under the applicable provision, the body was competent "to find the existence of prejudice. the Director-General therefore committed an error of law in stating [...] that he could not endorse the recommendation of the Appeals Committee on this point simply on the ground that the committee was not competent to make such a recommendation."
Keywords:
bias; competence; decision; enforcement; executive head; flaw; grounds; increment withheld; internal appeals body; recommendation; refusal; report; salary; step;
< previous | 1, 2
|
|
|
|
|
