Adversarial proceedings (183, 184,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Adversarial proceedings
Total judgments found: 86

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

• Judgment 162

  
  24th Session, 1970
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 3

  Extract:

  "The procedure laid down for the purpose of enabling an official to defend himself against the charges against him [written notification of charges, time limit for reply] is inappropriate once the person concerned has admitted those charges. The safeguard provided by [the rule] has become pointless in the present case, since the complainant has admitted his misconduct in statements which the Tribunal has found to be true."

  Keywords:

  adversarial proceedings; due process; evidence; misconduct; purpose; right to reply; safeguard; termination of employment;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 161

  
  24th Session, 1970
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 3

  Extract:

  Vide Judgment 162, consideration 3.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 162
  

  Keywords:

  adversarial proceedings; due process; evidence; purpose; right to reply; safeguard; serious misconduct; termination of employment;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 160

  
  24th Session, 1970
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 4

  Extract:

  Vide Judgment 162, consideration 3.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 162
  

  Keywords:

  adversarial proceedings; due process; evidence; purpose; right to reply; safeguard; serious misconduct; termination of employment;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 159

  
  24th Session, 1970
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 3

  Extract:

  Vide Judgment 162, consideration 3.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 162
  

  Keywords:

  adversarial proceedings; due process; evidence; purpose; right to reply; safeguard; serious misconduct; termination of employment;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 87

  
  15th Session, 1965
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 1

  Extract:

  "The complainant's counsel, after the close of the last public hearing, submitted ten documents which had not been communicated to the agent of the organization and upon which he therefore had no opportunity to comment. In conformity with the principle that each party shall be fully heard on all the evidence admitted, these documents were excluded from the dossier on which the Tribunal took its decision."

  Keywords:

  adversarial proceedings; closure of written proceedings; disclosure of evidence; receivability of the complaint; refusal; time limit; tribunal;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 82

  
  14th Session, 1965
  International Telecommunication Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 4

  Extract:

  The interveners submitted a document on 2 April. On 10 April the judgment was delivered, after the public hearing of 6 April. Applications to intervene may be made at any stage; "that does not necessarily mean that interveners are entitled to invoke up to the day of the proceedings any facts, evidence and new documents. [The material document] deals solely with points of law and raises no new points. Consequently [...] the organisation, [which] learned of this legal opinion three days before the oral proceedings began, has been able usefully to discuss the arguments and the conclusions. The [adversarial] procedure has thus been [followed]".

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 61
  

  Keywords:

  adversarial proceedings; disclosure of evidence; intervention; oral proceedings; receivability of the complaint; time limit;
  

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5