Judgment 402
43rd Session, 1980
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
"In some employments there are unavoidable risks. [...] The question in each case is whether the risk is abnormal having regard to the nature of the employment. In a case such as the present a reasonable test (though this is only one possible criterion) might be to consider whether an insurance company could, because of the civil war [...] properly demand an additional premium for cover against the risk of injury [...]. If so, the risk would be abnormal."
Keywords:
duty station; health insurance; insurance; special hazard; working conditions;
Consideration 2
Extract:
An abnormal risk "might be quite a sensible risk for a man to take who had a sufficient motive for taking it. But an employee is not obliged to run abnormal risks for the benefit of his employer, at any rate unless he is given insurance cover."
Keywords:
insurance; organisation's interest; special hazard; staff member's duties;
Consideration 2
Extract:
"The employee does not have to show that he was being asked to do something foolhardy. It is unnecessary [...] to suggest [...] that the order to return to [the duty station] was irresponsible. It was not, except in the sense that it may be irresponsible to require a staff member to return to a high risk area without offering him full insurance cover. Certainly, it might be said to be irresponsible for a man with dependants [...] to go [...] without full insurance cover."
Keywords:
complainant; duty station; insurance; liability; organisation; special hazard;
Consideration 2
Extract:
If an employer has failed to exercise due skill and care in arriving at a judgment on the safety of the place of work, the employee is entitled to compensation in full against the consequences of the misjudgment. "This principle is to be applied with due regard to the nature of the employment. In some employments there are unavoidable risks. A doctor may have to risk infection and a soldier or a policeman to risk bombs. The question in each case is whether the risk is abnormal having regard to the nature of the employment."
Keywords:
damages; duty station; negligence; organisation; right; special hazard;
Consideration 1
Extract:
"If there is doubt about the safety of a place of work, it is the duty of the employer to make the necessary inquiries and to arrive at a reasonable and careful judgement [...]. If [the employee] accepts the order, as prima facie he is bound to do, and the employer has failed to exercise due skill and care in arriving at his judgment, the employee is, subject to any contrary provision in the contract, entitled to be indemnified in full against the consequences of the misjudgment."
Keywords:
acceptance; assignment; damages; duty station; inquiry; investigation; negligence; organisation; organisation's duties; right; special hazard;