Early retirement (388,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Early retirement
Total judgments found: 6

• Judgment 3658

  
  122nd Session, 2016
  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant challenges the amount of the transitional allowance paid to him following his admission to the early termination of service scheme.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  allowance; complaint allowed; decision quashed; early retirement;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 3573

  
  121st Session, 2016
  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: After taking early retirement, the complainant refused to return his special identity card and the special registration plates of his vehicle.

  Judgment keywords

  Keywords:

  complaint dismissed; early retirement; privileges and immunities; right;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 1232

  
  74th Session, 1993
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 4

  Extract:

  Having been held in his home country against his wishes, the complainant applied, under duress, for early retirement, and the authorities of his country forwarded his application to the organization. "As soon as he was able to show that he had acted under duress UNESCO had the duty, according to the general principles that guarantee the independence of international civil servants, to grant relief. Such independence means that a staff member may not be put on early retirement where a member State has ordered him to apply for it."

  Keywords:

  burden of proof; early retirement; independence; international civil service principles; lack of consent; member state; official; organisation; organisation's duties; request by a party;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 1054

  
  69th Session, 1990
  European Organization for Nuclear Research
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 21

  Extract:

  "The staff member needs to know the grounds for the decision* so that he can defend his rights and interests [...]. What is more, the reasons need to be known for the purposes of judicial review".
  *The decision in question is the rejection of the complainants' applications for "early departure".

  Keywords:

  duty to substantiate decision; early retirement; grounds; judicial review; purpose; refusal; retirement;
  

  Consideration 23

  Extract:

  "In these cases the burden of CERN's obligation was at its lightest since the benefits [the complainants were denied] of early departure were conferred ex gratia and the purpose of the scheme was to meet a need for structural reform which the organization is the sole judge of. Yet it did not discharge even that minimal obligation. And its omission is compounded by its failure to keep its explicit promise to give every unsuccessful applicant a written explanation".

  Keywords:

  duty to substantiate decision; early retirement; grounds; material damages; promise; refusal;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 1004

  
  68th Session, 1990
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Summary

  Extract:

  In accordance with Circular No. 380 (Series 6) of 3 March 1987, the complainant, who had taken early retirement, was reappointed under a short-term contract. The decision he impugns is one denying him the right to enter internal competitions on the grounds that he had not yet acquired two years' continuous service since his reappointment. The Tribunal holds that the decision was in keeping with Article 4.11 of the Staff Regulations which says that "a former official, on reappointment, shall be regarded for the purpose of these Regulations, as becoming an official for the first time". The complaint is dismissed.

  Reference(s)

  Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 4.11 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS; CIRCULAR 380 (SERIES 6) OF 3 MARCH 1987
  
  

  Keywords:

  appointment; candidate; competition; condition; consequence; early retirement; internal competition; refusal; retirement;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 653

  
  55th Session, 1985
  European Patent Organisation
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 7

  Extract:

  The organisation introduced incentives for certain officials willing to accept early retirement at age 60. The Tribunal notes that it was the complainant's own choice not to leave at 60 and that he later requested early retirement at the age of 62 1/2. The Tribunal concludes that it was national law which induced him not to retire at 60. The organisation cannot be held liable on that account. The complainant is not entitled to special benefits.

  Keywords:

  early retirement; retirement;