|
|
|
|
Staff assessment (375,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Staff assessment
Total judgments found: 5
Judgment 4633
135th Session, 2023
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to impose on him the sanction of demotion.
Judgment keywords
Keywords:
case sent back to organisation; complaint allowed; disciplinary measure; staff assessment; standard of proof;
Judgment 2982
110th Session, 2011
International Organization for Migration
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 10
Extract:
Replacement of a staff member in circumstances constituting harassment. "The Tribunal has consistently held [...] that an organisation 'cannot base an adverse decision on a staff member's unsatisfactory performance if it has not complied with the rules established to evaluate that performance' (see Judgment 2916, under 4). It is also well established that an organisation 'owes it to its employees, especially probationers, to guide them in the performance of their duties and to warn them in specific terms if they are not giving satisfaction and are in risk of dismissal' (see Judgment 2732, under 16)."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2732, 2916
Keywords:
decision; organisation's duties; probationary period; staff assessment; staff regulations and rules; unsatisfactory service; warning; work appraisal;
Judgment 2032
90th Session, 2001
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 16
Extract:
"One of the purposes of staff assessment is surely to put the organisation in funds to protect its employees against States which refuse to recognise their tax-exempt status."
Keywords:
member state; official; privileges and immunities; purpose; refund; refusal; salary; staff assessment; tax;
Judgment 1225
74th Session, 1993
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Considerations 4-5
Extract:
The complainant seeks the refund of sums withheld from his pay as staff assessment. He submits that the FAO was applying a system of taxation at source without providing any service in return. The Tribunal holds that all that matters is whether the organization's subsequent refusal to refund the amounts withheld from his pay was lawful. "The levy of staff assessment on the complainant was initially lawful and equitable. If for any reason it had not been levied the basic objective of equality between him and other staff in like case would have been defeated."
Keywords:
equal treatment; equity; staff assessment;
Judgment 426
45th Session, 1980
Pan American Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The pension is not of course subject to a staff assessment(*), neither is it under the Convention [on the privileges and immunities of specialised agencies] exempted from national taxes." (*) which is deducted from pay in lieu of tax
Keywords:
pension; staff assessment; tax;
|
|
|
|
|