Formal demand for payment (126,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Formal demand for payment
Total judgments found: 6

• Judgment 3419

  
  119th Session, 2015
  World Intellectual Property Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The Tribunal found that the complainant was entitled to moral damages for identified errors of the Administration.

  Consideration 7

  Extract:

  To the extent that the complainant seeks compensation in excess of the 50,000 Swiss francs requested in the internal appeal, it will not be considered in the absence of any justification for the increase.

  Keywords:

  formal demand for payment; moral injury;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 3152

  
  114th Session, 2013
  International Fund for Agricultural Development
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
  Summary: The complainant applies for execution of Judgments 2867 and 3003.

  Consideration 26

  Extract:

  "The Tribunal, which has the power to take such measures as may be necessary to ensure that its judgments are executed, may, if it considers it appropriate, order the payment of a penalty for default (see, for example, Judgments 1620, under 10, or 2806, under 11). In the present case, the patent lack of goodwill demonstrated by [the organisation] to date with regard to honouring its obligation to pay the awards made against it justifies the imposition of a penalty, as requested by the complainant, of 25,000 euros for each month's delay in the settlement of the awards made in this judgment."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 1620, 2806
  

  Keywords:

  application for execution; continuing breach; delay; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; iloat; judgment of the tribunal; organisation's duties;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 1338

  
  77th Session, 1994
  World Health Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations 11-12

  Extract:

  "An organisation must, where a specific sum has been awarded [by the Tribunal], pay compensation if it takes more than one month to pay after the judgment was notified, save that if, as in Judgment 1219, the Tribunal does not put a figure on the amount due, the need to work out the figure warrants allowing additional time. In this instance [...] apart from alleging the need for consultations the Organization has offered no explanation for the delay in payment. The Tribunal therefore awards the complainant payment of interest".

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 1219
  

  Keywords:

  administrative delay; amount; application for execution; delay; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; organisation's duties; payment; penalty for delay; res judicata; time limit;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 874

  
  63rd Session, 1987
  International Labour Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 3

  Extract:

  "Save where there is express provision in a clause of a contract or in some general text, interest will not be payable until a formal demand for payment of the principal has been made. The demand may be addressed directly by the creditor to the debtor, or it may be implicit in an application for a court order."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 792
  

  Keywords:

  date; formal demand for payment; interest on damages;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 706

  
  57th Session, 1985
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 10

  Extract:

  "The complainant is also entitled to interest at 10 per cent a year on the sums due under this judgment from 3 May 1984, the date on which he asked UNESCO to execute Judgment 607 and from which there was a demand to pay."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 607
  

  Keywords:

  amount; application for execution; date; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; payment; penalty for delay;
  

  Consideration 10

  Extract:

  The organization failed to give proper effect to Judgment 607. The complainant wins his case. He is entitled to interest on the amounts due him from the date on which he asked UNESCO to execute Judgment 607 and from which there was a demand to pay.

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 607
  

  Keywords:

  date; delay in payment; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; payment; penalty for delay;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 553

  
  50th Session, 1983
  World Tourism Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 1

  Extract:

  "The Tribunal's judgments have the authority of res judicata. An [...] organisation [...] is therefore bound [...] first and foremost to take whatever action the judgment may require. That the judgment must be both respected and executed are thus principles which are beyond dispute, and they apply, in particular, where the organisation is ordered to pay a sum of money. The debtor's obligation to pay must as a rule be discharged immediately unless the judgment states that the sum shall be payable only at some later date."

  Reference(s)

  ILOAT Judgment(s): 463
  

  Keywords:

  execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; judgment of the tribunal; organisation's duties; res judicata; time limit;