Injury (46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Injury
Total judgments found: 183
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 | next >
Judgment 1043
69th Session, 1990
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
The complainant submitted an application for execution of Judgment 922 that set aside the decision to dismiss him. The UPU subsequently notified the Tribunal that it had reversed the decision and would offer the complainant compensation. The Tribunal took note of the Union's undertaking and awarded him 10,000 Swiss francs in damages for all the forms of injury he sustained and 1,000 francs towards costs.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 922
Keywords:
application for execution; case pending; cause of action; costs; injury; material damages; moral injury; no cause of action; settlement out of court;
Judgment 999
68th Session, 1990
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
"Since the breach of due process in the internal appeal proceedings has held up the final determination of the matter and caused the complainant injury whatever the outcome may eventually be, the Tribunal orders the Organization to pay him lump-sum damages in the amount of 500 United States dollars."
Keywords:
administrative delay; amount; injury; judgment of the tribunal; material damages; moral injury; procedural flaw;
Judgment 990
68th Session, 1990
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
"Having put the scale of pensionable remuneration into its own Staff Regulations, the ILO has a duty to ensure the payment of the corresponding benefits. The sole purpose of pensionable remuneration is the reckoning of the pension, and if the pension discounts the scale in the Staff Regulations because the organisation has entrusted the matter to another body, the ILO must make good the loss to its staff, who are entitled to have the regulations applied. Any difference of opinion there may be between the ILO and the fund is of no concern to the staff."
Keywords:
compensation; enforcement; injury; organisation's duties; pension; pensionable remuneration; staff regulations and rules; unjspf;
Judgment 986
67th Session, 1989
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 24
Extract:
Though the Tribunal "has held that the new scale [of pensionable remuneration] impairs the complainants' rights, it cannot now set the amount of their entitlements." Its ruling will therefore be one of principle.
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; amount; injury; material damages; pension; pensionable remuneration; reduction of salary; scale;
Judgment 958
66th Session, 1989
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 17
Extract:
"Unless there is express derogation the rule is that the organisation need not, if that is not its practice, state the reasons for all its decisions: what matters is that the absence of a statement should not be to the staff member's detriment."
Keywords:
appointment; candidate; duty to substantiate decision; injury; lack of injury; selection board;
Judgment 939
65th Session, 1988
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary
Extract:
The complainant was transferred without prior consultation of the Selection Board as required under Article 4.2(f) of the Staff Regulations. The Tribunal holds that the breach of procedure was minor, though it did cause the complainant injury. The Tribunal will therefore refrain from quashing the impugned decision and will order the organisation to pay the complainant damages and a further sum towards costs.
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 4.2 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
Keywords:
consultation; costs; flaw; injury; material damages; organisation's duties; procedural flaw; selection board; transfer;
Judgment 907
64th Session, 1988
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 9
Extract:
The complainant "is not entitled to damages for his wife's loss of salary and pension rights. Even if proven, the injury would not be directly attributable to the unlawful decisions."
Keywords:
compensation; consequence; decision; injury; material damages; moral injury; termination of employment;
Judgment 890
64th Session, 1988
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
The complainant's appointment was confirmed only after an extension of his probation. Because he was not notified in time of the decision to extend the probationary period, the complainant seeks to have it set aside. "Where it finds a formal flaw, the Tribunal will determine whether it taints the essence of the decision. [...] Late communication therefore will not make the decision unlawful unless the probationer suffers injury. The complainant did not."
Keywords:
administrative delay; date; extension of contract; flaw; formal flaw; injury; lack of injury; probation report; probationary period; right to reply;
Judgment 874
63rd Session, 1987
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"A debt of moneys is to be discharged by the date of payment stipulated either in the contract or by some general provision. Where payment is late, the rule is that there shall be a compensatory award of interest, the amount being set without making the creditor show specific injury."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 792
Keywords:
administrative delay; amount; date; delay in payment; execution of judgment; injury; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; payment;
Judgment 862
63rd Session, 1987
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 10
Extract:
Article 3.1.1.2 of the ILO Staff Regulations provides for periodic adjustments to pensionable remuneration. The application of this regulation was suspended effective 1 April 1985. The complainants argue that the absence of an adjustment on 1 April 1986 breaches their acquired rights. "The complainants say they cannot put a figure on the loss sustained but they submit a table showing losses that range from 13 to 39 per cent according to grade. The table does not distinguish between loss due to the measures of which the Tribunal was informed in the earlier proceedings - and which it declared lawful - and loss alleged to be due to the failure to revise the scale on 1 April 1986. So in any event the Tribunal cannot but endorse its ruling in Judgment 832 under 16." The complaints are dismissed.
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 3.1.1.2 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
ILOAT Judgment(s): 832
Keywords:
acquired right; adjustment; amount; breach; date; difference; enforcement; grade; injury; pension; pension entitlements; pensionable remuneration; provision; reckoning; res judicata; staff regulations and rules; subsidiary; suspensive action;
Judgment 832
62nd Session, 1987
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 7
Extract:
As a result of the adoption of a new scale of pensionable remuneration, Article 3.1.1 of the ILO Staff Regulations was amended. "The complainants' case does not rest on breach of any term of their contracts or of any provision of the Staff Regulations. What they are saying is that as applied to them Article 3.1.1 of the Regulations impairs their acquired rights. Their complaints will therefore be receivable if the application of 3.1.1 does cause them injury."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 3.1.1 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
Keywords:
amendment to the rules; cause of action; competence of tribunal; condition; enforcement; general decision; individual decision; injury; pension; pensionable remuneration; provision; receivability of the complaint; scale; staff regulations and rules;
Judgment 764
59th Session, 1986
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
"A decision by an international organisation is challengeable before the Tribunal only if it causes the complainant injury. One that has no effect on his position is not, for example an act which is not operative but a mere declaration of intent."
Keywords:
cause of action; complaint; injury; lack of injury; no cause of action; receivability of the complaint; statement of intent;
Judgment 732
58th Session, 1986
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
The complaint "would succeed only if the complainant had suffered injury and established a sufficient causal link between the organization's act and the injury. The conditions are not fulfilled. First, the injury to the complainant's credit is not proven. [...] Secondly, there is no sufficient causal link between the organization's act and the alleged injury."
Keywords:
cause; injury; lack of evidence; material injury; moral injury; organisation;
Consideration 2
Extract:
"This complaint is not about execution as such but about the allegedly harmful consequences of the way in which the FAO executed Judgment 620. That is not a matter that is ordinarily connected with execution and it is therefore one that must go through the internal appeal procedure before it can come to the Tribunal."
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 297, 620
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint; consequence; execution of judgment; injury; internal remedies exhausted; judgment of the tribunal; new claim; receivability of the complaint;
Judgment 724
58th Session, 1986
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 6
Extract:
"The procedure relating to Mr. V.'s first report lasted from 10 September 1980 until 7 June 1983, when the President went back on his decision to approve it. that was far too long. [...] For these reasons, and also in view of his age and record, the Tribunal will award him moral damages".
Keywords:
administrative delay; injury; moral injury; performance report;
Judgment 642
54th Session, 1984
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
The Tribunal held that the certificate provided did not include all the information required by the Staff Regulations. "The complainant's argument is that prospective employers were unable to assess fully the merit of her applications [...] The argument would succeed if the complainant's allegations were not unsupported. Although she need not offer formal proof, she ought to indicate what organisations and companies she approached and how they responded. [...] The complainant must establish injury, and she has failed to do so."
Keywords:
certificate of service; formal requirements; injury; lack of evidence;
Consideration 3
Extract:
"Fault may engage liability, but need not do so: it must also be the direct cause of injury."
Keywords:
cause; condition; injury; liability; misconduct;
Judgment 630
54th Session, 1984
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 3
Extract:
"The complainant argues that the unfair treatment lies in her being kept idle for so long. Accordingly the time limit for filing an appeal did not begin on the date on which her supervisor decided, while keeping her on her post, to give her no more work: the injury occurred only with the passage of time. Thus, although it was only after being kept idle for a considerable lapse of time that the complainant appealed to the Director-General, and then to the Tribunal, for compensation for the injury she alleged, her claims are not time-barred and her complaint is receivable."
Keywords:
compensation; complaint; date; executive head; iloat; injury; internal appeal; period; post; receivability of the complaint; refusal to assign work; request by a party; start of time limit; supervisor; time bar;
Judgment 621
53rd Session, 1984
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 4
Extract:
The Tribunal holds that a contract was concluded. Only the letter of appointment, a formality not requiring further agreement, was lacking. Owing to withdrawal of support from a third party, no action was taken, the project having been suspended. On the evidence, the Tribunal awards the complainant "damages for the direct injury caused by the administration's behaviour."
Keywords:
contract; injury; moral injury; offer; offer withdrawn;
Judgment 620
53rd Session, 1984
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 2
Extract:
The complainant suffers from angina pectoris; he did not receive regular medical examinations. The organization's breach of its duty deprived him of an opportunity to take precautions against an illness which has impaired his work capacity. The complainant is entitled to damages. "The award cannot be the full amount which would have been due had [the illness] been attributable beyond peradventure to the performance of official duties. But the FAO is liable in damages for injury the complainant may have suffered."
Keywords:
illness; injury; material damages; medical examination; organisation's duties; service-incurred;
Judgment 580
51st Session, 1983
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 8
Extract:
"The [Organisation] contends that the complainant has no cause of action. [It pleads] that the impugned decision does him no injury. It is clear, however, that in the circumstances the complainant has an interest, of a kind which the Tribunal will protect, in pleading any irregularity there may have been in the [...] candidacy" to the post of Director-General [the complainant was deprived of an opportunity to stand; if he had been able to stand, his chances of being elected would have been diminished with the candidacy in question].
Keywords:
candidate; cause of action; executive head; external candidate; injury;
Judgment 565
51st Session, 1983
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Consideration 8
Extract:
The complainant has been working in the organisation for 20 years. His advancements in grade have been due either to a reorganisation or to review of his duties. He has sought, in vain, a more senior post. Younger officials have reached higher grades. He has never been awarded a special salary increment. "Accordingly, life being what it is, even though he has misconstrued the reasons for the irregularities in his [performance report], he was particularly affected by them. For the moral injury he has suffered he is entitled to compensation".
Keywords:
administrative delay; flaw; injury; moral injury; performance report;
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 | next >
|
