ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Staff Regulations and Rules (232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Staff Regulations and Rules
Total judgments found: 494

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 | next >



  • Judgment 967


    66th Session, 1989
    General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 6

    Extract:

    The application of the Staff Regulations to the complainant "was expressly excluded by his successive contracts of employment." As a result the Tribunal is not competent to hear the complaint.

    Keywords:

    competence of tribunal; contract; locus standi; staff regulations and rules; status of complainant;



  • Judgment 963


    66th Session, 1989
    European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    "Any authority is bound by the rules it has itself issued until it amends or repeals them. The general principle is that rules govern only what is to happen henceforth, and it is binding on any authority since it affords the basis for relations between the parties in law. furthermore, a rule is enforceable only from the date on which it is brought to the notice of those it applies to."

    Keywords:

    amendment to the rules; effective date; enforcement; general principle; non-retroactivity; patere legem; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 952


    66th Session, 1989
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 7

    Extract:

    WHO Manual provision II.2.430.2 was amended so as to restrict the possibility of having adopted blood relatives treated as dependants. The complainant submits that the amendment infringed an acquired right. The Tribunal held that "the right which the amendment removed cannot be deemed to have constituted any essential part of the complainant's terms of appointment, and the allegation of breach of an acquired right is therefore unsound."

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: WHO MANUAL PROVISION II.2.430.2

    Keywords:

    acquired right; adoption; amendment to the rules; dependant; dependent child; family relationship; provision; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 945


    65th Session, 1988
    European Southern Observatory
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    Article R II 4.35 of the ESO Staff Regulations, which provides that "the first period of home leave shall be granted during the second year of service and the subsequent periods every alternate year thereafter", is deemed by the Tribunal to mean that "the right to home leave is confined in every case to a single year, i.e. the second, fourth and each succeeding even-numbered year of service."

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: ARTICLE R II 4.35 OF THE ESO STAFF REGULATIONS

    Keywords:

    home leave; interpretation; period; provision; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 944


    65th Session, 1988
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 4

    Extract:

    The complainant and her husband are both officials of the EPO. There are no rules concerning the refund of medical expenses which cover such contingencies. The Tribunal holds that "no other provision of the Service Regulations may be applied, even by analogy, if intended to fit an essentially different set of circumstances."

    Keywords:

    analogy; applicable law; enforcement; health insurance; marital status; medical expenses; no provision; other; provision; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 937


    65th Session, 1988
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 12, Summary

    Extract:

    The complainant was dismissed for misconduct. The organization submits that the complainant took home leave without going to his home country, the one which treats him as its citizen. The Tribunal held that the complainant was in breach of the letter and spirit of the rules: "Though the rules do allow rerouting, it must not be more than a minor change in travel arrangements."

    Keywords:

    direct route; enforcement; exception; home leave; misconduct; place of origin; serious misconduct; staff member's duties; staff regulations and rules; termination of employment;



  • Judgment 936


    65th Session, 1988
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 17

    Extract:

    "The conclusion is that the Council's approval of the new scales is null and void for two reasons: because no reasons for it are stated, and because it takes into account a factor, the Dutch levy, that the rules in force in the organisation do not provide for."

    Keywords:

    amendment to the rules; breach; decision; deduction; duty to substantiate decision; executive body; grounds; provision; reduction of salary; salary; scale; staff regulations and rules; written rule;

    Consideration 9

    Extract:

    "Article 64(6) of the Service Regulations reads: 'The remuneration of the permanent employees shall be subject to periodic review and shall be adjusted by the Administrative Council taking account of the recommendations of the Co-ordinating Committee of government budget experts of the co-ordinated organisations'. Though the definition puts the EPO under no specific obligation it does reflect an intention of not letting EPO pay get out of line with the broad trend in national civil services, and that is the rule of thumb followed by the Co-ordinating Committee."

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 64(6) OF THE EPO SERVICE REGULATIONS

    Keywords:

    adjustment; coordinated organisations; interpretation; provision; salary; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 926


    65th Session, 1988
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 8

    Extract:

    "The purpose of the [expatriation] allowance is [...] to meet the case where the employee has no affinity with the country of his duty station. Although the employee who is a citizen will ordinarily have such affinity, 72[3] [of the Service Regulations] recognises that residence abroad for at least ten years before appointment will break it. But it is only reasonable to require that the residence abroad be continuous because any interruption of it will restore the affinity."

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 72 OF THE EPO SERVICE REGULATIONS

    Keywords:

    condition; duty station; enforcement; non-resident allowance; residence; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 911


    64th Session, 1988
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 17

    Extract:

    "Although, as UNESCO says and indeed the Tribunal has held, facilities are not a matter for negotiation or agreement and although no obligation attaches to the actual outcome of consultations, one of an executive head's duties is to consult the staff association in keeping with [...] general principles [...] reflected in Chapter VIII [of the Staff Regulations]."

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: CHAPTER VIII OF THE UNESCO STAFF REGULATIONS

    Keywords:

    consultation; enforcement; facilities; general principle; organisation's duties; staff regulations and rules; staff union;

    Consideration 3

    Extract:

    "The organization [...] accepts as a term of every contract of appointment its duty to respect freedom of association, and anyone who has such a contract may challenge any decision that impairs that freedom. What the complainant is saying - indeed it is the sole issue - is that the organization acted in breach of freedom of association. His complaint is therefore receivable insofar as he is suing in his own name."

    Keywords:

    competence of tribunal; enforcement; freedom of association; locus standi; official; receivability of the complaint; staff regulations and rules; staff representative;



  • Judgment 905


    64th Session, 1988
    Intergovernmental Council of Copper Exporting Countries
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Summary

    Extract:

    A cost-of-living adjustment is provided for in the Staff Regulations. No final decision was taken on the matter. The complainant is entitled to the adjustment.

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: ARTICLES 3.2.1 AND 5.3 OF THE CIPEC STAFF REGULATIONS

    Keywords:

    adjustment; cost-of-living increase; enforcement; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 899


    64th Session, 1988
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 14

    Extract:

    "To begin with, the Tribunal will not review criteria laid down in any national law. The only rules it will apply are those that govern the international civil service and in this case they are the EPO Service Regulations".

    Keywords:

    applicable law; competence of tribunal; domestic law; international civil service principles; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 898


    64th Session, 1988
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 6

    Extract:

    The complainant wants the Tribunal to make recommendations on how to interpret certain provisions in the rules. "Besides stating his claims in vague and general terms the complainant is not seeking the quashing of any decision but mere recommendations in the form of advice to be commended to some unidentified person or authority. The Tribunal may neither give an advisory opinion nor rule on a dispute in which no breach of the terms of appointment or of the Staff Regulations is alleged. For that reason the claims are irreceivable."

    Keywords:

    advisory opinion; cause of action; competence of tribunal; complainant; interpretation; receivability of the complaint; request by a party; staff regulations and rules; tribunal; vague claim;

    Consideration 7

    Extract:

    The claims are irreceivable because "they are a pointless attempt to get review of decisions that the Tribunal ruled on in Judgments 732 and 733. [...] [The complainant is] pleading misinterpretation of the text, and that would be a mistake of law, which is not an admissible reason for reviewing a text that carries the authority of res judicata."

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 732, 733

    Keywords:

    application for review; interpretation; mistake of law; res judicata; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 872


    63rd Session, 1987
    European Southern Observatory
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    "A decision by a national court cannot be binding on the Tribunal, which is the body of final instance competent to interpret the Staff Rules as an issue of law."

    Keywords:

    competence of tribunal; consequence; iloat; interpretation; judgment of the tribunal; last instance; municipal court; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 869


    63rd Session, 1987
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 19(C)

    Extract:

    "The organization [has] failed to prove that the complainant knew or ought to have known of the change in the operation of the provision." It concerned paragraph 315.323 of the FAO Manual on withholding salary increments.

    Keywords:

    amendment to the rules; burden of proof; duty to inform; enforcement; lack of evidence; provision; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 862


    63rd Session, 1987
    International Labour Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 7

    Extract:

    "Suspension is temporary repeal: while in force it makes the text void. What distinguishes it from repeal is that it is not final, its purpose being to provide against some temporary contingency, and it need only be lifted for the text to come into force again. But repeal is final and once a text has been repealed the law-maker has to adopt a new one to bring the provisions back into effect."

    Keywords:

    binding character; difference; effect; enforcement; period; provision; provisional measures; staff regulations and rules; suspensive action; written rule;

    Consideration 7

    Extract:

    "Only the body competent to adopt or repeal a rule may suspend it, and by due process."

    Keywords:

    competence; decision-maker; procedure before the tribunal; provision; staff regulations and rules; suspensive action;

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    Article 3.1.1.2 of the ILO Staff Regulations provides for periodic adjustments to pensionable remuneration. The application of this regulation was suspended effective 1 April 1985. The complainants argue that the absence of an adjustment on 1 April 1986 breaches their acquired rights. "The complainants say they cannot put a figure on the loss sustained but they submit a table showing losses that range from 13 to 39 per cent according to grade. The table does not distinguish between loss due to the measures of which the Tribunal was informed in the earlier proceedings - and which it declared lawful - and loss alleged to be due to the failure to revise the scale on 1 April 1986. So in any event the Tribunal cannot but endorse its ruling in Judgment 832 under 16." The complaints are dismissed.

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 3.1.1.2 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS
    ILOAT Judgment(s): 832

    Keywords:

    acquired right; adjustment; amount; breach; date; difference; enforcement; grade; injury; pension; pension entitlements; pensionable remuneration; provision; reckoning; res judicata; staff regulations and rules; subsidiary; suspensive action;



  • Judgment 854


    63rd Session, 1987
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Summary

    Extract:

    The complainant, a national of the Federal Republic of Germany, was initially appointed to The Hague, where he received an expatriation allowance; he was then transferred to Berlin where he no longer received the allowance. The complainant contends that he is still entitled to the allowance under Article 72[3] of the EPO Service Regulations since, even though a national of the country in which he is serving, he had been continuously resident in another State for at least 10 years at the time of appointment. The complainant takes the expression 'at the time of their appointment' to mean at the date of transfer. The interpretation is without merit. The complaint is dismissed.

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 72.3 OF THE EPO STAFF REGULATIONS
    ILOAT Judgment(s): 786

    Keywords:

    interpretation; nationality; non-resident allowance; place of origin; provision; residence; right; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 853


    63rd Session, 1987
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    "According to the general rules of construction, all language versions of a text shall be deemed to bear the same meaning save that, where comparison reveals a point of disagreement, the construction that prevails shall be the one that, with due regard to the purpose of the law-maker, best reconciles the various versions."

    Keywords:

    authentic version; general principle; interpretation; language of rule; provision; purpose; staff regulations and rules;



  • Judgment 832


    62nd Session, 1987
    International Labour Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 7

    Extract:

    As a result of the adoption of a new scale of pensionable remuneration, Article 3.1.1 of the ILO Staff Regulations was amended. "The complainants' case does not rest on breach of any term of their contracts or of any provision of the Staff Regulations. What they are saying is that as applied to them Article 3.1.1 of the Regulations impairs their acquired rights. Their complaints will therefore be receivable if the application of 3.1.1 does cause them injury."

    Reference(s)

    Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 3.1.1 OF THE ILO STAFF REGULATIONS

    Keywords:

    amendment to the rules; cause of action; competence of tribunal; condition; enforcement; general decision; individual decision; injury; pension; pensionable remuneration; provision; receivability of the complaint; scale; staff regulations and rules;

    Consideration 14

    Extract:

    "The first [test] is the nature of the altered term. It may be in the contract or in the Staff regulations or Staff Rules or in a decision, and whereas the contract or a decision may give rise to acquired rights the Regulations and Rules do not necessarily do so. The second test is the reason for the change. It is material that the terms of appointment may often have to be adapted to circumstances, and there will ordinarily be no acquired right when a rule or a clause depends on variables such as the cost-of-living index or the value of the currency. Nor can the finances of the body that applies the terms of appointment be discounted. The third test is the consequence of allowing or disallowing an acquired right. What effect will the change have on staff pay and benefits ? And how do those who plead an acquired right fare as against others?"

    Keywords:

    acquired right; amendment to the rules; contract; cost-of-living increase; definition; equal treatment; exchange rate; provision; staff regulations and rules; terms of appointment;



  • Judgment 822


    62nd Session, 1987
    European Molecular Biology Laboratory
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 3

    Extract:

    "The grants [the complainant] is claiming under [his new] contract are those which were payable on the cancellation of an indefinite contract under the rules in force 'on this day'. The Tribunal takes that expression to denote [...] the date on which the letter was signed, not [...] the date when the complainant left on the expiry of his contract."

    Keywords:

    amendment to the rules; date; enforcement; interpretation; provision; staff regulations and rules; terminal entitlements;



  • Judgment 818


    62nd Session, 1987
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 4

    Extract:

    "The Tribunal will [...] consider [...] whether the purpose or even the mere effect of the rule is to put some members of the staff at a severe disadvantage. If the new method of reckoning seniority did have that effect the Tribunal would have to see whether it was warranted by broader considerations, the organisation being allowed a large degree of discretion in the matter."

    Keywords:

    amendment to the rules; discretion; equal treatment; judicial review; professional experience; provision; reckoning; seniority; staff regulations and rules;

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 | next >


 
Last updated: 20.05.2024 ^ top