Judgment No. 974
Decision
1. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION OF 7 JUNE 1988 IS QUASHED. 2. THE ORGANIZATION SHALL APPLY THE REDUCTION-IN-FORCE PROCEDURE TO THE COMPLAINANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 1050.2. 3. IT SHALL PAY HIM IN COMPENSATION THE SUMS RECKONED AS SET OUT IN 7 ABOVE. 4. IT SHALL PAY HIM 3,000 UNITED STATES DOLLARS IN COSTS. 5. HIS OTHER CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED.
Consideration 4
Extract:
"In the absence of a specific provision in the Rules, the Tribunal holds that, for the reasons it stated in Judgments 470 [...] and 891 [...], the right to the application of the reduction-in-force procedure arises on the abolition of a post of indefinite duration even though the official may have only a fixed-term appointment."
Reference(s)
Organization rules reference: ARTICLE 1050.2 OF THE PAHO STAFF RULES ILOAT Judgment(s): 470, 891
Keywords
procedure before the tribunal; no provision; contract; post; duration of appointment; fixed-term; permanent appointment; abolition of post; non-renewal of contract; staff reduction; right
|