Observation (CEACR) - adoptée 2022, publiée 111ème session CIT (2023)

Convention (n° 111) concernant la discrimination (emploi et profession), 1958 - Afrique du Sud (Ratification: 1997)

The Committee notes the observations made by the social partners within the National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC) and communicated with the Government’s report.

Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Discrimination based on race, colour and national extraction. Affirmative action. The Committee notes with interest the Government’s indication, in its report, that it is implementing various initiatives in order to strengthen its efforts in promoting equality of treatment and opportunities of all designated groups, such as: (1) conducting annual employment equity workshops nationally with workers, employers and their representative organizations and other interested parties; and (2) forging strategic partnerships between the Commission for Employment Equity (CEE) and various key institutions such as the Commission for Gender Equality, the South African Human Rights Commission, the National Skills Authority, the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Commission, the Department of Youth and Persons with Disabilities in the Presidency, the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), the Public Employment Services and the Inspections and Enforcement Services Branches of the Department of Employment and Labour. The main objectives of these partnerships are to raise awareness on the right to equality, dignity and fair treatment and to ensure there is coherence in the various policy instruments and implementation. The Government adds that the labour inspectors conduct employment equity inspections to assess the legal compliance with the Employment Equity Act, 1998 (EEA).

The Committee notes that the Government refers to the process of amending the Employment Equity Act 1998 with a view to: (1) empowering the Minister of Employment and Labour to regulate sector specific employment equity targets in order to address the slow pace of transformation in the labour market until now and achieve equitable representation of the designated groups, namely, black people, women, and persons with disabilities; (2) exempting employers with less than 50 employees from implementing Chapter III of the EEA on affirmative action; and (3) regulating assessment criteria for the issuing of employment equity compliance certificates as a prerequisite for accessing state contracts (section 53 of the EEA). In this regard, the Committee further notes that the Employment Equity Amendment Bill was adopted by Parliament (National Assembly and National Council of Provinces) on 17 May 2022. The Committee notes that the workers’ representatives within NEDLAC welcome the amendments of the EEA, but underline that the main issue is the non-implementation of section 53. The Committee also notes that the Chief Director of Statutory and Advocacy Services within the Department of Employment and Labour indicated in March 2022 that, in the past financial year, 60 per cent of employers had been referred to prosecution for failure to comply with the employment equity legislation; and that the review process of the Director-General of the Department of Employment and Labour (under section 43 of the EEA) revealed a 94 per cent non-compliance rate with the EEA. It further notes the information, shared by the Minister of Employment and Labour and the Chairperson of the CEE on the launch of the 22nd CEE Annual Report (April 2021-March 2022), that the labour market compliance levels with the EEA “remain[ed] regretfully low”, echoing in this the findings of the CEE. White and Indian population groups remained over-represented at top management, senior management and professionally qualified/middle management levels, against their Economically Active Population (EAP) rate. White people represented 63.2 per cent of top managers and 51.4 per cent of senior managers whereas the African and Coloured population groups were grossly under-represented at these levels (even at the professionally qualified/middle management level, the African population group was approximately 33 per cent below their EAP rate). It is worth noting that, at the top management level, the representation of the White population group was approximately seven times their EAP rate in the private sector (and just below their EAP in the public service) whereas the African population group representation was nearly six times below their EAP rate in the private sector (and almost at their EAP rate in the public service). The same pattern is reproduced at senior management level. As for the representation of the Coloured population group at top management level, it was far below their EAP rate in the private sector and slightly above their EAP rate in the public service. The Minister also noted with concern “the continued and flourishing slave conditions in the labour market, wherein the immigrants were being exploited”.

In view of the above, the Committee asks the Government to continue to strengthen its efforts in promoting equality of treatment and opportunities in employment and occupation of all the designated groups and to provide information on: (i) the results achieved in the transformation of the labour market towards a more equitable representation of the designated groups (including statistical data as shown in the annual report of the Commission for Employment Equity); and (ii) the assessment of its affirmative action measures with a view to determining whether they remain effective and are in line with the principle of non-discrimination.

It also asks the Government to provide information on: (i) the actions taken within the framework of the National Action Plan to Combat Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, 2019–2024, the obstacles identified and the results achieved; and (ii) the implementation of section 53 of the Employment Equity Act as amended (measures put in place to evaluate the assessment criteria for the issuing of employment equity compliance certificates and number of certificates denied based on this assessment).

The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.