ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 1992, publiée 79ème session CIT (1992)

Convention (n° 17) sur la réparation des accidents du travail, 1925 - Antigua-et-Barbuda (Ratification: 1983)

Autre commentaire sur C017

Demande directe
  1. 1993
  2. 1992
  3. 1991

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following points raised in its previous comments:

Article 5 of the Convention. Section 8 of the Workmen's Compensation Ordinance No. 24 of 1956 should be completed so as to ensure that the compensation due in the event of accidents causing permanent incapacity shall be paid in the form of periodical payments to the injured workman or his dependants. However, the compensation may be paid wholly or partially in a lump sum, if the competent authority is given guarantees that it will be properly utilised.

Article 7. Section 9 of Ordinance No. 24 of 1956 does not provide for additional compensation in respect of the assistance of a third person except in cases of temporary incapacity, whereas the Convention provides in such cases for the provision of additional compensation to the victims of injuries who suffer from temporary or permanent incapacity.

Article 9. In accordance with section 6, paragraph 3, of Ordinance No. 24 of 1956, the employer is responsible for paying the "expenses and reasonable cost" of medical treatment up to a prescribed amount, whereas the Convention does not prescribe any limits in this respect. Furthermore, surgical and pharmaceutical assistance would not appear to be provided for in the legislation in accordance with this Article of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to take the necessary steps in order to ensure that full effect is given to this provision of the Convention.

Article 10. (a) Section 10 of the Ordinance No. 24 of 1956 provides for the supply of artificial limbs only when this is likely to improve capacity for work, whereas the Convention prescribes this in all cases when they are recognised to be necessary without permitting the supply of artificial limbs to be restricted to cases where they are necessary to improve capacity for work. The Committee therefore requests the Government to take the necessary steps in order to bring national legislation fully into conformity with this Article of the Convention.

(b) The Committee also requests the Government to indicate the provisions under which the supply of surgical appliances is generally prescribed.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer