ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Compilation of decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association

« Go to Index

Protection against acts of interference14

Forms of interference

  1. As regards allegations of anti-union tactics in the form of preventing the establishment of workers organizations or bribes offered to union members to encourage their withdrawal from the union and the presentation of statements of resignation to the workers, as well as the alleged efforts made to create puppet unions, the Committee considers such acts to be contrary to Article 2 of Convention No. 98, which provides that workers and employers organizations shall enjoy adequate protection against any acts of interference by each other or each others agents in their establishment, functioning or administration.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
1865Republic of Korea346788
2388Ukraine348163
2468Cambodia344438
2735Indonesia358611
2775Hungary360731
2780Ireland363809
2815Philippines3651274
2829Republic of Korea365580
2850Malaysia363874
Digest: 2006858
  1. The intervention by an employer to promote the establishment of a parallel trade union constitutes an act of interference by the employer in the functioning of a workers association, which is prohibited under Article 2 of Convention No. 98.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2890Ukraine3641058
  1. The Committee recalled that it has had the opportunity to review the question of employers freedom of expression in a case where, observing that the protection afforded by unfair labour practices in the country included protection against freedom of speech that would interfere with the formation of any labour organization or with the selection of a trade union as a representative for the purpose of bargaining collectively, found that the principles of freedom of association did not appear to be violated.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2654Canada356381
  1. The Committee requested a government to ensure that employers did not express opinions which would intimidate workers in the exercise of their organizational rights, such as claiming that the establishment of an association is unlawful, or warning against application with a higher level organization, or encouraging workers to withdraw their membership.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2301Malaysia35680
2683United States of America357585
  1. Any coercion of workers or trade union officers to revoke their union membership constitutes a violation of the principle of freedom of association, in violation of Convention No. 87.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2985El Salvador370424
  1. Coercing trade union members into leaving the trade union constitutes a serious violation of Conventions Nos. 87 and 98 that consecrate the right of workers to freely join the organization of their own choice and the principle of the adequate protection of this right.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2341Guatemala350870
  1. Management drafting of a union resignation letter constitutes a grave interference in the functioning of workers organization.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2901Mauritius364722
  1. The Committee considered that the distribution of resignation forms and the setting up of a toll-free telephone line providing information on how to resign from the union constitute interference in the internal affairs of the union. In that regard, the Committee recalls that Article 2 of Convention No. 98 stipulates that workers and employers organizations shall enjoy adequate protection against any acts of interference by each other or each others agents or members in their establishment, functioning or administration, and requested the Government to put into place a mechanism that would enable it to rapidly redress any effects of this type of interference, including through the imposition of sufficiently dissuasive sanctions on the employer, where appropriate, and to avoid such incidents in the future.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2470Brazil344385
  1. The distribution of resignation forms to trade union members and one-on-one interviews to obtain the withdrawal of members from the union constitute acts of interference.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2602Republic of Korea350671
  1. Paid full-time union officers should be able to carry out their trade union duties in accordance with the rules of their organization without having to account for each activity to the management. Such activities should include educational activities, activities carried out under the aegis of the relevant federation or confederation and those related to the preparation of action on a collective dispute.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
1865Republic of Korea363110
  1. Extending an invitation to participate in the meetings with the enterprise management to one organization and not to another, may be an informal way of showing favouritism to one organization and thereby influencing the trade union membership of workers.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2388Ukraine348164
  1. The closure of trade union offices, as a consequence of a legitimate strike, constitutes a violation of the principles of freedom of association and, if carried out by management, interference by the employer in the functioning of a workers organization, which is prohibited under Article 2 of Convention No. 98.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006856
  1. The intervention by an employer to promote the constitution of the executive board of a trade union, and interference with its correspondence, are acts which constitute a grave violation of the principles of freedom of association.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006857
  1. Attempts by employers to persuade employees to withdraw authorizations given to a trade union could unduly influence the choice of workers and undermine the position of the trade union, thus making it more difficult to bargain collectively, which is contrary to the principle that collective bargaining should be promoted.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2808Cameroon362353
3171Myanmar378488
Digest: 2006863
  1. The alleged offer of conditional benefits by the company provided that it would not be required to enter into a collective bargaining relationship with the union, if true, would be tantamount to employer interference in the right of workers to form and join the organization of their own choosing to represent their occupational interests.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2780Ireland363809
  1. Legal provisions which allow employers to undermine workers organizations through artificial promotions of workers constitute a violation of the principles of freedom of association.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006864
  1. The maintenance of camera surveillance in rooms set aside for trade union meetings is likely to produce an intimidating effect on trade union bodies and members and may give rise to employer interference in a manner contrary to the principles of freedom of association in relation to trade union meetings.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2901Mauritius364725
  1. The issue of a management requesting its employees to state whether or not they belong to a union, even though this may not be intended to interfere with the exercise of trade union rights, may naturally be regarded as such an interference and felt to be intimidating to union members.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2901Mauritius364726
  1. The issue of circulars by a company requesting its employees to state to which trade union they belong, even though this is not intended to interfere with the exercise of trade union rights, may not unnaturally be regarded as such an interference.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006866
  1. The fact that one of the members of a government is at the same time a leader of a trade union which represents several categories of workers employed by the State creates a possibility of interference in violation of Article 2 of Convention No. 98.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006867
  1. Recalling the importance of the independence of the parties in collective bargaining, negotiations should not be conducted on behalf of employees or their organizations by bargaining representatives appointed by or under the domination of employers or their organizations.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2436Denmark343629
2512India348903
Digest: 2006868
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer