ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Compilation of decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association

« Go to Index

Protection against discrimination13

Forms of discrimination

General principles

  1. The Committee is not called upon to pronounce upon the question of the breaking of a contract of employment by dismissal except in cases in which the provisions on dismissal imply anti-union discrimination.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2835Colombia364500
2933Colombia368274
2950Colombia370329
2993Colombia370352
3114Colombia378190
Digest: 2006779
  1. Protection against anti-union discrimination should apply more particularly in respect of acts calculated to cause the dismissal of or otherwise prejudice a worker by reason of union membership or because of participation in union activities outside working hours or, with the employers consent, during working hours.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2648Paraguay355960
Digest: 2006780
  1. Protection against acts of anti-union discrimination should cover not only hiring and dismissal, but also any discriminatory measures during employment, in particular transfers, downgrading and other acts that are prejudicial to the worker.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2546Philippines3491217
2546Philippines353242
2566Iran (Islamic Republic of)351986
2580Guatemala349870
2633Côte d'Ivoire354719
2681Paraguay3561034
2811Guatemala374367
2825Peru3621258
2892Türkiye376145
3025Egypt372154
Digest: 2006781
  1. Acts of anti-union discrimination may vary in nature and are not confined to discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of service, but also include all actions taken in retaliation against a worker exercising trade union activities, such as suspension.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2228India37170

Discrimination in relation to hiring

  1. Workers face many practical difficulties in proving the real nature of their dismissal or denial of employment, especially when seen in the context of blacklisting, which is a practice whose very strength lies in its secrecy. While it is true that it is important for employers to obtain information about prospective employees, it is equally true that employees with past trade union membership or activities should be informed about the information held on them and given a chance to challenge it, especially if it is erroneous and obtained from an unreliable source. Moreover, in these conditions, the employees concerned would be more inclined to institute legal proceedings since they would be in a better position to prove the real nature of their dismissal or denial of employment.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2445Guatemala348784
Digest: 2006782
  1. With regard to special committees set up under a law with a view to granting or refusing the certificates of loyalty required of certain workers in public utility undertakings if they were to be engaged or retained in service, the Committee recalled the desirability of ensuring that the special committees in question should not be used in such a manner as to give rise to anti-union discrimination.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006783
  1. Legislation should allow the possibility to appeal against discrimination in hiring, i.e. even before the workers can be qualified as employees.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2768Guatemala363640
Digest: 2006784
  1. The Committee has expressed its fear that the use of polygraph tests during hiring interviews may lead to anti-union discriminations.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2768Guatemala363640

Discrimination during employment

  1. The non-renewal of a contract for anti-union reasons constitutes a prejudicial act within the meaning of Article 1 of Convention No. 98.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2602Republic of Korea350671
2602Republic of Korea355654
2775Hungary360739
2836El Salvador36760
2995Colombia373207
Digest: 2006785
  1. In certain circumstances, the renewal of fixed-term contracts for several years may affect the exercise of trade union rights.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2884Chile368213
2995Colombia373208
2998Peru371731
  1. In certain circumstances, the employment of workers through repeated renewals of fixed-term contracts for several years can be an obstacle to the exercise of trade union rights.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3066375481
2946Colombia374250
2998Peru374719
3064Cambodia377213
3065 375481
  1. Fixed-term contracts should not be used deliberately for anti-union purposes.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3066375481
2998Peru374719
3064Cambodia377213
3065 375481
  1. The Committee invited a government to examine with the most representative workers and employers organizations, a way of ensuring that the systematic use of short-term temporary contracts in the non-traditional export sector did not become in practice an obstacle to the exercise of trade union rights.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3066375481
2675Peru357874
3065 375481
  1. Acts of harassment and intimidation carried out against workers by reason of trade union membership or legitimate trade union activities, while not necessarily prejudicing workers in their employment, may discourage them from joining organizations of their own choosing, thereby violating their right to organize.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2494Indonesia348963
2508Iran (Islamic Republic of)3461181
2752Montenegro359919
2752Montenegro363920
2775Hungary360730
3035Guatemala373379
3142Cameroon378129
Digest: 2006786
  1. Granting bonuses to non-union member staff even if it is not to all non-union workers and excluding all workers who are union members from such bonuses during a period of collective conflict, constitutes an act of anti-union discrimination contrary to Convention No. 98.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2752Montenegro359919
2752Montenegro363920
Digest: 2006787
  1. Direct threat and intimidation of members of a workers organization and forcing them into committing themselves to sever their ties with the organization under the threat of termination constitutes a denial of these workers freedom of association rights.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3100India377376
  1. The governments obligations under Convention No. 98 and the principles on protection against anti-union discrimination cover not only acts of direct discrimination (such as demotion, dismissal, frequent transfer, and so on), but extend to the need to protect unionized employees from more subtle attacks which may be the outcome of omissions. In this respect, proprietorial changes should not remove the right to collective bargaining from employees, or directly or indirectly threaten unionized workers and their organizations.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2494Indonesia348963
2823Colombia364483
Digest: 2006788
  1. The Committee has drawn attention to the fact that initiating administrative proceedings against union officials without sufficient grounds might have an intimidating effect on union officials.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3000Chile373138
  1. Transfers of employees for reasons unconnected with their trade union affiliation or activities are not covered by Article 1 of Convention No. 98.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2661Peru358793

Discriminatory dismissal

  1. The dismissal of workers on grounds of membership of an organization or trade union activities violates the principles of freedom of association.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2241Guatemala340827
2400Peru3401228
2815Philippines3621381
2815Philippines3651277
2969Mauritius370525
Digest: 2006789
  1. Subcontracting accompanied by dismissals of union leaders can constitute a violation of the principle that no one should be prejudiced in his or her employment on the grounds of union membership or activities.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2602Republic of Korea350671
2815Philippines3621381
2815Philippines3651277
Digest: 2006790
  1. It would not appear that sufficient protection against acts of anti-union discrimination, as set out in Convention No. 98, is granted by legislation in cases where employers can in practice, on condition that they pay the compensation prescribed by law for cases of unjustified dismissal, dismiss any worker, if the true reason is the workers trade union membership or activities.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2252Philippines350172
2262Cambodia342233
2265Switzerland3431143
2376Côte d'Ivoire342106
2443Cambodia343315
2474Poland3441154
2613Nicaragua355930
2663Georgia356761
2684Ecuador372278
2737Indonesia358639
2754Indonesia359682
Digest: 2006791
  1. In cases of anti-union dismissals, newly established enterprise level unions are likely to suffer adverse consequences threatening their very existence, if their entire leadership and a large part of their membership is dismissed.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2252Philippines350172
  1. Where public servants are employed under conditions of free appointment and removal from service, the exercise of the right to freely remove public employees from their posts should in no instance be motivated by the trade union functions or activities of the persons who could be affected by such measures.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2926Ecuador370385
3051Japan376691
Digest: 2006792
  1. Not only dismissal, but also compulsory retirement, when imposed as a result of legitimate trade union activities, would be contrary to the principle that no person should be prejudiced in his or her employment by reason of trade union membership or activities.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2722Botswana357259
3025Egypt372154
3171Myanmar378488
Digest: 2006793
  1. In certain cases, the Committee has found it difficult to accept as a coincidence unrelated to trade union activity that heads of departments should have decided, immediately after a strike, to convene disciplinary boards which, on the basis of service records, ordered the dismissal not only of a number of strikers, but also of members of their union committee.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3018Pakistan372494
Digest: 2006794
  1. Acts of anti-trade union discrimination should not be authorized under the pretext of dismissals based on economic necessity.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2775Hungary360728
2815Philippines3621382
2815Philippines3651277
Digest: 2006795
  1. The application of staff reduction programmes must not be used to carry out acts of anti-union discrimination.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2488Philippines3461359
2573Colombia351467
2760Thailand3591165
3017Chile377265
Digest: 2006796
  1. A corporate restructuring should not directly or indirectly threaten unionized workers and their organizations.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2228India36280
2760Thailand3591165
2815Philippines3621382
2815Philippines3651277
Digest: 2006797
  1. It is not within the Committees purview to pronounce itself on allegations relating to restructuring programmes, even when these involve collective dismissals, unless they have given rise to acts of anti-union discrimination or interference.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3051Japan376690
  1. The liquidation of a company and the fact that the legal person under which the company operated has ceased to exist should not be used as a pretext for anti-union discrimination nor should they be an obstacle to the competent authorities determining whether or not there were acts of anti-union discrimination and, if such practices are shown to have taken place, to sanctioning such illegal acts and ensuring that the affected workers are duly compensated.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3027Colombia376297
  1. In the Committees opinion, the bipartite talks and the administrative procedure of permission to dismiss do not guarantee adequate protection to workers against acts of anti-union discrimination, since it appears that the legislation currently in force allows an employer merely to invoke lack of harmony in the working relationship to justify the dismissal of workers who only wish to exercise a fundamental right under the principles of freedom of association.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
1756Indonesia259414
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer