ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Compilation of decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association

« Go to Index

Right to strike10

Sanctions

Cases of abuse while exercising the right to strike

  1. The principles of freedom of association do not protect abuses consisting of criminal acts while exercising the right to strike.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2465Chile344718
2472Indonesia343959
2472Indonesia348936
2478Mexico356956
2486Romania3441208
2548Burundi349540
2602Republic of Korea355666
2668Colombia354676
2710Colombia362464
2742Bolivia (Plurinational State of)358279
2747Iran (Islamic Republic of)360840
2832Peru3621333
2912Chile368227
2928Ecuador371314
2946Colombia374252
3030Mali374536
3032Honduras374413
Digest: 2006667
  1. Penal sanctions should only be imposed as regards strikes where there are violations of strike prohibitions which are themselves in conformity with the principles of freedom of association. All penalties in respect of illegitimate actions linked to strikes should be proportionate to the offence or fault committed and the authorities should not have recourse to measures of imprisonment for the mere fact of organizing or participating in a peaceful strike.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2415Serbia3401259
2472Indonesia343959
2472Indonesia348936
2488Philippines356146
2525Montenegro3461242
2602Republic of Korea363465
2616Mauritius3511012
2616Mauritius35866
2659Argentina355242
2723Fiji362842
2723Fiji365778
2829Republic of Korea365577
3022Thailand372616
Digest: 2006668
  1. The Committee considered that some of the temporary measures taken by the authorities as a result of a strike in an essential service (prohibition of the trade unions activities, cessation of the check-off of trade union dues, etc.) were contrary to the guarantees provided for in Article 3 of Convention No. 87. The Committee drew the Governments attention to the fact that the measures taken by the authorities to ensure the performance of essential services should not be out of proportion to the ends pursued or lead to excesses.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006669
  1. Fines which are equivalent to a maximum amount of 500 or 1,000 minimum wages per day of abusive strike may have an intimidating effect on trade unions and inhibit their legitimate trade union activities, particularly where the cancellation of a fine of this kind is subject to the provision that no further strike considered as abusive is carried out.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3022Thailand372616
Digest: 2006670
  1. The Committee expects that any fines that could be imposed against trade unions for unlawful strikes will not be of an amount that is likely to lead to the dissolution of the union or to have an intimidating effect on trade unions and inhibit their legitimate trade union activities, and trusts that the Government would endeavour to resolve such situations by means of frank and genuine social dialogue.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3011Türkiye372649
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer