ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Compilation of decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association

« Go to Index

Right to strike10

Back-to-work orders, the hiring of workers during a strike, requisitioning orders

  1. Strikers should be replaced only: (a) in the case of a strike in an essential service in the strict sense of the term in which the legislation prohibits strikes; and (b) where the strike would cause an acute national crisis.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2587Peru3541061
  1. The hiring of workers to break a strike in a sector which cannot be regarded as an essential sector in the strict sense of the term, and hence one in which strikes might be forbidden, constitutes a serious violation of freedom of association.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
1865Republic of Korea346757
2465Chile344722
2472Indonesia343966
2548Burundi349538
2562Argentina349406
2563Argentina350230
2619Comoros353574
2638Peru357797
2697Peru357983
2770Chile360372
3011Türkiye372650
3096Peru376893
Digest: 2006632
  1. If a strike is legal, recourse to the use of labour drawn from outside the undertaking to replace the strikers for an indeterminate period entails a risk of derogation from the right to strike, which may affect the free exercise of trade union rights.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
1865Republic of Korea353711
2365Zimbabwe3441448
2472Indonesia343966
2638Peru357797
2770Chile360371
Digest: 2006633
  1. Whenever a total and prolonged strike in a vital sector of the economy might cause a situation in which the life, health or personal safety of the population might be endangered, a back-to-work order might be lawful, if applied to a specific category of staff in the event of a strike whose scope and duration could cause such a situation. However, a back-to-work requirement outside such cases is contrary to the principles of freedom of association.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2467Canada344578
2506Greece3461075
Digest: 2006634
  1. The use of the military and requisitioning orders to break a strike over occupational claims, unless these actions aim at maintaining essential services in circumstances of the utmost gravity, constitutes a serious violation of freedom of association.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006635
  1. The employment of the armed forces or of another group of persons to perform duties which have been suspended as a result of a labour dispute can, if the strike is lawful, be justified only by the need to ensure the operation of services or industries whose suspension would lead to an acute crisis.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
2770Chile360372
Digest: 2006636
  1. Although it is recognized that a stoppage in services or undertakings such as transport companies, railways and the oil sector might disturb the normal life of the community, it can hardly be admitted that the stoppage of such services could cause a state of acute national emergency. The Committee has therefore considered that measures taken to mobilize workers at the time of disputes in services of this kind are such as to restrict the workers right to strike as a means of defending their occupational and economic interests.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006637
  1. The requisitioning of iron and steel workers in the case of strikes, the threat of dismissal of strike pickets, the recruitment of underpaid workers and a ban on the joining of a trade union in order to break up lawful and peaceful strikes in services which are not essential in the strict sense of the term are not in accordance with freedom of association.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
1270Brazil236620
  1. The Committee permits the hire of non-striking workers in the case of essential services such as the health service.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
3096Peru376893
  1. Where an essential public service, such as the telephone service, is interrupted by an unlawful strike, a government may have to assume the responsibility of ensuring its functioning in the interests of the community and, for this purpose, may consider it expedient to call in the armed forces or other persons to perform the duties which have been suspended and to take the necessary steps to enable such persons to be installed in the premises where such duties are performed.
see related cases
Related CountryReportParagraph
Digest: 2006639
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer