ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body - Report No 368, June 2013

Case No 2676 (Colombia) - Complaint date: 21-OCT-08 - Closed

Display in: French - Spanish

Effect given to the recommendations of the Committee and the Governing Body

Effect given to the recommendations of the Committee and the Governing Body
  1. 21. The Committee recalls that, at its June 2010 meeting [see 357th Report, para. 300], it made the following recommendations:
    • (a) With regard to the refusal of the Ministry of Social Welfare to grant the request for entry in the trade union registry of the trade union organization established on 2 April 2006 (ASCOTRACOL), the Committee points out that the trade union organization may, if it so wishes, once the omissions and inconsistencies highlighted in the decisions concerned have been rectified, submit a new request for the entry of its founding charter, by-laws and executive committee in the register and requests the Government in that case to register the trade union organization immediately.
    • (b) With regard to the allegation that as soon as the administrative authority rejected the request for registration of the trade union, the company dismissed the members of the executive committee and 40 workers who had been involved in the union’s establishment or had joined the union, a fact that was verified by the judicial authority in its rulings, the Committee requests the Government to take the necessary steps to have the dismissed workers reinstated if indeed they were dismissed for having established a trade union and, should reinstatement be impossible for objective and compelling reasons, the Committee requests the Government to ensure that the workers receive appropriate compensation, such as to constitute a penalty that acts as a sufficiently dissuasive and effective deterrent against anti-union dismissals. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed in this regard.
  2. 22. At its June 2011 meeting, the Committee took note of the Government’s statements that: (1) the Territorial Directorate of Atlántico of the Ministry of Social Welfare certified that “there is no current” request to register a trade union, nor any registered trade union associated with the enterprise COOLITERIAL; and (2) judicial decisions have been handed down that are adverse to the complainants and that the Government is respecting and complying with the exercise of the duties and responsibilities specific to the separation of public powers. Given the above information, the Committee requested the Government to: (a) confirm that the trade union has not submitted a new request to be registered; and (b) provide the text of the judicial decisions on the alleged dismissals, which, according to the Government, have been adverse. While awaiting this information, the Committee maintains its previous recommendations [see 360th Report, paras 37–39].
  3. 23. In a communication of 24 July 2012, the Government reports that ASCOTRACOL went through the registration process again and, by means of documents Nos 151, 152 and 029 of 11 July 2012, the organization, its executive committee and its by-laws were registered. Furthermore, the Government has provided a copy of the judicial rulings rejecting the requests for reinstatement, along with documents declaring procedures terminated as a result of conciliation between the parties. The Committee takes note of this information; in particular, it notes with interest that ASCOTRACOL has been registered.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer