ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Country comments > Texts of comments: Sao Tome and Principe

Comments adopted by the CEACR: Sao Tome and Principe

Adopted by the CEACR in 2021

C029 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

Articles 1(1), 2(1) and 25 of the Convention. Trafficking in persons. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the new provisions of the Penal Code criminalizing trafficking in persons for labour exploitation and prostitution (sections 160 and 172), as well as measures taken to combat trafficking in persons, including training for officials and technicians of the Criminal Investigation Police (PIC) and awareness-raising activities conducted for the general public. 
The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that the practice of trafficking in persons is non-existent in the country and therefore no such cases have been recorded. It also states that it will continue its efforts with public authorities and private entities to prevent such practices from occurring in the country. The Committee encourages the Government to continue taking measures to prevent trafficking in persons for labour and sexual exploitation, including by undertaking awareness raising activities, providing training and strengthening the capacities of the competent authorities in identifying and suppressing this crime. It requests the Government to continue providing information on the measures taken in this regard.
Article 2(2)(a). Work exacted under compulsory military service laws. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the Government’s indication that according to section 7 of Act No. 8/2010 concerning national defence and the armed forces, conscripts receive three months of military training in which they only perform military tasks. At the end of this training, they are considered as soldiers fit to defend the country. It observed that according to the provisions of Act No. 8/2010 compulsory military service is defined as each citizen’s contribution to the military defence of the country. The Act also provides that civic service, which consists of support activities for the general public in the national interest, may be established to replace or supplement military service.
The Committee notes the Government’s information that pursuant to Act No 8/2010, compulsory military service lasts for two years, including the initial three months of military training and thereafter conscripts stay in the premises of the military barracks for the remaining period. Concerning civic service, the Government indicates that soldiers may be obliged, like any other individual, to engage in civic services of an exclusively public nature, provided that this is not forced or compulsory labour. The Committee reminds the Government that compulsory military service is excluded from the scope of the Convention, provided that it is used only for work of a purely military character.  The Committee requests the Government to indicate the type of works/activities that conscripts are requested to undertake after the initial three months military training period and for the remaining period of their compulsory military service; to clarify to whom the obligation to perform civic services under Act No 8/2010 applies; and to provide information on the specific type of activities that have to be performed by those who are obliged to perform civic services. Please provide a copy of any text regulating civic service.
Article 2(2)(c). Work exacted as a consequence of a conviction in a court of law. 1. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that labour is voluntary for persons serving a prison sentence and is organized by the Social Rehabilitation and Prison Administration Service (SERSAP), which must enable prisoners to engage in a paid occupational activity (Act No. 3/2003 of 2 June 2003 on the enforcement of penalties and custodial measures). The Committee also noted the Government’s indication that prisoners may work for public institutions and enterprises which provide support to the prison service (food, health equipment, etc.). The Committee requested the Government to indicate whether the SERSAP has concluded any agreements with private entities in order to provide work for prisoners inside or outside prisons.
The Committee notes the Government’s information that there are no such agreements in place, although there is a “statement of responsibility" signed by the SERSAP and entities seeking prisoners. The Government further indicates that section 444 of Law No. 5/2010 (the Penal Process Code), which concerns the replacement of fines with days of labour, broadly defines how this work should be carried out, conditions such as schedules and remuneration, as well as the type of institutions at which this work could be done. The Committee recalls that it considers that prisoners’ work for private entities is permissible under the Convention only if prisoners voluntarily enter into such an employment relationship without being subjected to pressure or the menace of any penalty, and perform work in conditions approximating a free employment relationship. This arrangement necessarily requires the formal, free and informed consent of the person concerned, as well as further guarantees and safeguards covering the essential elements of a free labour relationship, such as wages, social security and occupational safety and health (2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraphs 278, 279 and 291). The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide information on the manner in which sentenced prisoners express their formal, free and informed consent to carry out works for private entities assigned by the SERSAP. It also requests the Government to supply a copy of Law No.5 of 2010.
2. Sentence of community service. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate whether, as provided for in section 3 of Act No. 3/2003 of 2 June 2003 on the enforcement of penalties and custodial measures, the SERSAP keeps a register of entities which provide work for persons sentenced to community service. The Government indicates that for the moment there is no register listing such entities. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether private entities have been authorized to take on persons who have been sentenced to community service and if so to confirm that, as provided under sections 1 and 3 of Act No. 3/2003, such entities carry out work for the public interest.

C081 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

Article 3 of the Convention. Functions of the system of the labour inspection. The Committee notes that, according to section 5 of the Statute of the General Labour Inspectorate (Inspeccao Geral do Trabalho, hereafter IGT Statute) adopted in 2016, the labour inspectors perform activities in the field of working conditions, occupational safety and health (OSH), as well as job placement, migration and work of foreigners and social security. The Committee requests the Government to provide further detailed information on how the tasks regarding migration and work of foreigners and social security are performed by labour inspectors in practice, including the proportion of time and resources attributed, in order to ensure that it does not interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties, and does not prejudice in any way the authority and impartiality which are necessary in inspectors’ relations with employers and workers.
Article 5(a). Cooperation between the labour inspection system and the judicial system. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes that, according to section 34(2) of the IGT Statute, the IGT shall collaborate with the Courts and the Public Prosecution Office under the terms established in the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication in its report that violations of the law are constantly referred to the Public Prosecution Office, however, the feedback from the prosecutors regarding outcomes of the process never reaches the IGT. Recalling that Article 5(a) requires appropriate arrangements to promote effective cooperation between the inspection services and other Government services, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on any measures taken or envisaged to improve the collaboration between the labour inspection system and the judicial system, in particular regarding the feedback from the prosecutors on the processing of the cases transmitted to them by labour inspectors; and also requests information on the outcomes of cases referred to Public Prosecution Office, including specific violations found and sanctions imposed.
Article 6. Conditions of services. The Committee notes that, according to section 52(1) of the IGT Statute, the Ministers who oversee the areas of Finance and Labour shall approve, in a separate statute, the careers and the specific remuneration scale for IGT personnel. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether the statute provided for by section 52(1) of the IGT Statute has been adopted, and once again requests the Government to provide information on the career scheme and remuneration scale for IGT personnel, compared to public officers exercising similar functions, such as tax inspectors.
Article 7. Recruitment conditions and training. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that three inspectors have undergone higher education and two sub-inspectors have received professional training. Moreover, in light of the actions foreseen in the Decent Work Country Programme 2018-2021, internal and external trainings were organised in exchange with the Authority for Working Conditions of Portugal on OSH for the technicians of the IGT. The Committee also notes that, according to section 38(1) of the IGT Statute, the selection process of labour inspectors involves paid professional traineeship, under the terms of Decree No. 6/2010. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken to provide adequate training to labour inspectors, including the frequency and contents of the trainings and the attendance at each such training, so as to enable inspectors to perform their duties effectively and independently. It also requests the Government to provide information on the organisation of the paid professional traineeship in the recruitment process and to provide a copy of Decree No. 6/2010.
Articles 10 and 11. Human and material resources available to the labour inspection services. The Committee previously noted the limited number of inspectors and a shortage of financial resources. The Government indicates that the IGT currently consists of one General Inspector, four inspectors, four sub-inspectors and three inspection technicians. It states that no measures have been taken to ensure a sufficient number of labour inspectors due to its limited resources. The Government also indicates that there is one vehicle available for inspectors, and that travel expenses are reimbursed. However, it notes that there is a lack of personal protection equipment and communication devices. Noting the constraints on the resources available, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to ensure a sufficient number of inspectors to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate. It also requests the Government to make the necessary arrangements to provide labour inspectors with suitable personal protection equipment and communication devices in accordance with the requirements of the service. Finally, it requests the Government to provide information on any progress made in this regard.
Article 14. Notification of industrial accidents and cases of occupational disease. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that section 441 of the Labour Code of 2019 requires employers to register and declare accidents and occupational diseases to the competent authorities but does not indicate a deadline for this notification. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that section 45 of the IGT Statute establishes a time limit of 48 hours for the employer to communicate work related accidents and occupational diseases to the IGT. In addition, section 46 of the IGT Statute provides that companies shall collect, organize and communicate to the IGT quarterly data concerning diagnosed occupational illnesses and work-related accidents that result in the inactivity of the injured person for a period exceeding one working day. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures adopted to improve the detection and identification of cases of occupational diseases as well as their notification to the labour inspectorate. It also requests the Government to provide information on the application of this provision in practice and to include the representative statistics on cases of occupational disease and work-related accidents in its annual labour inspection report.
Articles 20 and 21. Reports on labour inspection activities. The Committee previously noted that no annual labour inspection reports had been received by the ILO. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in response that the requests of the Committee had been sent to the IGT and that in the medium term the reports are expected to be received and published as required by the Convention. The Committee also notes that sections 6 and 7 of the IGT Statute provide for the preparation of quarterly and annual reports. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that an annual inspection report is developed in the near future, containing full information on the activities of the labour inspection services required by Article 21: (a) laws and regulations relevant to the work of the inspection service; (b) staff of the labour inspection service; (c) statistics of workplaces liable to inspection and the number of workers employed therein; (d) statistics of inspection visits; (e) statistics of violations and penalties imposed; (f) statistics of industrial accidents; and (g) statistics of occupational diseases.

C087 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

Article 3 of the Convention. Right of organizations to freely elect representatives, organize activities and formulate their programmes. In its previous comments, the Committee trusted that the Government would take all necessary measures to amend the legislative provisions referring to the following issues so as to bring its legislation into line with the Convention:
  • – the two-thirds majority required for calling a strike is too high (originally section 4 of Act No. 4/92, currently section 422 of the Labour Code);
  • – with regard to minimum services, it is important, in the event of disagreement in determining such services, that the matter be settled by an independent body and not by the employer (originally section 10(4) of Act No. 4/92, currently section 428(4) of the Labour Code);
  • – compulsory arbitration for services which are not essential in the strict sense, such as postal, banking and loan services (originally section 11 of Act No. 4/92, currently section 429 of the Labour Code); and
  • – requisition of workers in cases of strikes is allowed in non-essential services while it should only be possible in the essential services in the strict sense of the term (Act No. 4-2002).
The Committee notes with regret that the Government, in its report, states that there has been no change to its legislation regarding strikes. It also takes note of the Government’s explanation that: (i) the two-thirds majority that is required to call a strike is based on principles such as collective interest and unanimity within a trade union; (ii) minimum services are currently established by the employer since the State does not have an independent body that can determine them; and (iii) requisition of workers is only allowed in essential services and in cases where a prolonged strike affects public works to a large extent. As regards the majority required to call a strike, the Committee considers that requiring a decision by two thirds of the workers present is excessive and could unduly hinder the possibility of calling a strike. The Committee recalls that the quorum and majority to vote on a strike should be fixed at a reasonable level, taking only into account the votes cast (see the 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 147). Concerning the establishment of minimum services, the Committee observes that the role of an independent body responsible for settling disagreements between the parties may be fulfilled, for instance, by the judicial authorities. Regarding the requisition of workers, the Committee recalls that it is desirable to limit powers of requisitioning to cases in which the right to strike may be limited, or even prohibited, namely: (i) in the public service for public servants exercising authority in the name of the State; (ii) in essential services in the strict sense of the term; and (iii) in the case of an acute crisis (see the 2012 General Survey, paragraph 151). Recalling once again that the above-mentioned matters have been the subject of its comments for several years, the Committee urges the Government to take the necessary measures to amend Act No. 4/92 and Act No. 4-2002 in the very near future and requests the Government to report on any progress made in this respect. The Committee reminds the Government that it may avail itself of the technical assistance of the Office in this regard, if it so wishes.

C098 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Adequate protection against anti-union discrimination and interference. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to take the necessary measures so as to ensure that its legislation imposes sufficiently effective and dissuasive sanctions against acts of anti-union discrimination and interference. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the new Labour Code adopted in 2019 has not introduced any changes in this respect but that it continues to contain a number of specific provisions that give application to Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes in this respect that the legislation in force: (i) comprehensively prohibits acts of anti-union discrimination and interference; (ii) contains rules for adjusting the burden of proof to facilitate the determination of the existence of anti-union discrimination; (iii) establishes enhanced protection for trade union representatives and candidates for the post of representatives against acts of anti-union discrimination; (iv) provides for the reinstatement of workers in the event of unlawful dismissal; and (v) establishes fines and a sanction of imprisonment in the event of acts of anti-union interference.
The Committee takes due note of these elements. It continues however to observe that the provisions of the Labour Code do not provide for specific sanctions for acts of anti-union discrimination affecting workers who are not trade union representatives or candidates for the post of representatives. The Committee therefore requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the legislation provides for effective and dissuasive sanctions against acts of anti-union discrimination that apply to all workers covered by the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any progress made in this regard in its next report.
Article 4. Promotion of collective bargaining. Absence of a legal framework for the exercise of the right to collective bargaining and absence of collective bargaining in practice. The Committee previously expressed concern at the absence of collective agreements in the country, highlighting that the absence of a legal framework could hamper the exercise of the right to collective bargaining. The Committee notes that while the Government states that its legislation still does not provide a legal framework for collective bargaining, it acknowledges the need to facilitate the collective bargaining process in the country in order to reverse the current situation and indicates that meetings of the National Council of Social Concertation have taken place. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all the necessary measures, both in law and practice, to encourage and promote the development and utilization of collective bargaining, and requests it to provide information on the concrete steps taken in this regard.
The Committee reiterates that the technical assistance of the Office is available to the Government in relation to the various matters raised in this observation.

C100 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
Article 2 of the Convention. Minimum wages. The Committee notes the Government’s indication, in its report, concerning the adoption of Decree No. 2/2016 establishing the new national minimum wage and salary scale for the public sector. It further takes note of sections 237 to 243 of the Labour Code, adopted through Act No. 6/2019 of 16 November 2018, on the national minimum wage. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the wage-fixing methods and mechanisms used in practice to establish and revise the national minimum wages and the impact of such measures on the gender wage gap. It asks the Government to provide statistical information on the percentage of women and men who are paid the minimum wage in the private sector, as well as the distribution of women and men in all the grades of the new salary scale in the public sector and their remuneration levels. The Committee also asks the Government to provide information on any awareness-raising activities carried out on the application of the principle of the Convention, in the context of the setting of national minimum wages, including in collaboration with employers’ and workers’ organizations, as well as on any case or complaint regarding a lack of compliance to pay the minimum wage reported or detected by the labour inspectorate and the penalties imposed.
Article 3. Objective job evaluation. The Committee notes that section 22(3) of the Labour Code provides that job description and job evaluation systems should be based on objective criteria which are common to men and women in order to exclude any discrimination based on sex. The Committee recalls that effective implementation of the principle of the Convention requires the use of a job evaluation method in order to measure and compare the relative value of different jobs held by men and women, through an examination of the respective tasks involved, undertaken on the basis of entirely objective and non-discriminatory criteria, such as skills and qualifications, effort, responsibilities and working conditions, to avoid the assessment being tainted by gender bias. It further recalls that measures for the objective evaluation of jobs can be taken at the enterprise, sectoral or national level, in the context of collective bargaining, as well as through wage-fixing mechanisms (see General survey of 2012 on the fundamental Conventions, paragraphs 695 and 701). The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the practical application of section 22(3) of the Labour Code, by indicating the steps taken to promote, develop and implement practical methods for the objective evaluation of jobs, both in the public and private sectors, based on criteria that are free from gender bias, such as qualifications and skills, effort, responsibilities and conditions of work, with a view to ensure the effective implementation of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value. It asks the Government to provide information on any job evaluation exercise undertaken in the public sector, indicating the criteria used and the measures taken to ensure that men and women receive equal remuneration for work of equal value.

C100 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
Article 1 of the Convention. Equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value. Legislative developments. For many years, the Committee has been drawing the Government’s attention to the fact that article 43(a) of the Constitution does not fully reflect the principle of the Convention as it only guarantees “equal wages for equal work”. Referring to its previous comments where it noted that a draft General Labour Act had been prepared and submitted to the Office for comments, the Committee notes with interest the adoption of the Labour Code through Act No. 6/2019 of 16 November 2018, and notes that the provisions on equality and non-discrimination apply to public sector employees (section 3). It notes, in particular, that section 22(1) of the Labour Code provides for equal working conditions for men and women, in particular with regard to pay, and that section 234(5) provides that “all workers of the same company under identical contractual conditions are entitled to receive equal pay for work of equal value, any wage discrimination being prohibited”. The Committee wishes to point out that while the new provisions guarantee “equal pay for work of equal value”, the formulation used under section 234(5) of the Labour Code which requires “identical contractual conditions” is narrower than the principle of the Convention. It recalls that while factors such as complexity, responsibility, difficulty and working conditions are clearly relevant in determining the value of jobs, when examining two jobs, the value does not have to be the same with respect to each of the factors considered. Determining whether two different jobs are of equal value consists of determining the overall value of the jobs when all the factors are taken into account. The principle of the Convention requires equal remuneration for “equal”, “the same” or “similar work”, but also addresses situations where men and women perform different work that is nevertheless of equal value (see 2012 General Survey on fundamental Conventions, paragraphs 676–679). Furthermore, the Committee recalls that the application of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value should not be limited to comparisons between men and women in the same company, as it allows for a much broader comparison to be made between jobs performed by men and women in different places or enterprises, or between different employers (see General Survey of 2012, paragraphs 697 and 698). Regretting that the adoption of the Labour Code has not been taken as an opportunity to give full legislative expression to the principle of the Convention, the Committee asks the Government to consider amending section 234(5) of the Labour Code to ensure that when determining whether two jobs are of equal value: (i) the overall value of the job is considered without limiting the comparison to «identical contractual conditions», and the definition allows for the jobs of an entirely different nature to be compared free from gender bias; and (ii) the scope of comparison goes beyond the same company. The Committee also asks the Government to provide information on the practical application of article 43(a) of the Constitution and sections 22(1) and 234(5) of the Labour Code, including any cases or complaints concerning inequality of remuneration dealt with by the labour inspectorate, the courts or any other competent authorities, specifying the penalties imposed and the compensation awarded. It asks the Government to provide information on any awareness-raising activities undertaken on the new legislative provisions and the principle of the Convention, including in collaboration with employers’ and workers’ organizations.
Articles 2 and 3. Assessing and addressing the gender wage gap. The Committee has repeatedly emphasized the importance of gathering and analysing statistics on salary levels, disaggregated by sex, in order to be in a position to assess the application of the Convention by adequately evaluating the nature, extent and causes of the gender wage gap. The Committee once again notes with regret the absence of information provided by the Government in this regard. It notes that, according to the last available statistical information, women are more often affected by poverty than men (71.3 per cent and 63.4 per cent, respectively, in 2010). Furthermore, in 2012, the women’s labour force participation rate was nearly twice as low as men’s (41.3 per cent and 75.4 per cent, respectively), with women being mostly concentrated in low-qualifications jobs such as unskilled labour force (71 per cent), domestic workers (94 per cent) and services or trade (58.9 per cent of women). It further notes that women are mostly working in the informal economy, which affects 75.7 per cent of the economically active population, characterized by low wages and the lack of social protection. The Committee notes that the Decent Work Country Programme (DWCP) for 2018–21, adopted in July 2018, sets as a specific objective the promotion of productive employment for all, in particular for young people and women, including by raising awareness and encouraging transition from informal to formal economy, enhancing women’s entrepreneurship and access to vocational training, as well as strengthening the National Statistics Institute (INE). Noting that a National Statistical Development Strategy (ENDE) for 2018–21, adopted in February 2018, is currently implemented, the Committee recalls that appropriate data and statistics are crucial in determining the nature, extent and causes of discrimination and unequal remuneration, to set priorities and design appropriate measures, to monitor and evaluate the impact of such measures, and make any necessary adjustments (see General Survey of 2012, paragraph 891). Consequently, the Committee asks the Government to provide information on any measures undertaken to assess and address the gender wage gap, both in the formal and informal economy, in the framework of the DWCP or otherwise. The Committee trusts that the Government will be soon in a position to provide relevant information that would permit an assessment of the remuneration levels of men and women and wage differentials. It again asks the Government to provide updated information on the distribution of women and men in the various economic sectors and occupations, and their corresponding earnings, both in the public and private sectors.
Article 4. Cooperation with workers’ and employers’ organizations. In response to the Committee’s long-standing indication that workers’ and employers’ organizations play an important role with respect to giving effect to the provisions of the Convention, the Government reiterates, in its report, that social partners play an important role in the effective implementation of international standards and national legislation. The Government adds that a revision of Act No.1/99 on the National Council for Social Dialogue (CNCS) is planned. The Committee notes that the DWCP for 2018–21 sets as a specific objective the strengthening of the CNCS and other institutions of social dialogue, as well as capacity-building of the tripartite constituents to promote, inter alia, gender equality and non-discrimination. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on any progress made in the revision of Act No. 1/99 on the CNCS, as well as on any capacity-building activities of employers’ and workers’ organizations undertaken, in the framework of the DWCP or otherwise, to promote gender equality and non-discrimination. In light of the absence of legislation giving full expression to the principle of the Convention, the Committee again asks the Government to seek the cooperation of employers’ and workers’ organizations with regard to the amendment of the legislative framework, as indicated above, as well as with regard to practical measures to ensure equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value. It asks the Government to provide information on any progress made in this regard.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

C111 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
Article 1(1)(b) of the Convention. Additional ground of discrimination. Disability. The Committee notes that sections 16, 17 and 283(1) of the Labour Code, adopted through Act No. 6/2019 of 16 November 2018, prohibit discrimination on the ground of disability in employment and occupation. It further notes that, according to sections 283(2) and (3) and 284 of the Labour Code, the State and the employer shall promote adequate measures to enhance the access of persons with disability to employment and vocational training. The Committee also refers to its 2017 observation on the application of the Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (Disabled Persons) Convention, 1983 (No. 159), where it noted that section 27(2) of the Basic Act for Persons with Disabilities No. 7/2012 establishes a quota system for the employment of persons with disabilities in the public and private sectors. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the practical application of sections 16, 17, 283 and 284 of the Labour Code and section 27(2) of the Basic Act for Persons with Disabilities, including on their impact on ensuring equality of opportunity and treatment of persons with disabilities in employment and occupation. It further asks the Government to provide statistical information on the number of people with disabilities employed in the public and private sectors, disaggregated by sex.
Article 2. General observation of 2018. The Committee would like to draw the Government’s attention to its general observation on discrimination based on race, colour and national extraction which was adopted in 2018. In the general observation, the Committee notes with concern that discriminatory attitudes and stereotypes based on the race, colour or national extraction of men and women workers continue to hinder their participation in education, vocational training programmes and access to a wider range of employment opportunities, resulting in persisting occupational segregation and lower remuneration received for work of equal value. Furthermore, the Committee considers that it is necessary to adopt a comprehensive and coordinated approach to tackling the obstacles and barriers faced by persons in employment and occupation because of their race, colour or national extraction, and to promote equality of opportunity and treatment for all. Such an approach should include the adoption of interlocking measures aimed at addressing gaps in education, training and skills, providing unbiased vocational guidance, recognizing and validating the qualifications obtained abroad, and valuing and recognizing traditional knowledge and skills that may be relevant both to accessing and advancing in employment and to engaging in an occupation. The Committee also recalls that, in order to be effective, these measures must include concrete steps, such as laws, policies, programmes, mechanisms and participatory processes, remedies designed to address prejudices and stereotypes and to promote mutual understanding and tolerance among all sections of the population.
The Committee draws the Government’s attention to its general observation of 2018 and requests the Government to provide information in response to the questions raised in that observation.
Article 5(2). Affirmative action measures. The Committee notes that section 19 of the Labour Code provides that affirmative action measures of a temporary nature for specific disadvantaged groups, for reasons such as sex, reduced working capacity, disability or chronic illness, nationality or ethnic origin, determined by the legislation, are not considered as discrimination. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the practical application of section 19 of the Labour Code, and the adoption and implementation in practice of any affirmative action measures with the objective of ensuring equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of employment and occupation. It asks the Government to indicate how it is ensured that any affirmative action measures envisaged is adopted after consultation with employers’ and workers’ organizations, pursuant to Article 5(2) of the Convention.

C111 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Legislative developments. The Committee has been requesting the Government to ensure that the draft General Labour Act, which was under preparation, would include a prohibition of direct and indirect discrimination at all stages of the employment process and on all the grounds listed in Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention. The Committee notes with satisfaction the adoption of the Labour Code, through Act No. 6/2019 of 16 November 2018, and more particularly sections 15–17, which define and prohibit both direct and indirect discrimination in access to employment, vocational training and promotion and working conditions, based on the grounds of ancestry and social origin, race, colour, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, genetic heritage, reduced working capacity, disability or chronic illness, nationality, ethnic origin, religion, political or ideological beliefs and trade union membership. It further notes that section 18 of the Labour Code defines and prohibits both quid pro quo and hostile work environment sexual harassment, which is expressly defined as a form of discrimination. It notes that, in accordance with section 20, any employee or jobseeker adversely affected by discriminatory practices would be entitled to receive compensation. The Committee notes that, pursuant to section 3(1)(a) and (2) of Act No. 6/2019, the provisions on equality and non-discrimination and sexual harassment at the workplace apply to public employees. In that respect, it further notes the adoption of Act No. 2/2018 of 22 November 2017, amending Act No. 5/1997 on the Civil Service Statute, and more particularly new section 52(B)(1)(e), which provides that civil servants are prohibited from exerting pressure, threatening or harassing other officials or agents or subordinates that may affect the dignity of the person, or include malicious actions. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 15–18 and 20 of the Labour Code, as well as section 52(B)(1)(e) of the Civil Service Statute. The Committee also asks the Government to provide information on any concrete measures taken to raise public awareness and understanding of the relevant new legislative provisions, the procedures and remedies available, in particular for employers, workers and the general public. It asks the Government to provide detailed information on the number and nature of cases of direct and indirect discrimination in employment and occupation dealt with by labour inspectors, the courts or any other competent authorities, as well as the sanctions imposed and compensation awarded.
Articles 2 and 3. Equality of opportunity and treatment of men and women. Policies and institutions. The Committee previously noted the adoption of the National Strategy for Gender Equality and Equity (ENIEG) for 2007–12, dealing with issues relating to women’s equality in the world of work, as well as the establishment of the National Institute for the Promotion of Gender Equality and Equity (INPG) under the Ministry of Labour to implement the ENIEG. Referring to its previous request concerning statistical information on the participation of men and women in vocational training and the labour market, the Committee notes the Government’s general indication, in its report, that such information is not available so far, but that women’s access to decision-making positions and vocational training has improved. The Committee however notes that, according to the latest available statistical information from the National Statistics Institute (2012): the women’s unemployment rate was more than twice as high as that of men (19.7 per cent compared to 9.3 per cent for men), while women’s labour force participation rate was nearly twice as low as men’s (41.3 per cent and 75.4 per cent, respectively), with women being mostly concentrated in low-skilled jobs, such as the unskilled labour force (71 per cent of women), domestic workers (94 per cent) and services or trade (58.9 per cent). It notes that, according to the NSI, women mostly work in the informal economy, which accounts for 75.7 per cent of the economically active population. Furthermore, only 31.1 per cent of women have attained at least a secondary level of education (compared with 45.2 per cent of men). The Committee notes that the Decent Work Country Programme, 2018–21, adopted in July 2018, sets as a specific objective the promotion of productive employment for all, in particular for young persons and women, including by raising awareness and encouraging the transition from the informal to the formal economy, enhancing women’s entrepreneurship and access to vocational training, as well as strengthening the INE. The DWCP further explicitly aims at building this capacity of the tripartite constituents to promote, inter alia, gender equality and non-discrimination. The DWCP refers to the adoption of: (i) a Second National Strategy for Gender Equality and Equity (ENIEG II) for 2013–17 which highlights that one of the main challenges is that men and women benefit from equal opportunities to effectively achieve financial autonomy; and (ii) the National Employment Policy (PNE) in 2015, which highlights the importance of decent work and sets as specific objectives to strengthen technical education and vocational training and promote women’s entrepreneurship, and its accompanying Action Plan on Employment and Vocational Training (PANEF), adopted in 2017, both developed in collaboration with the ILO. It also notes with interest the ratification of the Maternity Protection Convention, 2000 (No. 183), on 12 June 2017. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on any specific measures taken, particularly in the framework of the ENIEG II, the PNE, the PANEF and the DWCP 2018–21, to effectively enhance women’s economic empowerment and access to the formal economy and vocational training, including in sectors where they are under-represented, and to improve equality of opportunity and treatment for men and women in employment and occupation, in both the public and private sectors, including in collaboration with employers’ and workers’ organizations. Noting that a National Statistical Development Strategy for 2018–21 is currently being implemented, the Committee hopes that the Government will soon be in a position to collect and provide updated statistical information on the participation of men and women in vocational training and the labour market, indicating the proportion of men and women in the various economic activities, disaggregated by occupational categories and positions, in both the public and private sectors, as well as in the informal economy.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

C138 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2022, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.
Repetition
Legislation. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that a new Labour Code has been drafted and is in the process of being adopted. The Committee hopes that its comments will be taken into account in the new draft Labour Code and that it will be adopted in the near future.
Article 2(1) of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee had previously noted that according to section 2(1) of Act No. 6/92, the provisions of this Act are applicable only to the relations established between employers and workers within Sao Tome and Principe. It had also noted that out of the 8 per cent of children between the ages of 5 and 14 years found working, 3.2 per cent work in family businesses, and 2.5 per cent perform domestic service.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that there are no children below the age of 14 working in the informal economy and that, for this reason, the legislation does not provide a protection mechanism for children working outside of a formal employment relationship. The Government further indicates that the few children who are working on their own account are street children and that draft legislation providing support for these children is awaiting adoption by the National Assembly. While noting the information provided by the Government, the Committee recalls that, in many countries, the very activities not covered by the legislation are those in which the majority of economically active children under the minimum age are engaged, such as domestic work and family work (see 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 339). Therefore, the Committee requests that the Government take the necessary steps to ensure that children working outside of a formal employment relationship are protected as required by the Convention, especially children involved in domestic and family work. It also requests the Government to provide information on the content of the draft legislation for street children and to provide it with a copy once it has been adopted.
Article 2(3). Age of completion of compulsory schooling. In its previous comments, the Committee had noted that the Basic Education System Law establishes a mandatory six years of free primary education and that six years of compulsory primary education may be completed at the age of 12 years, which is below the minimum age of 14 years for admission to employment or work. It therefore encouraged the Government to take the necessary measures to provide free and compulsory education to all children up to the minimum age for employment, which is 14 years, as a means of combating and preventing child labour.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in partnership with the Portuguese cooperation authorities, it has established the “Escola+” project in the lower and upper secondary schools as part of the review of the education system with a view to increasing the age of completion of free compulsory education from 12 to 15 years of age. While noting the Government’s efforts to raise the age of completion of compulsory schooling, the Committee emphasizes the necessity of linking the age of admission to employment to the age limit for compulsory education. If the minimum age for admission to work or employment is lower than the age of completion of compulsory schooling, children may be encouraged to leave school as children required to attend school may also be legally authorized to work (see 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 370). The Committee therefore strongly urges the Government to link the age of completion of compulsory education with the minimum age of admission to employment. It requests that the Government provide information on the outcome of the review of the education system, including progress made in raising the age of completion of compulsory schooling.
Article 3(2). Determination of hazardous work. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government and the social partners, in a joint effort with the ILO, have been implementing several activities aimed at combating child labour and that these activities have culminated in the production of an agreed list of types of work considered to be hazardous. The Government further indicates that the list will be made available with the new Labour Code and that it will provide a copy once it is published. The Committee once again expresses the hope that the draft list of types of hazardous work will be adopted in the near future. It requests that the Government provide information on any progress made in this regard and to provide a copy of the list, once it has been adopted.
Article 6. Apprenticeship and vocational training. The Committee had previously noted that, as per section 132 of Act No. 6/92, employers must offer training possibilities appropriate to the minor’s age and facilitate their attendance at technical and vocational training courses but that this Act does not establish the minimum age for apprenticeship programmes in undertakings.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that under the new Labour Code, the National Assembly will be responsible for all legal procedures relating to apprenticeship programmes. The Government further indicates that there is no minimum age for entering into programmes in training centres but that there is a minimum level of education requested which can be completion of fourth, sixth or, in most cases, ninth grade. Whilst taking due note of the information regarding vocational training centres, the Committee notes that the Government has not provided information on the minimum age to enter apprenticeship programmes in undertakings and recalls that under Article 6 of the Convention, the minimum age should be set at 14 years. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that children below the age of 14 do not enter apprenticeship programmes in undertakings. It also requests the Government to provide information on whether the National Assembly has prescribed conditions under which apprenticeships may be undertaken and performed by children above the age of 14 years.
Article 7. Light work. The Government previously indicated that there are no exceptions to the minimum age with regard to light work. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the new Labour Code will address this issue. The Committee recalls that under Article 7(1) and (4) of the Convention, national laws or regulations may permit the employment of persons of at least 12 years of age on light work which is not likely to be harmful to their health or development and not such as to prejudice their attendance at school, their participation in vocational orientation or training programmes approved by the competent authority or their capacity to benefit from the instruction received. It also recalls that, under Article 7(3) of the Convention, the competent authority shall determine the activities in which light work may be permitted and shall prescribe the number of hours during which, and the conditions in which, such employment or work may be undertaken. The Committee takes due note of the Government’s indications and expresses the firm hope that the new Labour Code will include provisions that regulate and determine the light work performed by children between 12 to 14 years of age.
Article 9(1). Penalties. The Committee had previously noted section 147 of Act No. 6/92 which establishes penalties of fines for the breach of section 128 (minimum age provision), section 129 (prohibition on hazardous work by minors) and section 133 (requiring employers to provide minor employees with working conditions appropriate to their age).
The Government indicates that, with the new Labour Code, the penalties for breach of these provisions will increase. However, the Committee once again notes that the Government did not provide information on the application in practice of penalties under section 147 of Act No. 6/92. Therefore, the Committee once again requests that the Government provide information on the application in practice of the penalties laid down under section 147 of Act No. 6/92 for the breach of the provisions related to employment of children under 14 years of age, including the number and nature of the penalties imposed in order to assess the adequateness of the penalties.
Article 9(3). Keeping of registers. The Committee had previously noted that there appears to be no provisions in Act No. 6/92 requiring employers to keep a register or other documents, such as worker identification cards, that contain the details, including the name and age of the minors employed by them.
The Government indicates that employers have an obligation to send to the employment authorities information on workers above 14 years of age. It further indicates that a Memorandum of Understanding will soon be signed between the Ministry of Employment and Social Affairs and the Chamber of Commerce and that one of the measures taken will involve employers’ issuance of internal worker identification cards. The Committee recalls that one important tool used by labour inspectors to monitor the employment of young persons is the employers’ registers of employment. These registers (or similar documents) are required under Article 9(3) and should contain the names and ages (or dates of birth) of all persons employed under the age of 18. These registers are to be made available to labour inspectors, and consulting these registers may aid labour inspectors in the detection of violations related to child labour (see General Survey on fundamental Conventions, 2012, paragraph 404). The Committee therefore requests that the Government provide information on whether the internal worker identification cards will contain the names and ages or dates of birth of employees below the age of 18 and whether they will be made available to labour inspectors, in conformity with Article 9(3) of the Convention.
Labour inspectorate and application of the Convention in practice. The Committee had previously noted the Government’s statement that the Directorate of the Labour Inspection within the Ministry of Labour, Solidarity and Family, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of Act No. 6/92. The Government also indicated it would send copies of the reports concerning the activities undertaken by the Directorate according to Act No. 6/92.
The Committee notes from the Government’s report on the application of the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182), that the labour inspectorate conducts inspections and imposes penalties on employers who illegally employ minors. The Committee recalls that information on the concrete activities of the labour inspectorate is necessary to assess how the Convention is being applied and enforced in practice. The Committee therefore once again requests that the Government provide extracts of reports or documents of the labour inspectorate indicating the number, nature and extent of violations detected concerning child labour. Recalling the importance of statistical data to assess the application of the Convention in practice, it also requests the Government to provide a general appreciation of the manner in which the Convention is applied in practice, including available statistical data on the employment of children and young persons, extracts from inspection reports, information on the number and nature of violations detected, investigation conducted and sanctions applied.

C182 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2022, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.
Repetition
Article 3 of the Convention. Worst forms of child labour. Clause (a). All forms of slavery or practices similar to slavery. Sale and trafficking of children. The Committee previously noted that the new Penal Code Law No. 6 of 2012 was adopted. It noted that section 172 of the Penal Code prohibits the transporting of persons to a foreign country for prostitution and that section 181(2) provides that enticing, transporting, harbouring or receiving a minor below the age of 18 years for prostitution shall be punished. The Committee requested the Government to indicate the provisions of the Penal Code that prohibit the trafficking of minors for labour exploitation.
The Committee takes due note of the Government’s indication in its report that section 160(1) of the Penal Code prohibits trafficking in persons for labour exploitation with a penalty ranging from two to eight years of imprisonment and that under section 160(3) this penalty increases to three to ten years when the crime involves children under the age of 16 years. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application in practice of the sections of the Penal Code that prohibit the sale and trafficking of children under the age of 18 years for sexual or labour exploitation, including the number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and nature of the penalties imposed.
Article 4(1). Determination of hazardous work. With regard to the adoption of the list of hazardous types of work prohibited to children under the age of 18 years, the Committee requests the Government to refer to its detailed comments under the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138).
Article 6. Programmes of action. The Committee previously noted that the Government, in cooperation with the ILO and UNICEF, had approved a National Plan on the Worst Forms of Child Labour, under which several training and awareness-raising seminars on child labour and its worst forms has been organized for teachers, employers and young businessmen.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the National Plan has helped raise awareness about child labour and the importance of prevention at all levels of society, including in schools and in the media. The Government states that the National Plan has rendered many results, including the complete disappearance of “helpers” under 18 years of age in offices. Moreover, the Committee notes that in 2012 the Government, in collaboration with ILO–IPEC, implemented the “Awareness Raising and Support for the Implementation of the Global Action Plan on the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labour by 2016”. The project’s objectives were to provide support to tripartite constituents to fight child labour and eradicate its worst forms through the elaboration and implementation of an action plan, the strengthening of competent institutions and the elaboration of a list of hazardous types of work prohibited to children. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on any measures taken or envisaged within the framework of the National Plan on the worst forms of child labour and the ILO–IPEC project. Please also provide information on the impact of such programmes with regard to the elimination of the worst forms of child labour, particularly the number of children reached through these initiatives.
Article 7(1). Penalties. The Committee notes the absence of information provided with regard to the practical application of the penalties laid down under Act No. 6/92 for imposing hazardous work on minors or under the Penal Code for offences under Article 3(a)–(c) of the Convention. The Committee recalls that information on the number and nature of the infringements reported, investigations, prosecutions, convictions and penalties applied serves both to measure the number of child victims of the worst forms of child labour and the effective implementation and enforcement of the national provisions giving effect to the Convention (see General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, 2012, paragraph 644). Therefore, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the practical application of the penalties laid down under Act No. 6/92 and under the Penal Code for violation of the rights protected under the Convention.
Article 7(2). Effective and time-bound measures. Clause (a). Prevent the engagement of children in the worst forms of child labour. Access to free basic education. The Committee previously noted that the Government, in partnership with some civil society organizations and donors, has implemented specific assistance programmes for facilitating access to school for children belonging to poor communities, through free uniforms, concession of school passes on school buses, and the distribution of school grants to low-income families to keep children in school. Moreover, the Government indicated that in partnership with the United Nations World Food Programme and the Government of Brazil, the Government introduced the provision of one hot meal per day to students in order to reduce school drop-outs. Finally, the Committee noted that the Fast-Track Project instituted within the Structural Adjustment Programme (PASS) undertook the construction and renovation of classrooms to reach the objective of universalizing the free and compulsory six-year elementary school programme for children in the country.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it has adopted the National Poverty Reduction Strategy (2012–16) in which the objective in terms of education was to develop strategies to improve the quality of instruction and to create genuine equality of opportunity in initial and continuing school enrolment. The Government further indicates that it has built schools at the community level in order to ensure that most, if not all, school-age children meet the compulsory education requirement. Considering that the National Poverty Reduction Strategy ended in 2016, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the strategies that are being developed or envisaged to improve access to free basic compulsory education and the results achieved. The Committee encourages the Government to continue its efforts to improve the functioning of the education system, by taking measures to ensure access to free basic, quality education for all children, particularly children from poor communities, including by taking measures to increase the school enrolment and completion rates, both at the primary and secondary levels. It requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken in this regard and on the results achieved. To the extent possible, this information should be disaggregated by age and by gender.
Clause (b). Providing the necessary and appropriate assistance for the removal of children from the worst forms of child labour and for their rehabilitation and social integration. Street children. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the Government’s information that the reception centres established in the country play an important role in removing children, especially street children, from the worst forms of child labour.
The Government indicates that underage children found to be working are automatically removed from the workplace, taken to reception centres and, later, returned to their families. Additionally, the Committee notes the Government’s statement from its report under the application of the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138), that the Ministry of Employment and Social Affairs and the Department of Social Protection and Solidarity are working on a Street Children Support Project which, once implemented, will mitigate this problem. The Committee encourages the Government to continue its efforts to remove street children from the worst forms of child labour. It requests, once again, the Government to provide information on the number of children removed from the street and received in the reception centres. Please also provide a copy of the Street Children Support Project.
Article 7(3). Designation of a competent authority. The Committee notes from the concluding observations formulated by the Committee on the Rights of the Child dated 29 October 2013 that the National Child Rights Committee ceased to operate in November 2012 and that no appropriate body was created or named to replace it (CRC/C/STP/CO/2-4, paragraph 10). Recalling the importance of the existence of a competent authority to properly supervise the application of the Convention, the Committee requests the Government to designate a competent authority responsible for the implementation of the provisions giving effect to this Convention.
Article 8. International cooperation. The Committee previously noted that Sao Tome and Principe was one of the 24 countries to adopt the Multilateral Cooperative Agreement to Combat Trafficking in Persons, especially women and children in West and Central Africa, which, among others, aims to develop a common front to prevent, fight and suppress trafficking in persons and to protect, rehabilitate and reintegrate victims of trafficking.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that in the framework of the Multilateral Cooperative Agreement, it has ratified the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. It has also signed an agreement on cooperation between Central African criminal police agencies aimed at ensuring cooperation between the national police authorities on matters relating to trafficking in persons. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the impact these cooperation agreements have had in combating trafficking in children.
Application of the Convention in practice. The Government indicates that it has implemented various activities in partnership with public and private institutions and non-governmental organizations, with a view to give effect, in practice, to the Convention such as a Rapid Survey on Child Labour (2014), the National Plan on the Worst Forms of Child Labour, and the Sao Tome and Principe Campaign against Child Labour. The Committee takes due note of the efforts made and requests the Government to provide detailed information on the current situation regarding the worst forms of child labour, including information on the nature, extent and trends of these forms of child labour, the number of children covered by the measures giving effect to the Convention, the number and nature of infringements reported, investigations, prosecutions, convictions and penal sanctions applied.

Adopted by the CEACR in 2019

C155 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Legislation. Labour Code of 2019. The Committee notes the Government’s indication, in reply to its previous comments, that Act No. 14 of 2017 on Occupational Safety, Hygiene and Health (OSH Act) is the primary legislation that gives effect to the Convention, which is now an integral part of the new Labour Code adopted in 2019 (sections 436–526). In this respect, the Committee welcomes that the new Labour Code gives effect to a number of provisions of the Convention.
Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Scope of application. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Convention applies to all branches of economic activity and to all categories of workers. It notes with interest that, under sections 438(1) and 439 of the Labour Code, all branches of activity and all workers regardless of their association with an employment relationship fall under the application of sections 436–526 of the Labour Code regarding OSH. However, the Committee notes section 438(3) of the Labour Code, which excludes the armed forces, police forces and civil protection services in the public sector from the application of these sections. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which it ensures that workers in the activities excluded from the application of sections 436–526 of the Labour Code regarding OSH benefit from the provisions of the Convention, and to provide a copy of any relevant legislation in this respect.
Articles 4, 7 and 8. National OSH policy and review of the national OSH situation in consultation with the most representative employers’ and workers’ organizations. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the OSH Act (which is now an integral part of the Labour Code), as well as Act No. 1/1999 establishing the National Council for Social Dialogue, give effect to these Articles of the Convention. It also notes that, pursuant to section 378(c) of the Labour Code, trade unions have the right to participate in the drafting of labour legislation. The Committee also notes the 2018–21 Decent Work Country Programme (DWCP) that establishes, as its priorities, strengthened OSH and workplace compliance through the elaboration of a national OSH policy as well as strengthened tripartism and social dialogue. The DWCP also identifies a lack of ownership between policymakers as a challenge to achieving an effective system of OSH.
Regarding the periodic review of the national OSH situation, the Government explains that, although the general labour inspectorate is responsible for a review of the situation regarding OSH and the working environment, labour inspectors are unable to periodically carry out such a review due to limited resources. The Government states that awareness-raising campaigns are conducted instead. In its 2009 General Survey, Promoting standards on occupational safety and health, paragraph 78, the Committee indicated that the review of the national policy provided for in Article 4 of the Convention depends on and should be informed by the review of the national situation provided for in Article 7.
The Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which the National Council for Social Dialogue was involved and consulted for the development and the adoption of the occupational safety and health provisions of the Labour Code. It also requests the Government to take measures, in the context of the present DWCP, to periodically review the national OSH policy through consultation with the National Council for Social Dialogue, and provide information on the progress made in this regard. The Committee also asks the Government to take necessary measures to ensure the periodic review of the national situation regarding OSH and the working environment, including in the context of the DWCP.
Article 5(c). Training and education. The Committee notes that sections 101(2)(j) and 442(c) of the Labour Code cover this sphere of action generally. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the provision of training and education related to OSH in practice.
Articles 5(d) and 20. Communication and cooperation at the level of the undertaking. The Committee notes that the principles of communication and cooperation on occupational safety and health between employers and workers are outlined generally under the Labour Code (sections 442(i) and 443(a)). It also notes that, pursuant to section 516(1), all workplaces with more than 50 workers are obliged to organize health and safety services under the guidance of a safety officer, whose duties include promoting workers’ awareness about hygiene and safety issues in order to foster prevention of occupational risks. The Committee also notes that the DWCP seeks to establish health and safety committees that would institutionalize communication and cooperation at the level of undertakings in order to give effect to Article 20. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the progress made in the establishment of safety and health committees at the workplace level in the context of the current DWCP.
Article 5(e). The protection of workers from disciplinary measures. The Committee notes that section 116 of the Labour Code provides that “disciplinary sanctions are considered to be abusive” when workers had legitimate complaints about working conditions or have exercised, or intend to exercise, their rights. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on all the measures taken in order to ensure that workers and their representatives are protected from disciplinary measures as a result of actions properly taken by them in accordance with the national OSH policy, including information on the implementation of section 116 of the Labour Code in this respect.
Articles 6 and 15. Functions and responsibilities of public authorities, employers and workers. Necessary coordination between various authorities and bodies. The Committee notes that the functions and responsibilities of employers, workers and safety officers with respect to OSH and the working environment are defined under the Labour Code (sections 442, 443, 516(1), and 517). The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken or envisaged to define the respective functions and responsibilities of public authorities, including the Ministry of Labour and the tripartite National Council for Social Dialogue in the areas of OSH and the working environment. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the arrangements taken or envisaged to ensure necessary coordination between various authorities and bodies to give effect to the provisions of the Convention. It also requests the Government to provide information on the consultations and their outcomes, regarding those arrangements, with the most representative organizations of employers and workers.
Article 9(1). Enforcement of laws and regulations concerning OSH through an adequate and appropriate system of inspection. The Committee notes that, under the terms of section 519 of the Labour Code, the supervision of compliance with its provisions on OSH shall be carried out by the general labour inspectorate, the health inspectorate and the other entities with competence in this matter, according to the applicable legislation. However, it notes with concern the information provided by the Government in its report on the application of Convention No. 81 that the Occupational Safety, Hygiene and Health Department under the general labour inspectorate within the Ministry of Employment and Social Affairs has one department coordinator, four technicians, and one inspector. Noting the significantly limited number of labour inspectors in the areas of OSH, the Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the manner in which effect is given in practice to Article 9(1). The Committee also refers the Government to its comments on the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), concerning the requirement for an adequate and appropriate system of labour inspection.
Article 9(2). Adequate penalties for violations. The Committee notes that, under section 533 of the Labour Code, a fine is applicable for infringements of the technical OSH standards set out in: sections 444–499 on installations, protection, maintenance and use of machinery, use of machines, lifting, transportation and storage of devices and equipment, installation, appliances and miscellaneous utensils (section 533(1)); sections 500–508 concerning personal protective equipment (section 533(2)); sections 509–511 on safety, hygiene and health of workers (section 533(3)); and sections 512–513 on sanitary facilities and medical exams (section 533(4)). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application in practice of the fines set out in section 533 of the Labour Code.
Article 11(a) and (b). Determination of design, construction, layout and operations of undertakings and safety of technical equipment. Prohibition, limitation or authorization of work processes, substances and agents. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that the competent authorities progressively carry out the functions set out in Article 11(a) and (b) relating to the determination of conditions governing the design, construction, and layout of undertakings, the commencement of their operations, major alterations and changes in their purposes, the safety of technical equipment used at work, and the application of procedures; as well as the determination of prohibition, limitation or authorization or control of work processes and substances and agents.
Article 11(c). Procedures for the notification of occupational accidents and diseases and production of annual statistics. The Committee notes that section 441(1) of the Labour Code requires employers to declare accidents and occupational diseases to the competent authorities and register them. It also notes the Government’s indication that the National Social Security Institute handles cases whenever occupational accidents occur or medical reports are submitted to the Institute. The Government states that in 2016, 19 individuals were registered as victims of occupational accidents and received social security payments, while many undertakings also deal directly with insurance companies that insure victims of accidents. The Committee requests the Government to take necessary measures to ensure the production of annual statistics on occupational accidents and diseases, and to provide information on any progress achieved in this respect.
Article 11(d). Holding of inquiries. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to give full effect to Article 11(d) of the Convention by providing for the holding of inquiries where cases of occupational accidents, occupational diseases or any other injuries to health which arise in the course of or in connection with work appear to reflect situations which are serious.
Article 11(e). Publication of information on the implementation of the national policy. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the annual publication of information on OSH measures taken pursuant to the national OSH policy, and on occupational accidents and occupational diseases.
Article 11(f). Systems to examine chemical, physical and biological agents. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which it gives effect to Article 11(f) of the Convention.
Article 12(b) and (c). Obligations of persons who design, manufacture, import, provide or transfer machinery, equipment or substances for occupational use. The Committee requests the Government to take measures to ensure that those who design, manufacture, import, provide or transfer machinery, equipment or substances for occupational use make available information concerning the correct installation and use of all types of machinery and equipment, and to provide further information on the manner in which it ensures that those persons keep abreast of the necessary scientific and technical knowledge.
Article 13. Right of workers to remove themselves from danger. The Committee notes that section 116 of the Labour Code contains a list of situations in which it is prohibited for the employer to sanction an employee, but observes that this section does not refer specifically to cases in which a worker has removed themselves due to a perceived imminent or serious danger. The Committee requests the Government to take specific measures to ensure that workers who remove themselves from a work situation which they have reasonable justification to believe presents an imminent and serious danger to their life or health are protected from undue consequences and the employer cannot require workers to return to a work situation where there is continuing imminent and serious danger to life or health.
Article 14. Inclusion of occupational safety and health and the working environment at all levels of education and training. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the OSH Act (which are now included the Labour Code) and the Act No. 5/97 on the Statute of the Public Administration give effect to this Article. It notes that these sections provide for employers’ duty to provide workers and their representatives with training (sections 101(2)(j) and 442(c) of the Labour Code), and the workers’ right to vocational training provided by public administration in general (section 17 of the Act No. 5/97). The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken or envisaged to ensure the inclusion of OSH at all levels of education and training, including higher technical, medical and professional education.
Article 16(2). Employers’ OSH responsibilities to ensure protection from health risks relating to chemical, physical and biological substances and agents. The Committee notes that the Labour Code provides for employers’ responsibilities related to Article 16(2) with respect to pregnant women and young workers (sections 264, 265, and 266). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to give full effect to Article 16(2) to ensure employers’ responsibilities as required under Article 16(2) are generally applicable to all workplaces and workers.
Article 17. Collaboration between undertakings engaging in activities simultaneously at one workplace. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures, in accordance with Article 17 that whenever two or more undertakings engage in activities simultaneously at one workplace, they collaborate in applying the requirements of this Convention.
Article 19(b), (c) and (e). Cooperation of workers’ representatives and the employer. Information to and consultation with workers’ representatives on OSH measures taken by the employer. Ability of workers and their representatives to enquire into and be consulted on all aspects of OSH associated with their work. The Committee notes that effect is given to Article 19(a),(d) and (f), and partially to Article 19(e) by sections 443(a) (on workers’ duty to cooperate), 442(c) (on employers’ duty to provide training for workers and their representatives), 516(1) and 517 (role of safety officers), and section 443(e) (on workers’ duty to notify an imminent and serious danger) of the Labour Code. The Committee requests the Government to take further measures to give effect to Article 19(b), (c), and (e) of the Convention with respect to cooperation of workers’ representatives and the employer; employers’ duty to ensure workers’ representatives are given adequate information and consulted on OSH measures taken by them; and rights of workers and their representatives to inquire into and be consulted on all aspects of OSH. It also requests the Government to provide further information on whether a technical adviser may be brought from outside the undertaking by mutual agreement for the purpose of enabling workers and their representatives to inquire into, and be consulted on, OSH matters, in accordance with Article 19(e).
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer