Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006) - Finland (Ratification: 2013)

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee takes note of the supplementary information provided by the Government in light of the decision adopted by the Governing Body at its 338th session (June 2020). The Committee proceeded with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the supplementary information received from the Government this year, as well as on the basis of the information at its disposal in 2019. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that its supplementary information took into account observations from the Finnish Seamen's Union (FSU).

The Committee notes the Government’s second and third reports on the application of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, as amended (MLC, 2006). The Committee notes that the amendments to the Code approved by the International Labour Conference in 2014 and 2016 entered into force for Finland on 18 January 2017 and 8 January 2019, respectively. Based on the review of the information and documents available, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the following issues.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Committee takes note of the observations of the International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF) and of the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), received by the Office on 1 October 2020 and 26 October 2020, respectively, alleging that ratifying states have failed to comply with certain provisions of the Convention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Noting with deep concern the impact of the COVID pandemic on the respect of seafarers’ rights as laid out in the Convention, the Committee refers to its general observation of 2020 on this issue.

Article I of the Convention. General questions on application. Implementing measures. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in April 2020, it submitted to Parliament a proposal (HE 42/2020 vp) for the adoption and implementation of the amendments to the Code approved by the International Labour Conference in 2018, and to a number of acts, including the Seafarers' Employment Contracts Act, which will ensure the continuation of the employee’s employment relationship and salary payment in a situation where the employee is imprisoned as a result of piracy or armed robbery against the ship. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the proposed amendments to the Seafarers’ Employment Contracts Act, Seamen’s Working Hours Act and the Act on Working Hours on Vessels in Domestic Traffic, with more detailed specifications in relation to the appeal procedure on board the ship, and matters concerning working hours and rest periods. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that technical amendments were proposed to the Seamen’s Annual Holidays Act, the Act on Seamen’s Service, and the Act on Compensation with State Funds for Travel Expenses for Seafarers. Moreover, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that a Government Decree bringing such amendments into force nationally is expected to be issued by the end of 2020. The Committee requests the Government to confirm whether the above-mentioned amendments have entered into force, and if so, to communicate a copy of each of the amended texts, indicating the new provisions that have a bearing on the implementation of the Convention.

Regulation 1.2 and Standard A1.2, paragraph 5. Medical certificate. Right to have a further examination. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how it gives effect to seafarers’ rights to have a further medical examination in cases where they have been refused a certificate or have had a limitation imposed on their ability to work. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that if a seafarer is found not to be fit for service at sea during a pre-sea examination or a periodic examination, he/she can apply for dispensation from the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (FTSA). Before taking a decision on dispensation, the FTSA shall request a second opinion from the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health on the applicant’s health status. It further notes that a dispensation may be granted for no more than two years at a time and, if necessary, limitations or conditions may be added to it. A decision on dispensation granted by the FTSA may be appealed, as provided in Administrative Judicial Procedure Act No. 586/1996. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 1.4 and Standard A1.4, paragraph 7. Recruitment and placement. Investigation of complaints. The Committee noted that chapter 14, section 1, of the Act on Public Employment and Business Service (916/2012) permits a claim for rectification against a decision issued by the employment and economic development office but does not seem to provide for an investigation of complaints and requested the Government to explain how it implements this requirement of the Convention. In its reply, the Government indicates that the Chancellor of Justice and the Parliamentary Ombudsman monitors that authorities and civil servants, public employees and other persons performing a public task comply with the law and fulfil their obligations. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 2.1 and Standard A2.1, paragraph 1(b). Seafarers’ employment agreement. Examination and advice before signing. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide clarification on how it is ensured that seafarers are given the opportunity to examine and seek advice on the employment agreement before signing it, as required under Standard A2.1, paragraph 1(b), of the Convention. In its reply, the Government indicates again that, in practice, seafarers are given the opportunity to have sufficient information concerning the conditions of work on board ship. The Committee recalls that the Convention requires that each Member shall adopt laws or regulations giving the seafarer the opportunity to request again the Government to examine and seek advice on the agreement before signing it. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures to give effect to this requirement of the Convention.

Regulation 2.1 and Standard A2.1, paragraph 4(a). Seafarers’ date of birth or age. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that chapter 1, section 3, of the Seafarers’ Employment Contract Act (756/2011), and the Seaman’s Contract of Employment provided by the Government contain almost all of the requirements set out in Standard A2.1, paragraph 4, with the exception of the seafarer’s date of birth or age. It requested the Government to indicate the measures adopted in order to include the seafarer’s date of birth or age in the seafarers’ employment agreement. In its reply, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that chapter 1, section 3, of the Contract of Employment contains inter alia the identity number, which includes six numbers referring to the date of birth of the seafarer. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 2.1 and Standard A2.1, paragraphs 5 and 6. Seafarers’ employment agreement. Termination. Shorter notice period for urgent reasons. The Committee requested the Government to explain how it is ensured that the agreed notice period shall not be shorter than seven days, as required under Standard A2.1, paragraph 5, with the exception of cases of “compassionate or other urgent reasons” as stated in paragraph 6 of this Standard. In its reply, the Government indicates that, in Finland, collective agreements include comprehensive provisions on notice periods for employment that last more than seven days. For example, according to the collective agreement between the Finnish Seamen’s Union (SMU ry) and the Finnish Shipowners’ Association on passenger vessels in international traffic as well as the collective bargaining agreement for vessels in international commercial trade, the employer must comply with a minimum notice period, which is two months (if employment has continued for zero to five years), and employees must comply with a one-month notice period (if employment has continued for zero to ten years). Unorganized employers are also obligated to comply with the provisions on periods of notice in generally applicable collective agreements. The Committee notes however that neither the collective agreement nor the Seafarers’ Employment Contract Act seem to contain any indication about the circumstances in which a seafarer is authorized to terminate the employment agreement, without penalty, on shorter notice or without notice for compassionate or other urgent reasons, according to Standard A2.1, paragraph 6. The Committee requests the Government to explain how compliance with this requirement of the Convention is ensured.

Regulation 2.3 and the Code. Hours of work and hours of rest. The Committee requested the Government to: (i) explain how all seafarers, including masters, chief engineers or first mates and chief officers of the catering department of passenger vessels, are covered by the protection afforded by Regulation 2.3; (ii) adopt the necessary measures ensuring that watchkeeping in port is included in the schedule of service in port, emphasizing that such task cannot be considered as an emergency situation; and (iii) provide further details on the procedures for keeping the records on board concerning seafarers’ working hours and the intervals at which the information is recorded as well as a copy of the approved standardized table for shipboard working arrangements, according to Standard A2.3, paragraphs 10 and 11. In its reply, the Government refers to the amendments 436/2020 to the Seafarer’s Working Hours Act N°296/2976, the amendments 437/2020 to the Act on Working Hours on Vessels in Domestic Traffic N°248/1982. The Committee takes note with interest of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 2.5, Standard A2.5, paragraph 1(b)(ii). Repatriation. The Committee requested the Government to explain how it ensures that a reasonable period of time to claim repatriation is indeed given to seafarers before they may lose this entitlement guaranteed by Standard A2.5, paragraph 1(b)(ii) of the Convention. In its reply, the Government indicates that according to chapter 3, section 2, subsection 3, of the Seafarers’ Employment Contracts Act, when terminating or voiding their employment contract, the employee must ask for the right to a paid homeward journey. Seafarers’ and shipowners’ organizations were not aware of any instances in which the provisions may have caused problems or in which the paid homeward journey requested by an employee had been denied. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 2.5 and Standard A2.5.2. Financial security in the event of abandonment. In relation to the 2014 amendments to the Code of the Convention, the Committee recalls that, pursuant to Standard A2.5.2, the Government shall ensure the provision of an expeditious and effective financial security system to assist seafarers in case of their abandonment. In this regard, the Committee takes note with interest that the Seafarer’s Employment Contracts Act (chapter 13, section 13) was amended in 2016 to give effect to Standard A2.5.2. The Committee requests the Government to indicate if it has received requests to facilitate repatriation of a seafarer and, if yes, how did it respond. It further requests the Government to indicate what are the circumstances under which a seafarer is considered abandoned according to national legislation.

Regulation 3.1 and Standard A3.1, paragraph 18. Accommodation and recreational facilities. Frequent inspections. The Committee requested the Government to specify the frequency of the inspections of the seafarers’ accommodation, pursuant to the requirements of Standard A3.1, paragraph 18, of the Convention. In its reply, the Government refers to section 13 of Act 395/2012, which provides that the ship’s master has the right to inspect the seafarers’ accommodation, if there is reason to suspect that the accommodation does not meet the health and safety requirements or if an inspection is necessary to ensure that the accommodation is suitable for living. The Government indicates that more specific provisions on regular inspections could not be included in national law, because such inspections would constitute a violation of the sanctity of the home guaranteed by section 10 of the Finnish Constitution, which protects the facilities on board a vessel used for accommodation of a permanent nature. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 3.2 and Standard A3.2, paragraphs 2(c), 3 and 4. Food and catering. Training for ship’s cook. The Committee requested the Government to provide information on the implementation of this provision of the Convention, in particular details on the requirements of a training course for obtaining a cook’s certificate. The Committee notes the Government’s reference in this regard to Decree No. 508/2018 on Manning and Certification of Seafarers, in particular, sections 9, 52, 53 and 54, which contain the requirements for receiving certification as a cook. The content of this training is specified in the Finnish National Agency for Education’s criteria for a basic qualification in the hotel, restaurant and catering industry. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 4.1, Standard A4.1, paragraph 4(d). Medical advice by radio or satellite. The Committee requested the Government to indicate whether the existing system of satellite or radio to provide medical advice is available free of charge, 24 hours a day to all ships, and how this requirement of the Convention is applied in practice. In its reply, the Government refers to the Maritime Search and Rescue Act (1145/2001). According to section 3 of the Act, the Border Guard acts as the leading maritime rescue authority, and is responsible for radio communications related to hazardous situations as well as the transmission of doctor’s services via telephone to vessels (section 3). Maritime search and rescue are on call around the clock. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 4.2 and Standard A4.2.1, paragraph 1(c). Shipowners’ liability. Minimum standards. Expenses of medical care and board and lodging away from home. The Committee requested the Government to clarify the duration of the shipowner’s liability with respect to the seafarer’s medical care and wages, in accordance with Standard A4.2, paragraphs 1(c) and 3. In its reply, the Government refers to chapter 2, section 13, of the Seafarer’s Employment Contracts Act, which provides that the employer shall be responsible for the costs of medical treatment, up to a maximum of 112 days. As regards the application of paragraph 3 of Standard A4.2.1, the Government indicates that chapter 2, section 10, of the said Act provides that “employees who are prevented from performing their work by an illness or accident are entitled to pay during illness, shipmasters up to a maximum of 90 days, other employees up to a maximum of 60 days in foreign traffic and up to a maximum of 30 days in domestic traffic”. The Committee recalls that Standard A4.2, paragraph 3, requires that the shipowner shall be liable to pay full wages to the sick or injured seafarers, regardless of their position on board, as long as they remain on board or until the seafarers have been repatriated and from the time when they are repatriated or landed until recovery or, if earlier, until they are entitled to cash benefits under the national legislation. The liability of the shipowner to pay wages in whole or in part shall not be less than 16 weeks. The Committee observes that the legislation referred to by the Government does not give full effect to the provision of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to give full effect to the requirements of Standard A4.2, paragraph 3, of the Convention.

Regulation 4.2 and Standards A4.2.1 and A4.2.2. Shipowners’ liability. Financial security in the event of death or long-term disability. In relation to the 2014 amendments to the Code of the Convention, the Committee recalls that pursuant to Standards A4.2.1 and A4.2.2, national laws and regulations shall provide that the financial security system to assure compensation in the event of the death or long-term disability of seafarers due to an occupational injury, illness or hazard meet certain minimum requirements. In this regard, the Committee takes note with interest that the Seafarer’s Employment Contracts Act (chapter 13, section 13) was amended in 2016 to give effect to Standard A4.2.2. The Committee draws the Government’s attention to the following questions: (1) how do national laws and regulations ensure that the system of financial security meets the following minimum requirements: (i) payment of compensation in full and without delay; (ii) no pressure to accept payment less than the contractual amount; (iii) interim payments (while the situation is being assessed) to avoid undue hardship; (iv) offsetting payment against any damages resulting from any other claim made by the seafarer against the shipowner and arising from the same incident; and (v) persons who can bring the claim for contractual compensation (seafarer, her/his next of kin, representative or designated beneficiary)?; (2) does national legislation provide that seafarers receive prior notification if a shipowner’s financial security is to be cancelled or terminated?; and (3) how does national legislation ensure that effective arrangements are in place to receive, deal with and impartially settle contractual claims relating to compensation in the event of the death or long-term disability of seafarers due to an occupational injury, illness or hazard, through expeditious and fair procedures? The Committee requests the Government to reply to the above-mentioned questions, indicating in each case the applicable national provisions.

Regulation 4.3 and the Code. Legislation on health and safety protection and accident prevention. The Committee requested the Government to specify whether and how the legislation implementing Regulation 4.3 and the Code takes into account the relevant international instruments dealing with occupational safety and health protection, particularly with respect to maritime employment, as required by Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(a). In its reply, the Government refers to the Occupational Safety and Health Act (738/2002) and the Act on Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement and Cooperation on Occupational Safety and Health at Workplaces (44/2006), which also applies to ships, as well as to the Government Decree on the Working Environment on Board Ships (289/2017). The Committee further notes the Government’s indication that there is no need to enact another legislation specifically on the health and safety of seafarers. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 4.3 and Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(d). Health and safety protection and accident prevention. Ship’s safety committee. The Committee requested the Government to indicate the measures taken to implement this requirement of the Convention. In its reply, the Government refers to Section 42 of the Act on Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement and Cooperation on Occupational Safety and Health at Workplaces (44/2006), as amended by Act No 398/2012. Such provision states that, on ships with at least five crew members, an occupational safety and health delegate shall be elected and an occupational safety and health committee shall be established. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 5.1.3 and the Code. Maritime labour certificate and declaration of maritime labour compliance (DMLC). The Committee requested the Government to consider amending the DMLC, Part I, so as to ensure that it not only provides a reference to the national requirements embodying the relevant provisions of the Convention, but also, to the extent necessary, concise information on the main content of these requirements. In its reply, the Government indicates that it will take the necessary measures to amend the DMLC, Part I. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to provide a copy of the amended DMLC, Part I, once available. Noting the absence of explicit provisions in the legislation, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how it ensures that a valid maritime labour certificate and the DMLC are carried on board the ship in accordance with Standard A5.1.3, paragraph 12. The Committee notes with interest that chapter 13, section 15 of the Seafarers’ Employment Contracts Act, as amended in 2016, gives effect to this provision of the Convention. The Committee further notes with interest the adoption of the Act on Amendments to the Code of the Maritime Labour Convention (447/2018) and the Government Decree on the Entry into Force of the Act on Amendments to the Code of the Maritime Labour Convention (1029/2018), as well as of the amendment to section 8 of the Act on the Working and Living Environment and Catering for Seafarers on Board Ships (395/2012), which give effect to Standard A5.1.3, paragraph 4, of the Convention, as amended in 2016. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 5.1.4 and the Code. Inspection and enforcement. The Committee requested the Government to clarify whether the inspection report is, in fact, submitted to the competent authority, as required by the Convention. In its reply, the Government indicates that an inspector from the competent authority enters the inspection report into the VERA system, which will automatically notify the competent authority that the report has been completed. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 5.1.5, paragraph 2. On-board complaint procedures. The Committee requested the Government to explain how it is ensured that any kind of victimization of a seafarer for filing a complaint is prohibited and penalized, as required under Regulation 5.1.5, paragraph 2. In its reply, the Government refers to chapter 47, section 3, of the Criminal Code, which penalizes an employer or a representative thereof who, when advertising for a vacancy or selecting an employee, or during employment without an important and justifiable reason, commits work discrimination based on 1) race, national or ethnic origin, nationality, colour, language, sex, age, family status, sexual preference, inheritance, disability or state of health, or 2) religion, political opinion, political or industrial activity or a comparable circumstance. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes the Government’s second and third reports on the application of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, as amended (MLC, 2006). The Committee notes that the amendments to the Code approved by the International Labour Conference in 2014 and 2016 entered into force for Finland on 18 January 2017 and 8 January 2019, respectively. Based on its second review of the information and documents available, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the following issues.

Regulation 1.2 and Standard A1.2, paragraph 5. Medical certificate. Right to have a further examination. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how it gives effect to seafarers’ rights to have a further medical examination in cases where they have been refused a certificate or have had a limitation imposed on their ability to work. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that if a seafarer is found not to be fit for service at sea during a pre-sea examination or a periodic examination, he/she can apply for dispensation from the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (FTSA). Before taking a decision on dispensation, the FTSA shall request a second opinion from the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health on the applicant’s health status. It further notes that a dispensation may be granted for no more than two years at a time and, if necessary, limitations or conditions may be added to it. A decision on dispensation granted by the FTSA may be appealed, as provided in Administrative Judicial Procedure Act No. 586/1996. The Committee takes note of this information.

Regulation 1.4 and Standard A1.4, paragraph 7. Recruitment and placement. Investigation of complaints. The Committee noted that chapter 14, section 1, of the Act on Public Employment and Business Service (916/2012) permits a claim for rectification against a decision issued by the employment and economic development office but does not seem to provide for an investigation of complaints and requested the Government to explain how it implements this requirement of the Convention. In its reply, the Government indicates that the Chancellor of Justice and the Parliamentary Ombudsman monitors that authorities and civil servants, public employees and other persons performing a public task comply with the law and fulfil their obligations. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 2.1 and Standard A2.1, paragraph 1(b). Seafarers’ employment agreement. Examination and advice before signing. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide clarification on how it is ensured that seafarers are given the opportunity to examine and seek advice on the employment agreement before signing it, as required under Standard A2.1, paragraph 1(b), of the Convention. In its reply, the Government indicates again that, in practice, seafarers are given the opportunity to have sufficient information concerning the conditions of work on board ship. The Committee recalls that the Convention requires that each Member shall adopt laws or regulations giving the seafarer the opportunity to request again the Government to examine and seek advice on the agreement before signing it. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures to give effect to this requirement of the Convention.

Regulation 2.1 and Standard A2.1, paragraph 4(a). Seafarers’ date of birth or age. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that chapter 1, section 3, of the Seafarers’ Employment Contract Act (756/2011), and the Seaman’s Contract of Employment provided by the Government contain almost all of the requirements set out in Standard A2.1, paragraph 4, with the exception of the seafarer’s date of birth or age. It requested the Government to indicate the measures adopted in order to include the seafarer’s date of birth or age in the seafarers’ employment agreement. In its reply, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that chapter 1, section 3, of the Contract of Employment contains inter alia the identity number which includes six numbers referring to the date of birth of the seafarer. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 2.1 and Standard A2.1, paragraphs 5 and 6. Seafarers’ employment agreement. Termination. Shorter notice period for urgent reasons. The Committee requested the Government to explain how it is ensured that the agreed notice period shall not be shorter than seven days, as required under Standard A2.1, paragraph 5, with the exception of cases of “compassionate or other urgent reasons” as stated in paragraph 6 of this Standard. In its reply, the Government indicates that, in Finland, collective agreements include comprehensive provisions on notice periods for employment that has lasted more than seven days. For example, according to the collective agreement between the Finnish Seamen’s Union (SMU ry) and the Finnish Shipowners’ Association on passenger vessels in international traffic as well as the collective bargaining agreement for vessels in international commercial trade, the employer must comply with a minimum notice period, which is two months (if employment has continued for zero to five years), and employees must comply with a one-month notice period (if employment has continued for zero to ten years). Unorganized employers are also obligated to comply with the provisions on periods of notice in generally applicable collective agreements. The Committee notes however that neither the collective agreement nor the Seafarers’ Employment Contract Act seem to contain any indication about the circumstances in which a seafarer is authorized to terminate the employment agreement, without penalty, on shorter notice or without notice for compassionate or other urgent reasons, according to Standard A2.1, paragraph 6. The Committee requests the Government to explain how compliance with this requirement of the Convention is ensured.

Regulation 2.3 and the Code. Hours of work and hours of rest. The Committee requested the Government to: (i) explain how all seafarers, including masters, chief engineers or first mates and chief officers of the catering department of passenger vessels, are covered by the protection afforded by Regulation 2.3; (ii) adopt the necessary measures ensuring that watchkeeping in port is included in the schedule of service in port, emphasizing that such task cannot be considered as an emergency situation; and (iii) provide further details on the procedures for keeping the records on board concerning seafarers’ working hours and the intervals at which the information is recorded as well as a copy of the approved standardized table for shipboard working arrangements, according to Standard A2.3, paragraphs 10 and 11. In its reply, the Government indicates that it has initiated in September 2019 a draft amendment of Seafarer’s Working Hours Act No. 296/1976 implementing Standard A2.3, paragraphs 12 and 14, of the Convention. Such legislative amendment will be examined together with shipowners’ and seafarers’ organizations. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the progress made in this regard and to provide a copy of the text once it has been adopted.

Regulation 2.5, Standard A2.5, paragraph 1(b)(ii). Repatriation. The Committee requested the Government to explain how it ensures that a reasonable period of time to claim repatriation is indeed given to seafarers before they may lose this entitlement guaranteed by Standard A2.5, paragraph 1(b)(ii) of the Convention. In its reply, the Government indicates that according to chapter 3, section 2, subsection 3, of the Seafarers’ Employment Contracts Act, when terminating or voiding their employment contract, the employee must ask for the right to a paid homeward journey. Seafarers’ and shipowners’ organizations were not aware of any instances in which the provisions may have caused problems or in which the paid homeward journey requested by an employee had been denied. The Committee takes note of this information.

Regulation 2.5 and Standard A2.5.2. Financial security in the event of abandonment. In relation to the 2014 amendments to the Code of the Convention, the Committee recalls that, pursuant to Standard A2.5.2, the Government shall ensure the provision of an expeditious and effective financial security system to assist seafarers in case of their abandonment. In this regard, the Committee takes note with interest that the Seafarer’s Employment Contracts Act (chapter 13, section 13) was amended in 2016 to give effect to Standard A2.5.2. The Committee requests the Government to indicate if it has received requests to facilitate repatriation of a seafarer and, if yes, how did it respond. It further requests the Government to indicate what are the circumstances under which a seafarer is considered abandoned according to national legislation.

Regulation 3.1 and Standard A3.1, paragraph 18. Accommodation and recreational facilities. Frequent inspections. The Committee requested the Government to specify the frequency of the inspections of the seafarers’ accommodation, pursuant to the requirements of Standard A3.1, paragraph 18, of the Convention. In its reply, the Government refers to section 13 of Act 395/2012, which provides that the ship’s master has the right to inspect the seafarers’ accommodation, if there is reason to suspect that the accommodation does not meet the health and safety requirements or if an inspection is necessary to ensure that the accommodation is suitable for living. The Government indicates that more specific provisions on regular inspections could not be included in national law, because such inspection would constitute a violation of the sanctity of the home guaranteed by section 10 of the Finnish Constitution which protects the facilities on board a vessel used for accommodation of a permanent nature. The Committee takes note of this information.

Regulation 3.2 and Standard A3.2, paragraphs 2(c), 3 and 4. Food and catering. Training for ship’s cook. The Committee requested the Government to provide information on the implementation of this provision of the Convention, in particular details on the requirements of a training course for obtaining a cook’s certificate. The Committee notes the Government’s reference in this regard to Decree No. 508/2018 on Manning and Certification of Seafarers, in particular, sections 9, 52, 53 and 54, which contain the requirements for receiving certification as a cook. The content of this training is specified in the Finnish National Agency for Education’s criteria for a basic qualification in the hotel, restaurant and catering industry. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 4.1, Standard A4.1, paragraph 4(d). Medical advice by radio or satellite. The Committee requested the Government to indicate whether the existing system of satellite or radio to provide medical advice is available free of charge, 24 hours a day to all ships, and how this requirement of the Convention is applied in practice. In its reply, the Government refers to the Maritime Search and Rescue Act (1145/2001). According to section 3 of the Act, the Border Guard acts as the leading maritime rescue authority, and is responsible for radio communications related to hazardous situations as well as the transmission of doctor’s services via telephone to vessels (section 3). Maritime search and rescue are on call around the clock. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 4.2 and Standard A4.2.1, paragraph 1(c). Shipowners’ liability. Minimum standards. Expenses of medical care and board and lodging away from home. The Committee requested the Government to clarify the duration of the shipowner’s liability with respect to the seafarer’s medical care and wages, in accordance with Standard A4.2, paragraphs 1(c) and 3. In its reply, the Government refers to chapter 2, section 13, of the Seafarer’s Employment Contracts Act which provides that the employer shall be responsible for the costs of medical treatment, up to a maximum of 112 days. As regards the application of paragraph 3 of Standard A4.2.1, the Government indicates that chapter 2, section 10, of the said Act provides that “employees who are prevented from performing their work by an illness or accident are entitled to pay during illness, shipmasters up to a maximum of 90 days, other employees up to a maximum of 60 days in foreign traffic and up to a maximum of 30 days in domestic traffic”. The Committee recalls that Standard A4.2, paragraph 3, requires that the shipowner shall be liable to pay full wages to the sick or injured seafarers, regardless of their position on board, as long as they remain on board or until the seafarers have been repatriated and from the time when they are repatriated or landed until recovery or, if earlier, until they are entitled to cash benefits under the national legislation. The liability of the shipowner to pay wages in whole or in part shall not be less than 16 weeks. The Committee observes that the legislation referred to by the Government does not give full effect to the provision of the Convention. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to give full effect to the requirements of Standard A4.2, paragraph 3, of the Convention.

Regulation 4.2 and Standards A4.2.1 and A4.2.2. Shipowners’ liability. Financial security in the event of death or long-term disability. In relation to the 2014 amendments to the Code of the Convention, the Committee recalls that pursuant to Standards A4.2.1 and A4.2.2, national laws and regulations shall provide that the financial security system to assure compensation in the event of the death or long-term disability of seafarers due to an occupational injury, illness or hazard meet certain minimum requirements. In this regard, the Committee takes note with interest that the Seafarer’s Employment Contracts Act (chapter 13, section 13) was amended in 2016 to give effect to Standard A4.2.2. The Committee draws the Government’s attention to the following questions: (1) how do national laws and regulations ensure that the system of financial security meets the following minimum requirements: (i) payment of compensation in full and without delay; (ii) no pressure to accept payment less than the contractual amount; (iii) interim payments (while the situation is being assessed) to avoid undue hardship; (iv) offsetting payment against any damages resulting from any other claim made by the seafarer against the shipowner and arising from the same incident; and (v) persons who can bring the claim for contractual compensation (seafarer, her/his next of kin, representative or designated beneficiary)?; (2) does national legislation provide that seafarers receive prior notification if a shipowner’s financial security is to be cancelled or terminated?; and (3) how does national legislation ensure that effective arrangements are in place to receive, deal with and impartially settle contractual claims relating to compensation in the event of the death or long-term disability of seafarers due to an occupational injury, illness or hazard, through expeditious and fair procedures? The Committee requests the Government to reply to the above-mentioned questions, indicating in each case the applicable national provisions.

Regulation 4.3 and the Code. Legislation on health and safety protection and accident prevention. The Committee requested the Government to specify whether and how the legislation implementing Regulation 4.3 and the Code takes into account the relevant international instruments dealing with occupational safety and health protection, particularly with respect to maritime employment, as required by Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(a). In its reply, the Government refers to the Act on Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement and Cooperation on Occupational Safety and Health at Workplaces which also applies to ships. The Committee observes however that this law does not contain any reference to the particularities of the work of seafarers. The Committee again requests the Government to indicate how effect is given to Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(a), of the Convention.

Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(d). Ship’s safety committee. The Committee requested the Government to indicate the measures taken to implement this requirement of the Convention. In its reply, the Government refers to the Act on Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement and Cooperation on Occupational Safety and Health at Workplaces. Section 38 of the Act provides that an occupational safety and health committee shall be established at workplaces of at least 20 employees. Recalling that Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(d), specifies that a safety committee shall be established on board ships on which there are five or more seafarers, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to implement this requirement of the Convention.

Regulation 5.1.3 and the Code. Maritime labour certificate and declaration of maritime labour compliance (DMLC). The Committee requested the Government to consider amending the DMLC, Part I, so as to ensure that it not only provides a reference to the national requirements embodying the relevant provisions of the Convention, but also, to the extent necessary, concise information on the main content of these requirements. In its reply, the Government indicates that it will take the necessary measures to amend the DMLC, Part I. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to provide a copy of the amended DMLC, Part I, once available. Noting the absence of explicit provisions in the legislation, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how it ensures that a valid maritime labour certificate and the DMLC are carried on board the ship in accordance with Standard A5.1.3, paragraph 12. The Committee notes with interest that chapter 13, section 15 of the Seafarers’ Employment Contracts Act, as amended in 2016, gives effect to this provision of the Convention. The Committee further notes with interest the adoption of the Act on Amendments to the Code of the Maritime Labour Convention (447/2018) and the Government Decree on the Entry into Force of the Act on Amendments to the Code of the Maritime Labour Convention (1029/2018), as well as of the amendment to section 8 of the Act on the Working and Living Environment and Catering for Seafarers on Board Ships (395/2012), which give effect to Standard A5.1.3, paragraph 4, of the Convention, as amended in 2016.

Regulation 5.1.4 and the Code. Inspection and enforcement. The Committee requested the Government to clarify whether the inspection report is, in fact, submitted to the competent authority, as required by the Convention. In its reply, the Government indicates that an inspector from the competent authority enters the inspection report into the VERA system, which will automatically notify the competent authority that the report has been completed. The Committee takes note of this information, which addresses its previous request.

Regulation 5.1.5, paragraph 2. On-board complaint procedures. The Committee requested the Government to explain how it is ensured that any kind of victimization of a seafarer for filing a complaint is prohibited and penalized, as required under Regulation 5.1.5, paragraph 2. In its reply, the Government refers to chapter 47, section 3, of the Criminal Code penalizing discrimination when advertising for a job vacancy or when selecting a candidate for such job. In the absence of relevant information on the implementation of this provision, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to prohibit and penalize any kind of victimization of a seafarer for filing a complaint.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes the Government’s first report on the application of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006). It further notes that Finland had previously ratified 21 maritime labour Conventions that were denounced as a result of the entry into force of the MLC, 2006 for Finland. Following a first review of the information and documents available, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the following issues. If considered necessary, the Committee may come back to other matters at a later stage.

Regulation 1.2 and the Code. Medical certificate. The Committee notes that the Act on Medical Fitness Examinations of Seafarers (1171/2010) regulates the medical fitness examinations that seafarers must undergo in order to obtain a medical certificate attesting that they are medically fit to work on board ships. It also notes that the legislation does not, however, contain any provisions with respect to seafarers who have been refused a certificate or have had a limitation imposed on their ability to work. The Committee recalls that Standard A1.2, paragraph 5, requires that seafarers in these situations are given the opportunity to have a further examination by another independent medical practitioner or by an independent medical referee. The Committee requests the Government to explain how it ensures the implementation of this provision of the Convention.

The Committee notes that section 9(1) of the Act on Medical Fitness Examinations of Seafarers states that the medical certificates shall be issued in Finnish or Swedish and in English if the seafarer is engaged on international voyages, which is a requirement of Standard A1.2, paragraph 10. It also notes that the Seafarer Medical Examination Form, approved by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and provided by the Government is written in Finnish and contains only one section that appears also in English. The Committee requests the Government to explain how it is ensured that the medical certificates for seafarers working on ships ordinarily engaged on international voyages are as a minimum provided in English, as required under Standard A1.2, paragraph 10.

Regulation 1.4 and the Code. Recruitment and placement services. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there are no private recruitment services operating in its territory and that the public employment and business services, in accordance with the Act on Public Employment and Business Service (916/2012), seek to promote, among other things, the functioning of the labour market by ensuring the availability of skilled labour and providing jobseekers with opportunities for finding work. The Committee notes in particular that Chapter 14, section 1 of the Act permits a claim for rectification against a decision issued by the employment and economic development office but does not seem to provide for the investigation of complaints. The Committee recalls in this regard that Standard A1.4, paragraph 7, requires the competent authority to ensure that adequate machinery and procedures exist for the investigation of complaints concerning the activities of seafarer recruitment and placement services, involving, as appropriate, representatives of shipowners and seafarers. The Committee requests the Government to explain how it implements this requirement of the Convention.

Regulation 2.1 and the Code. Seafarers’ employment agreements. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that although Finnish legislation does not contain any specific provisions that an employee should be given time to examine an employment contract in advance before signing it, this rule is applied in practice. It also notes that there is no provision nor any mention regarding the seafarer’s right to seek advice on the agreement before signing it. The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide clarifications on how it is ensured that seafarers are given the opportunity to examine and seek advice on the employment agreement before signing it, as required under Standard A2.1 of the Convention.

The Committee notes that Chapter 1, section 3 of the Seafarers’ Employment Contract Act (756/2011), and the Seaman’s Contract of Employment provided by the Government contain almost all of the requirements set out in Standard A2.1, paragraph 4, of the Convention, with the exception of the seafarer’s date of birth or age. Recalling that this information is essential to ensure that no person below the minimum age is employed or engaged in a ship, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures adopted or foreseen in order to include the seafarer’s date of birth or age in the seafarers’ employment agreement, as required by the Convention.

The Committee notes that if an employment contract has been concluded for an indefinite period, Chapter 7, section 4, of the Seafarers’ Employment Contract Act provides for various periods of notice to be observed by the employer, unless otherwise agreed, ranging from one month to six months, depending on the length of uninterrupted service. It also notes that the seafarer, on the other hand, must observe periods of notice ranging from 14 days to two months (also depending on the length of uninterrupted service), unless otherwise agreed. In any case, it appears that the parties are able to agree upon a notice period shorter than what is prescribed by the Act, or even the minimum period of seven days required under Standard A2.1, paragraph 5, of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to explain how it is ensured that the agreed notice period shall not be shorter than seven days, as required under Standard A2.1, paragraph 5, of the Convention, with the exception of cases of “compassionate or other urgent reasons” as stated in paragraph 6 of this Standard.

Regulation 2.3 and the Code. Hours of work and hours of rest. The Committee notes that section 2 of the Seamens’ Working Hours Act (296/1976) states that this Act does not apply to work performed by: (i) the master of a vessel on board which two or more persons are employed in addition to the master; (ii) the chief engineer or first mate, if their work is not divided into watches; and (iii) the chief officer of a passenger vessel catering department employing at least 15 persons in addition to the said officer. The Committee recalls that “seafarer” is defined under Article II, paragraph (1)(f), of the Convention as “any person who is employed or engaged or works in any capacity on board a ship to which this Convention applies”. The Committee therefore requests the Government to explain how all seafarers, including masters, chief engineers or first mates and chief officers of the catering department of passenger vessels, are covered by the protection afforded by Regulation 2.3 of the Convention.

The Committee had previously noted in its comment concerning the Seafarers’ Hours of Work and the Manning of Ships Convention, 1996 (No. 180), that under sections 10 of both the Seafarers’ Hours of Work Act and the Act on Working Hours on Vessels in Domestic Traffic, minimum rest periods may not only be interrupted by the master in case of emergency situations, but also in the case of necessary watchkeeping duties in the port. The Committee had requested the Government to ensure that watchkeeping in port is included in the schedule of service in port. Observing that the legislation has not changed on this matter, the Committee recalls that according to Standard A2.3, paragraph 14, of the Convention, the master may suspend the schedule of hours of work or hours of rest and require a seafarer to perform any hours of work necessary until the normal situation has been restored when necessary for the immediate safety of the ship, persons on board or cargo, or for the purpose of giving assistance to other ships or persons in distress at sea. As watchkeeping in port cannot be considered as an emergency situation, the Committee requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures to ensure that this task is included in the schedule of service in port and that interruptions to the scheduled hours of work and rest periods are limited to the circumstances contemplated in Standard A2.3, paragraph 14.

The Committee had also noted, with respect to Convention No. 180, that there were no provisions in the legislation requiring the endorsement of the working hours register by all parties concerned. Noting that the situation remains the same, the Committee recalls that under Standard A2.3, paragraph 12, of the Convention, seafarers are entitled to receive a copy of the records pertaining to them which shall be endorsed by the master, or a person authorized by the master, and by the seafarers. The Committee requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures to implement this provision of the Convention. It also requests the Government to provide further details on the procedures for keeping the records on board and the intervals at which the information is recorded. The Government is finally requested to provide a copy of the approved standardized table for shipboard working arrangements, according to Standard A2.3, paragraphs 10 and 11.

Regulation 2.5, Standard A2.5, paragraph 1(b)(ii). Repatriation. The Committee notes that Chapter 3, section 2(3) of the Seafarers’ Employment Contracts Act states that seafarers may lose their right to a free homeward journey if they fail to request it when giving notice or cancelling their employment agreement. Noting that according to Guideline B2.5.1, paragraph 8, the entitlement to repatriation may lapse if the seafarers concerned do not claim it within a reasonable period of time to be defined by national laws or regulations or collective agreements, the Committee requests the Government to explain how it ensures that a reasonable period of time to claim repatriation is indeed given to seafarers before they may lose this entitlement guaranteed by Standard A2.5, paragraph 1(b)(ii), of the Convention.

Regulation 3.1, Standard A3.1, paragraph 18. Accommodation and recreational facilities. The Committee notes that according to section 12 of the Act on the Working and Living Environment and Catering for Seafarers on Board Ships (395/2012), the ship’s master has the right to inspect the seafarers’ accommodation if there is reason to suspect that the accommodation does not meet the health and safety requirements or if an inspection is necessary to ensure that the accommodation is suitable for living. It notes, however, that this Act does not mention the frequency of the inspections. The Committee requests the Government to specify the frequency of the inspections of the seafarers’ accommodation, pursuant to the requirements of Standard A3.1, paragraph 18, of the Convention.

Regulation 3.2, Standard A3.2, paragraph 4. Training requirements for ships’ cooks. The Committee notes that the applicable legislation, while regulating training for ships’ cooks, does not contain details on the requirements of a training course for obtaining a cook’s certificate, which should be approved or recognized by the competent authority and cover practical cookery, food and personal hygiene, food storage, stock control and environmental protection and catering health and safety, as required under Standard A3.2, paragraph 4, of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the implementation of this provision of the Convention, indicating any relevant legislation on this matter.

Regulation 4.1, Standard A4.1, paragraph 4(d). Medical advice by radio or satellite. The Committee notes that section 4 of the Decree of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on Ships’ Medical Stores (589/2015) states that the medical stores of certain vessels must have the latest edition of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) International Code of Signals for medical consultation via radio or satellite communication systems. While this implies that the ships are required to carry the appropriate equipment to allow medical advice through radio or satellite communications, the Committee notes that this is not specified in the legislation. The Committee recalls that Standard A4.1, paragraph 4(d), of the Convention requires the competent authority to ensure that medical advice by radio or satellite communication to ships at sea, including specialist advice, is available 24 hours a day, and shall be free of charge to all ships irrespective of the flag they fly. The Committee requests the Government to specify whether this system is put in place and how this requirement of the Convention is applied in practice.

Regulation 4.2 and the Code. Shipowner’s liability. The Committee notes that Chapter 2, section 12, of the Seafarers’ Employment Contracts Act states that the employer has a duty to provide proper care for sick or injured seafarers and, where necessary, the seafarer must be brought ashore to receive medical care including the medical care prescribed by a medical doctor with any and all travel, medication and subsistence. The employer’s responsibility for subsistence of the seafarer shall expire, at the latest, when the seafarer returns to his or her home. If a sick or injured seafarer has to remain abroad to receive medical care, the employer shall make sure that the employee receives proper care and treatment. The Committee recalls that Standard A4.2, paragraph 1(c), of the Convention states that shipowners shall be liable to defray the expense of medical care until the sick or injured seafarer has recovered, or until the sickness or incapacity has been declared of a permanent character. The Committee also notes that Chapter 2, section 10, of the Act states that the seafarer is entitled to wages during illness and limits the shipowner’s liability to pay wages for a set period according to their position on board. The Committee recalls that Standard A4.2, paragraph 3, states that the shipowner shall be liable to pay full wages to the sick or injured seafarer as long as he or she remains on board or until the seafarers have been repatriated; and from the time when he or she is repatriated or landed until recovery or, if earlier, until they are entitled to cash benefits under the national legislation. The Committee notes that the legislation does not specify the duration of the shipowner’s liability in each of these cases. The Committee requests the Government to clarify the duration of the shipowner’s liability with respect to the seafarer’s medical care and wages, in accordance with Standard A4.2, paragraphs 1(c) and 3, of the Convention.

The Committee notes that Chapter 2, section 10, of the Seafarers’ Employment Contracts Act states that the seafarer is entitled to wages during illness according to their position on board: shipmasters up to a maximum of 90 days, other employees up to a maximum of 60 days in foreign traffic and up to a maximum of 30 days in domestic traffic. The Committee recalls that the shipowners’ liability regarding the payment of wages in whole or in part in respect of a seafarer no longer on board shall not be less than 16 weeks from the day of the injury or the commencement of the sickness, as required under Standard A4.2, paragraph 4, of the Convention. Noting that the limit established by the legislation does not satisfy this requirement of the Convention, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to fully implement this provision of the Convention.

Regulation 4.3 and the Code. Legislation on health and safety protection and accident prevention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Occupational Safety and Health Act No. 738/2002 is observed as a general Act that applies to all work carried out on the basis of an employment relationship or service. It also takes note of other legislation of general application implementing Regulation 4.3, such as the Act on Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement and Cooperation on Occupational Safety and Health at Workplaces No. 44/2006, as amended. The Committee requests the Government to specify whether and how the legislation implementing Regulation 4.3 and the Code takes account of relevant international instruments dealing with occupational safety and health protection, particularly with respect to maritime employment, as required by Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(a), of the Convention.

Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(d). Ship’s safety committee. The Committee notes that section 38 of the Act on Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement and Cooperation on Occupational Safety and Health at Workplaces states that an occupational safety and health committee shall be established at workplaces of at least 20 employees. The Committee recalls that Standard A4.3, paragraph 2(d), specifies that a safety committee shall be established on board ships on which there are five or more seafarers. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to implement this requirement of the Convention.

Regulation 5.1.3 and the Code. Maritime labour certificate and declaration of maritime labour compliance. The Committee notes that the Government supplied a copy of the Declaration of Maritime Labour Compliance (DMLC) Part I and an example of a DMLC Part II. It also notes that the DMLC Part I only refers to the relevant legislation without further information on the content of the identified provisions. Similarly, the Committee notes that the example of a DMLC, Part II, contains a reference to the relevant legislation and a brief description of the requirement but it is not an authorized document. The Committee recalls that Standard A5.1.3, paragraph 10(a), provides that the DMLC, Part I, drawn up by the competent authority shall not only “identify the national requirements embodying the relevant provisions of this Convention by providing a reference to the relevant national legal provisions” but also provide, “to the extent necessary, concise information on the main content of the national requirements”. The Committee also recalls that Guideline B5.1.3, paragraph 1, provides guidance with respect to the statement of national requirements, including recommending that “where national legislation precisely follows the requirement stated in this Convention, a reference may be all that is necessary”. The Committee requests the Government to consider amending the DMLC, Part I, so as to ensure that it not only provides a reference to the national requirements embodying the relevant provisions of the Convention, but also to the extent necessary concise information on the main content of these requirements.

The Committee notes the Government’s statement that there is no specific provision in the national legislation requiring the posting of the labour certificate on the ship, but that this is implemented in practice through the general International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) requirement where the certificate, at minimum, must be readily available on board for examination at all times. The Committee recalls that, according to Standard A5.1.3, paragraph 12, a current valid maritime labour certificate and declaration of maritime labour compliance shall be carried on board the ship, a copy shall be placed in a conspicuous place on board ship to be available to all seafarers, and a copy shall be available upon request to seafarers, flag State inspectors, authorized officers in port States and shipowners’ and seafarers’ representatives. The Committee requests the Government to explain how it is ensured that these documents are available on board ship in the manner required by the Convention.

Regulation 5.1.4 and the Code. Inspection and enforcement. The Committee notes that under section 11(3) of the Act on Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement and Cooperation on Occupational Safety and Health at Workplaces the inspection report, completed by the inspector, shall be submitted to the employer and the occupational safety and health representative, or in the absence of an occupational safety and health representative, the employer shall notify the employees of the inspection report in an appropriate manner at the workplace. The Committee recalls that while Standard A5.1.4, paragraph 12, of the Convention requires inspectors to submit a report to the competent authority, this requirement is not specified in the legislation. The Committee requests the Government to clarify whether the inspection report is in fact submitted to the competent authority, as required by the Convention.

Regulation 5.1.5, paragraph 2. On-board complaint procedures. The Committee notes that section 28 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act states that if harassment or other inappropriate treatment of an employee occurs at work, the employer shall take measures for remedying this situation. However, it is unclear if the seafarer is protected from any kind of victimization after lodging a complaint, as required by Regulation 5.1.5, paragraph 2. The Committee requests the Government to explain how it is ensured that any kind of victimization of a seafarer for filing a complaint is prohibited and penalized, as required under Regulation 5.1.5, paragraph 2, of the Convention.

[The Government is asked to reply in full to the present comments in 2018.]