ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2022, published 111st ILC session (2023)

Croatia

Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81) (Ratification: 1991)
Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129) (Ratification: 1991)

Other comments on C081

Observation
  1. 2023
  2. 2022
  3. 2018
  4. 2015
  5. 2013
  6. 2011

Other comments on C129

Observation
  1. 2023
  2. 2022
  3. 2018

Display in: French - SpanishView all

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.
The Committee notes the observations of the Union of Autonomous Trade Unions of Croatia (UATUC) and the Independent Trade Unions of Croatia (NHS) on Convention No. 81, received in 2016.
Article 3(2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(3) of Convention No. 129. Additional functions entrusted to labour inspectors. The Committee notes that the Government has not replied to its previous request regarding the role of the labour inspectorate and the justice system in the enforcement of the Foreigners Act (FA) and on joint activities involving the labour inspectorate in combating undeclared work. The Committee notes that pursuant to section 3(2) of the Labour Inspection Act (LIA), labour inspectors conduct inspections in connection with the implementation of other legislation whenever stipulated in specific legislation. The Committee also notes that the Annual Report of the labour inspectorate of 2017, referred to by the Government, contains information on the work of labour inspectors in the enforcement of the provisions of the FA, including measures relating to the work of foreigners without a permit or a work registration certificate (section 208 of the FA). The Committee recalls once again its previous comments that the Convention does not contain any provision suggesting that any workers be excluded from the protection afforded by labour inspection on account of their irregular employment status, and that the primary duty of labour inspectors is to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers and not to enforce immigration law. It further recalls that pursuant to Article 3(2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(3) of Convention No. 129, any further duties which may be entrusted to labour inspectors shall not be such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties.The Committee requests the Government to take measures to ensure that the functions assigned to labour inspectors do not interfere with the main objective of labour inspectors to ensure the protection of workers in accordance with labour inspectors’ primary duties as provided for in Article 3(2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(3) of Convention No. 129. It also once again requests the Government to provide detailed information regarding the role of labour inspectors in the enforcement of the FA, as well as any other joint activities between the labour inspectorate and other state bodies aimed at combating undeclared work, including the scope of these activities, the proportion of labour inspection activities and resources directed to the enforcement of the FA or otherwise combating undeclared work, and the impact of these activities on the work of the labour inspectorate with regard to the enforcement of legal provisions on conditions of work and the protection of workers.
Articles 3(2), 10, and 16 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 6(3), 14 and 21 of Convention No. 129. Number of labour inspectors for the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate and additional duties. The Committee notes the observations by the UATUC and the NHS that there is an insufficient number of labour inspectors, and that the existing inspection staff is burdened by the quantity of work related to workers’ claims in cases of employer bankruptcy, which prevents them from discharging their primary tasks in the fields of employment relations and occupational health and safety (OSH). The UATUC and NHS further note the likely imminent retirement of many labour inspectors, and that the lack of inspectors has a significant influence on the regularity and quality of inspections in the field of OSH and labour relations. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that, as of 31 December 2016, the labour inspectorate employed a total of 226 labour inspectors and 10 other civil servants in positions related to IT and analytical activities for the improvement of the work carried out by the labour inspectorate and that by 31 December 2017, the number of labour inspectors had increased to 229. Nonetheless, the Government also identifies the insufficient number of labour inspectors as one of the difficulties encountered in the application of the Convention.The Committee requests the Government to provide further information regarding the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that a sufficient number of labour inspectors is appointed, in accordance with Article 10 of Convention No. 81 and Article 14 of Convention No. 129, and that existing labour inspectors’ additional duties do not interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties.
Articles 5(a), 17 and 18 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12, 22(1) and 24 of Convention No. 129. Institution of legal proceedings and enforcement of adequate penalties. In its previous comments, the Committee noted a decrease in the rate of cases in which the legal proceedings initiated by labour inspectors were declared inadmissible by the misdemeanour courts due to the expiration of the statute of limitations (from 58 to 36.5 per cent), due primarily to the adoption of the Misdemeanours Act modifying the applicable time limits. The Committee notes an absence of information in response to its previous request regarding additional measures to give effect to Articles 5(a), 17 and 18 of Convention No. 81.Recalling the importance of cooperation between the labour inspection system and the justice system, the Committee requests the Government to provide information regarding any measures taken or envisaged to accelerate the examination of cases referred by labour inspectors to the courts and to ensure effective enforcement of adequate and sufficiently dissuasive penalties, including detailed information on the progress achieved or the difficulties encountered as well as statistical information on the number of legal proceedings initiated by labour inspectors that were declared inadmissible, and the main reasons for their inadmissibility.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer