National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
The Committee notes with satisfaction the measures adopted recently by the Government as a result of which:
(1) underemployment is measured in the manner defined by the 1998 International Conference of Labour Statisticians (Article 7);
(2) the resolutions of the 2003 International Conference of Labour Statisticians are given full effect by Statistics New Zealand (Article 12); and
(3) the provisions of the resolution adopted by the 2003 Conference have been followed in designing the concepts, definitions and methodology used in the collection, compilation and publication of household income and expenditure statistics (other than for the coverage of goods and services received as income in kind or produced for barter or own consumption, free subsidized goods and services provided by employers, housing services provided by owner-occupied dwellings and income taxation payments).
With reference to its observation, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide certain clarifications on the following points.
Article 12 of the Convention. Consumer price indices. Noting the Government’s indication in relation to Article 12 that the latest standards and guidelines have been followed, the Committee would be grateful if it would indicate which standards and guidelines are referred to (Article 2).
Article 14. Statistics of occupational injuries and occupational diseases. Noting that the provisions of the Convention on statistics of occupational injuries are in general applied and that the compilation of injury statistics is currently at the development stage with a view to integrating the various administrative sources of data and completing the coverage of these statistics, the Committee asks the Government to keep the ILO informed of any progress in this regard and to provide any available information on the compilation of statistics of occupational injuries.
The Committee would be grateful if the Government would ensure that statistical publications containing data on occupational injuries are communicated to the ILO, and particularly the publication "Injury Statistics: Work-related Injuries" (Article 5).
The Committee notes with satisfaction the information contained in the Government’s first report and available from other national and international sources referred to in the report, showing that full effect is given to Articles 7 to 15 of the Convention.
The Committee also notes the detailed information provided by the Government in a letter of 17 November 2003 replying to comments by the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU) on the application of the Convention.
According to the NZCTU, the wage statistics collected by Statistics New Zealand for its Quarterly Employment Surveys (QES) use a different methodology and produce different figures from the wage data used in the Labour Cost Index, which are taken from the Household Labour Force Survey coordinated by the Department of Labour. In the view of the NZCTU, this inconsistency makes it more difficult to compare and use the data and it would be desirable for the two Government agencies to coordinate more and use more standard measures and methodologies for the collection of wage data.
The Committee notes in this respect that the wage data used in the Labour Cost Index are not drawn from the Household Labour Force Survey, but from a quarterly survey from employers, such as the Quarterly Employment Survey and, secondly, that the two surveys are conducted by Statistics New Zealand. In its reply dated 17 November 2003, the Government provided, inter alia, detailed information on the various measures of wages produced by Statistics New Zealand with regard to their objectives, source, scope and methods. These details supplement and confirm the information that it provided in its first report and that is available to the ILO. The Committee accordingly considers that there is no contradiction, but rather complementarities between these measures. It notes that, according to the Government, Statistics New Zealand can provide further information on the difference between these wage measures and the most appropriate source for the needs of users, and that full methodological information is also available on the Internet site of Statistics New Zealand.
The Committee is addressing a request directly to the Government on certain points.