National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Repetition Effective tripartite consultations required by the Convention. Financing of training. The Committee notes the Government’s report received in July 2012. The Government indicates that the activities of the Labour and Social Legislation Advisory Committee (CCTLS) were suspended and only resumed in 2011. The Advisory Committee held its first session from 8 to 23 November 2011 on the rereading of the draft Labour Code. It proposes to conduct an exchange on the items placed on the agenda of the next session of the Conference. In reply to the Committee’s latest comments, the Government indicates that the cost of CCTLS sessions are covered by the national development budget. The Government refers in its report to the activities conducted in the context of the regional programme for the promotion of social dialogue in francophone Africa, including the tripartite workshop on training in collective bargaining techniques and the training workshop for members of the steering committee of the National Forum on Social Dialogue held in 2010. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information in its next report on the consultations held on the matters referred to in Article 5(1) of the Convention (reply to questionnaires, submissions to the National Assembly, re-examination of unratified Conventions and of Recommendations, reports to be made to the ILO) including information on the activities of the CCTLS in relation to the consultations required by the Convention (Articles 2 and 5). The Committee also requests the Government to describe, in its next report, the training activities which were conducted in relation to international labour standards (Article 4).
Repetition Articles 2 and 5 of the Convention. Effective tripartite consultations required by the Convention. In a report received in May 2005, the Government recalled that, with a view to holding tripartite consultations on matters relating to ILO activities, it established an Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation (CCTLS) in 1995. However, the Government recognized that this body has met rarely since its establishment and that there has been no tripartite dialogue on the items on the agenda of the Conference. The Government indicated that this situation is due, among other factors, to the lack of reaction of the social partners. Furthermore, the Government reported that, following a tripartite workshop on international labour standards held in October 2004, the Department of Employment and the Public Service renewed the officers of the CCTLS and relaunched legislative activities. The Committee expresses again the firm hope that the Government will be in a position to provide information in its next report on the measures adopted to ensure effective tripartite consultations on the matters covered by the Convention. It requests the Government to provide reports regularly containing detailed information on the consultations held on all the subjects covered by Article 5(1), including precise information on the activities of the Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation.Article 4. Financing of training. The Government indicated that there are no specific arrangements for the training of participants. However, when training is initiated at the national level by the competent authority in the context of social consultations, it is generally tripartite in nature. In this respect, the Committee recalls that, where training for participants in the consultations proves to be necessary to enable them to perform their functions effectively, its financing should be covered by appropriate arrangements between the Government and the representative organizations (see General Survey on tripartite consultation, 2000, paragraphs 125 and 126). It requests the Government to take measures for this purpose and to describe in its next report, where appropriate, the content of these arrangements (Article 4(2)). Finally, the Government indicated that a training programme was envisaged in the context of the Regional Programme for the Promotion of Social Dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF), but that, in the absence of any reaction by the social partners, it was limited to activities initiated by the Ministry of Employment and the Public Service and carried out at the national level. The Committee requests the Government to describe in its next report the training activities undertaken in relation to international labour standards. It also requests the Government to provide information on any progress achieved in the implementation of the PRODIAF programme in relation to the necessary training for participants in the consultation procedures, as required by the Convention.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observations which read as follows:
Articles 2 and 5 of the Convention. Effective tripartite consultations required by the Convention. In a report received in May 2005, the Government recalled that, with a view to holding tripartite consultations on matters relating to ILO activities, it established an Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation (CCTLS) in 1995. However, the Government recognized that this body has met rarely since its establishment and that there has been no tripartite dialogue on the items on the agenda of the Conference. The Government indicated that this situation is due, among other factors, to the lack of reaction of the social partners. Furthermore, the Government reported that, following a tripartite workshop on international labour standards held in October 2004, the Department of Employment and the Public Service renewed the officers of the CCTLS and relaunched legislative activities. The Committee expresses again the firm hope that the Government will be in a position to provide information in its next report on the measures adopted to ensure effective tripartite consultations on the matters covered by the Convention. It requests the Government to provide reports regularly containing detailed information on the consultations held on all the subjects covered by Article 5(1), including precise information on the activities of the Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation.
Article 4. Financing of training. The Government indicated that there are no specific arrangements for the training of participants. However, when training is initiated at the national level by the competent authority in the context of social consultations, it is generally tripartite in nature. In this respect, the Committee recalls that, where training for participants in the consultations proves to be necessary to enable them to perform their functions effectively, its financing should be covered by appropriate arrangements between the Government and the representative organizations (see the General Survey of 2000 on tripartite consultation, paragraphs 125 and 126). It requests the Government to take measures for this purpose and to describe in its next report, where appropriate, the content of these arrangements (Article 4(2)). Finally, the Government indicated that a training programme was envisaged in the context of the Regional Programme for the Promotion of Social Dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF), but that, in the absence of any reaction by the social partners, it was limited to activities initiated by the Ministry of Employment and the Public Service and carried out at the national level. The Committee requests the Government to describe in its next report the training activities undertaken in relation to international labour standards. It also requests the Government to provide information on any progress achieved in the implementation of the PRODIAF programme in relation to the necessary training for participants in the consultation procedures, as required by the Convention.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous observations, which read as follows:
Article 4. Financing of training. The Government indicated that there are no specific arrangements for the training of participants. However, when training is initiated at the national level by the competent authority in the context of social consultations, it is generally tripartite in nature. In this respect, the Committee recalls that, where training for participants in the consultations proves to be necessary to enable them to perform their functions effectively, its financing should be covered by appropriate arrangements between the Government and the representative organizations (see the 2000 General Survey on tripartite consultation, paragraphs 125 and 126). It requests the Government to take measures for this purpose and to describe in its next report, where appropriate, the content of these arrangements (Article 4(2)). Finally, the Government indicated that a training programme was envisaged in the context of the Regional Programme for the Promotion of Social Dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF), but that, in the absence of any reaction by the social partners, it was limited to activities initiated by the Ministry of Employment and the Public Service and carried out at the national level. The Committee requests the Government to describe in its next report the training activities undertaken in relation to international labour standards. It also requests the Government to provide information on any progress achieved in the implementation of the PRODIAF programme in relation to the necessary training for participants in the consultation procedures, as required by the Convention.
Articles 2 and 5 of the Convention. Effective tripartite consultations required by the Convention. In a report received in May 2005, the Government recalled that, with a view to holding tripartite consultations on matters relating to ILO activities, it established an Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation (CCTLS) in 1995. However, the Government recognized that this body has met rarely since its establishment and that there has been no tripartite dialogue on the items on the agenda of the Conference. The Government indicated that this situation is due, among other factors, to the lack of reaction of the social partners. Furthermore, the Government reported that, following a tripartite workshop on international labour standards held in October 2004, the Department of Employment and the Public Service renewed the officers of the CCTLS and relaunched legislative activities. The Committee expresses again the firm hope that the Government will be in a position to provide information in its next report on the measures adopted to ensure effective tripartite consultations on the matters covered by the Convention. It requests the Government to provide reports regularly containing detailed information on the consultations held on all the subjects covered by Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention, including precise information on the activities of the Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation.
Article 4. Financing of training. The Government indicated that there are no specific arrangements for the training of participants. However, when training is initiated at the national level by the competent authority in the context of social consultations, it is generally tripartite in nature. In this respect, the Committee recalls that, where training for participants in the consultations proves to be necessary to enable them to perform their functions effectively, its financing should be covered by appropriate arrangements between the Government and the representative organizations (see General Survey of 2000 on tripartite consultation, paragraphs 125 and 126). It requests the Government to take measures for this purpose and to describe in its next report, where appropriate, the content of these arrangements (Article 4, paragraph 2). Finally, the Government indicated that a training programme was envisaged in the context of the Regional Programme for the Promotion of Social Dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF), but that, in the absence of any reaction by the social partners, it was limited to activities initiated by the Ministry of Employment and the Public Service and carried out at the national level. The Committee requests the Government to describe in its next report the training activities undertaken in relation to international labour standards. It also requests the Government to provide information on any progress achieved in the implementation of the PRODIAF programme in relation to the necessary training for participants in the consultation procedures, as required by the Convention.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its 2005 observation which read as follows:
1. Articles 2 and 5 of the Convention. Effective tripartite consultations required by the Convention. In a report received in May 2005, the Government recalled that, with a view to holding tripartite consultations on matters relating to ILO activities, it established an Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation (CCTLS) in 1995. However, the Government recognized that this body has met rarely since its establishment and that there has been no tripartite dialogue on the items on the agenda of the Conference. The Government indicated that this situation is due, among other factors, to the lack of reaction of the social partners. Furthermore, the Government reported that, following a tripartite workshop on international labour standards held in October 2004, the Department of Employment and the Public Service renewed the officers of the CCTLS and relaunched legislative activities. The Committee expresses again the firm hope that the Government will be in a position to provide information in its next report on the measures adopted to ensure effective tripartite consultations on the matters covered by the Convention. It requests the Government to provide reports regularly containing detailed information on the consultations held on all the subjects covered by Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention, including precise information on the activities of the Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation.
2. Article 4. Financing of training. The Government indicated that there are no specific arrangements for the training of participants. However, when training is initiated at the national level by the competent authority in the context of social consultations, it is generally tripartite in nature. In this respect, the Committee recalls that, where training for participants in the consultations proves to be necessary to enable them to perform their functions effectively, its financing should be covered by appropriate arrangements between the Government and the representative organizations (see paragraphs 125 and 126 of the General Survey of 2000 on tripartite consultation). It requests the Government to take measures for this purpose and to describe in its next report, where appropriate, the content of these arrangements (Article 4, paragraph 2). Finally, the Government indicated that a training programme was envisaged in the context of the Regional Programme for the Promotion of Social Dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF), but that, in the absence of any reaction by the social partners, it was limited to activities initiated by the Ministry of Employment and the Public Service and carried out at the national level. The Committee requests the Government to describe in its next report the training activities undertaken in relation to international labour standards. It also requests the Government to provide information on any progress achieved in the implementation of the PRODIAF programme in relation to the necessary training for participants in the consultation procedures, as required by the Convention.
1. Tripartite consultations required by the Convention. In a report received in May 2005, the Government recalls that, with a view to holding tripartite consultations on matters relating to ILO activities, it established an Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation (CCTLS) in 1995. However, the Government recognizes that this body has met rarely since its establishment and that there has been no tripartite dialogue on the items on the agenda of the Conference. The Government indicates that this situation is due, among other factors, to the lack of reaction of the social partners. Furthermore, the Government reports that, following a tripartite workshop on international labour standards held in October 2004, the Department of Employment and the Public Service renewed the officers of the CCTLS and relaunched legislative activities. The Committee notes this information and expresses the firm hope that the Government will be in a position to provide information in its next report on the measures adopted to ensure effective tripartite consultations on the matters covered by the Convention. In particular, it requests the Government to provide reports regularly containing detailed information on the consultations held on all the subjects covered by Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention, including precise information on the activities of the Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation.
2. Financing of training. The Government indicates that there are no specific arrangements for the training of participants. However, when training is initiated at the national level by the competent authority in the context of social consultations, it is generally tripartite in nature. In this respect, the Committee recalls that, where training for participants in the consultations proves to be necessary to enable them to perform their functions effectively, its financing should be covered by appropriate arrangements between the Government and the representative organizations (see paragraphs 125 and 126 of the General Survey of 2000 on tripartite consultation). It requests the Government to take measures for this purpose and to describe in its next report, where appropriate, the content of these arrangements (Article 4, paragraph 2). Finally, the Government indicates that a training programme was envisaged in the context of the Regional Programme for the Promotion of Social Dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF), but that, in the absence of any reaction by the social partners, it was limited to activities initiated by the Ministry of Employment and the Public Service and carried out at the national level. The Committee notes this information and requests the Government to describe in its next report the training activities undertaken in relation to international labour standards. It also requests it to continue providing information on any progress achieved in the implementation of the PRODIAF programme in relation to the necessary training for participants in the consultation procedures, as required by the Convention.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:
1. Article 2 of the Convention. Please inform the Committee of the consultation procedures in place, and explain the manner in which the nature and form of these consultations guarantee the application of Article 2.
2. Article 4. Please provide information on any progress achieved in the implementation of the Regional Programme for the Promotion of Social Dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF) with regard to the training necessary for the participants in consultation procedures.
3. Article 5, paragraph 1. Please provide detailed information on any consultations held on the issues set out in these provisions and information on any reports or recommendations adopted as a result.
4. Finally, the Government is requested to provide any other information relating to the application of the Convention in practice, including in accordance with its normal practice, a copy of any report and of any legislation or documentation mentioned in the report.
[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2005.]
The Committee notes that the report received in June 2003 reproduces information from previous reports. It hopes that a report will be provided for examination by the Committee and that it will contain information on the following points, which had already been raised in the previous comments.
1. Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would inform it of the consultation procedures in place, and explain the manner in which the nature and form of these consultations guarantee the application of Article 2.
2. Article 4. The Government is requested to provide information on any progress achieved in the implementation of the Regional Programme for the Promotion of Social Dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF) with regard to the training necessary for the participants in consultation procedures.
[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2004.]
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its direct request of 2001, which read as follows:
The Committee takes note of the Government’s report. It notes that the text of Order No. 95/0624MTASE/DNTLS/95, cited several times in the Government’s report, has not yet been sent to the Office and again asks the Government to send it with its next report. 1. Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would continue to report on the consultation procedures in place and explain how it is ensured that these procedures guarantee the application of the provisions of Article 2. 2. Article 4. The Committee notes that the Government is in the process of preparing a training programme for participants in consultation procedures as part of the subregional programme for the promotion of social dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF). The Government is asked to report on progress in the implementation of the above programme regarding the necessary training for participants in consultation procedures. 3. Article 5, paragraph 1. The Committee notes the general information supplied by the Government, and would appreciate more specific information on the consultations held on all the items listed in Article 5, paragraph 1, during the period covered by the next report, together with particulars of any resulting reports or recommendations. It also asks the Government to provide copies, with its next report, of the minutes of the meetings of the Labour Advisory Committee inasmuch as they refer to issues concerning ILO activities listed in the Convention. 4. Lastly, the Government is asked to provide any other information which has a bearing on the application of the Convention in practice and to send, as is customary, copies of any minutes, legislation or documentation referred to in the report.
The Committee takes note of the Government’s report. It notes that the text of Order No. 95/0624MTASE/DNTLS/95, cited several times in the Government’s report, has not yet been sent to the Office and again asks the Government to send it with its next report.
1. Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would continue to report on the consultation procedures in place and explain how it is ensured that these procedures guarantee the application of the provisions of Article 2.
2. Article 4. The Committee notes that the Government is in the process of preparing a training programme for participants in consultation procedures as part of the subregional programme for the promotion of social dialogue in French-speaking Africa (PRODIAF). The Government is asked to report on progress in the implementation of the above programme regarding the necessary training for participants in consultation procedures.
3. Article 5, paragraph 1. The Committee notes the general information supplied by the Government, and would appreciate more specific information on the consultations held on all the items listed in Article 5, paragraph 1, during the period covered by the next report, together with particulars of any resulting reports or recommendations. It also asks the Government to provide copies, with its next report, of the minutes of the meetings of the Labour Advisory Committee inasmuch as they refer to issues concerning ILO activities listed in the Convention.
4. Lastly, the Government is asked to provide any other information which has a bearing on the application of the Convention in practice and to send, as is customary, copies of any minutes, legislation or documentation referred to in the report.
2. Article 4. The Committee notes that the Government is in the process of preparing a training programme for participants in consultation procedures as part of the subregional programme for the promotion of social dialogue in French speaking Africa (PRODIAF). The Government is asked to report on progress in the implementation of the above programme regarding the necessary training for participants in consultation procedures.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
The Committee notes with interest the Government's first report in respect of the application of the Convention. The Committee notes the consultations held on the matters set out in Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention take place once a year within the Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation whose composition is tripartite as required by the Convention. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would describe the consultative procedures implemented within the above Committee and to define the manner in which it ensures that the nature and form of these consultations guarantee the application of the provisions of Article 2. The Committee also requests the Government to provide more detailed information in respect of the consultations held on each of the matters set out in Article 5, paragraph 1, and to indicate the nature of any reports or recommendations made as a result of the consultations. In this regard, the Committee requests the Government to provide a copy of Decree No. 95/0624/MTASE/DNTLS/95, referred to several times in the Government's first report and, where possible, a copy of the reports drawn up at the close of the meetings of the Advisory Committee on Labour and Social Legislation with respect to the matters concerning the activities of the ILO as set out in the Convention. Finally, the Government is asked to provide, where necessary, information on any progress made concerning the training of participants on the consultative procedures provided for under Article 4, paragraph 2, of the Convention.