Seafarers' Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146) - Iraq (RATIFICATION: 1985)

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the Government’s reports on Conventions Nos 22, 23, 92, 146 and 147. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of these maritime Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine them in a single comment, as set out below.

The Committee recalls that, in the framework of the Standards Review Mechanism, the ILO Governing Body, as recommended by the Special Tripartite Committee on the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, as amended (MLC, 2006) classified Conventions Nos 22, 23, 92, 146 and 147 as “outdated”. At its 343rd Session (November 2021), the Governing Body placed an item on the agenda of the 118th Session (2030) of the International Labour Conference concerning the abrogation of Conventions Nos 22, 23, 92 and 146 and requested the Office to launch an initiative to promote the ratification on a priority basis of the MLC, 2006 among the countries still bound by Conventions Nos 22, 23, 92, 146 and 147. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it is in favour of ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that several meetings were held on issues relating to this process with the participation of the General Federation of Workers’ Unions in Iraq and the Iraqi Federation of Industries. The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide information on any progress made towards the ratification of the MLC, 2006 and reminds it of the possibility to avail itself of the technical assistance of the Office.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Committee notes with  deep concern  the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the protection of seafarers’ rights as laid out in the Conventions.  In this regard, the Committee refers to the resolution adopted by the Governing Body in its 340th Session (GB.340/Resolution) concerning maritime labour issues and COVID-19 disease, which calls on Member States to take measures to address the adverse impacts of the pandemic on seafarers’ rights and requests the Government to provide information in its next report on any temporary measures adopted in this regard, their duration and their impact on seafarers’ rights.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22)

Articles 3–14 of the Convention. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee requested the Government to indicate the measures adopted to give effect to these requirements of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is a signed agreement between the State Company for Maritime Transport and the seafarers working on board its ships providing seafarers with decent working and living conditions on board ship and giving full effect to the Convention. While noting this information, the Committee requests the Government to clarify whether the Maritime Civil Service Act of 1975 is still in force, thereby giving to seafarers the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. It further requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions that ensure compliance with the different Articles of the Convention for all seafarers working on board its ships.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23)

Article 5. Repatriation expenses. The Committee requested the Government to specify the laws and regulations implementing Article 5 of the Convention ensuring that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers irrespective of whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the State Company for Maritime Transport is committed to the right of seafarers to repatriation upon completion of their period of service aboard ship or in the event of sickness, termination of their employment with the contracting company, injury or death during the course of work. P&I Insurance Club covers the expenses of repatriation of seafarers injured as a result of accidents. While noting this information, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the relevant legislative provisions giving effect to Article 5 of the Convention.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92)

Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation. Crew accommodation requirements. Noting the absence of legislation giving effect to Articles 3 and 6–17 of the Convention, the Committee requested the Government to adopt the necessary measures in this regard. In the absence of new information, the Committee requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures, without delay, taking into account its previous comment on this matter.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146)

Application of the Convention. The Committee requested the Government to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the State Company for Maritime Transport grants persons working on board its ships paid annual leave under appropriate conditions, in accordance with the annual leave regulations under the international Code, which applies to seafarers working on board its ships, taking into consideration the special needs of seafarers with regard to such leave and that this matter is implemented in full. In the absence of specific reference to new legislative provisions, the Committee once again requests the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to the following provisions of the Convention: Article 4 (proportionate leave if length of service is insufficient for full entitlement), Article 6 (justified absence from work and temporary shore leave not to be counted in the minimum annual leave), Article 8 (annual leave in principle consisting of an uninterrupted period), Article 10 (return to the place of engagement or recruitment at the employer’s cost) and Article 11 (prohibition of agreement to relinquish the right to annual leave) of the Convention. The Committee also requests the Government to consider appropriate action to ensure that seafarers employed on board privately owned vessels enjoy the coverage of Article 3 (30-day annual leave), Article 6 (public holidays and periods of incapacity for work not to be counted as annual leave), Article 8 (division of leave into parts and accumulation of leave) and Article 10 (free transportation to place of engagement or recruitment) of the Convention as the existing Labour Code does not appear to give effect to any of these provisions.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147)

The Committee previously requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention is ensured in law and practice. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the State Company for Maritime Transport relies on laws and regulations pertaining to global safety standards, including standards of competency and hours of work. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the matters raised in its previous comment with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. Noting that the absence of new information in this respect, the Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. Noting the absence of new information in this respect, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable to collective agreements and ratified international labour Conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2021, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1997 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour Conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2020, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour Conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments initially made in 2015.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour Conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments initially made in 2015.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• -Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• -Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• -Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• -Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• -Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• -Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour conventions.

[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2016.]

CMNT_TITLE

Articles 3–12 of the Convention. Seafarers’ entitlement to annual holidays with pay. The Committee notes that the Government’s succinct report does not address any of the numerous points the Committee has been raising practically since the time of the ratification of the Convention. The Committee fully understands the persisting instability and multiple challenges the Government is facing, which of course impact on its efforts to improve the legislative framework and effectively implement ratified Conventions. It considers, however, that most of the requirements of this Convention do not require extensive legislative action or complex measures and should therefore be given effect in a timely manner. The Committee has been formulating its comments on the understanding that Civil Marine Service Act No. 201 of 1975 regulates the annual leave of seafarers employed on board publicly owned vessels while the Labour Code of 1987 applies to those employed on board privately owned vessels. Assuming that this properly reflects the current situation of law and practice, the Committee requests the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to the following provisions of the Convention: Article 4 (proportionate leave if length of service insufficient for full entitlement), Article 6 (justified absence from work and temporary shore leave not to be counted in the minimum annual leave), Article 8 (annual leave in principle consisting of an uninterrupted period), Article 10 (return to the place of engagement or recruitment at the employer’s cost) and Article 11 (prohibition of agreement to relinquish the right to annual leave) of the Convention. The Committee also requests the Government to consider appropriate action to ensure that seafarers employed on board privately owned vessels enjoy the coverage of Article 3 (30-day annual leave), Article 6 (public holidays and periods of incapacity for work not to be counted as annual leave), Article 8 (division of leave into parts and accumulation of leave) and Article 10 (free transportation to place of engagement or recruitment) of the Convention as the existing Labour Code does not appear to give effect to any of these provisions.

CMNT_TITLE

Articles 3 to 12 of the Convention. Seafarers’ entitlement to annual holidays with pay. The Committee recalls its previous comments in which it requested the Government to clarify whether the annual paid leave of seafarers employed on privately owned vessels was regulated by the Labour Code while the paid annual leave of seafarers employed on board publicly owned vessels was regulated by Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975. Moreover, the Committee has been drawing the Government’s attention to the absence of specific legal provisions implementing numerous requirements of the Convention. The Committee notes that in its last report the Government does not reply to any of the points that the Committee has been raising for a number of years. The Committee is therefore obliged to recall that: (i) insofar as seafarers on board private-owned vessels are concerned, the Labour Code does not appear to give effect to Articles 3 (30-day annual leave), 6 (public holidays and periods of incapacity for work not to be counted as annual leave), 8 (division of leave into parts and accumulation of leave), and 10 (free transportation to place of engagement or recruitment) of the Convention; and (ii) insofar as seafarers employed on publicly owned vessels are concerned, the Maritime Civil Service Act does not appear to contain any provisions implementing Articles 4 (proportionate leave if length of service insufficient for full entitlement), 6 (justified absence from work and temporary shore leave not to be counted in the minimum annual leave), 8 (annual leave in principle consisting of an uninterrupted period), 10 (return to the place of engagement or recruitment at the employer’s cost), and 11 (prohibition of agreement to relinquish right to annual leave) of the Convention. Noting the Government’s ongoing efforts to rebuild the country’s maritime transportation system and infrastructure, the Committee requests once again the Government to take appropriate action in order to bring the national legislation into full conformity with the requirements of the Convention.

In addition, the Committee takes this opportunity to recall that the main provisions of this Convention have been incorporated in Regulation 2.4 and the corresponding Code of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and therefore ensuring compliance with Convention No. 146 would facilitate the implementation of the respective provisions of the MLC, 2006. The Committee requests the Government to keep the Office informed of any further developments regarding the process of early ratification and effective implementation of the MLC, 2006.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the Government’s report on the application of the Convention, received in 2008. The Government no longer mentions Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and exclusively refers to Labour Code No. 71 of 1987. The Committee therefore requests the Government to confirm: whether the Maritime Civil Service Act is still in force and, if so, whether the paid annual leave of seafarers employed on board vessels of the private, mixed or cooperative sectors is regulated by the Labour Code, while the paid annual leave of seafarers employed on board publicly owned vessels is regulated by the Maritime Civil Service Act.

Should the Labour Code be the relevant legislation applicable to the private, mixed and cooperative sectors, and in view of the present efforts to draft a new Labour Code, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the following shortcomings.

Article 2 of the Convention. Scope of application. According to its section 8(1), the Labour Code only applies to the private, mixed and cooperative sector. Section 2 of the Labour Code guarantees the right to work under equal conditions and with equal opportunity to all “citizens” without any discrimination on the basis of sex, race, language or religion. According to section 7, Arab workers employed in Iraq shall be treated on an equal footing with Iraqi workers in regard to the rights and duties set forth in the Code. Sections 2 and 7 thus appear to leave open the possibility of different treatment of non-Arab seafarers. The Convention, however, applies to all persons employed on board seagoing ships registered in the territory of Iraq in an equal manner, regardless of nationality. The Committee requests the Government to indicate by what means it is ensured that the protection provided by the Convention equally applies to non-Arab seafarers employed on board seagoing ships registered in Iraq.

Article 3. Length of annual leave. According to section 67(1) of the Labour Code, a worker shall have a right to 20 days’ paid leave for each year of work. The Convention, however, provides that the leave shall in no case be less than 30 days for one year of service. The Committee also recalls that, pursuant to Iraq’s declaration at the time of ratification, the length of annual leave is 36 days. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that national legislation is brought into conformity with the Convention.

Article 5. Length of service. The Committee asks the Government to indicate the manner in which the length of service is calculated for the purpose of determining the leave entitlement (paragraph 1). According to section 74 of the Labour Code, leave counts as part of the period of service. In addition, please indicate the conditions under which service off articles and absence from work to attend an approved maritime vocational training course or for reasons beyond the control of the seafarer, are counted as part of the period of service (paragraphs 2 and 3).

Article 6. Calculation of annual leave. Section 75 of the Labour Code leaves it unclear whether holidays fixed by law are counted as part of annual leave. The Committee asks the Government to indicate by what measures it is ensured that public and customary holidays shall not be counted as part of the minimum annual leave with pay (subparagraph (a)). According to section 77, the worker is entitled to 30 days’ sick leave for every year of work. Section 84 provides that every woman is entitled to 62 days’ maternity leave at full pay. Please indicate by what measures it is ensured that such periods of incapacity for work are not counted as part of the annual leave with pay (subparagraph (b)). The Committee also asks the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that temporary shore leave and compensatory leave are not counted in the minimum annual leave with pay (subparagraphs (c) and (d)).

Article 8. Accumulation of annual leave. Section 69 permits the division of annual leave. The Committee asks the Government to indicate whether the accumulation of annual leave due in respect of one year, together with a subsequent period of leave, is authorized by the competent authority or through the appropriate machinery.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. Place of annual leave. The Committee asks the Government to indicate by what means it is ensured that no seafarers are required without their consent to take annual leave due to them at a place other than that where they were engaged or recruited, whichever is nearer home, except under the provisions of a collective agreement or of national laws or regulations. Please further indicate the measures taken to ensure that, if a seafarer is required to take annual leave from a place other than the place of engagement or recruitment, whichever is nearer home, he or she shall be entitled to free transportation to that place; subsistence and other costs directly involved in the return shall be for the account of the employer; and the travel time shall not be deducted from the annual leave with pay due to the seafarer.

Should the Maritime Civil Service Act be the relevant legislation applicable to publicly owned vessels, the Committee notes that the Government's report contains no reply to its previous direct request of 2002. The Committee must therefore reiterate its previous comments, which were essentially drafted in the following terms:

Article 2. Scope of application. The Committee reiterates its previous request for clarification as to whether the text of section 2(3) of the Maritime Civil Service Act rather refers to seafarers listed in “Schedules Nos (2) and (3)” instead of those in “Schedules Nos (1) and (2)”, in order to confirm that the leave provisions in the Maritime Civil Service Act apply to all seafarers occupying positions listed in Schedules 1, 2 and 3.

Articles 3 and 4. Proportionate annual leave. The Committee hopes the Government will not fail to indicate the provisions of the Maritime Civil Service Act that ensure a proportionately reduced annual leave for a seafarer whose length of service for any one year is less than that required for the full entitlement, as required by Article 4 of the Convention.

Article 6. Calculation of annual leave. In reply to the previous request concerning this provision of the Convention, the Government once again states that Fridays and official holidays are not counted in the minimum annual paid leave and seafarers who work on these days are given compensatory leave. The Committee hopes the Government will not fail to indicate the relevant provisions of the Maritime Civil Service Act. The Committee reiterates the point that Article 6, paragraphs (b) and (c), of the Convention require similar treatment for periods of incapacity for work and temporary shore leave. It hopes the Government will not fail to provide full particulars in this regard.

Article 8. Uninterrupted period. The Committee notes that neither the Maritime Civil Service Act nor the Civil Service Law appear to provide for such a minimum of continuous days of leave. It recalls that Article 8(2) of the Convention provides that, subject to the division or accumulation of annual leave due in one year that may be authorized by the competent authority or through the appropriate machinery in each country under paragraph 1 of the same Article, the annual leave with pay prescribed by the Convention shall be of an uninterrupted period. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the provisions that provide for the annual leave with pay prescribed by the Convention to be of an uninterrupted period.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. Place of annual leave. The Committee notes that the Government repeats its earlier replies to its comments that, according to section 42(3) of the Maritime Civil Service Act, annual leave is granted upon a written application submitted by the seafarer and that the place and time such leave is to be taken is fixed by the seafarer. The Committee wishes to point out that the text of section 42(3) does not provide for free transportation to the place of engagement or recruitment, whichever is nearer home, for subsistence and other costs directly involved in the return to be for the account of the employer; and for travel time involved not to be deducted from the annual leave with pay, as required by paragraph 3 of this Article of the Convention. The Committee asks the Government to indicate the relevant measures taken in this regard, and to provide texts of any relevant terms of collective agreements or formal decisions on these points.

Article 11. Waiver. The Committee notes the Government’s report does not contain a reply to its previous request for an indication of the specific provisions ensuring that any agreement to relinquish the right to the minimum leave with pay of seafarers employed by publicly owned seagoing ships covered by the Maritime Civil Service Act are null and void. The Committee asks the Government to provide full details on these points.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s 1997 report.

Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that, in reply to its previous comments, the Government’s report repeats the statement that Law No. 201 of 1975 applies to all persons working on civil maritime units belonging to the State. The Committee reiterates its previous request for clarification as to whether the text of section 2 of Law No. 201 should read: seafarers listed in "Schedules Nos. (2) and (3)" instead of "Schedules Nos. (1) and (2)", in order to confirm that the leave provisions in Law No. 201 apply to all seafarers occupying positions listed in Schedules 1,2 and 3. Further to its previous request for the original Arabic text of Law No. 201 of 1975, the Committee notes the short extract from the original Arabic of the said text enclosed with the Government’s last report. It would be grateful if the Government would supply the full Arabic text of the said Law.

The Committee again notes that the Government’s report does not contain a reply to its previous request regarding legislative provisions applying the Convention to non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered ships. The Committee recalls that the Convention applies to all persons employed on board seagoing ships registered in the territory and requests the Government to indicate which legislative provisions apply the Convention to non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels.

Articles 3 and 4. The Committee notes that the Government’s report repeats previous replies to its earlier comments. It therefore hopes the Government will not fail to indicate the provisions under Chapter 7 of Law No. 201, or of any other legislation that ensures a proportionately reduced annual leave for a seafarer whose length of service for any one year is less than that required for the full entitlement, as required by Article 4 of the Convention.

Article 6. In reply to its previous request concerning this provision of the Convention, the Government once again states that Fridays and official holidays are not counted in the minimum annual paid leave and seafarers who work on these days are given compensatory leave. The Committee hopes the Government will not fail to indicate the specific provisions of national law which apply to seafarers on both privately and publicly owned ships. The Committee reiterates the point that Article 6, paragraphs (b) and (c), of the Convention require similar treatment for periods of incapacity for work and temporary shore leave. It hopes the Government will not fail to provide full particulars in this regard.

Article 8. The Committee notes the Government’s reply to its previous comments that seafarers may divide and accumulate their leave by virtue of the provisions of the Civil Service Law and the Labour Code and that according to Law No. 201 of 1975, the maximum length of uninterrupted annual leave is 36 days. The Committee notes that, while under section 69(II) of the Labour Code, 1987, only six continuous days of leave must be taken at one time, neither Law No. 201 nor the Civil Service Law provide for such a minimum of continuous days of leave. It recalls that Article 8, paragraph 2, of the Convention provides that, subject to the division or accumulation of annual leave due in one year that may be authorized by the competent authority or through the appropriate machinery in each country under paragraph 1 of the same Article, the annual leave with pay prescribed by the Convention shall be of an uninterrupted period. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the provisions of national law that provide for the annual leave with pay prescribed by the Convention to be of an uninterrupted period.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. The Committee notes that the Government repeats its earlier replies to its previous comments that, according to section 42(3) of Law No. 201, annual leave is granted upon a written application submitted by the seafarer and that the place and time such leave is to be taken is fixed by the seafarer. The Government states that the fact that free choice of leave is afforded to seafarers means there is no text compelling them to take annual leave without their consent or in a place other than where they were engaged. The Committee wishes to point out that the text of section 42(3) of Law No. 201 does not provide for free transportation to the place where he was engaged or recruited, whichever is nearer his home, for subsistence and other costs directly involved in his return to be for the account of the employer, and for travel time involved not to be deducted from the annual leave with pay, as required by paragraph 3 of this Article of the Convention. Please also provide texts of any relevant terms of collective agreements or formal decisions on these points.

Article 11. The Committee notes the Government’s report does not contain a reply to its previous request for an indication of the specific provisions of national law that provide that any agreement to relinquish the right to the minimum leave with pay of seafarers employed by publicly owned seagoing ships covered by Law No. 201 should be null and void. In this regard it points out that section 71 of the Labour Code, while so providing, it is nonetheless limited to "workers employed in the private, mixed and cooperative sectors" (section 8(1) of the same Labour Code). Please provide full details on these points.

Article 12. Please provide a copy of the Service Regulations also referred to in the Government’s last report.

CMNT_TITLE

Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's 1997 report.

Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that, in reply to its previous comments, the Government's report repeats the statement that Law No. 201 of 1975 applies to all persons working on civil maritime units belonging to the State. The Committee reiterates its previous request for clarification as to whether the text of section 2 of Law No. 201 should read: seafarers listed in "Schedules Nos. (2) and (3)" instead of "Schedules Nos. (1) and (2)", in order to confirm that the leave provisions in Law No. 201 apply to all seafarers occupying positions listed in Schedules 1,2 and 3. Further to its previous request for the original Arabic text of Law No. 201 of 1975, the Committee notes the short extract from the original Arabic of the said text enclosed with the Government's last report. It would be grateful if the Government would supply the full Arabic text of the said Law.

The Committee again notes that the Government's report does not contain a reply to its previous request regarding legislative provisions applying the Convention to non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered ships. The Committee recalls that the Convention applies to all persons employed on board seagoing ships registered in the territory and requests the Government to indicate which legislative provisions apply the Convention to non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels.

Articles 3 and 4. The Committee notes that the Government's report repeats previous replies to its earlier comments. It therefore hopes the Government will not fail to indicate the provisions under Chapter 7 of Law No. 201, or of any other legislation that ensures a proportionately reduced annual leave for a seafarer whose length of service for any one year is less than that required for the full entitlement, as required by Article 4 of the Convention.

Article 6. In reply to its previous request concerning this provision of the Convention, the Government once again states that Fridays and official holidays are not counted in the minimum annual paid leave and seafarers who work on these days are given compensatory leave. The Committee hopes the Government will not fail to indicate the specific provisions of national law which apply to seafarers on both privately and publicly owned ships. The Committee reiterates the point that Article 6, paragraphs (b) and (c), of the Convention require similar treatment for periods of incapacity for work and temporary shore leave. It hopes the Government will not fail to provide full particulars in this regard.

Article 8. The Committee notes the Government's reply to its previous comments that seafarers may divide and accumulate their leave by virtue of the provisions of the Civil Service Law and the Labour Code and that according to Law No. 201 of 1975, the maximum length of uninterrupted annual leave is 36 days. The Committee notes that, while under section 69(II) of the Labour Code, 1987, only six continuous days of leave must be taken at one time, neither Law No. 201 nor the Civil Service Law provide for such a minimum of continuous days of leave. It recalls that Article 8, paragraph 2, of the Convention provides that, subject to the division or accumulation of annual leave due in one year that may be authorized by the competent authority or through the appropriate machinery in each country under paragraph 1 of the same Article, the annual leave with pay prescribed by the Convention shall be of an uninterrupted period. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the provisions of national law that provide for the annual leave with pay prescribed by the Convention to be of an uninterrupted period.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. The Committee notes that the Government repeats its earlier replies to its previous comments that, according to section 42(3) of Law No. 201, annual leave is granted upon a written application submitted by the seafarer and that the place and time such leave is to be taken is fixed by the seafarer. The Government states that the fact that free choice of leave is afforded to seafarers means there is no text compelling them to take annual leave without their consent or in a place other than where they were engaged. The Committee wishes to point out that the text of section 42(3) of Law No. 201 does not provide for free transportation to the place where he was engaged or recruited, whichever is nearer his home, for subsistence and other costs directly involved in his return to be for the account of the employer, and for travel time involved not to be deducted from the annual leave with pay, as required by paragraph 3 of this Article of the Convention. Please also provide texts of any relevant terms of collective agreements or formal decisions on these points.

Article 11. The Committee notes the Government's report does not contain a reply to its previous request for an indication of the specific provisions of national law that provide that any agreement to relinquish the right to the minimum leave with pay of seafarers employed by publicly owned seagoing ships covered by Law No. 201 should be null and void. In this regard it points out that section 71 of the Labour Code, while so providing, it is nonetheless limited to "workers employed in the private, mixed and cooperative sectors" (section 8(1) of the same Labour Code). Please provide full details on these points.

Article 12. Please provide a copy of the Service Regulations also referred to in the Government's last report.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government's reply to its previous comments that Law No. 201 of 1975 applies to all workers on board state-owned marine civil units. The Committee requests the Government to clarify whether the text of section 2 of Law No. 201 should read: seafarers listed in "Schedules Nos. (2) and (3)" instead of "Schedules Nos. (1) and (2)", in order to confirm that the leave provisions in Law No. 201 apply to all seafarers occupying positions listed in schedules 1, 2 and 3. The Committee also would be grateful if the Government would supply a copy of the original Arabic version of Law No. 201 of 1975.

With regard to non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels, the Committee notes that section 8(1) of Law No. 201 states that an "organization (defined in section 2 of the same Law as any company, administration or civil official or semi-official department possessing or administering or hiring any marine unit)' may employ foreigners according to special contracts made by the board without being bound by the legislative regulations governing the employment of foreigners in Iraq". The Committee recalls that the Convention applies to all persons employed on board seagoing ships registered in the territory. It therefore requests the Government to indicate which legislative provisions apply the Convention to non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels.

Articles 3 and 4. The Committee notes that the Government's report does not reply to its previous comment. It therefore repeats its request to the Government to indicate what provision under Chapter 7 of Law No. 201, or of any other legislation, ensures a proportionately reduced annual leave.

Article 6. In reply to its previous request concerning this provision of the Convention, the Government again states that Fridays and official holidays are not counted in the minimum annual paid holiday and seafarers who work on these days are given compensatory leave. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to indicate the specific provisions which apply to seafarers on both privately and publicly owned ships. The Committee must also point out again that Article 6, paragraphs (b) and (c) of the Convention require similar treatment for periods of incapacity for work and temporary shore leave. It therefore repeats its request to the Government to provide full particulars in this regard.

Article 8. With reference to its previous comments on the division and accumulation of annual leave, the Committee notes the Government's indication that in accordance with Law No. 201 of 1975, a seafarer may take his annual leave for an uninterrupted period of 36 days. It requests the Government to clarify which specific provision of Law No. 201 explicitly provides that the annual leave shall consist of an uninterrupted period of 36 days.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that under section 42(3) of Law No. 201, ordinary leave is granted on written application by the seafarer or officer, and will be granted on the date and in the place chosen by the applicant. The Government states in its report that the fact that a seafarer is able to freely request his annual leave means that no provisions exist which require him to take his annual leave without his consent or to spend his annual leave at a place other than the place of engagement or recruitment. The Committee requests the Government to indicate how free transport to the place of engagement or recruitment of the seafarer, subsistence and other costs of return are ensured at the employer's charge. It also requests the Government to provide texts of any relevant terms of collective agreements or formal decisions on these points.

Article 11. The Committee notes that under section 71 of the Labour Code "any agreement under which a worker partially or totally waives his or her right to take annual leave in return for compensation or for any other reason shall be null and void". The Committee recalls that section 8(1) of the Labour Code explicitly provides that "(t)he provisions of this Code apply to all workers employed in the private, mixed and cooperative sectors". It therefore requests the Government to indicate which specific provisions (providing that any agreement to relinquish the right to the minimum leave should be null and void) apply to seafarers employed by publicly owned seagoing ships, which are covered by Act No. 201.

Article 12. The Committee notes that the Office has not received a copy of the service rules referred to in the Government's first report. It therefore would be grateful if the Government would provide a copy of these service rules.

CMNT_TITLE

Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government's reply to its previous comments that Law No. 201 of 1975 applies to all workers on board state-owned marine civil units. The Committee requests the Government to clarify whether the text of section 2 of Law No. 201 should read: seafarers listed in "Schedules Nos. (2) and (3)" instead of "Schedules Nos. (1) and (2)", in order to confirm that the leave provisions in Law No. 201 apply to all seafarers occupying positions listed in schedules 1, 2 and 3. The Committee also would be grateful if the Government would supply a copy of the original Arabic version of Law No. 201 of 1975.

With regard to non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels, the Committee notes that section 8(1) of Law No. 201 states that an "organization (defined in section 2 of the same Law as (a)ny company, administration or civil official or semi-official department possessing or administering or hiring any marine unit)' may employ foreigners according to special contracts made by the board without being bound by the legislative regulations governing the employment of foreigners in Iraq". The Committee recalls that the Convention applies to all persons employed on board seagoing ships registered in the territory. It therefore requests the Government to indicate which legislative provisions apply the Convention to non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels.

Articles 3 and 4. The Committee notes that the Government's report does not reply to its previous comment. It therefore repeats its request to the Government to indicate what provision under Chapter 7 of Law No. 201, or of any other legislation, ensures a proportionately reduced annual leave.

Article 6. In reply to its previous request concerning this provision of the Convention, the Government again states that Fridays and official holidays are not counted in the minimum annual paid holiday and seafarers who work on these days are given compensatory leave. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to indicate the specific provisions which apply to seafarers on both privately and publicly owned ships. The Committee must also point out again that Article 6, paragraphs (b) and (c) of the Convention require similar treatment for periods of incapacity for work and temporary shore leave. It therefore repeats its request to the Government to provide full particulars in this regard.

Article 8. With reference to its previous comments on the division and accumulation of annual leave, the Committee notes the Government's indication that in accordance with Law No. 201 of 1975, a seafarer may take his annual leave for an uninterrupted period of 36 days. It requests the Government to clarify which specific provision of Law No. 201 explicitly provides that the annual leave shall consist of an uninterrupted period of 36 days.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that under section 42(3) of Law No. 201, ordinary leave is granted on written application by the seafarer or officer, and will be granted on the date and in the place chosen by the applicant. The Government states in its report that the fact that a seafarer is able to freely request his annual leave means that no provisions exist which require him to take his annual leave without his consent or to spend his annual leave at a place other than the place of engagement or recruitment. The Committee requests the Government to indicate how free transport to the place of engagement or recruitment of the seafarer, subsistence and other costs of return are ensured at the employer's charge. It also requests the Government to provide texts of any relevant terms of collective agreements or formal decisions on these points.

Article 11. The Committee notes that under section 71 of the Labour Code "(a)ny agreement under which a worker partially or totally waives his or her right to take annual leave in return for compensation or for any other reason shall be null and void". The Committee recalls that section 8(1) of the Labour Code explicitly provides that "(t)he provisions of this Code apply to all workers employed in the private, mixed and cooperative sectors". It therefore requests the Government to indicate which specific provisions (providing that any agreement to relinquish the right to the minimum leave should be null and void) apply to seafarers employed by publicly owned seagoing ships, which are covered by Act No. 201.

Article 12. The Committee notes that the Office has not received a copy of the service rules referred to in the Government's first report. It therefore would be grateful if the Government would provide a copy of these service rules.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 2 of the Convention. 1. The Committee takes note of the information that seafarers employed by publicly owned seagoing ships are subject to Law No. 201 of 1975 and those engaged on privately owned ones or ships with mixed or cooperative ownership are subject to the Labour Code (section 8(1)).

2. The Committee notes that the Government's report does not contain a reply to its previous comment that the provisions in Law No. 201 relating to leave apply only to seafarers as defined in section 2, i.e. those occupying positions listed in schedules 1 and 2. The Committee trusts the Government will indicate what provisions concerning leave apply to seafarers listed in schedule 3 or other seafarers including non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels.

Articles 3 and 4. The Committee notes the information provided in the Government's report. It also notes the provision of section 67.III of the Labour Code as regards seafarers engaged on ships that are not publicly owned. It further notes that a proportionately shorter period of leave is given under Chapter 7 of Law No. 201 for a shorter period of service. Please indicate what provision of Law No. 201 ensures such proportionately reduced annual leave.

Article 6. The Committee notes that Fridays, national and official holidays are not counted in the minimum annual paid holiday and seafarers who work on those days are given compensatory leave. Please indicate the specific provisions for seafarers on both privately and publicly owned ships. The Committee points out that Article 6, paragraphs (b) and (c) of the Convention require similar treatment for periods of incapacity for work and temporary shore leave. Please provide indications in this regard.

Article 8. The Committee notes that seafarers have the right to divide and accumulate annual leave in conformity with Law No. 201 and the Labour Code. The Committee notes that section 69.II of the Labour Code permits dividing annual leave but does not deal with the question of accumulation, while section 42(8) of Law No. 201 authorises the laying down of schedules specifying dates of leave but not their division or accumulation. Please provide further details in this regard.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. The Committee notes that according to section 42(3) of Law No. 201 ordinary leave is granted on written application by the seafarer or officer, and will be granted on the date and in the place chosen by the applicant. Please indicate what provisions ensure that seafarers are not required, without their consent, to take annual leave otherwise than at the place of engagement except under a collective agreement or legislation, and, if such exception is allowed, what arrangements apply as regards transport and other costs, as required by this Article.

Article 11. The Committee notes that no measures are proposed to prohibit any agreement to relinquish the right to a minimum annual leave with pay as required by this Article. The Committee hopes the Government will review the situation and report on measures taken or proposed in its next report.

Article 12. The Committee notes with interest the information provided.

Please provide a copy of the previously requested service rules referred to in an earlier report.

CMNT_TITLE

Article 2 of the Convention. 1. The Committee takes note of the information that seafarers employed by publicly owned seagoing ships are subject to Law No. 201 of 1975 and those engaged on privately owned ones or ships with mixed or cooperative ownership are subject to the Labour Code (section 8(1)).

2. The Committee notes that the Government's report does not contain a reply to its previous comment that the provisions in Law No. 201 relating to leave apply only to seafarers as defined in section 2, i.e. those occupying positions listed in schedules 1 and 2. The Committee trusts the Government will indicate what provisions concerning leave apply to seafarers listed in schedule 3 or other seafarers including non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels.

Articles 3 and 4. The Committee notes the information provided in the Government's report. It also notes the provision of section 67.III of the Labour Code as regards seafarers engaged on ships that are not publicly owned. It further notes that a proportionately shorter period of leave is given under Chapter 7 of Law No. 201 for a shorter period of service. Please indicate what provision of Law No. 201 ensures such proportionately reduced annual leave.

Article 6. The Committee notes that Fridays, national and official holidays are not counted in the minimum annual paid holiday and seafarers who work on those days are given compensatory leave. Please indicate the specific provisions for seafarers on both privately and publicly owned ships. The Committee points out that Article 6, paragraphs (b) and (c) of the Convention require similar treatment for periods of incapacity for work and temporary shore leave. Please provide indications in this regard.

Article 8. The Committee notes that seafarers have the right to divide and accumulate annual leave in conformity with Law No. 201 and the Labour Code. The Committee notes that section 69.II of the Labour Code permits dividing annual leave but does not deal with the question of accumulation, while section 42(8) of Law No. 201 authorises the laying down of schedules specifying dates of leave but not their division or accumulation. Please provide further details in this regard.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. The Committee notes that according to section 42(3) of Law No. 201 ordinary leave is granted on written application by the seafarer or officer, and will be granted on the date and in the place chosen by the applicant. Please indicate what provisions ensure that seafarers are not required, without their consent, to take annual leave otherwise than at the place of engagement except under a collective agreement or legislation, and, if such exception is allowed, what arrangements apply as regards transport and other costs, as required by this Article.

Article 11. The Committee notes that no measures are proposed to prohibit any agreement to relinquish the right to a minimum annual leave with pay as required by this Article. The Committee hopes the Government will review the situation and report on measures taken or proposed in its next report.

Article 12. The Committee notes with interest the information provided.

Please provide a copy of the previously requested service rules referred to in an earlier report.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 2 of the Convention. 1. The Committee notes from the report that no exclusion from the application of the Convention has been made by national legislation. It notes, however, that Law No. 201 of 1975 deals only with merchant shipping. Please indicate whether this Law in fact covers all sea-going ships registered in the national territory, and, if not, what provisions (e.g. the Labour Code) apply to ships which are not merchant vessels.

2. The Committee notes that the provisions in Law No. 201 relating to leave apply only to seamen as defined in section 2, i.e. those occupying positions listed in schedules 1 and 2. Please indicate what provisions concerning leave apply to seafarers listed in schedule 3 or other seafarers, including non-Iraqi nationals employed on board Iraqi-registered vessels.

Articles 3 and 4. Please indicate whether the provisions in Chapter 7 of Law No. 201 ensure, in practice, that every seafarer is entitled to annual leave with pay of the specified minimum length (i.e. 36 days), or, where service is shorter than that required for the full entitlement, to annual leave proportionate to the length of service.

Article 6. Please indicate the measures taken to ensure that public and customary holidays, periods of incapacity for work, temporary shore leave, and compensatory leave are not counted in the minimum annual paid holiday as provided for in this Article.

Article 8. The Committee notes that section 42(8) of Law No. 201 authorises organisations to lay down schedules specifying dates of leave; but there appears to be no provision as to the division or accumulation of annual leave. Please indicate whether such provision exists and what period of annual leave with pay is taken uninterrupted in accordance with this Article.

Article 10, paragraphs 2 and 3. Please indicate how it is ensured that seafarers are not required without their consent to take annual leave otherwise than at the place of engagement except under a collective agreement or legislation, and, if such exception is allowed, what arrangements apply as regards transport and other costs, as required by this Article.

Article 11. Please indicate any steps envisaged to prohibit any agreement to relinquish the right to a minimum annual leave with pay, in accordance with this Article.

Article 12. Please indicate the conditions in which a seafarer can, in practice, be recalled from annual leave.

Please provide a copy of the service rules referred to in the report.