National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Repetition Article 5(a) of the Convention. Specific measures to encourage cooperation between the inspection services and the justice system. The Committee notes that trial magistrates, public prosecutors and labour inspection officials participated in the subregional seminar on cooperation between inspection services and judicial bodies held in Dakar from 8 to 10 May 2008 as part of a project to modernize labour administration and inspection (ADMITRA). It notes that the Minister of Justice addressed a circular letter to general prosecutors asking them to urge regional prosecutors to provide for action to be taken on reports of infringements drawn up by labour inspectors and to maintain healthy cooperation with inspectors in the interests of better compliance with the labour legislation. The Committee requests the Government to provide in its next report information on the practical action taken on this circular. It requests the Government to ensure that relevant statistics are published in future annual reports on the work of the labour inspection services.Articles 6, 7 and 10. Status, conditions of service and composition of the labour inspection staff. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes that, contrary to what the Government has been announcing for years, the draft decree on bonuses and indemnities for labour inspectors has still not been promulgated. It also notes that despite the Government’s statement that 12 labour inspectors were to be recruited in 2008, the list of labour personnel for Mali includes no inspectors, and that the staff of the inspectorate are all, without exception, in the category “controllers” (31).In an earlier report on the application of this Convention (2003), the Government indicated that it would be utopian to expect training in labour inspection, and that training for labour inspectors was limited to a grounding in labour law at the National School of Administration, an internship in the services and participation in a training course at the African Regional Labour Administration Centre (CRADAT). The Committee notes, however, a training plan sent in 2008 intended for all labour services personnel and covering, inter alia, occupational risk prevention in the construction and public works sector (BTP); inspection methodology; penal action; and the preparation of various forms of inspection visit reports. Furthermore, the National Labour Directorate’s annual report for 2008 indicates that a training workshop on ethics in inspection work, work contracts and hours of work was held for controllers from 14 to 25 April 2008 and that a training session for labour inspection trainers on occupational risks was also organized, under the guidance of two experts from GIP INTER.The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide information on any developments in the area of initial training for inspection staff, and on the number and distribution by category and level of qualification of the staff currently performing inspection duties as prescribed in Article 3(1) of the Convention, specifying the criteria used to differentiate between these categories. It would be grateful if the Government would also explain why the 12 inspectors who were supposed to be recruited in 2008 are not on the list of central and regional labour administration staff sent to the Office.The Committee again asks the Government to adopt the measures that are essential to the improvement of the conditions of service of labour inspection staff (remuneration, career plan, merit bonuses, etc.) so as to attract to, and retain in the profession persons who are sufficiently qualified and motivated, and hopes that in its next report the Government will be in a position to provide information showing real progress in this area.The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also continue to provide details of the training received by staff performing labour inspection duties and on the practical impact of such training.Articles 11, 16 and 21(c). Additional functions entrusted to labour inspectors, transport facilities and frequency of inspection visits. According to the abovementioned annual report for 2008, the duties of the inspection services consist not only of dispute settlement and conciliation, but also supervision of the application of the labour legislation, “which must ordinarily take up most of their time”. The report even stresses that “they must make visits to workplaces their main occupation”. The Committee notes from the same report than ten vehicles have been assigned to the National Labour Directorate and the regional directorates for labour, employment and vocational training. In the absence of any figures on the industrial and commercial workplaces subject to labour inspection, the statistics of inspections (306) and the workers they covered (16,613) in the course of 2008, are not sufficient for an assessment of the labour inspectorate’s coverage rate in relation to the scope of its mandate. It nonetheless notes that in 2008, out of 1,482 individual complaints, 1,091 were settled through conciliation. The report also indicates that 11 collective labour disputes were recorded, 40 per cent of which were followed by work stoppages in which 2,935 workers took part, mostly in the mining (2,680 workers) and the hotel (208) sectors. The Committee would like to stress that conciliation is not among the duties of the labour inspectorate as defined in Article 3(1) of the Convention and that, furthermore, according to Paragraph 8 of Labour Inspection Recommendation, 1947 (No. 81), “the functions of labour inspectors should not include that of acting as conciliator or arbitrator in proceedings concerning labour disputes”.The Committee would be grateful if the Government would take measures to relieve labour inspection staff of conciliation duties so as to enable them to devote themselves more fully to supervising the legislation on working conditions and the protection of workers, making use, in particular, of the vehicles recently acquired by the labour administration. The Government is asked in its next report to provide information in this regard (number and distribution of vehicles made available to labour inspectors for travel to workplaces; measures taken to relieve labour inspectors from conciliation duties).Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to ensure that the labour inspectorate has access to reliable data such as the number, categories and geographical distribution of workplaces and establishments subject to inspection, and the number of workers employed in them, so that the central inspection authority can plan inspection activities (supervision, advice, information) that ensure protection of the most vulnerable categories, and to ensure that this information is included in the annual report required by Articles 20 and 21. Articles 17 and 18. Follow-up action taken by the labour inspectorate in relation to breaches of the legislation covered by the Convention. The Committee notes from the 2008 annual report the most frequent causes of the individual complaints submitted to the National Labour Directorate (claims for wages and accessories; notices of dismissal or resignation; overtime; paid leave; and dismissals), and the infringements noted in the course of inspections (concerning pay registers, employer registers and safety registers; labour contracts; wages; minimum wages; safety and hygiene; hours of work; staff representation; weekly rest; social contributions; and occupational medicine). It nonetheless notes that no information is provided as to the causes of the collective labour disputes, which affect the mining and hotel sectors in particular. According to information available at the ILO, the collective action affecting the mining sector is founded on an enterprise’s violation of the provisions of a collective agreement on working conditions and the protection of certain rights at work. The miners’ claims reportedly concern, in particular, the rate of output demanded of them, the length of the working day and the non-payment of overtime and other bonuses included in a collective agreement. It would appear that the enterprise dismissed en masse workers who were covered by this collective agreement only to re-employ them under new inferior contractual conditions. The Committee requests the Government to send to the Office detailed information on the role of the labour inspectorate in collective labour disputes, particularly in the mining sector, where these conflicts have affected 2,680 workers and consequently their families. Please also indicate whether, in the enterprises concerned by these disputes, the inspection staff noted any infringements of the labour legislation covered by the Convention and whether they recommended remedial measures or the application of penalties. Pointing out that according to Article 27 of the Convention, legal provisions consist not only of laws and regulations but of arbitration awards and collective agreements upon which the force of law is conferred and which are enforceable by inspectors, the Committee requests the Government to supplement the required information with relevant statistics and documents.Articles 14 and 21. Notification of occupational accidents and cases of occupational diseases. The Committee notes that the annual reports for 2007 and 2008 contain information on reported industrial accidents and, in the case of the report for 2008, the inquiries conducted into these accidents. It observes, however, that no information at all is provided on cases of occupational disease, although information available at the ILO refers to pathologies linked to the handling and ingestion by workers of certain toxic substances in the course of extraction work in gold mines. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate the preventive measures taken to reduce the number of accidents and mitigate their consequences in the mining and public works sectors, and to take measures to allow the diagnosis of cases of service-incurred diseases and the notification of such cases to the inspection services so that their most common causes can be identified and eliminated to the extent possible. The Committee requests the Government to keep the Office informed of the measures taken for these purposes.
Articles 20 and 21 of the Convention. Publication and communication of reports on the activities of the inspection services. The Committee notes with interest the annual reports of the National Labour Directorate for 2007 and 2008. These reports contain much of the information required by Article 21. The Committee can thus assess to some extent how far the Convention is applied and support the Government in its efforts for gradual improvement. It notes, however, that the National Directorate’s annual reports cover not only inspection work, in accordance with Article 21 of the Convention, but also other labour administration duties, done by other public servants than inspectors. One of the aims of Articles 20 and 21 is to provide the central inspection authority with the kind of information it needs in order to determine, in the light of the social and economic objectives of labour inspection, the resources required to run the services efficiently, and in order to submit appropriate budgetary proposals for the attainment of these objectives. This aim can be achieved only if the data on the operation and results of labour inspection are compiled and consolidated separately from data on other functions of labour administration. Since, as the annual reports of the National Labour Directorate indicate, relevant data on labour inspection are available, the Committee asks the Government to take the necessary steps in the near future, with the requested ILO assistance, to have a separate annual report on the work of the inspection services published, in accordance with Articles 20 and 21, setting out clearly the information on labour inspection in industrial and commercial workplaces. Referring to its general observation of 1999 on the labour inspectorate’s role in combating child labour, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would ensure that the report in question also includes information on child labour in relation to industrial and commercial workplaces.
Article 5(a). Specific measures to encourage cooperation between the inspection services and the justice system. The Committee notes that trial magistrates, public prosecutors and labour inspection officials participated in the subregional seminar on cooperation between inspection services and judicial bodies held in Dakar from 8 to 10 May 2008 as part of a project to modernize labour administration and inspection (ADMITRA). It notes with interest that the Minister of Justice addressed a circular letter to general prosecutors asking them to urge regional prosecutors to provide for action to be taken on reports of infringements drawn up by labour inspectors and to maintain healthy cooperation with inspectors in the interests of better compliance with the labour legislation. The Committee requests the Government to provide in its next report information on the practical action taken on this circular. It requests the Government to ensure that relevant statistics are published in future annual reports on the work of the labour inspection services.
Articles 6, 7 and 10. Status, conditions of service and composition of the labour inspection staff. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes that, contrary to what the Government has been announcing for years, the draft decree on bonuses and indemnities for labour inspectors has still not been promulgated. It also notes that despite the Government’s statement that 12 labour inspectors were to be recruited in 2008, the list of labour personnel for Mali includes no inspectors, and that the staff of the inspectorate are all, without exception, in the category “controllers” (31).
In an earlier report on the application of this Convention (2003), the Government indicated that it would be utopian to expect training in labour inspection, and that training for labour inspectors was limited to a grounding in labour law at the National School of Administration, an internship in the services and participation in a training course at the African Regional Labour Administration Centre (CRADAT). The Committee notes with interest, however, a training plan sent in 2008 intended for all labour services personnel and covering, inter alia, occupational risk prevention in the construction and public works sector (BTP); inspection methodology; penal action; and the preparation of various forms of inspection visit reports. Furthermore, the National Labour Directorate’s annual report for 2008 indicates that a training workshop on ethics in inspection work, work contracts and hours of work was held for controllers from 14 to 25 April 2008 and that a training session for labour inspection trainers on occupational risks was also organized, under the guidance of two experts from GIP INTER.
The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide information on any developments in the area of initial training for inspection staff, and on the number and distribution by category and level of qualification of the staff currently performing inspection duties as prescribed in Article 3(1) of the Convention, specifying the criteria used to differentiate between these categories. It would be grateful if the Government would also explain why the 12 inspectors who were supposed to be recruited in 2008 are not on the list of central and regional labour administration staff sent to the Office.
The Committee again asks the Government to adopt the measures that are essential to the improvement of the conditions of service of labour inspection staff (remuneration, career plan, merit bonuses, etc.) so as to attract to, and retain in the profession persons who are sufficiently qualified and motivated, and hopes that in its next report the Government will be in a position to provide information showing real progress in this area.
The Committee would be grateful if the Government would also continue to provide details of the training received by staff performing labour inspection duties and on the practical impact of such training.
Articles 11, 16 and 21(c). Additional functions entrusted to labour inspectors, transport facilities and frequency of inspection visits. According to the abovementioned annual report for 2008, the duties of the inspection services consist not only of dispute settlement and conciliation, but also supervision of the application of the labour legislation, “which must ordinarily take up most of their time”. The report even stresses that “they must make visits to workplaces their main occupation”. The Committee notes with interest from the same report than ten vehicles have been assigned to the National Labour Directorate and the regional directorates for labour, employment and vocational training. In the absence of any figures on the industrial and commercial workplaces subject to labour inspection, the statistics of inspections (306) and the workers they covered (16,613) in the course of 2008, are not sufficient for an assessment of the labour inspectorate’s coverage rate in relation to the scope of its mandate. It nonetheless notes that in 2008, out of 1,482 individual complaints, 1,091 were settled through conciliation. The report also indicates that 11 collective labour disputes were recorded, 40 per cent of which were followed by work stoppages in which 2,935 workers took part, mostly in the mining (2,680 workers) and the hotel (208) sectors. The Committee would like to stress that conciliation is not among the duties of the labour inspectorate as defined in Article 3(1) of the Convention and that, furthermore, according to Paragraph 8 of Labour Inspection Recommendation, 1947 (No. 81), “the functions of labour inspectors should not include that of acting as conciliator or arbitrator in proceedings concerning labour disputes”.
The Committee would be grateful if the Government would take measures to relieve labour inspection staff of conciliation duties so as to enable them to devote themselves more fully to supervising the legislation on working conditions and the protection of workers, making use, in particular, of the vehicles recently acquired by the labour administration. The Government is asked in its next report to provide information in this regard (number and distribution of vehicles made available to labour inspectors for travel to workplaces; measures taken to relieve labour inspectors from conciliation duties).
Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to ensure that the labour inspectorate has access to reliable data such as the number, categories and geographical distribution of workplaces and establishments subject to inspection, and the number of workers employed in them, so that the central inspection authority can plan inspection activities (supervision, advice, information) that ensure protection of the most vulnerable categories, and to ensure that this information is included in the annual report required by Articles 20 and 21.
Articles 17 and 18. Follow-up action taken by the labour inspectorate in relation to breaches of the legislation covered by the Convention. The Committee notes with interest from the 2008 annual report the most frequent causes of the individual complaints submitted to the National Labour Directorate (claims for wages and accessories; notices of dismissal or resignation; overtime; paid leave; and dismissals), and the infringements noted in the course of inspections (concerning pay registers, employer registers and safety registers; labour contracts; wages; minimum wages; safety and hygiene; hours of work; staff representation; weekly rest; social contributions; and occupational medicine). It nonetheless notes that no information is provided as to the causes of the collective labour disputes, which affect the mining and hotel sectors in particular. According to information available at the ILO, the collective action affecting the mining sector is founded on an enterprise’s violation of the provisions of a collective agreement on working conditions and the protection of certain rights at work. The miners’ claims reportedly concern, in particular, the rate of output demanded of them, the length of the working day and the non-payment of overtime and other bonuses included in a collective agreement. It would appear that the enterprise dismissed en masse workers who were covered by this collective agreement only to re-employ them under new inferior contractual conditions. The Committee requests the Government to send to the Office detailed information on the role of the labour inspectorate in collective labour disputes, particularly in the mining sector, where these conflicts have affected 2,680 workers and consequently their families. Please also indicate whether, in the enterprises concerned by these disputes, the inspection staff noted any infringements of the labour legislation covered by the Convention and whether they recommended remedial measures or the application of penalties. Pointing out that according to Article 27 of the Convention, legal provisions consist not only of laws and regulations but of arbitration awards and collective agreements upon which the force of law is conferred and which are enforceable by inspectors, the Committee requests the Government to supplement the required information with relevant statistics and documents.
Articles 14 and 21. Notification of occupational accidents and cases of occupational diseases. The Committee notes that the annual reports for 2007 and 2008 contain information on reported industrial accidents and, in the case of the report for 2008, the inquiries conducted into these accidents. It observes, however, that no information at all is provided on cases of occupational disease, although information available at the ILO refers to pathologies linked to the handling and ingestion by workers of certain toxic substances in the course of extraction work in gold mines. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate the preventive measures taken to reduce the number of accidents and mitigate their consequences in the mining and public works sectors, and to take measures to allow the diagnosis of cases of service-incurred diseases and the notification of such cases to the inspection services so that their most common causes can be identified and eliminated to the extent possible. The Committee requests the Government to keep the Office informed of the measures taken for these purposes.
The Committee takes note of the Government’s report and the information elements it contains in response to the previous direct request. In view of the current situation, in which the labour inspectorate still has only limited resources at its disposal, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would continue to provide detailed information, particularly regarding the following points.
1. Conditions of service of labour inspectors. The Committee observes that, although the Government acknowledges that inspectorate staff are inadequately remunerated, it has not as yet taken further action on the plan it announced in its previous report to grant a bonus or specific indemnity for inspectors and controllers. The Committee recalls that it is important for inspection staff to benefit from a status and conditions of service which guarantee their independence and ensure that they are not subject to improper external influences, in accordance with Article 6 of the Convention. It requests the Government to describe the measures taken or envisaged to this end.
2. Training of labour inspectors. The Committee notes with interest that cooperation with the French Ministry of Labour has continued, including the training of trainers, and should shortly culminate in the creation of a centre for the training of labour inspectors and controllers. It requests the Government to provide detailed information on the measures taken to ensure initial and further training for inspection staff, and on the results achieved (Article 7, paragraph 3).
3. Publication of an annual report. The Committee notes that a general report on inspection activities is being prepared. It hopes that, as required by Article 20 of the Convention, the labour inspectorate will shortly be in a position to ensure that an annual activities report is published, that it will be transmitted to the Office and that it will contain all the information required under Article 21 of the Convention.
4. ILO technical cooperation. The Committee requests the Government to provide all relevant information on any ILO training, advisory or technical assistance activities that may have taken place in the area of labour inspection.
The Committee notes the Government’s report in reply to its previous comments and the documentation attached.
The Committee notes the recent creation of a new ministry responsible for labour matters, entitled the Ministry of the Civil Service, State Reform and Institutional Relations. It would be grateful if the Government would provide copies of the texts relating to its establishment, organization and functioning and provide any useful information on the impact of the restructuring of the central bodies responsible for labour matters on the functioning of the labour inspectorate and the status of labour inspectors. It requests the Government to indicate, in particular, whether Act No. 02-72 establishing the National Labour Directorate has been affected by the restructuring.
Articles 6 and 15 of the Convention. The Committee notes with interest that the Government envisages establishing by decree a bonus and compensation for inspectors, controllers and their assistants and that this bonus would be sufficiently high to ensure their independence of improper external influences. It would be grateful if the Government would provide a copy of the decree as soon as it has been adopted and inform the ILO of its effects over the next reporting period.
International cooperation and ILO technical assistance. According to the Government, a cooperation programme between the French Ministry of Labour and the Ministry of the Civil Service, which includes the creation of a vocational training centre, is currently being implemented. The Committee notes with interest that two inspectors and an occupational medical officer participated in a short "train the trainers" course in July 2004 in Lille. The Government is requested to provide information on the content of the training course and to the effects that are expected.
The Committee also notes that an evaluation of the labour administration was carried out with the technical assistance of the ILO in March to April 2004. However, noting that the component on labour inspection has not yet been examined, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate whether any measures have been taken for this purpose and communicate any information available on the progress achieved and on any difficulties encountered.
Articles 19, 20 and 21. The Committee notes that measures have been taken for the reports of the regional inspectorates to be submitted in time and that a general annual report on inspection activities will soon be transmitted to the ILO. The Committee reminds the Government that, in accordance with Article 20, the report should also be published so that it is accessible to any persons interested, and particularly for representative employers’ and workers’ organizations. It therefore requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to this end.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report contains no reply to its previous comments but repeats the information supplied in its previous report. It notes that the table of the staff of the National Labour Directorate does not show the human resources of the services that are competent for labour inspection within the meaning of the Convention, and that the text of Decree No. 03-192/P-RM of 12 May 2003 on the organization and operation of the National Labour Directorate contains no specific provisions on the manner in which effect is given to the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide a copy of Act No. 02-072 of 19 December 2002 establishing the National Labour Directorate referred to by the Government, and to provide the information which it requested in its previous observation, which read as follows.
Article 3 of the Convention. Noting the information that, being subject to the administrative hierarchy, the labour inspectorate is obliged to bring to the notice of the higher authority any defects or abuses not specifically covered by the legislation, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which this function is discharged in practice by labour inspectors (paragraph 1(c)).
The Committee notes the information concerning the functions discharged by labour inspectors in the fields of conciliation, judicial appeals, arbitration, the protection of workers’ representatives and the supervision of employment. It notes in particular that conciliation duties prevail over the inspection of workplaces. The Committee considers that the duties thus entrusted to inspectors to the evident prejudice of their principal functions interfere with the latter within the meaning of paragraph 2 of this Article and it requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the further duties entrusted to labour inspectors are not such as to interfere with the discharge of their primary duties or to prejudice in any way the authority and impartiality which are necessary to them in their relations with employers and workers.
Articles 6 and 15(a). The Committee notes with concern that the remuneration of the staff of the inspection services is derisory in comparison with that of officials in the administration of finances and public works and lays inspection staff open to the need to undertake parallel gainful activities, or to the temptation to accepting gratuities when discharging their duties. This situation is in violation of the obligation for inspectors not to have any interest in the enterprises under their supervision and to the necessary authority which is indispensable to discharge the function of inspection. It is therefore necessary and urgent for the Government to take measures with a view to ensuring that labour inspectors and their assistants enjoy remuneration and career prospects that are appropriate to their functions so as to assure that they are independent of any improper external influences.
Article 7, paragraph 3. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it would be utopian to expect training for labour inspectors, which is confined to a grounding in labour law at the National School of Administration, a trainee course in the labour services and participation in a training course at the African Regional Labour Administration Centre (CRADAT). In practice, there is no specialized branch in national colleges, nor training grants or university courses in the field of labour and social security. The Committee cannot overemphasize the importance which should be accorded to the technical and practical training of labour inspectors during their employment so that they can cope with the increasing complexity of their duties and it requests the Government to take the necessary measures to provide them with training in accordance with their needs. Please indicate in the next report the measures which have been taken or are envisaged to this effect.
Articles 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17 and 18. The Committee notes the difficulties of a practical nature which occur in the application of the Convention, and particularly the inadequacy of the resources made available to the inspection services, which are described by the Government as being purely symbolic (clearly inadequate staff numbers, working conditions and material resources; dilapidated, undersized, unhealthy and unequipped premises; complete lack of documentation). The Committee notes in particular the irregular nature of inspections, the shortcomings of the public transport system and the absence of any transport facilities for the professional travel of labour inspectors, and of any arrangements for the reimbursement of their travelling and incidental expenses. The Government also indicates that the derisory level of fines for violations of the labour legislation means that it is of no avail to take the relevant measures. The Committee notes that it is the Government’s own opinion that the application of the Convention depends on the political will to accord the world of work an appropriate priority with the objective of economic and social development. The Committee therefore trusts that measures will be taken in the very near future, where necessary calling upon international cooperation and the technical assistance of the ILO, to establish the conditions required for the effective organization and operation of a system of labour inspection benefiting from appropriate resources, in which inspectors are in a position to make effective use of the powers entrusted to them by the above provisions of the Convention.
Articles 19, 20 and 21. With reference to its previous comments under these Articles, the Committee notes the indication that the Regional Labour Directorates are obliged to prepare quarterly or annual reports on their activities, which they submit to the National Labour Directorate. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the progress achieved with a view to the compilation by the Central Labour Inspection Authority, on the basis of these regular reports, of an annual general report on the activities of the labour inspection services, and its transmission to the ILO.
The Committee notes the Government’s detailed report and the table showing the distribution of the staff of the National Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Security and the Regional Labour Directorates (DRETSS). The Government is requested to provide additional information on the following points.
Article 7, paragraph 3. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it would be utopic to expect training for labour inspectors, which is confined to a grounding in labour law at the National School of Administration, a trainee course in the labour services and participation in a training course at the African Regional Labour Administration Centre (CRADAT). In practice, there is no specialized branch in national colleges, nor training grants or university courses in the field of labour and social security. The Committee cannot overemphasize the importance which should be accorded to the technical and practical training of labour inspectors during their employment so that they can cope with the increasing complexity of their duties and it requests the Government to take the necessary measures to provide them with training in accordance with their needs. Please indicate in the next report the measures which have been taken or are envisaged to this effect.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which reads as follows:
Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention. The Committee notes with interest the information to the effect that, in accordance with these provisions, a credit has been set aside in the budget for material and human resources and partially disbursed. The Committee requests the Government to provide a detailed financial statement on the means which are now available to labour inspectors and its impact on the development of the activities of the labour inspectorate.
Articles 19, 20 and 21. In accordance with these provisions of the Convention, labour inspectors or labour inspection officers, as the case may be, shall be required to submit to the central inspection authority periodical reports on the results of their inspection activities (Article 19); the central inspection authority shall publish an annual general report on the work of the inspection services under its control and transmit a copy to the ILO (Article 20). The annual reports should also include the points enumerated under Article 21(a) to (g). The Committee notes that the ILO has received no inspection reports during the last 12 years. It had already pointed out in paragraph 273 of its 1985 General Survey on the importance it attaches to the application of these provisions of the Convention. From a national viewpoint, annual inspection reports are essential to evaluate the practical results of labour inspectorate activities to ensure the necessary means are made available to improve their effectiveness. The annual reports of the labour inspectorate are also published to provide information to and to receive comments from employers and workers as well as their respective organizations. Finally, failure to provide the ILO with regular annual reports on the activities of the labour inspectorate deprives the ILO’s supervisory bodies of an essential instrument enabling an evaluation of the manner in which the labour inspectorate functions in practice and a means of communication with the Government to ensure the correct application of the Convention. The Committee is therefore bound to reiterate to the Government the need to take appropriate measures to give effect to these provisions within the prescribed period and requests the Government to provide information in its next report on progress achieved to that end.
The Committee notes the Government's report.
Articles 19, 20 and 21. In accordance with these provisions of the Convention, labour inspectors or labour inspection officers, as the case may be, shall be required to submit to the central inspection authority periodical reports on the results of their inspection activities (Article 19); the central inspection authority shall publish an annual general report on the work of the inspection services under its control and transmit a copy to the ILO (Article 20). The annual reports should also include the points enumerated under Article 21(a) to (g). The Committee notes that the ILO has received no inspection reports during the last 12 years. It had already pointed out in paragraph 273 of its 1985 General Survey on the importance it attaches to the application of these provisions of the Convention. From a national viewpoint, annual inspection reports are essential to evaluate the practical results of labour inspectorate activities to ensure the necessary means are made available to improve their effectiveness. The annual reports of the labour inspectorate are also published to provide information to and to receive comments from employers and workers as well as their respective organizations. Finally, failure to provide the ILO with regular annual reports on the activities of the labour inspectorate deprives the ILO's supervisory bodies of an essential instrument enabling an evaluation of the manner in which the labour inspectorate functions in practice and a means of communication with the Government to ensure the correct application of the Convention. The Committee is therefore bound to reiterate to the Government the need to take appropriate measures to give effect to these provisions within the prescribed period and requests the Government to provide information in its next report on progress achieved to that end.
[The Government is asked to report in detail in 2000.]
The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
Articles 6, 7, 10, 11, 16, 20 and 21 of the Convention. With reference to its observation, the Committee notes that the specific objectives of the project to support the employment services are to recruit and train staff, to make available to inspectors motor vehicles, micro-computers, the necessary documentation and office furniture. However, it notes that achievement of these objectives, which govern the practical application of the Convention, with effective inspection of establishments coming first, depend on funding which has not yet been obtained. The Committee hopes that the Government will take this project into consideration in its budgetary priorities and that other sources of funding will also be considered so that implementation can begin as soon as possible, even if the project is carried out in stages, so that progress can be made in practical application of these provisions of the Convention.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:
The Committee takes note of the Government's report which refers to information supplied previously on the subject of the labour inspection situation. It also takes note of the project to support labour services with the general objective of dynamizing these services and strengthening their intervention capacity. The Committee is sending directly to the Government a direct request on a number of points.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:
The Committee takes note of the Government's report which refers to information supplied previously on the subject of the labour inspection situation. It also takes note of the project to support labour services with the general objective of dynamizing these services and strengthening their intervention capacity.
The Committee is sending directly to the Government a direct request on a number of points.
Articles 6, 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government's reply to its previous comments. It notes with interest the Government's frank critical assessment of the insufficiency of the strength of the inspectorate, the insufficient training provided to inspectors, the poor and precarious conditions of employment undermining their employment security and independence, and their lack of financial, material and transportation means resulting in general in inspection visits which are both irregular and inadequate. At the same time, the Committee finds some encouragement in the new administrative arrangements referred to in the report; and in the holding of a national tripartite seminar on labour inspection, with ILO participation, in 1992. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would communicate information about any measures it finds possible to improve the situation and it trusts the Government will endeavour to maintain contacts with the competent services of the ILO in this connection.
Articles 20 and 21. The Committee notes that annual inspection reports for the years 1987-91 have not reached the Office. It hopes in future progress may be made in preparing reports containing information on all subjects enumerated in Article 21 and publishing and communicating them within the time-limits set by Article 20. It would be glad if the Government would also supply copies of Ordinance No. 90-63/PRM, Decrees Nos. 90-421, 90-422 and Order No. 90-0598 concerning administration of the labour inspection service.
Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. The Committee notes the very brief information supplied by the Government to the effect that the staff placed at the disposal of the labour inspection services consists of 23 officials, a number which appears somewhat inadequate. It asks the Government to indicate all measures taken or contemplated to remedy that deficiency and to supply with its next report information on any progress made in that respect.
Articles 20 and 21. Further to its previous comment, the Committee notes that the annual reports on the activities of labour inspection services for the years 1987, 1988, 1989 and 1990 have not reached the ILO. It asks the Government to state whether such reports are regularly prepared and published at the national level and to supply the ILO with copies. The Committee trusts that in future these reports, containing information on all the subjects enumerated in Article 21, will be published and communicated within the time limits set by Article 20.
[The Government is asked to supply a detailed report for the period ending 30 June 1992.]
Articles 20 and 21 of the Convention. The Committee notes that the annual report on the activities of the National Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Security (Part II, statistical tables) for 1986, appended to the Government's report on the application of the Convention, contains no information on the staff of the labour inspection service, or statistics of workplaces liable to inspection and the number of workers employed therein (points (b) and (c) of Article 21). It trusts that the Government will take the necessary steps to ensure that, in future, annual reports containing general information on the work of the inspection services and including statistics on all the subjects listed at Article 21 will be transmitted to the International Labour Office within the period laid down at Article 20.