National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Repetition Obligation to report pursuant to article 22 of the ILO Constitution. The Committee notes the communication by the Government, in reply to its previous request, of the circulars (notices) of 18 March 2005 designating the authorities which must be notified of occupational accidents and cases of occupational disease, in relation to Article 19 of the Convention. It also notes the communication of the annual report for 2004 from the Industrial Relations Department of the Ministry of Labour, containing brief information on labour inspection activities in the agricultural sector. However, the Committee notes that no detailed report on the application of the Convention has been sent for more than ten years. The Committee therefore requests the Government to supply, in its next report under article 22 of the ILO Constitution, all the information required by each part of the Convention report form.Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention. Objectives and content of the annual report on the work of the labour inspectorate. The Committee notes that, despite the high number of strikes in sugar plantations and agriculture in 2004 and their socio-economic impact (227 strikes resulting in the loss of 82,880 workdays and wages amounting to 129,061,000 dollars) the labour inspectorate only performed six inspections for the whole sector. The Committee considers that these figures testify both to poor conditions of work and lack of vigilance on the part of the inspection authorities responsible for monitoring conditions of work in agricultural undertakings. In any event, they call for the adoption of measures to curb the deterioration of the social climate, particularly by means of inspection activities and initiatives to provide employers and workers with information. However, the Committee notes that the Government has not supplied any information indicating that such measures have been taken or are envisaged. It also notes that the content of the report does not allow any assessment to be made of the level of coverage of the labour inspection system in relation to worker protection requirements in the sector, these needs not being defined, particularly with regard to occupational safety and health. The significant lack of statistics relating to inspection visits (Article 27(d)) and violations (clause (e)) and the total lack of information regarding the laws and regulations giving effect to the provisions of the Convention (clause (a)), the number of staff of the labour inspection service (clause (b)), the number of agricultural undertakings liable to inspection and the number of persons working therein (clause (c)), and also the lack of statistics with respect to penalties imposed (clause (e)), occupational accidents, including their causes (clause (f)) and occupational diseases, including their causes (clause (g)), make it impossible for the Committee to perform its role of monitoring the practical application of the Convention. The Committee reminds the Government that the requirement to publish an annual report on inspection activities and send it to the ILO serves an important purpose at both the national and international level. It is an essential tool for evaluating the operation of the labour inspection system and for making improvements to it, with the participation of employers and workers and their respective organizations (Articles 26 and 27). The Committee invites the Government to refer to paragraphs 320–328 of its 2006 General Survey on labour inspection and requests it to take the necessary measures, if need be with technical assistance from the Office, to enable the central labour inspection authority to include all the information required by each of clauses (a)–(g) of Article 27 in the annual report on its work.
Repetition Obligation to report pursuant to article 22 of the ILO Constitution. The Committee notes the communication by the Government, in reply to its previous request, of the circulars (notices) of 18 March 2005 designating the authorities which must be notified of occupational accidents and cases of occupational disease, in relation to Article 19 of the Convention. It also notes the communication of the annual report for 2004 from the Industrial Relations Department of the Ministry of Labour, containing brief information on labour inspection activities in the agricultural sector. However, the Committee notes that no detailed report on the application of the Convention has been sent for more than ten years. The Committee therefore requests the Government to supply, in its next report under article 22 of the ILO Constitution, all the information required by each part of the Convention report form.Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention. Objectives and content of the annual report on the work of the labour inspectorate. The Committee notes that, despite the high number of strikes in sugar plantations and agriculture in 2004 and their socio-economic impact (227 strikes resulting in the loss of 82,880 workdays and wages amounting to 129,061,000 dollars) the labour inspectorate only performed six inspections for the whole sector. The Committee considers that these figures testify both to poor conditions of work and lack of vigilance on the part of the inspection authorities responsible for monitoring conditions of work in agricultural undertakings. In any event, they call for the adoption of measures to curb the deterioration of the social climate, particularly by means of inspection activities and initiatives to provide employers and workers with information. However, the Committee notes that the Government has not supplied any information indicating that such measures have been taken or are envisaged. It also notes that the content of the report does not allow any assessment to be made of the level of coverage of the labour inspection system in relation to worker protection requirements in the sector, these needs not being defined, particularly with regard to occupational safety and health. The significant lack of statistics relating to inspection visits (Article 27(d)) and violations (clause (e)) and the total lack of information regarding the laws and regulations giving effect to the provisions of the Convention (clause (a)), the number of staff of the labour inspection service (clause (b)), the number of agricultural undertakings liable to inspection and the number of persons working therein (clause c)), and also the lack of statistics with respect to penalties imposed (clause (e)), occupational accidents, including their causes (clause (f)) and occupational diseases, including their causes (clause (g)), make it impossible for the Committee to perform its role of monitoring the practical application of the Convention. The Committee reminds the Government that the requirement to publish an annual report on inspection activities and send it to the ILO serves an important purpose at both the national and international level. It is an essential tool for evaluating the operation of the labour inspection system and for making improvements to it, with the participation of employers and workers and their respective organizations (Articles 26 and 27). The Committee invites the Government to refer to paragraphs 320–328 of its 2006 General Survey on labour inspection and requests it to take the necessary measures, if need be with technical assistance from the Office, to enable the central labour inspection authority to include all the information required by each of clauses (a) to (g) of Article 27 in the annual report on its work.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation, which read as follows:
Obligation to report pursuant to article 22 of the ILO Constitution. The Committee notes the communication by the Government, in reply to its previous request, of the circulars (notices) of 18 March 2005 designating the authorities which must be notified of occupational accidents and cases of occupational disease, in relation to Article 19 of the Convention. It also notes the communication of the annual report for 2004 from the Industrial Relations Department of the Ministry of Labour, containing brief information on labour inspection activities in the agricultural sector. However, the Committee notes that no detailed report on the application of the Convention has been sent for more than ten years. The Committee therefore requests the Government to supply, in its next report under article 22 of the ILO Constitution, all the information required by each part of the Convention report form.
Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention. Objectives and content of the annual report on the work of the labour inspectorate. The Committee notes that, despite the high number of strikes in sugar plantations and agriculture in 2004 and their socio-economic impact (227 strikes resulting in the loss of 82,880 workdays and wages amounting to 129,061,000 dollars) the labour inspectorate only performed six inspections for the whole sector. The Committee considers that these figures testify both to poor conditions of work and lack of vigilance on the part of the inspection authorities responsible for monitoring conditions of work in agricultural undertakings. In any event, they call for the adoption of measures to curb the deterioration of the social climate, particularly by means of inspection activities and initiatives to provide employers and workers with information. However, the Committee notes that the Government has not supplied any information indicating that such measures have been taken or are envisaged. It also notes that the content of the report does not allow any assessment to be made of the level of coverage of the labour inspection system in relation to worker protection requirements in the sector, these needs not being defined, particularly with regard to occupational safety and health. The significant lack of statistics relating to inspection visits (Article 27(d)) and violations (clause (e)) and the total lack of information regarding the laws and regulations giving effect to the provisions of the Convention (clause (a)), the number of staff of the labour inspection service (clause (b)), the number of agricultural undertakings liable to inspection and the number of persons working therein (clause c)), and also the lack of statistics with respect to penalties imposed (clause (e)), occupational accidents, including their causes (clause (f)) and occupational diseases, including their causes (clause (g)), make it impossible for the Committee to perform its role of monitoring the practical application of the Convention. The Committee reminds the Government that the requirement to publish an annual report on inspection activities and send it to the ILO serves an important purpose at both the national and international level. It is an essential tool for evaluating the operation of the labour inspection system and for making improvements to it, with the participation of employers and workers and their respective organizations (Articles 26 and 27). The Committee invites the Government to refer to paragraphs 320–328 of its 2006 General Survey on labour inspection and requests it to take the necessary measures, if need be with technical assistance from the Office, to enable the central labour inspection authority to include all the information required by each of clauses (a) to (g) of Article 27 in the annual report on its work.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous observation, which read as follows:
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous observation on the following points:
1. Obligation to report pursuant to article 22 of the ILO Constitution. The Committee notes the communication by the Government, in reply to its previous request, of the circulars (notices) of 18 March 2005 designating the authorities which must be notified of occupational accidents and cases of occupational disease, in relation to Article 19 of the Convention. It also notes the communication of the annual report for 2004 from the Industrial Relations Department of the Ministry of Labour, containing brief information on labour inspection activities in the agricultural sector. However, the Committee notes that no detailed report on the application of the Convention has been sent for more than ten years. The Committee therefore requests the Government to supply, in its next report under article 22 of the ILO Constitution, all the information required by each part of the Convention report form.
2. Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention. Objectives and content of the annual report on the work of the labour inspectorate. The Committee notes that, despite the high number of strikes in sugar plantations and agriculture in 2004 and their socio-economic impact (227 strikes resulting in the loss of 82,880 workdays and wages amounting to 129,061,000 dollars) the labour inspectorate only performed six inspections for the whole sector. The Committee considers that these figures testify both to poor conditions of work and lack of vigilance on the part of the inspection authorities responsible for monitoring conditions of work in agricultural undertakings. In any event, they call for the adoption of measures to curb the deterioration of the social climate, particularly by means of inspection activities and initiatives to provide employers and workers with information. However, the Committee notes that the Government has not supplied any information indicating that such measures have been taken or are envisaged. It also notes that the content of the report does not allow any assessment to be made of the level of coverage of the labour inspection system in relation to worker protection requirements in the sector, these needs not being defined, particularly with regard to occupational safety and health. The significant lack of statistics relating to inspection visits (Article 27(d)) and violations (clause (e)) and the total lack of information regarding the laws and regulations giving effect to the provisions of the Convention (clause (a)), the number of staff of the labour inspection service (clause (b)), the number of agricultural undertakings liable to inspection and the number of persons working therein (clause c)), and also the lack of statistics with respect to penalties imposed (clause (e)), occupational accidents, including their causes (clause (f)) and occupational diseases, including their causes (clause (g)), make it impossible for the Committee to perform its role of monitoring the practical application of the Convention. The Committee reminds the Government that the requirement to publish an annual report on inspection activities and send it to the ILO serves an important purpose at both the national and international level. It is an essential tool for evaluating the operation of the labour inspection system and for making improvements to it, with the participation of employers and workers and their respective organizations (Articles 26 and 27). The Committee invites the Government to refer to paragraphs 320–328 of its 2006 General Survey on labour inspection and requests it to take the necessary measures, if need be with technical assistance from the Office, to enable the central labour inspection authority to include all the information required by each of clauses (a) to (g) of Article 27 in the annual report on its work.
1. Obligation to report pursuant to article 22 of the ILO Constitution. The Committee notes with interest the communication by the Government, in reply to its previous request, of the circulars (notices) of 18 March 2005 designating the authorities which must be notified of occupational accidents and cases of occupational disease, in relation to Article 19 of the Convention. It also notes the communication of the annual report for 2004 from the Industrial Relations Department of the Ministry of Labour, containing brief information on labour inspection activities in the agricultural sector. However, the Committee notes that no detailed report on the application of the Convention has been sent for more than ten years. The Committee therefore requests the Government to supply, in its next report under article 22 of the ILO Constitution, all the information required by each part of the Convention report form.
2. Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention. Objectives and content of the annual report on the work of the labour inspectorate. The Committee notes that, despite the high number of strikes in sugar plantations and agriculture in 2004 and their socio-economic impact (227 strikes resulting in the loss of 82,880 workdays and wages amounting to 129,061,000 dollars) the labour inspectorate only performed six inspections for the whole sector. The Committee considers that these figures testify both to poor conditions of work and lack of vigilance on the part of the inspection authorities responsible for monitoring conditions of work in agricultural undertakings. In any event, they call for the adoption of measures to curb the deterioration of the social climate, particularly by means of inspection activities and initiatives to provide employers and workers with information. However, the Committee notes that the Government has not supplied any information indicating that such measures have been taken or are envisaged. It also notes that the content of the report does not allow any assessment to be made of the level of coverage of the labour inspection system in relation to worker protection requirements in the sector, these needs not being defined, particularly with regard to occupational safety and health. The significant lack of statistics relating to inspection visits (Article 27(d)) and violations (clause (e)) and the total lack of information regarding the laws and regulations giving effect to the provisions of the Convention (clause (a)), the number of staff of the labour inspection service (clause (b)), the number of agricultural undertakings liable to inspection and the number of persons working therein (clause c)), and also the lack of statistics with respect to penalties imposed (clause (e)), occupational accidents, including their causes (clause (f)) and occupational diseases, including their causes (clause (g)), make it impossible for the Committee to perform its role of monitoring the practical application of the Convention. The Committee reminds the Government that the requirement to publish an annual report on inspection activities and send it to the ILO serves an important purpose at both the national and international level. It is an essential tool for evaluating the operation of the labour inspection system and for making improvements to it, with the participation of employers and workers and their respective organizations (Articles 26 and 27). The Committee invites the Government to refer to paragraphs 320–328 of its 2006 General Survey on labour inspection and requests it to take the necessary measures, if need be with technical assistance from the Office, to enable the central labour inspection authority to include all the information required by each of clauses (a)–(g) of Article 27 in the annual report on its work.
With reference to its observation and further to its previous comments, the Committee notes that, in accordance with the provisions of Act No. 32 of 1997 respecting occupational health and safety, provided by the Government, the employment accidents and cases of occupational disease shall be notified to the “Authority” without any other indication of the nature of such authority. Recalling that, in accordance with Article 19, paragraph 1, of the Convention, inspectors should be notified of such information, it requests the Government to transmit, where appropriate, a copy of any relevant legislation, or to adopt the necessary measures to bring the legislation into conformity with the Convention on this matter and to keep the Office informed.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous observation which read as follows:
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the annual reports on the activities of the Labour Department for 1998, 2000 and 2002.
Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention. While noting with interest the information included in the annual reports on the activities of the Ministry of Labour on inspection in agricultural enterprises and the data on employment accidents in agriculture provided by the Government, the Committee once again emphasizes the importance, from both a national and an international point of view, of the publication and communication to the ILO of an annual report of the activities of the labour inspectorate. It therefore once again hopes that the Government will take the necessary measures in practice to ensure that the central inspection authority fulfils this obligation set out in the Convention. In this respect, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the various forms that the report may take in accordance with Article 26, while emphasizing the need to include information that is as detailed as possible on each of the items covered by Article 27, with specific reference to the agricultural sector.
The Committee is addressing a request directly to the Government on another point.
Referring also to its observation, the Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
With reference also to its observation and further to its previous comments, the Committee notes that, in accordance with the provisions of Act No. 32 of 1997 respecting occupational health and safety, provided by the Government, the employment accidents and cases of occupational disease shall be notified to the "Authority" without any other indication of the nature of such authority. Recalling that, in accordance with Article 19, paragraph 1, of the Convention, inspectors should be notified of such information, it requests the Government to transmit, where appropriate, a copy of any relevant legislation, or to adopt the necessary measures to bring the legislation into conformity with the Convention on this matter and to keep the Office informed.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:
Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention. While noting with interest the information included in the annual reports on the activities of the Ministry of Labour on inspection in agricultural enterprises and the data on employment accidents in agriculture provided by the Government, the Committee once again emphasizes the importance, from both a national and an international point of view, of the publication and communication to the ILO of an annual report of the activities of the labour inspectorate. It therefore once again hopes that the Government will take the necessary measures in practice to ensure that the central inspection authority fulfils this obligation set out in the Convention. In this respect the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the various forms that the report may take in accordance with Article 26, while emphasizing the need to include information that is as detailed as possible on each of the items covered by Article 27, with specific reference to the agricultural sector.
The Committee notes the Government’s brief report in which it indicates that there has been no change over the period covered.
1. Annual inspection reports in the agricultural sector. Noting once again that no annual inspection report has been communicated to the ILO in spite of its repeated requests, and contrary to Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention, the Committee is obliged to renew the terms of its previous observation, as follows:
The Committee notes the Government’s reports for 1996 and 1998. It refers to its previous comments and again reiterates the requirement to publish and communicate to the Office, within the prescribed time limits established under Article 26 of the Convention, annual labour inspection reports containing the information enumerated under Article 27 and recalls that the Government may avail itself of ILO technical assistance for the correct application of these provisions. The annual reports contain information enabling, on the one hand, the Government to regularly evaluate the overall progress in the labour inspection system and to adopt, where necessary, measures to improve its effectiveness and, on the other hand, provide the Committee with sound information to assess the manner in which the Convention is applied and to propose a more appropriate application of the Convention, where necessary. However, the Committee notes that, although the Government’s report contains a statement of intent, no inspection report has been transmitted to the ILO since 1996. Moreover, the 1996 report contained only partial responses to the information required by the relevant Articles of this Convention and of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (and Protocol, 1995) (No. 81). Statistics concerning the undertakings which require inspection visits and the number of workers employed in these undertakings had been omitted from the report despite their importance in assessing the appropriateness of the means made available to labour inspectors for the discharge of their duties. The Committee is bound once again to request the Government to regularly publish and transmit annual reports on the activities of the labour inspection service and reiterates its proposal to the Government to avail itself of the Office’s technical assistance to establish the structures to enable the correct application of this Convention and Convention No. 81.
2. Occupational accidents and diseases (Articles 14 and 27(f)(g)). The Committee notes that in 1999, 2,370 accidents were registered in the agricultural sector, 15 of which were fatal. Recalling that under Article 19, the labour inspection must also be informed in case of occupational diseases, the Committee requests the Government to supply information on the provisions of legislation and regulations, as well as on measures of a practical nature which ensure that labour inspectors are informed not only of occupational accidents, but also of cases of occupational diseases arising in the agricultural sector and to indicate whether, as provided under Article 19(2), labour inspectors are associated with any inquiry into the causes of most serious occupational accidents or occupational diseases.
The Committee notes the Government's reports for 1996 and 1998. It refers to its previous comments and again reiterates the requirement to publish and communicate to the Office, within the prescribed time limits established under Article 26 of the Convention, annual labour inspection reports containing the information enumerated under Article 27 and recalls that the Government may avail itself of ILO technical assistance for the correct application of these provisions. The annual reports contain information enabling, on the one hand, the Government to regularly evaluate the overall progress in the labour inspection system and to adopt, where necessary, measures to improve its effectiveness and, on the other hand, provide the Committee with sound information to assess the manner in which the Convention is applied and to propose a more appropriate application of the Convention, where necessary. However, the Committee notes that, although the Government's report contains a statement of intent, no inspection report has been transmitted to the ILO since 1996. Moreover, the 1996 report contained only partial responses to the information required by the relevant Articles of this Convention and of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (and Protocol, 1995) (No. 81). Statistics concerning the undertakings which require inspection visits and the number of workers employed in these undertakings had been omitted from the report despite their importance in assessing the appropriateness of the means made available to labour inspectors for the discharge of their duties. The Committee is bound once again to request the Government to regularly publish and transmit annual reports on the activities of the labour inspection service and reiterates its proposal to the Government to avail itself of the Office's technical assistance to establish the structures to enable the correct application of this Convention and Convention No. 81.
Articles 14, 15, 21, 26 and 27 of the Convention. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes from the Government's report that the situation of labour inspection in agriculture has not improved. It notes that although inspectors are based at two main offices, they visit agricultural districts, particularly the sugar belt, once a week. The Committee also notes that inspectors without their own means of transport are reimbursed for travelling and incidental expenses. The Committee, while welcoming the information that the Government hopes to acquire a vehicle next year to facilitate visits to the plantations, notes however that, due to the shortage of staff, full effect cannot be given to the requirement of Article 21 that agricultural undertakings be inspected as often and as thoroughly as is necessary. As concerns labour inspection reports the Committee, referring also to its comments under Convention No. 81, recalls the need to publish and supply to the Office within the time-limits laid down by Article 26, annual labour inspection reports containing all the particulars listed in Article 27. In this regard the Committee also reiterates its suggestion that the Government consider soliciting the technical assistance of the Office.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
Articles 14, 15, 21, 26 and 27 of the Convention. The Committee notes from the Government's report that the information requested in its previous comments is not yet available and that it will be supplied in the next report. It hopes the next report will contain full information also as regards agriculture, in reply to its comments under Convention No. 81.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct requests, which read as follows:
Articles 14, 15, 21 and 26 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to refer to its comments concerning the application of Articles 10, 11, 16 and 20 of Convention No. 81, as follows:
Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. With reference to its earlier comments, the Committee notes from the Government's report that no progress has been made towards ensuring more effective application of these Articles of the Convention. While noting that the Government is facing economic difficulties, it expresses the hope that it will be possible to increase the number of labour inspectors and that appropriate measures will be taken to provide all inspectors with the necessary transport facilities for them to visit workplaces regularly. It asks the Government, in its future reports, to provide detailed information on any new measures taken to this end.
Article 20. The Committee notes that the annual labour inspection reports have not reached the International Labour Office. It hopes that, in future, these reports will be transmitted within the time-limits laid down in Article 20 of the Convention.
Article 20. The Committee notes that the annual labour inspection reports for 1987 and 1988 have not reached the International Labour Office. It hopes that, in future, these reports will be transmitted within the time-limits laid down in Article 20 of the Convention.