Safety Provisions (Building) Convention, 1937 (No. 62) - Netherlands (RATIFICATION: 1950)

CMNT_TITLE

To provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the ratified Conventions on occupational safety and health (OSH), the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 62 (safety provisions (building)), 115 (radiation protection), 139 (occupational cancer), 148 (air pollution, noise and vibration), 155 (OSH), 162 (asbestos), 170 (chemicals) and 174 (prevention of major industrial accidents) together.

The Committee notes the joint observations of the Netherlands Trade Union Confederation (FNV) and the National Federation of Christian Trade Unions (CNV) on Conventions Nos 139, 155, 170 and 174, received in 2021, and the Government’s response in this respect.

General Provisions

Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155)

Articles 4, 7 and 8 of the Convention. National OSH policy. Consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers. With regard to its previous comment on consultations with the social partners, the Committee notes that the Government indicates in its report that it continues to involve the social partners in the periodic discussions of the national OSH policy and future policy planning, specifying that: (i) in May 2020, the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment organized a virtual open dialogue on the new strategic vision of the OSH policy 2040 with employers, workers, occupational health experts, occupational health services and the labour inspectorate participating in three sessions; and (ii) on the basis of this dialogue, the Government has submitted a formal request to the tripartite Social and Economic Council for advice on the OSH vision 2040. The Government also indicates that regular informal consultations have been held between the labour inspectorate and the trade union federations for environmental analysis and that every year stakeholders, including representatives of employers and workers, are consulted on the annual report (in March-April) and the annual plan (in September–October) of the labour inspectorate. In this regard, the Committee notes that the FNV and CNV are of the view that the Government fails to formulate, implement and periodically review a coherent national OSH policy and that the ad hoc and periodical consultations referred to by the Government do not lead to a such policy. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on any progress made in the formulation of the OSH policy 2040, including information on the consultations held with the tripartite Social and Economic Council in this regard, and to provide a copy of the national OSH policy once it has been adopted. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that the above-mentioned OSH policy is periodically reviewed in consultation with the social partners.

Article 11(c). Notification of occupational diseases. With regard to its previous comment on the system for the notification of occupational diseases, the Committee notes that the Government provides information on measures taken, indicating that: (i) following an amendment to the Working Conditions Act adopted in 2017, a basic contract for the provision of OSH services to employers was introduced, which includes minimum rights and obligations for employers, workers and providers; (ii) the basic contract states that occupational physicians shall report occupational diseases to the Netherlands Centre for Occupational Diseases (NCvB) and have to be able to devote time to this; and (iii) the NCvB is assisting and encouraging occupational physicians and OSH services to report occupational diseases through refresher courses, a helpdesk and the simplification of reporting procedures. The Government expects that by improving the infrastructure for reporting occupational diseases to the NCvB, the number of reported cases will increase. Regarding the latter, the Committee notes that, in their observations on the application of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the FNV and CNV refer to the underreporting of occupational diseases to the NCvB and point out that this may be due to the non-compliance with reporting obligations by occupational physicians, the reduced contact of occupational physicians with workers for routine examinations, the lack of information on occupational diseases among self-employed and precarious workers, as well as the absence of a separate (additional) statutory insurance for occupational diseases. The Committee requests the Government to provide its comments in this respect. It also requests the Government to provide information on further measures taken or envisaged in order to improve the rate of notification of occupational diseases to the NCvB, as well as statistics on the reports received by the NCvB.

Regarding notification to the labour inspectorate, the Committee requests the Government to refer to its direct request regarding the application of Article 14 of Convention No. 81 and Article 19 of Convention No. 129 (notification of occupational diseases). 

B.Protection against specific risks

1.Radiation Protection Convention, 1960 (No. 115)

Article 1 of the Convention. Laws and regulations. Consultation. The Committee notes the adoption in 2017 of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection and in 2018 of the Regulation on radiation protection for occupational exposure. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection has repealed the Decree on radiation protection of 2001 and has implemented the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionizing radiation. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the consultations held with representatives of employers and workers prior to the adoption of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection and its corresponding Regulation.

Articles 2(2) and 6(1). Exemptions.The Committee notes that sections 11.7(1) and 7.31(1) of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection provide that the competent authorities may grant exemptions from the provisions of its Chapter 7 concerning occupational exposure to radiation and from the dose limits prescribed in section 7.34 for workers directly engaged in radiation work, respectively. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any exemptions that may have been adopted under the above-mentioned provisions.

Articles 3(1), 6 and 7. Effective protection of workers in the light of the knowledge available. Maximum permissible doses. 1. Protection for pregnant and breastfeeding workers. With regard to its previous comment on the methods of protection at work for workers who are pregnant, the Committee notes that the Government refers to section 7.36(1) of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection, which provides that the employer shall ensure that the working conditions for pregnant workers are such that the equivalent dose for the unborn child is as low as reasonably achievable and that it is unlikely that this dose will exceed 1 mSv from the moment the pregnancy is reported to the employer until the end of the pregnancy. The Committee notes that the Government also indicates that, pursuant to section 7.29(1) of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection, the employer shall ensure that, before the commencement of work, women workers who are likely to be exposed to ionizing radiation are adequately informed of: (i) the need to report a pregnancy at an early stage in view of the risks of exposure to ionizing radiation for the unborn child; and (ii) the risks to a breastfed child from contamination from the mother's body. The Committee notes this information, which addresses its previous request.

2. Persons between 16 and 18 years of age. Prohibition on the engagement of workers under the age of 16 in work involving ionizing radiation. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, pursuant to sections 7.4 and 7.35 of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection, workers under the age of 18 are prohibited from working with radioactive sources with the sole exception of students from 16 years of age studying a profession in the nuclear or radioprotection field. The Committee notes that the dose limits provided for in the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection for this group have been established in accordance with the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Noting the absence of specific information in this respect, the Committee requests the Government to indicate whether maximum dose limits have been established for apprentices between the ages of 16 and 18 who are being trained for employment involving radiation, or whether the dose limits for students in sections 7.4 and 7.35 also apply to apprentices.

3. Lens of the eye. With regard to its previous comment on the review of the maximum permissible doses established with respect to the lens of the eye for radiation workers and for students and apprentices between 16 and 18 years of age, the Committee notes with interest that the Government refers to sections 7.34(2) and 7.35(2) of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection, which respectively fix the limits for the equivalent dose for the lens of the eye at 20 mSv a year for workers directly engaged in radiation work and at 15 mSv a year for students between the ages of 16 and 18 who are exposed to radiation in the course of their studies. The Committee notes this information, which addresses its previous request.

Article 9(2). Adequate instruction of all workers engaged in radiation work. The Committee notes that section 7.28 of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection provides that the employer shall ensure: (i) appropriate training and information programmes for workers, focusing, where appropriate, on high-activity sources; and (ii) that the employees cooperate in the information meetings and training organized for them, and comply with the instructions given to them pursuant to the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the training and information programmes for workers carried out under section 7.28 of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection, specifying the measures adopted to ensure that workers engaged in radiation work are adequately instructed, before and during such work, in the precautions to be taken for the protection of their health and safety and the reasons thereof.

Articles 12 and 14. Medical examinations. Employment involving exposure to ionizing radiation contrary to medical advice. The Committee notes that section 7.11(1) to (3) of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection provides that employers shall classify each worker directly engaged in radiation work as an A or B worker, for the purpose of individual monitoring and health surveillance: category A-workers are those who receive an annual effective dose greater than 6 mSv and category B-workers are those who are not classified as category A-workers. The Committee also notes that sections 7.21(4) and 7.25 of the Decree on basic safety standards for radiation protection provide respectively that: (i) medical examinations of category A-workers shall take place before the commencement of radiation work, periodically during employment (at least once a year) and after the period of employment as a category A-worker; and (ii) a worker shall not be employed in a specific position as a category A-worker if, according to the results of an initial health examination, he or she is not suitable for that position. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that: (i) category B-workers undergo appropriate medical examinations prior or shortly after taking up radiation work and subsequently undergo further examination at appropriate intervals (Article 12 of the Convention); and (ii) no category B-worker is employed or continues to be employed in work by reason of which the worker could be subject to exposure to ionizing radiations contrary to qualified advice (Article 14 of the Convention).

2.Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 (No. 139)

Articles 2 and 6(a) of the Convention. Replacement of carcinogenic substances and agents. Consultations on measures to give effect to the Convention. With regard to its previous comment, the Committee notes that the Government indicates, in its report, that the occupational hygiene strategy prescribes substitution with less harmful substances as a first step as far as possible and makes a general reference to a self-inspection tool on working with hazardous substances available to employers on the website of the labour inspectorate. The Committee notes that the FNV and CNV reiterate that there is a lack of discussion on substitution of carcinogenic substances and that such substitution should be discussed in the tripartite Social Economic Council before determining limit values. Furthermore, the FNV and CNV indicate that the labour inspectorate is not in a position to provide information on the number of companies that have been inspected in relation to the application of section 4.17 of the Working Conditions Decree, which provides for the replacement of carcinogenic or mutagenic substances and processes with a view to minimizing the exposure of workers. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on further specific measures taken in practice to ensure that carcinogenic substances are replaced by non-carcinogenic substances or agents, or by less harmful substances or agents, including any discussion on the substitution of carcinogenic substances in the tripartite Social Economic Council. The Committee requests the Government to refer to its comment onArticle 6(c) (provision of appropriate inspection services) of the Convention. 

Article 3. Establishment of an appropriate system of records. With regard to its previous comment, the Committee notes the Government’s reference to a study of December 2017 on how to deal with work-related data and data on occupational side-effects to health, which the Committee noted in its previous comments on the Chemicals Convention, 1999 (No. 170). The Government indicates that, based on the 2017 study, improvements appear to be necessary in the field of compliance with the registration obligations of employers. In this regard, the Government refers to actions taken to disseminate information on the responsibilities of all stakeholders involved in the setting up a safe workplace when working with hazardous substances, as well as to improve compliance with risk-assessment obligations. The Committee notes that the FNV and CNV underline the absence of a commitment for action by the Government and indicate that an evaluation report on policy interventions prepared by the Government concluded that between 2012 and 2020 the communication actions did not have the expected policy effects. Recalling thatsection 4.15 of the Working Conditions Decree requires employers to keep a list of employees who are or may be exposed to carcinogenic substances, the Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the measures taken in practice by the labour inspectorate to identify companies where workers are exposed to carcinogenic substances and to ensure that these companies have established an appropriate system of records under the above-mentioned provision, as well as to indicate any consultations undertaken with the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned.

Article 4. Workers provided with all the available information on the dangers involved from exposure. The Committee notes that the Government states that providing information, as well as education and internal supervision, are key regulatory provisions and that those matters have been the subject of much attention in the occupational disease prevention programme. In this respect, the Committee notes that the FNV and CNV indicate that these key regulatory provisions are neglected by employers and that the non-compliance with these provisions is partly the cause of most of the accidents investigated. Noting the absence of information in reply to its previous comment, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on concrete measures taken to ensure that workers, including “flex-workers”, exposed to carcinogens are provided with all the available information on the dangers involved and on the protective measures to be taken.

Article 5. Medical examinations after the period of employment. With regard to its previous comment, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that employers can request medical professionals to work out how to ensure transmission to the public medical services after the period of employment. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on concrete measures taken by medical professionals or public medical services to ensure that workers exposed to carcinogens are provided with medical examinations after the period of their employment.

Article 6(c). Provision of appropriate inspection services. With regard to its previous comment, the Committee notes that the Government indicates that the labour inspectorate has a specific inspection programme on health and safety issues related to work with hazardous substances and refers to the increased capacity of the labour inspectorate in this respect. The Committee notes that while the FNV and CNV acknowledge that these are improvements, they reiterate their concerns regarding the system of self-regulation of working conditions and the problems in the enforcement of the legal framework giving effect to the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on specific measures taken in practice by the labour inspectorate to ensure that workplaces where workers may be exposed to carcinogens comply with the provisions of the Convention. Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to refer to its comments regarding the application of Conventions Nos 81 and 129. 

3.Working Environment (Air Pollution, Noise and Vibration) Convention, 1977(No. 148)

Article 4 of the Convention. Protection against occupational hazards in the working environment. Air pollution. Noting the absence of information in reply to its previous comment, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide its comments with respect to the previous observations of the FNV and CNV that while there are limit values established for many chemical substances, there are no specific health and safety regulations related to ultrafine particles.

Article 11(3) and (4). Continued assignment to work. With regard to its previous comment, the Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that, pursuant to section 7:658a(1) of the Civil Code, employers must offer suitable work in their own companies if workers are temporarily unable to carry out their own work due to incapacity for work and that where suitable work is not available in the employers’ companies, the employers must seek suitable work with another employer. The Committee notes that the above-mentioned provision appears to provide that alternative work with other employers will be in place for the period during which the original employer is obliged to continue to pay wages of the workers concerned under section 7:629 of the Civil Code (104 weeks) or the relevant provisions of the social security and insurance legislation. The Committee notes this information and once again requests the Government to provide specific information on the measures or provisions in place to ensure that the rights of workers under social security or social insurance legislation are not adversely affected.

4.Asbestos Convention, 1986 (No. 162)

Articles 3(1) and (2), 4, 9(2) and 15(1) of the Convention. Laws and regulations. Consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers. Special rules and procedures for certain work processes. Exposure limits. With regard to its previous comment, the Committee notes that, in its report, the Government provides information on amendments to the Working Conditions Decree adopted in 2014, 2016 and 2017. Pursuant to these amendments: (i) a new certification and accreditation system was introduced whereby statutory certificates, including those for work involving exposure to asbestos, can only be issued by bodies accredited by the Dutch Accreditation Council; (ii) the limit values for the exposure of workers to asbestos (chrysotile and amphibole groups) were reduced; and (iii) corresponding changes were made to the asbestos risk classification (which is used to determine the preventive measures to be taken) and to the process of assessing the safety of workplaces following work with asbestos. The Government indicates that the latter amendments were adopted considering advice from the Committee on Limit Values for Substances at the Workplace, which is part of the tripartite Social and Economic Council. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on legislative measures undertaken with regard to the application of the Convention.

Application in practice. The Committee notes that, in reply to its previous comment, the Government provides information on the number of workers holding certificates for asbestos removal or demolition work (3,086 workers) and inventory activities (874 workers), specifying that the number of workers incidentally exposed to asbestos during maintenance work (mainly in the installation and constructions sectors) remains unknown. It also notes the Government’s indication that the total number of new occupational diseases due to exposure to asbestos in the past (including lung cancer and asbestosis) was estimated at around 1,300 in 2016 by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), when limit values of exposure were higher. The Committee also notes that the Asbestos Validation and Innovation Centre was established in June 2020 as an independent body under the RIVM that advises the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment on the occupational safety of methods used for asbestos removal work (including working methods, techniques, devices or machines). The Committee notes this information which responds to its previous request.

5.Chemicals Convention, 1990 (No. 170)

Article 11 of the Convention. Transfer of chemicals. Noting the absence of information in reply to its previous comment, the Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the measures taken for employers to ensure that when chemicals are transferred into other containers or equipment, the contents are indicated in a manner which will make known to workers their identity, any hazards associated with their use and any safety precautions to be observed.

Application in practice. The Committee notes that the FNV and CNV reiterate most of their previous observations relating to problems in the enforcement of the legal framework giving effect to the Convention by the labour inspectorate. In this regard, the Committee notes that, as under the Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 (No. 139), the Government refers to the inspection programme on health and safety issues surrounding work with hazardous substances and to the increased capacity of the labour inspectorate. It also indicates that compliance with relevant national legislation is enforced through traditional inspections and is further encouraged and promoted through, inter alia, self-inspection tools, making information on hazardous substances easily available to workers (via an online application), and information and awareness-raising campaigns. The Committee notes that the FNV and CNV recognize as an improvement the fact that the labour inspectorate is requesting information on hazardous substances from companies using these substances and testing the use of new enforcement methods in pilot-studies, such as requesting risk-assessments and chemical documents by digital enforcement. The Committee notes, however, that the FNV and CNV also point out that the labour inspectorate mainly focuses on awareness-raising activities, and generation of information and campaigns. The organizations further indicate that a 2019 study commissioned by the Government concluded that its previous policy (based on the idea of self-regulation of working conditions) has not led employers and workers to fulfil this public task. According to the FNV and CNV, the Minister of Social Affairs and Employment has considered that the aforementioned study includes interesting recommendations for the next policy agenda such as, , not focusing only on self-regulation and other soft instruments, but using a broader range of interventions. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on specific measures taken to ensure that the provisions of the Convention are applied in practice, including any follow-up actions to the conclusions and recommendations of the 2019 study commissioned by the Government. Further, the Committee requests the Government to refer to its comments regarding the application of Conventions Nos 81 and 129. 

6.Prevention of Major Industrial Accidents Convention, 1993 (No. 174)

Article 4 of the Convention. National policy. With regard to its previous comment on possible amendments to the Additional Risk Assessment and Evaluation (ARIE) Regulations, the Committee notes the Government’s indication, in its report, that these Regulations, which provide for supplementary risk assessment and evaluation obligations for companies working with large quantities of dangerous substances, were not amended between 2014 and 2021, but are undergoing revision and are expected to be amended in 2022. The Government also indicates that the recommendations of the tripartite Social Economic Council are being taken into consideration in the amendment process. The Committee notes that the FNV and CNV generally agree with the amendments to the ARIE Regulations and propose a number of recommendations in this regard, which the Government indicates will be taken into consideration.

Furthermore, the Committee also notes the Government’s indication that the Decree on hazards of major accidents of 2015, which implements the Directive 2012/18/EU on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, will be repealed in the framework of a major adjustment of all environmental, nature and surroundings legislation that is also planned for 2022. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on how effect is given to each provision of the Convention following such legislative reform process. It also requests the Government to provide copies of all relevant laws and regulations once adopted.

Article 16(a) and (b). Responsibilities of the competent authorities concerning off-site emergency preparedness. With regard to its previous comment, the Committee notes that the Government indicates that relevant information on off-site emergencies can be found on official websites containing a map of all risks to the public (for example, an accident involving dangerous substances), as well as instructions on actions to be taken. The Committee notes that this risk map has been developed within the framework of the Act on Safety Regions, according to which off-site emergency plans are drafted by local authorities. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that in the event of a major accident, there are several ways of notifying the public under the Act on Safety Regions, including through a local alarm and signal system, a digital alert in harmful and life-threatening situations, such a major fire, and mobile notifications. The Committee takes note of this information which responds to its previous request.

Article 17. Siting of major hazard installations. With regard to its previous comment, the Committee notes that the Government indicates that the General Provisions Act (WABO) is the basis for many of the permits relating to the physical living environment and that together with the Environmental Management Act, they are the legal basis for ensuring that major hazard sites are separated from other areas. Moreover, it indicates that permits for major hazard installations are revised every five years under the above legislation if anything has changed. The Committee notes that also in the framework of the aforementioned legislative reform process, amendments regarding the siting of major hazard installations are expected to be adopted in 2022. The Committee requests the Government to refer to its comment on Article 4 (national policy) of the Convention.

Application in practice. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in reply to its previous request concerning the actions undertaken to improve safety at major hazard companies and the cause of the increase in the number of safety reports received by the labour inspectorate since 2011. The Committee takes note of this information which responds to its previous request.

C.Protection in specific branches of activities

Safety Provisions (Building) Convention, 1937 (No. 62)

The Committee notes the information provided by the Government, in its report, in reply to its previous request concerning: (i) the adoption of a new policy rule on OSH catalogues in 2019, the tools in place to assist the social partners in developing and improving OSH catalogues (for example, digital support to develop specific OSH catalogues and guidance manuals on a range of specific risks at work) and the number of OSH catalogues approved by the labour inspectorate (approximately 150); (ii) the amendment of Chapter 2, section 5 on construction processes of the Working Conditions Decree in 2016, which aimed at improving compliance with the relevant provisions and allowing better enforcement; and (iii) the number of workplaces in the building sector (190,340 in 2019 and 202,455 in 2020), the number of enterprises inspected (829 in 2019 and 844 in 2020), the number of accidents, including fatal accidents (470 in 2016 (fatal accidents: 16); 503 in 2017 (fatal accidents: 20); 415 in 2018 (fatal accidents: 11) and 374 in 2019 (fatal accidents: 14)). The Committee takes note of this information which responds to its previous request.

Furthermore, the Committee recalls that the ILO Governing Body at its 334th Session, October–November 2018, on the recommendation of the Standards Review Mechanism Tripartite Working Group, confirmed the classification of Convention No. 62 as an outdated instrument, and placed an item on the agenda of the 112th Session of the International Labour Conference (2024) for the consideration of its abrogation. The Governing Body requested the Office to undertake follow-up action to actively encourage the ratification of the up-to-date instrument concerning OSH in construction, the Safety and Health in Construction Convention, 1988 (No. 167). The Committee encourages the Government to follow up the Governing Body’s decision at its 334th Session (October–November 2018) approving the recommendations of the Standards Review Mechanism Tripartite Working Group, and to consider ratifying Convention No. 167.

CMNT_TITLE

Article 1 of the Convention. Update on new legislation and regulations. With reference to its previous comment, the Committee notes the information in the Government’s report that, since 2007, a large number of occupational health and safety (OSH) catalogues have been developed by the social partners at the level of sectors and branches, and that the Labour Foundation is currently running a project, subsidized by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, which focuses on the implementation of the OSH catalogues. The Committee also notes that, in July 2012, the OSH regulations were amended in relation to self-employed workers (Zelfstandigen zonder personeel (ZZP)), in order to ensure that the same rules apply to those who are self-employed and employees alike, enhancing the enforceability of OSH regulations. The amendments were a result of advice from the Social and Economic Council regarding self-employed workers and their working environment. The Committee also notes that the Enhancement of Regulations on Enforcement and Sanctions Law came into force on 1 January 2013, enabling heavier fines and more opportunities to shut down a business when labour laws, such as the Working Conditions Act, are violated. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the development of the OSH catalogues and their implementation, as well as on new legislation, in relation to the application of the Convention.

Article 4. Maintain an adequate system of inspection to ensure the effective enforcement of laws and regulations relating to safety precautions in the building industry. Application of the Convention in practice. The Committee notes the statistical information in the Government’s report on the number of enterprises, accidents and inspections in the building industry between 2009 and 2014. The Committee notes that in addition to the OSH catalogues, other initiatives have been developed in the building sector to improve the health and safety of the workers, including, practical tools for risk assessment and safety performance to support employers and workers in the sector, as well as agreements between parties concerned, aimed at further improving safety and health performance. The Committee also notes that between 2009 and 2013 an action programme by the Government, in which the construction industry actively participated, aimed at reducing accidents and improving the safety culture and behaviour was implemented, and that the targeted reduction, a decrease of 25 per cent of accidents, was achieved. The Committee further notes the information that the Storybuilder, a project initiated in 2003, to analyse the most serious occupational accidents in the country is in progress. All 20,030 serious occupational accidents investigated by the Dutch labour inspectorate over a period of 12 years, from 1998−2009, have been entered into a database and the data has been analysed in order to gain insight into the causes of the accidents or possible patterns therein. The Government also refers to the safety index tool which is a tool to measure the safety performance on the construction site. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the application of the Convention in practice, including statistics on the number of workplaces in the building sector, the number of these workplaces covered by labour inspection, the number of inspections undertaken, the number, nature and causes of accidents reported, the number and nature of the contraventions reported.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the observations submitted by the Netherlands Trade Union Confederation (FNV) on the Government’s brief report. These observations were transmitted to the Government on 16 September 2009.

Article 1 of the Convention. Update on new legislation and administrative regulations. The Committee notes the observations by the FNV that the Government’s latest report does not have content apart from remarking that there are no new developments. The FNV has indicated that this content is insufficient considering that, during the reporting period, occupational safety and health legislation in the Netherlands has changed dramatically. These changes imply a possibility for the social partners to develop so-called “Health and Safety catalogues” at the level of sectors and branches, with the aim of establishing the means by which the goals of the Working Conditions Act can be reached. The FNV notes that, in the building sector, such catalogues have been developed. The Committee asks the Government to include, in its next report, information on any further legislative measures adopted in respect of the Convention and to update the Committee on the success of the “Health and Safety catalogues”.

Article 4 and Part V of the report form. Maintain an adequate system of inspection to ensure the effective enforcement of its laws and regulations relating to safety precautions in the building industry. The Committee notes that the Government included comprehensive information on the application of the Convention in practice in their report for the period 1 June 1996 to 1 June 2001, but that no such information was provided in this year’s report. The Committee notes the observations by the FNV which indicate that during the reporting period there were several incidents in the building sector with regard to chemical substances, illegal work, the risk of falling from heights and several other dangerous aspects that have been indicated in reports made by the labour inspectorate, and that this information is not included in the Government’s latest report. The Committee asks the Government to include information in its next report on the application of the Convention in practice, including data on the number of enterprises involved in the building sector, the number of work accidents and the number of inspections undertaken and any measures taken to reduce the number of accidents in this sector.

The Committee draws the Government’s attention to the Safety and Health in Construction Convention, 1988 (No. 167), which revises this Convention and which may be better suited to the current situation in the building industry. It reminds the Government that the ILO Governing Body invited States parties to this Convention to examine the possibility of ratifying the Safety and Health in Construction Convention, 1988 (No. 167), the ratification of which implies ipso jure immediate denunciation of Convention No. 62 (document GB.268/8/2). The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of any developments in this regard.

CMNT_TITLE

Part V of the report form of the Convention. Further to its previous observation, the Committee notes with interest the information provided by the Government on the practical application of the Convention. It notes in particular the information concerning the results of a study commissioned in 1996 by the Ministry of Social Affairs to examine the extent to which the construction industry was familiar with and complying with the former Construction Process Decree. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would keep the Office informed of any follow-up measures taken regarding the findings of this study in respect of the impossibility of taking into account the Decree’s "preventive principle" on safety and health at the design stage, resulting from contractors drawing up their own health and safety plans, and the non-compliance by specialized subcontractors and self-employed operators with the legislation.

CMNT_TITLE

1. The Committee notes with interest the Government's reply to its previous comments concerning points raised by the Netherlands Trade Union Confederation, communicated by the Government in 1992. It also notes with interest the amendments and expansion of regulations on the building industry, in connection with the implementation of European Directives of 1989 and 1992. In particular, it notes the adoption of the amendment (Decree No. 440 of June 1994) to the Working Conditions Act, and the Building Process Decree No. 597 of 11 August 1994. Under the amended Act, employers are obliged to draw up a document identifying and assessing the risks associated with their company's activities, with a view to taking measures for the protection of their employees. The measures are then to be laid down in an action plan and carried out in order of priority. When carrying out the first risk identification and assessment, employees must call in a certified safety, health and welfare service. The Government indicates that since 1 January 1996 all employers in the building industry have been obliged to be in possession of a written risk identification and assessment document that has been approved by a certified safety, health and welfare service.

The Committee notes from the Government's report that the Building Process Decree aims at improving the health of employees working on temporary and mobile building sites. One of the Decree's main features is that its provisions provide for the responsibilities of all parties in the building process, notably employers, principals, designers and the self-employed, depending on their role and position in the process. The Government's report indicates that this extended division of responsibility has integrated safety, health and welfare policy into the entire building process, leading to a chain of responsibility, which links all the parties involved, without detracting from the responsibility of employers, in particular, in this area.

2. Lifting equipment. Articles 4 and 12, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the information that as of 1 May 1994 various inspectorates at the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment -- including the Labour Inspectorate -- were amalgamated to form one inspection service (I-SZW). The Government indicates that, not only is this consistent with the "one window" idea, but that it renders the supervision and enforcement of regulations more effective and efficient. The Government therefore believes that the inspection capacity of the current I-SZW is adequate for a sector like the building industry.

Article 13, paragraph 1. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the information that employers are obliged to observe the statutory regulations in ensuring that every crane driver or hoisting appliance operator is properly qualified. The Government indicates that employers must engage an internal or external expert to assess whether everything is in order.

3. Scaffolding. Article 7, paragraph 8. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the information that, with respect to the construction, use and supervision of scaffolding, the Government believes there are sufficient statutory provisions which comply with the provisions of the Convention. It considers that the legally prescribed instruments such as compulsory risk identification, use of expert safety, health and welfare services (as of 1 January 1996) and the drawing up of a health and safety plan for larger building sites, provide an adequate basis for employers to meet their obligations. It further indicates that employers and employees remain responsible for the practical implementation of the requirements to ensure that working conditions at building sites are good.

Article 3(a). Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the information that the legal provisions concerning information and training for employees have been expanded for larger building sites with the entry into force of the Building Process Decree pursuant to the Working Conditions Act. The Government states that section 5, subsection 1(g), of the Decree requires the health and safety plan to state how cooperation and consultation at the site between employers and employees is to be put into practice and how employees will be provided with information and training

Article 4 and point V of the report form. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the statistics of inspection made by the I-SZW for the years 1991 to 1996. The Committee requests the Government to continue to supply information on the practical application of the Convention in its next report.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following points:

The Committee has noted the information supplied in the Government's report for the period 1987-91 as well as the observations made by the Netherlands Trade Union Confederation (FNV) on the application of the Convention and the Government's reply to these observations, communicated by the Government in March 1992. I. Lifting equipment 1. The Committee notes that the Netherlands Trade Union Confederation (FNV) is reasonably satisfied with regard to the implementation of provisions concerning lifting equipment, but mentions, among its concerns, that lifting equipment should be tested for reliability before the start of each new building project. In its reply, referring, inter alia, to section 141(4) of the Factory and Workplace Safety Regulations 1938 (VBF), the Government indicates that a crane must be checked and tested before the commencement of a new construction project, but not by the KEBOMA foundation, which has been designated only for the periodical checks and tests on mobile and tower cranes; the employers themselves bear the responsibility for carrying out the necessary checks and tests before the commencement of a new construction project. The Committee observes that under Article 12(1) of the Convention, hoisting machines and tackle shall be examined and adequately tested after erection on the site and before use, and under Article 4, a system of inspection is to ensure the effective enforcement of laws and regulations relating to safety precautions in the building industry. Noting also the view of the FNV that in general terms, the inspection capacity of the labour inspection services is too limited, the Committee hopes that the Government will indicate the measures taken to ensure that there is maintained a system of inspection adequate to ensure the effective enforcement of laws and regulations relating to safety precautions in the building industry, including section 141(4) of the VBF. 2. In its comments, the FNV also points out that a lifting certificate is not required for operators of cranes at certain relevant work sites (for instance carpenters' yards); in its view, this shortcoming should be remedied. The Committee notes that in its reply, the Government indicates that at the moment only the operators of cranes being used on buildings, construction, earth and hydraulic engineering, underground piping and ducts which are under construction, being installed, extended, renovated or demolished or are undergoing maintenance work, have a hoist licence; the notes on section 212 of the VBF indicate that the desirability of the obligation to have a hoist licence in other branches and sectors of industry is being investigated. However, the Government notes that in practice, hoist crane operators often carry out other work in other sectors where the hoist licence does not apply; the group of operations which is carried out by the non-hoist licence holders is relatively small as a result. Referring to Article 13(1) of the Convention, the Committee hopes that the necessary measures will be taken to ensure that every crane driver or hoisting appliance operator is properly qualified, and that the Government will indicate the measures adopted to this end. II. Scaffolding 3. As regards scaffolding, the Committee notes the view expressed by the FNV that while in formal terms, the provisions of the Convention may be met, in practice, the following deficiencies are noted: no specific provisions are made regarding the skills and expertise required of workers who build scaffolds and supervise their construction; there is no periodical inspection of scaffolding equipment nor inspection of scaffolds before building activities start; there is a general obligation for employers to inform workers, but no specific provision for information about scaffolding; the inspection capacity of the Labour Inspectorate is considered insufficient. In its reply, the Government refers to the provisions of section 212ter of the VBF concerning the experience required of workers who build scaffolds, their supervision by an expert, and the regular checking of scaffolds by an expert. The Government further refers to a preliminary draft of a proposed EC directive to amend the Directive of November 1989 concerning safety and health in the use of tools at the workplace (89/655/EEC); under this draft, construction scaffolds must be approved after each assembly at a new location before the commencement of operations; implementation of this amendment directive is expected before the end of 1994. The Government indicates that the general obligation of employers to clearly inform employees on the nature of their work (section 6, Factories Act) means that scaffolders must be extensively informed about everything concerning the construction of scaffolds, and that more detailed information from government authorities are deemed unnecessary. Finally, the Government considers that the Inspectorate of Works has sufficient capacity for the tasks allocated to it, which do not, however, include checking every scaffold construction, since this is the task of an expert, as indicated in section 212ter of the VBF. The Committee takes due note of these indications. It hopes that, in conformity with Article 7(8) of the Convention, the proposed directive to ensure the inspection of scaffolds after each assembly at a new location will soon be made operative, and that the Government will indicate the measures taken to this end. Furthermore, referring to Article 3(a) of the Convention, the Committee hopes that in addition to the general obligation to clearly inform employees on the nature of their work, employers will be required to bring the laws or regulations for ensuring the application of the provisions of the Convention regarding scaffolds to the notice of all persons concerned, i.e. builders and users of scaffolds, in a manner approved by the competent authority. Finally, as regards the capacity of the Labour Inspectorate to ensure the effective enforcement of laws and regulations relating to safety precautions (Article 4 of the Convention), the Committee, noting also the statistical information supplied on the number of violations, closure orders and occupational accidents in the construction industry and building installations companies, looks forward to the Government's sending further information on the relevant activities of the Inspectorate.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee has noted the information supplied in the Government's report for the period 1987-91 as well as the observations made by the Netherlands Trade Union Confederation (FNV) on the application of the Convention and the Government's reply to these observations, communicated by the Government in March 1992.

I. Lifting equipment

1. The Committee notes that the Netherlands Trade Union Confederation (FNV) is reasonably satisfied with regard to the implementation of provisions concerning lifting equipment, but mentions, among its concerns, that lifting equipment should be tested for reliability before the start of each new building project. In its reply, referring, inter alia, to section 141(4) of the Factory and Workplace Safety Regulations 1938 (VBF), the Government indicates that a crane must be checked and tested before the commencement of a new construction project, but not by the KEBOMA foundation, which has been designated only for the periodical checks and tests on mobile and tower cranes; the employers themselves bear the responsibility for carrying out the necessary checks and tests before the commencement of a new construction project. The Committee observes that under Article 12(1) of the Convention, hoisting machines and tackle shall be examined and adequately tested after erection on the site and before use, and under Article 4, a system of inspection is to ensure the effective enforcement of laws and regulations relating to safety precautions in the building industry. Noting also the view of the FNV that in general terms, the inspection capacity of the labour inspection services is too limited, the Committee hopes that the Government will indicate the measures taken to ensure that there is maintained a system of inspection adequate to ensure the effective enforcement of laws and regulations relating to safety precautions in the building industry, including section 141(4) of the VBF.

2. In its comments, the FNV also points out that a lifting certificate is not required for operators of cranes at certain relevant work sites (for instance carpenters' yards); in its view, this shortcoming should be remedied. The Committee notes that in its reply, the Government indicates that at the moment only the operators of cranes being used on buildings, construction, earth and hydraulic engineering, underground piping and ducts which are under construction, being installed, extended, renovated or demolished or are undergoing maintenance work, have a hoist licence; the notes on section 212 of the VBF indicate that the desirability of the obligation to have a hoist licence in other branches and sectors of industry is being investigated. However, the Government notes that in practice, hoist crane operators often carry out other work in other sectors where the hoist licence does not apply; the group of operations which is carried out by the non-hoist licence holders is relatively small as a result. Referring to Article 13(1) of the Convention, the Committee hopes that the necessary measures will be taken to ensure that every crane driver or hoisting appliance operator is properly qualified, and that the Government will indicate the measures adopted to this end.

II. Scaffolding

3. As regards scaffolding, the Committee notes the view expressed by the FNV that while in formal terms, the provisions of the Convention may be met, in practice, the following deficiencies are noted: no specific provisions are made regarding the skills and expertise required of workers who build scaffolds and supervise their construction; there is no periodical inspection of scaffolding equipment nor inspection of scaffolds before building activities start; there is a general obligation for employers to inform workers, but no specific provision for information about scaffolding; the inspection capacity of the Labour Inspectorate is considered insufficient.

In its reply, the Government refers to the provisions of section 212ter of the VBF concerning the experience required of workers who build scaffolds, their supervision by an expert, and the regular checking of scaffolds by an expert. The Government further refers to a preliminary draft of a proposed EC directive to amend the Directive of November 1989 concerning safety and health in the use of tools at the workplace (89/655/EEG); under this draft, construction scaffolds must be approved after each assembly at a new location before the commencement of operations; implementation of this amendment directive is expected before the end of 1994. The Government indicates that the general obligation of employers to clearly inform employees on the nature of their work (section 6, Factories Act) means that scaffolders must be extensively informed about everything concerning the construction of scaffolds, and that more detailed information from government authorities are deemed unnecessary. Finally, the Government considers that the Inspectorate of Works has sufficient capacity for the tasks allocated to it, which do not, however, include checking every scaffold construction, since this is the task of an expert, as indicated in section 212ter of the VBF.

The Committee takes due note of these indications. It hopes that, in conformity with Article 7(8) of the Convention, the proposed directive to ensure the inspection of scaffolds after each assembly at a new location will soon be made operative, and that the Government will indicate the measures taken to this end. Furthermore, referring to Article 3(a) of the Convention, the Committee hopes that in addition to the general obligation to clearly inform employees on the nature of their work, employers will be required to bring the laws or regulations for ensuring the application of the provisions of the Convention regarding scaffolds to the notice of all persons concerned, i.e. builders and users of scaffolds, in a manner approved by the competent authority. Finally, as regards the capacity of the Labour Inspectorate to ensure the effective enforcement of laws and regulations relating to safety precautions (Article 4 of the Convention), the Committee, noting also the statistical information supplied on the number of violations, closure orders and occupational accidents in the construction industry and building installations companies, looks forward to the Government's sending further information on the relevant activities of the Inspectorate.