National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Previous comment
National Constitution. The Committee notes that the new Constitution was promulgated on 7 February 2009. The Committee asks the Government to provide detailed information on the legislative and policy measures related to non-discrimination and equality of treatment and opportunity in employment and occupation adopted as a result of the new Constitution.
Persons with disabilities. Noting that articles 70–72 of the new Constitution refer to the rights of persons with disabilities, providing, among other things, their right to work and prohibiting discrimination, the Committee asks the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged to combat discrimination and promote equality of opportunity of persons with disabilities in respect of access to employment and training.
Legislation. Referring to its previous comments, the Committee once again requests the Government to take all necessary measures to bring section 3 of the General Labour Act into conformity with the Convention and to keep it informed in this regard.
Remedies. Referring to its previous comments, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the legal and administrative remedies available with regard to discrimination in employment and occupation and to provide information on any appeals lodged and the outcome of such appeals.
National plan on equality between men and women. In its previous comments, the Committee asked for information on the measures taken under the 2004–07 National Public Policy Plan for the full exercise of women’s rights. It notes that the Plan was implemented in part, including through activities to deal with the problems of violence and citizens’ participation, such as the holding of workshops in mining centres or with organizations of rural women. The Government indicates that access to credit has been democratized with 50 per cent of all loans by the Production Development Bank going to women entrepreneurs. A gender-sensitive budget programme is being developed with participation of the organizations of women grouped together in the National Bureau for Work on Gender-Sensitive Budgets and this is reflected, inter alia, in plans and programmes for rural development and in municipal programmes. Some of the objectives of these programmes are: (i) gender equality in access to, and use and control of, the resources of production; (ii) access to and equality in participation in decision-making; and (iii) enhancing opportunities for paid employment and income generation. The Government also states that in the new Constitution, promulgated on 7 February 2009, focus on gender is more systematic and practical than it was in the old Constitution. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the legislative and policy changes with respect to equality between women and men in employment and occupation as a result of the new Constitution. Noting that, under Supreme Decree No. 29894 of 7 February 2009, the Ministry of Justice and the Vice-Ministry of Equality of Opportunity are given specific competences with respect to the formulation and implementation of plans, programmes and policies directed at promoting equality of opportunity between men and women, the Committee asks the Government to provide detailed information on any programmes and policies specifically concerning equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation that have been adopted by these bodies and their implementation.
Indigenous women. The Committee notes that, in the framework of the sectoral programme support to the rights of indigenous peoples and of the programme to regularize and title indigenous lands (Componente Saneamiento y Titulación de Tierras Comunitarias de Origen Fase II 2005–09), funded by Denmark, a strategy is to be formulated for cross-cutting gender activities in the regularization of lands, with a view to including systematic participation by women in all processes of regularization of agricultural land. The Committee notes that, in the period 1997–2005, women accounted for 46 per cent of a total of 42,178 titles and certificates issued. It also notes with interest that the Distribution of Lands and Human Settlements Programme of the Lands Vice-Ministry includes a gender perspective in many activities, for instance a gender dimension has been incorporated in the Five-Year Plan to regularize and issue titles in respect of community ancestral lands. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on this matter.
Racial discrimination. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that public policy measures are being taken with respect to racial discrimination and that the political will exists to tackle racism and discrimination. It notes the measures indicated by the Government on literacy programmes, redistribution policy, and universal access to health services, which focus on disadvantaged sectors that suffer from structural racial discrimination. The Government indicates that there is a new approach to the framing of public policies which is based on the redistribution criteria set forth in the “Vivir Bien” National Development Plan, in sectoral plans and inter-institutional initiatives that are implemented in combination with legislation that targets the fundamental causes of racial discrimination. The Government indicates that the lands and territory issue is of great importance to the elimination of the servitude, exploitation and slavery suffered by the peoples that are subject to such racism. The report refers to the “Plan Guaraní”, which seeks to restore the fundamental rights of the Guaraní people, including the restitution in part of their lands of origin. The Ministry of Labour is at present giving impetus to the promulgation of legal standards on workers’ rights in the sugar cane and chest nut sectors. Furthermore, the Ministry of the Presidency’s group on the Coordination and Promotion of Indigenous Policy and Rights has given priority to tackling racial discrimination in its plan of operations for 2008. The Government also refers to the application of the requirement to consult indigenous peoples on their participation in the profits of extraction operations, their participation in environmental control, and other forms of wealth redistribution to combat structural exclusion and discrimination. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information in this regard.
Access to education and vocational training. The Committee notes with interest the measures taken to give priority to education for rural and indigenous peoples and women. It notes the creation of three inter-cultural community indigenous universities (Unibol), one for the Aymará people, another for the Quechua and the other for the Guaraní. The Committee addresses this point in greater detail in its comments under Convention No. 169. The Government further indicates that education being the basis for equitable access to jobs, the intake in secondary schools for both sexes was higher in 2006 than in 2005. However, while male enrolment was 57.42 per cent, female enrolment was 42.58 per cent. Since the lowest school attendance rates are registered in rural areas, particularly among women, the national education policy makes such areas a priority and has established two implementation plans, one on rural boarding accommodation and the other on rural transport, to facilitate access to school for girls and young persons and to keep them in education. The “Vivir Bien” National Development Plan includes education as a priority, taking into account that the first problem to be tackled is lack of equality in education, in terms of access, quality and avoidance of drop-out. In this framework, the Ministry of Education formulated its Multiannual Operation Plan 2004–08 (POMA) as part of the Strategic Plan for the education sector. With regard to technical training geared to the production sector, coverage is to be 171,074 men and 156,873 women. The Government refers to other measures, and by way of conclusion states that “the aim is to lay new foundations for education in Bolivia in the interests of education that is decolonized, equitable, inter-cultural and bilingual. The Committee encourages the Government to pursue this path and requests it to continue to provide information on these matters.
The Committee is raising other points in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
1. Legislation. With reference to the issues addressed in points 1 and 2 of its previous direct request, the Committee notes that the basic rules of the national personnel administration system, approved by Supreme Decision No. 217064 of 23 May 1997, were amended by Supreme Decree No. 26115 of 16 March 2001, section 56 of which (“requirements”) provides that “all citizens, without any discrimination whatsoever, may aspire to obtain a career position …”, while section 67 (“revocation”) of the same Decree provides that “grounds for lodging an appeal for revocation are unfair or discriminatory treatment and violation of the law governing the conditions of service of public servants, the basic rules of the personnel administration system in the public sector or other current provisions relating to this matter”. The Committee also notes that Act No. 2027 of 1999 on the conditions of service of public servants lays down principles such as “equal opportunities without discrimination of any sort” (section 1(e)), the right to careers in the administration and the right to stability, inspired, amongst other things, by the principle of equality. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, the grounds for lodging an appeal for revocation such as that referred to by the Committee are covered by the terms “discriminatory treatment”, so as to avoid omissions that might lead to the appeal being rejected and which implies that the criteria of the Convention and of all other international human rights instruments are being taken into account. The report adds that, until now, only one case alluding to discrimination has been brought before the Civil Service Superintendence, and that this case involved a female public official dismissed for budgetary reasons who alleged discrimination on the grounds of disability. The official in question also referred to the obligation set forth in Supreme Decree No. 27477 of 2004, which requires public institutions to ensure that persons with disabilities make up 4 per cent of their total personnel. The official was asked to provide a certificate of disability and did not do so, yet the possibility of appeal was not refused given the broad terms of the anti-discriminatory legislation. The Committee duly notes that, according to the Government, all the grounds for discrimination that are prohibited by the Convention and by other international treaties are covered by the broad terms of the reform. The Committee asks the Government to keep it informed of any future appeals alleging discrimination on the grounds covered by the Convention, and the decisions taken, where appropriate.
2. In relation to point 3 of its previous direct request, the Committee notes that the Anti-Discrimination Bill presented by the President of the Human Rights Committee of the Chamber of Deputies did not achieve consensus on the approach to be adopted. At the initiative of the Permanent Assembly of Human Rights, an Anti-Discrimination Bill has recently been drafted and is currently the subject of civil society debate. It has been agreed that the Ministry of Labour, in conjunction with institutions dealing with indigenous peoples and the Ministry of Justice, will examine this Bill in the light of the Convention. The Committee reminds the Government that it is possible to request the technical assistance of the Office to examine the abovementioned Bill in the light of the Convention.
3. Racial discrimination. The Government’s report also indicates that, as well as the legislative measures which may be adopted, the Government has launched a vast anti-discrimination campaign at national level in response to a situation in which ethnic, racial and regional differences have been seriously exacerbated to the point of generating conflict between indigenous persons and mestizos and between persons born in the east (in Santa Cruz, cambas) and those born in the west (in La Paz, collas). The Ministry of Labour launched a broad campaign in the mass media with a view to generating discussion and debate on the dangers of discrimination in a country where the majority of the population is indigenous and to preventing the conflict from having a dangerous effect on access to employment in certain social sectors. The Committee notes the documentation provided by the Government, together with the cassettes and CD-ROMs containing publicity clips such as that produced by the Ombudsperson: “I won’t let myself be discriminated against, nor should you.” The Committee notes with interest the efforts made by the Government to address and put an end to discrimination. It would be grateful if the Government would keep it informed of the policies, measures taken and activities carried out to eliminate discrimination, particularly racial discrimination relating to employment and occupation, and their impact in practice.
4. Access to vocational training. The Committee notes the comprehensive information provided by the Government and the efforts made to facilitate access to vocational and university training for low-income students from rural areas. The Committee notes the various programmes developed by the University of San Andrés (UMSA) and by university-dependant institutes to provide cultural, technical and social training for workers and the general population. It also notes the activities of the Institute of Regional Development (IDR) and the technical university of Oruro in Tarija, and the various technical training programmes, such as that developed with the support of the Government of Denmark, aimed at generating further development in the agricultural sector (PETA) through alternative technical education for men and women from rural areas within the framework of a poverty-reduction programme. The Committee also notes, in particular, the programmes based on model policies with a gender perspective, which aim to improve employability and equality in vocational training by offering women a quality technical education. Such programmes include those being developed with the technical assistance of ILO–CINTERFOR, which has generated a model linking the women’s study programme to the needs of the productive sector, which continues to be carried at FORMUJER–Bolivia. FORMUJER focuses its efforts mainly on young women with low incomes. The success of this programme will depend on its ability to cover a broad group of people, to recognize ethnic and socio-cultural differences and to create possibilities to include different groups. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would continue providing information on the progress of these programmes, in particular on the progress made with regard to the inclusion of women and ethnic groups in the labour market, and on the impact of such programmes in practice.
5. The Committee notes that the creation of the Advisory Labour Council has, to date, not been possible, but that, since August 2004, the Programme for the Prevention and Resolution of Conflicts of the Organization of American States (OEA–PSPRC/Bolivia) has implemented a programme of technical assistance for the Ministry of Labour which involves three courses of action: (a) institutional strengthening; (b) education and training; and (c) advice and support. The Committee asks the Government to indicate how this programme incorporates policies on equality based on the criteria covered by the Convention.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation, which read as follows:
1. In its previous observation, the Committee requested the Government to amend section 3 of the General Labour Act, under which the proportion of female staff may not exceed 45 per cent in enterprises and establishments which, by their nature, do not require the use of a larger proportion of women workers. The Committee also requested that the amendment to the Labour Act take into account paragraph 5 of the ILO resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment, adopted in 1985, since this would provide an opportunity to re-examine, in the light of up to date scientific knowledge and technical changes, all protective legislation applying solely to women with a view to revising and repealing it, as appropriate, in consultation with the social partners and women workers, taking into account the measures aimed at promoting equality for men and women in employment. The Committee notes that, according to the Government, the current social and political conditions make any amendment to the General Labour Act impossible, mainly because of the workers themselves, who, fearing that any reform will open the way to the “flexibilization of work”, prefer to oppose any change. The Government indicates that although the General Labour Act Bill, prepared with the technical assistance of the ILO, is ready, it has not yet been adopted for the abovementioned reasons. The Government also indicates that the legal provision in question has fallen into disuse and is not applied in practice, and that the amendment of this section will therefore be a mere formality to adapt the provision to the reality of the situation in Bolivia. Noting the above, the Committee hopes that the Government will consider at the earliest opportunity bringing the legislation into line with the practice and asks to be kept informed in this regard.
2. The Committee notes with interest the 2004–07 National Public Policies Plan for the full exercise of women’s rights, prepared by the Vice-Ministry of Women, approved by Ministerial Decision No. 006 of 24 January 2005 and authenticated by Supreme Decree No. 28035 of 7 March 2005. In the economic dimension, the Plan identifies a context of ethnic poverty and discrimination common to indigenous men and women, natives and farmers, as well as gender-related elements of discrimination due to the sexual division of labour, the occupational pattern by gender and the segmentation and concentration of the female labour force, all of which widen the gender inequity gap in the economic field. The Plan puts forward a series of policies to eliminate discrimination, including institutional, training-related, economic and legal measures. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of the measures taken to apply the Plan and of their impact in practice. The Committee, noting that one of the development objectives of the Plan is to “amend laws that are sources of inequity for women and increase timely and effective access for women to the justice system, within the framework of the new Political Constitution of the State, until 2007”, would be grateful if the Government would keep it informed of any action taken to meet the abovementioned objective and of any progress made. The Committee also hopes that by amending the legislation to meet this objective, the Government will make an effort to achieve consensus so as to amend section 3 of the General Labour Act in the manner indicated by the Committee and that it will keep the Committee informed in this respect.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.
3. Racial discrimination. The Government’s report also indicates that, as well as the legislative measures which may be adopted, the Government has launched a vast anti-discrimination campaign at national level in response to a situation in which ethnic, racial and regional differences have been seriously exacerbated to the point of generating conflict between indigenous persons and mestizos and between persons born in the east (in Santa Cruz, cambas) and those born in the west (in La Paz, collas). The Ministry of Labour launched a broad campaign in the mass media with a view to generating discussion and debate on the dangers of discrimination in a country where the majority of the population is indigenous and to preventing the conflict from having a dangerous effect on access to employment in certain social sectors. The Committee notes the documentation provided by the Government, together with the cassettes and CD-ROMs containing publicity clips such as that produced by the Ombudsperson: “I won’t let myself be discriminated against, nor should you”. The Committee notes with interest the efforts made by the Government to address and put an end to discrimination. It would be grateful if the Government would keep it informed of the policies, measures taken and activities carried out to eliminate discrimination, particularly racial discrimination relating to employment and occupation, and their impact in practice.
2. The Committee notes with interest the 2004-07 National Public Policies Plan for the full exercise of women’s rights, prepared by the Vice-Ministry of Women, approved by Ministerial Decision No. 006 of 24 January 2005 and authenticated by Supreme Decree No. 28035 of 7 March 2005. In the economic dimension, the Plan identifies a context of ethnic poverty and discrimination common to indigenous men and women, natives and farmers, as well as gender-related elements of discrimination due to the sexual division of labour, the occupational pattern by gender and the segmentation and concentration of the female labour force, all of which widen the gender inequity gap in the economic field. The Plan puts forward a series of policies to eliminate discrimination, including institutional, training-related, economic and legal measures. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of the measures taken to apply the Plan and of their impact in practice. The Committee, noting that one of the development objectives of the Plan is to “amend laws that are sources of inequity for women and increase timely and effective access for women to the justice system, within the framework of the new Political Constitution of the State, until 2007”, would be grateful if the Government would keep it informed of any action taken to meet the abovementioned objective and of any progress made. The Committee also hopes that by amending the legislation to meet this objective, the Government will make an effort to achieve consensus so as to amend section 3 of the General Labour Act in the manner indicated by the Committee and that it will keep the Committee informed in this respect.
The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report.
1. The Committee regrets to note once again that the Government’s report does not contain information on the issue raised in its previous request concerning the possibility for workers in the public sector to make allegations of discrimination on grounds of colour, national extraction or social origin in the context of the appeal procedure set out in section 14(2) of Supreme Decision No. 217064 of 23 May 1997 issuing basic rules for the personnel administration system in the public sector. The Committee reminds the Government that section 2(d) of the above Decision does not include the grounds of discrimination referred to above. The Committee urges the Government to provide the information requested in its next report, together with copies of administrative or judicial rulings on this matter.
2. In its previous comments, the Committee indicated to the Government the need to include "national extraction" as a ground upon which discrimination is prohibited. The Committee reminded the Government that the concept of national extraction does not refer to the distinctions that may be made between the citizens of one country and those of another, but to distinctions between the citizens of the same country on the basis of a person’s place of birth, ancestry or foreign origin. Thus, discrimination based on national extraction means discrimination which may be directed against persons who are nationals of the country in question, but who have acquired their citizenship by naturalization or who are descendants of foreign immigrants, or persons belonging to groups of different national extraction living in the same State. The Committee requests the Government to take the above comments into account when amending its labour legislation.
3. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report indicating that, due to the change of Government, the Bill prepared by the President of the Human Rights Committee of the Chamber of Deputies penalizing discrimination was not examined by the Congress. The Committee requests the Government to provide information in its next report of the adoption of measures to protect the population against acts of discrimination.
4. With reference to its comment in point 3 of its previous direct request, the Committee once again hopes that the Government will adopt measures to ensure equality of access to vocational training, particularly for persons who live far from the central areas and who do not have the necessary means.
5. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report of the existence of a draft Decree to establish a tripartite Advisory Labour Council which would be responsible for discussing and proposing social policies to achieve the economic and social development of the country in a framework of dialogue and concerted action. The Committee requests the Government to provide information in its next report of any progress made in relation to this important matter. The Committee also hopes that, once established, the Advisory Labour Council will take action to promote and ensure the application of the Convention.
The Committee notes the Government’s report.
Discrimination on grounds of sex. Further to its previous comments, the Committee regrets that once again the Government refers to a new preliminary draft text which is in the process of being revised and agreed to, but that there is as yet no concrete progress on the adoption of amendments to section 3 of the General Labour Act, under which the proportion of women staff may not exceed 45 per cent in enterprises and establishments which, by their nature, do not require the use of a larger proportion of women workers. The Committee has pointed out on many occasions to the Government that this section is prejudicial to equality of opportunity and treatment on grounds of sex. The Committee reminds the Government once again that, in accordance with Article 3(c) of the Convention, each Member for which it is in force undertakes to repeal any statutory provisions which are inconsistent with the policy of equality of opportunity and treatment set out in Article 2. The Committee once again urges the Government to take the necessary measures to bring section 3 of the General Labour Act into conformity with the Convention. The above amendment to the labour law should also take into account paragraph 5 of the ILO resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment, adopted in 1985, and should provide an opportunity to re-examine, in the light of up-to-date scientific knowledge and technical changes, all protective legislation applying solely to women with a view to revising and repealing it, as appropriate, in consultation with the social partners and women workers, taking into account the measures aimed at promoting equality for men and women in employment.
The Committee is addressing a request directly to the Government on other points.
1. In its previous comments, the Committee referred to Supreme Decision No. 217064 of 23 May 1997 issuing basic rules for the personnel administration system in the public sector, which does not include in section 2(d) as prohibited criteria of discrimination, colour, national extraction and social origin. In this respect, it requested the Government to indicate whether, in the event that workers in the public sector alleged discrimination on grounds of colour, national extraction or social origin, they can make use of the appeal procedure set out in section 14(2) of the above Supreme Decision, or any other appeal procedure. The Committee also requested the Government to provide copies of any administrative and/or judicial decisions on this matter. The Committee notes that the Government’s report does not contain information in reply to its comment, or copies of the decisions requested. The Committee also notes the Government’s reference to national extraction in relation to section 3 of the General Labour Act. The Committee notes that section 3 refers to foreign and national workers, but does not include the term "national extraction". The Committee reminds the Government that the concept of national extraction does not refer to the distinctions that may be made between the citizens of one country and those of another, but to distinctions between the citizens of the same country on the basis of a person’s place of birth, ancestry or foreign origin. Thus, discrimination based on national extraction means discrimination which may be directed against persons who are nationals of the country in question, but who have acquired their citizenship by naturalization or who are descendants of foreign immigrants, or persons belonging to groups of different national extraction living in the same State (see the Special survey on equality of employment and occupation, ILO, 1996, paras. 33 and 34). The Committee therefore once again urges the Government to provide information including copies of administrative and/or judicial decisions relating to this procedure, or any other means or recourse available to workers in the public sector alleging discrimination on grounds of colour, national extraction or social origin.
2. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report that, although there are no legislative provisions or administrative practices which are discriminatory, due to the everyday customs and practices developed in the field of labour, there is a percentage of exclusion of certain social groups, for example as a result of demands to be of "good appearance" or not to have dependants. In this context, the Committee notes with interest the information provided by the Government that a Bill prepared by the President of the Human Rights Committee of the Chamber of Deputies has been submitted with a view to prohibiting discrimination on grounds of race, political ideas, descendancy, religion, culture, religious origin, sex, state of health, physical characteristics, nationality or economic or social situation, under penalty of six months to three years imprisonment and immediate dismissal in the case of public officials. The Committee refers to paragraph 58 of its General survey on equality in employment and occupation, 1998, in which it indicates that where provisions are adopted in order to give effect to the principle contained in the Convention, they should include all the grounds of discrimination laid down in Article 1, paragraph 1(a). The Committee therefore hopes that measures will be adopted to broaden the provisions contained in the above Bill so as to include specific reference to colour and national extraction. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the progress achieved in this respect.
3. The Committee notes the information referred to by the Government in its report that many parents are unable to provide vocational education to their children due to lack of means, and that the situation is worse for those who live far from central areas where schools are located, since the cost of transport is an additional cost over and above other needs. The Government also indicates that, although the State provides free education, it is totally precarious and does not cover demand. The Government adds in its report that, although the Act respecting educational reform resulted in a change in the system of teaching, the education system still lacks quality and shows many deficiencies in practice. The Committee trusts that the Government will adopt measures to provide equal access to vocational training, particularly for persons who live far from the central areas and who do not have the necessary means, and that it will adopt measures to provide quality training which offers opportunities for access to employment and occupation.
4. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report that there are no legal provisions in any statutes respecting the cooperation of employers’ and workers’ organizations, with the exception of matters relating to wages. The Committee reminds the Government that, under the terms of Article 3(a) of the Convention, each Member for which the Convention is in force undertakes to seek the cooperation of employers’ and workers’ organizations and other appropriate bodies in promoting the acceptance and observance of a national policy designed to promote, by methods appropriate to national conditions and practice, equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of employment and occupation, with a view to eliminating any discrimination in respect thereof. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on this matter with its next report.
1. Discrimination on grounds of sex. As indicated by the Committee in its recent comments, for many years it has been referring to section 3 of the General Labour Act, under which the proportion of women staff may not exceed 45 per cent in enterprises and establishments which, by their nature, do not require the use of a larger proportion of women workers. The Committee had pointed out to the Government that this provision is prejudicial to equality of opportunity and treatment on grounds of sex, and on many occasions it has expressed the hope that the revision of the General Labour Act would provide an opportunity to ensure compliance with the Convention in relation to equality of men and women in access to employment and occupation. The Government had indicated its intention to revise the above Act. It subsequently provided a report indicating that a draft of a new General Labour Act had been set aside and that, in the context of the programme of national dialogue initiated by the Government, it had been proposed to establish the parameters for future labour legislation. Finally, in its previous report, the Government indicated that the Ministry of Labour and Micro-Enterprises was evaluating a number of legal measures to review the criterion set out in section 3 of the General Labour Act. The Committee regrets to note that in its last report the Government indicates that there has been no amendment to the provisions offering special treatment for certain persons. The Committee reminds the Government that, in accordance with Article 3(c) of the Convention, each Member for which it is in force undertakes to repeal any statutory provisions which are inconsistent with the policy of equality of opportunity and treatment set out in Article 2. The Committee once again urges the Government to take the necessary measures to bring section 3 of the General Labour Act into conformity with the Convention so as to ensure equality for men and women in access to employment and occupation. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on this matter in its next report.
2. In its last comment, the Committee referred to paragraph 5 of the ILO resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment, adopted in 1985. It again urges the Government to take measures to re-examine, in the light of up-to-date scientific knowledge and technical changes, all protective legislation applying solely to women with a view to revising and repealing it, as appropriate, taking into account, where appropriate, measures aimed at promoting equality in employment between men and women. The Committee reminds the Government that this revision should be carried out in consultation with the representatives of employers’ and workers’ organizations, and with the participation of women workers. The Committee requests the Government to provide information with its next report on the measures adopted in this respect and the progress achieved.
With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes that, according to the report, although Supreme Decision No. 217064, of 23 May 1997, issuing basic rules for the personnel administration system in the public sector, does not include in the protection against discrimination (section 2(d)) the criteria of colour, national extraction or social origin, the Government considers that article 6 of the political Constitution of the State is sufficiently explicit and precise, and it does not consider it necessary to amend section 2 above at the present time. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate whether, in the event that workers in the public sector allege discrimination on grounds of colour, national extraction or social origin, they can make use of the appeal procedure set out in section 14(2) of the Supreme Decision, under the terms of which "discriminatory or unjust treatment or violations of the rules which govern personnel administration in the public sector shall be grounds for the submission of appeals" or any other recourse procedures available to them. Please supply copies of any relevant administrative and/or judicial decisions.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:
1. Discrimination on grounds of sex. For many years, the Committee has been referring to section 3 of the General Labour Act, under which the proportion of women staff may not exceed 45 per cent in enterprises and establishments which, by their nature, do not require the use of a larger proportion of women workers. The Committee had noted that this provision was prejudicial to equality of opportunity and treatment on grounds of sex and expressed the hope on many occasions that the revision of the General Labour Act would make it possible to comply with the Convention in relation to the equality of men and women in access to employment and occupation. The Government had previously indicated its intention of revising the Act, and then indicated that the draft of a new General Labour Act had been set aside and that, in the context of the programme of national dialogue initiated by the Government, it had been proposed to establish the parameters for future labour legislation. The Committee notes that, in its last report, the Government states that the General Labour Act remains in force and that there does not appear to have been any progress in amending it. It also notes that, according to the report, the types of enterprises and establishments which, by their nature do not require the use of women workers, include heavy transport and similar enterprises where the objective is that women should not suffer physical or psychological injury, nor damage to their reproductive capacity. 2. The Committee reiterates that this provision is not compatible with Article 3(c) of the Convention and requests the Government to take measures to review and amend it. It also recalls that maternity protection measures are intended to protect the maternal function, and are not considered to be in violation of the Convention pursuant to Article 5. With reference to paragraph 5 of the ILO resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment, adopted in 1985, the Committee hopes that the Government will take measures to re-examine, in the light of up-to-date scientific knowledge and technical changes, all protective legislation applying solely to women with a view to revising and repealing it, as appropriate, taking into account measures aimed at promoting equality in employment between men and women. This revision should be carried out in consultation with the representatives of employers’ and workers’ organizations, and with the participation of women workers. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted in this respect and the progress achieved. 3. The Committee is addressing a request directly to the Government on another point.
1. Discrimination on grounds of sex. For many years, the Committee has been referring to section 3 of the General Labour Act, under which the proportion of women staff may not exceed 45 per cent in enterprises and establishments which, by their nature, do not require the use of a larger proportion of women workers. The Committee had noted that this provision was prejudicial to equality of opportunity and treatment on grounds of sex and expressed the hope on many occasions that the revision of the General Labour Act would make it possible to comply with the Convention in relation to the equality of men and women in access to employment and occupation. The Government had previously indicated its intention of revising the Act, and then indicated that the draft of a new General Labour Act had been set aside and that, in the context of the programme of national dialogue initiated by the Government, it had been proposed to establish the parameters for future labour legislation. The Committee notes that, in its last report, the Government states that the General Labour Act remains in force and that there does not appear to have been any progress in amending it. It also notes that, according to the report, the types of enterprises and establishments which, by their nature do not require the use of women workers, include heavy transport and similar enterprises where the objective is that women should not suffer physical or psychological injury, nor damage to their reproductive capacity.
2. The Committee reiterates that this provision is not compatible with Article 3(c) of the Convention and requests the Government to take measures to review and amend it. It also recalls that maternity protection measures are intended to protect the maternal function, and are not considered to be in violation of the Convention pursuant to Article 5. With reference to paragraph 5 of the ILO resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment, adopted in 1985, the Committee hopes that the Government will take measures to re-examine, in the light of up-to-date scientific knowledge and technical changes, all protective legislation applying solely to women with a view to revising and repealing it, as appropriate, taking into account measures aimed at promoting equality in employment between men and women. This revision should be carried out in consultation with the representatives of employers’ and workers’ organizations, and with the participation of women workers. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted in this respect and the progress achieved.
3. The Committee is addressing a request directly to the Government on another point.
1. Discrimination on grounds of sex. For many years, the Committee has been referring to section 3 of the General Labour Act, under which the proportion of women staff may not exceed 45 per cent in enterprises and establishments which, by their nature, do not require the use of a larger proportion of women workers. The Committee had noted that this provision was prejudicial to equality of opportunity and treatment on grounds of sex and expressed the hope on many occasions that the revision of the General Labour Act would make it possible to comply with the Convention in relation to the equality of men and women in access to employment and occupation. The Government had previously indicated its intention of revising the Act, and then indicated that the draft of a new General Labour Act had been set aside and that, in the context of the programme of national dialogue initiated by the Government, it had been proposed to establish the parameters for future labour legislation. The Committee notes that, in its last report, the Government states that the General Labour Act remains in force and that there does not appear to have been any progress in amending it. It also notes that, according to the report, the types of enterprises and establishments which, by their nature, do not require the use of women workers include heavy transport and similar enterprises where the objective is that women should not suffer physical or psychological injury, nor damage to their reproductive capacity.
2. The Committee reiterates that this provision is not compatible with Article 3(c) of the Convention and requests the Government to take measures to review and amend it. It also recalls that maternity protection measures are intended to protect the maternal function, and are not considered to be in violation of the Convention pursuant to Article 5. With reference to paragraph 5 of the ILO resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment, adopted in 1985, the Committee hopes that the Government will take measures to re-examine, in the light of up-to-date scientific knowledge and technical changes, all protective legislation applying solely to women with a view to revising and repealing it, as appropriate, taking into account measures aimed at promoting equality in employment between men and women. This revision should be carried out in consultation with the representatives of employers’ and workers’ organizations, and with the participation of women workers. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of the measures adopted in this respect and the progress achieved.
1. In its previous direct request, the Committee referred to the draft of the "Basic Rules of the Personnel Administration System for the Bolivian Public Sector", noting that the non-discrimination provision contained in the draft mentioned only the grounds of race, religion and political opinion. The Committee requested that the Government consider the possibility of including colour, sex, national extraction and social origin, the other grounds of non-discrimination set forth in the Convention.
The Committee notes that, according to the information contained in the Government's report, the "Basic Rules of the Personnel Administration System for the Public Sector" were approved by Executive Resolution No. 217064 of 23 May 1997. The Committee observes that section 2(d) of the above-referenced Rules establishes that the personnel administration system is based upon, inter alia, the principle of non-discrimination. Section 2(d) provides for "equal access to employment and career development in the public sector, without distinction on the basis of race, sex, political affiliation, or religious beliefs". The Committee notes with interest that the ground of sex was added to the version of the Rules that was adopted, but it regrets that the other grounds, including colour, national extraction and social origin, are absent from the final version of the above-mentioned provision. The Committee makes reference to paragraph 58 of the 1988 ILO General Survey on equality in employment and occupation, which provides that, "where provisions are adopted in order to give effect to the principles contained in the Convention, they should include all the grounds of discrimination laid down in Article 1, paragraph 1(a) of the Convention". The Committee also refers to article 6 of the Bolivian Constitution, which prohibits discrimination "on the grounds of race, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, origin, economic or social status or any other". The Committee asks the Government to consider the possibility of amending section 2(d) of the "Basic Rules of the Personnel Administration System for the Public Sector" to include, at a minimum, all of the grounds of non-discrimination mentioned in the Convention.
2. The Committee noted the Report of the Human Rights Commission, Volume I, General Assembly, Official Documents, Fifty-second Session, Supplement No. 40 (A/52/40), in which the Human Rights Commission expressed its concern that "despite the constitutional guarantees of women's rights and the legislation intended to eradicate discrimination, women in Bolivia continue to be subjected to unequal treatment, due in part to the continued presence of traditional attitudes and the existence of certain antiquated laws that squarely contravene the provisions of the Pact". In previous comments, the Committee had made reference to section 3 of the General Labour Act, according to which the proportion of female staff may not exceed 45 per cent in businesses and establishments that, by their nature, do not require the use of a larger proportion of female labour. The Committee had noted that a draft Labour Act omitting the above provision was due to be submitted to the National Congress. The Committee notes that this draft Bill has not been adopted and that section 3 of the General Labour Act remains in effect.
The Committee asks the Government to provide information regarding the types of businesses or establishments that are not deemed to require female labour. The Government is also requested to indicate the measures taken or contemplated to ensure observance of the Convention, which provides for equality of opportunity and treatment between women and men with respect to access to all types of employment.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
1. The Committee recalls that the draft revision of the General Labour Act prepared with technical assistance from the International Labour Office was completed at the end of 1990. It observes that after its circulation to the employers' and workers' organizations -- although they have not commented on it -- the present Government envisages the possibility (among others) of holding discussions with the employers and workers, with a view to possibly reaching a consensus on the drafting of specific changes to the present legislation. The Committee asks the Government to keep it informed on this subject.
2. The Committee notes the draft of August 1994 of the "Basic Rules of the Personnel Administration System for the Bolivian Public Sector", a final version of which will be sent as soon as it has been adopted. The Committee notes that section B.2.02 "Standards", under subsection (d), states that discrimination of a political, racial or religious nature shall be avoided in selecting the person best suited to a given post, but it does not mention colour, sex, national extraction or social origin as set out in Article 1, paragraph 1(a), of the Convention. The Committee refers to paragraph 58 of its 1988 General Survey on equality in employment and occupation, and asks the Government to consider including these grounds before the adoption of the final version of the above Rules.
3. The Committee thanks the Government for having sent the draft document of the Ministry of Economy and Economic Development, of August 1994, which constitutes the Public Service Regulations pursuant to Act No. 1178 of 1990. The Committee observes that this document contains no specific provisions on the elimination of discrimination in the public sector or on the promotion of equality. Since the Committee has already noted the absence of provisions in the main Act (No. 1178 of 1990) and Presidential Decree No. 23326 of 1992 establishing the programme of careers in the public administration, it asks the Government to consider including in the final version of the above Rules, in section 123 for instance, a provision to cover this subject-matter in accordance with Article 3(d) of the Convention.
4. Under section 12(e) of Presidential Decree No. 23326 of 1992, a court sentence or other "impediments and incompatibilities specific to the public service" disqualify a person from being admitted to and remaining in the public service as a career civil servant. The Committee again asks the Government to state what the "impediments and incompatibilities" are, and to provide a copy of the Manual of Posts in the Public Administration, referred to in section 12(c) of the Presidential Decree.
1. The Committee recalls that the draft revision of the General Labour Act prepared with technical assistance from the International Labour Office was completed at the end of 1990. It observes that after its circulation to the employers' and workers' organizations - although they have not commented on it - the present Government envisages the possibility (among others) of holding discussions with the employers and workers, with a view to possibly reaching a consensus on the drafting of specific changes to the present legislation. The Committee asks the Government to keep it informed on this subject.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
2. The Committee notes the draft of August 1994 of the "Basic Rules of the Personnel Administration System for the Bolivian Public Sector", a final version of which will be sent as soon as it has been adopted. The Committee notes that section B.2.02 "Standards", under subsection (d), states that discrimination of a political, racial or religious nature shall be avoided in selecting the person best suited to a given post, but it does not mention colour, sex, national extraction or social origin as set out in Article 1, paragraph 1(a), of the Convention. The Committee refers to paragraph 58 of its 1988 General Survey on Equality in Employment and Occupation, and asks the Government to consider including these grounds before the adoption of the final version of the above Rules.
The Committee notes the Government's report and the information to the effect that the preliminary draft of a new General Labour Act has been sent to the employers' and workers' organizations for approval. Since the Government has been referring to the above draft since 1990, the Committee hopes that it will be discussed and adopted by the National Congress in the near future. It asks the Government to keep it informed of any progress in this respect.
1. The Committee notes that Act No. 1178 repealed Legislative Decree No. 11049 and that the present Presidential Decree, No. 23326 of 10 November 1992, establishes the Administrative Careers Act but contains no provisions on forms of discrimination and their prohibition. The Committee asks the Government to state which legal provisions prohibit discrimination on the various grounds set out in Article 1, paragraph 1(a), of the Convention, in the public sector.
2. Subsection (c) of section 12 of Presidential Decree No. 23326 refers to a Manual of Posts in the Public Administration. Subsection (e) refers to "impediments and specific incompatibilities of the public service". The Committee asks the Government to provide a copy of the above Manual and to state what these impediments and incompatibilities are, and to provide a copy of the legal text establishing and defining them.
3. The second paragraph of section 13 of Decree No. 23326 refers to the creation of a "Governing Body of the System". The Committee asks the Government to provide copies of the regulations governing (a) the creation and procedure of the Governing Body of the System; (b) the convening of applicants to competitive examinations and the selection of candidates; and (c) a copy of the manual governing recruitment in the public administration.
1. The Committee notes with interest that its previous comments concerning departures from section 3 of the General Labour Act (which limits women's access to employment) are superseded in the context of the new draft General Labour Act which will be submitted to the National Congress once a consensus has been reached between the parties concerned. The Committee hopes that this Act can be adopted in the near future; it asks the Government to be good enough to supply a copy of the Act once it has been adopted.
2. With regard to procedures and measures for ensuring equality of opportunity and treatment in appointment to and promotion within the public service, the Committee takes note of the text of the Administrative Careers Act (Legislative Decree No. 11049 of 24 August 1973) supplied in response to its previous direct request. The Committee notes, however, that section 13 of the Administrative Careers Act provides that "there shall be no discrimination as to sex or of a political or religious nature" in making appointments, but does not mention the other grounds for discrimination enumerated in Article 1, paragraph 1(a) of the Convention, such as race, colour, national extraction and social origin. The Committee refers to paragraph 58 of its General Survey of 1988 on equality in employment and occupation, in which it states that, where provisions are adopted in order to give effect to the principle contained in Convention No. 111, they should include all the grounds of discrimination laid down in Article 1, paragraph 1(a), of the Convention. The Committee accordingly hopes that measures will be taken to expand the provisions of section 13 of the Administrative Careers Act so as expressly to mention race, colour, national extraction and social origin. The Committee asks the Government to be good enough to supply information about the progress made in this respect.
The Committee takes note of the Government's report.
1. In its previous direct request, the Committee referred to section 3 of the General Labour Act under which the number of women employees shall not exceed 45 per cent in any enterprise or establishment which, owing to its nature, does not require a higher percentage of women employees, and requested the Government to indicate the types of enterprise or establishment which, owing to their nature, do not require women employees.
The Committee takes note of the information supplied by the Government concerning the updating of the General Labour Act and its alignment with the international Conventions ratified by Bolivia, to the effect that the preliminary draft of the new Act is to be completed by 31 October next.
The Committee recalls that under Article 3(c) of the Convention, each Member for which this Convention is in force undertakes to repeal any statutory provisions which are inconsistent with the policy of equal opportunity and treatment laid down by the Convention. The provision contained in section 3 of the General Labour Act as it now stands limits the access of women to employment, thereby impairing equality of opportunity and treatment on the basis of sex which is one of the criteria in the definition of discrimination contained in Article 1(a) of the Convention.
The Committee hopes that the revised General Labour Act will make it possible to ensure that the Convention is respected with regard to equality for men and women in respect of access to employment and occupation.
The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on this matter.
2. The Committee notes that the Government's report contains no information on the procedures and measures to ensure equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of appointment and promotion in the public service (Article 3(d) of the Convention), requested by the Committee in previous comments. It therefore repeats its request to the Government to report on this matter and to supply a copy of the Administrative Careers Act.
The Commttee requests the Government to continue providing information on this matter.